Archived threads in /sci/ - Science & Math - 2046. page

>>7747129
Do it, if you're capable of it.

>>7747129
You send money to a company for a card that says "congrats you're smart".

You decide if it''s worth it.

>>7747129

It's like the Boy Scouts for people with high IQ.

>>7747034
yes

no

>>7747034
>Are they dangerous?
Not really, don't drive or anything like that though.
>Do they have potential in the medical field?
Maybe?

They can be dangerous. Within the circle of people who use psychedelics it is understood that they can be used to rewire the brain somewhat. Your established perceptions of the reality you have forged throughout your life can be questioned. Some people find this an uncomfortable experience, others just let it take them where it will and yet others use that inherent ability as a tool to repair damage that has been done to their mind, or just to enhance the way they perceive life.

It's largely psychology babble and unfortunately most psychologists are more nuts than their patients.

So they have the potential to be dangerous from a psychological perspective, or to be useful. Physically the psychoactive constituents are not dangerous, however other poisons contained in varieties like the Aminitas and non-psychedelic look alikes do pose risk of serious harm and even death.

>>7746861
i try to masterbate but i dont have enoug to one and when i cum it isnt whole and my masterbate is fire.

>>7746885
Where did they go?

>>7746861
>such as consciousness

"we don't know nuffin"

>Integrated information theory

popmath nonsense

>immortality

popsci nonsense

>rocket engine

>>>/diy/

>>7746822
>If the multiverse existed in which all possibilities have occurred in at least one universe then a universe would exist in which a being developed a way to travel through the multiverse
Unless that's not possible.

Except multiverse theory doesn't state that all possibilities have occurred, it states that there are infinite universes with infinite possibilities.

multiverse =/= many-worlds

Just convert P into Jordan normal form.

>>7746824
That's easier said than done if you don't even know what a Jordan normal form is.

>>7746837
...
how about you look it up?

It's past your bedtime kid

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Nz2zhh8-UPs

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r_NLK3NkckI

epilepsy?

I Don't have any medical disorder, and I don't have epilepsy.

>>7746698
>Unknown Medical issue, help
"Hey 4chan, could you help me? I clearly have a medical disorder and actually am just dumb as shit lol"

>>7746567
A lot of things can happen, but yeah one of the possibilities is them spilling their innards, especially after a viral infection. Read up on transformation and transduction.

File: images.jpg (9KB, 299x168px) Image search: [Google]

9KB, 299x168px

>>7746567
Bumping for general interest

>>7746574
The point of asking is so all the "reading up" can be done here

:)

The pyramid. It is the most structurally sound

>>7746527
>>7746533
cube because these 2 don't like it

>>7746518
Cube, because it's the perfect logical representation of three dimensions, length width and height equal. Spheres are plebes- they occur naturally in celestial bodies and bubbles

but the mighty cube is the stackable achievement of man kind. Tetrahedrons are arranged creatively to form houses. 90 degree angles are the most beautiful angles since they unite the earth and sky.

I love cube

File: c0dt00375a-f1.gif (29KB, 392x339px) Image search: [Google]

29KB, 392x339px

I guess because you get to learn how your body works or whatever

In the meantime, organic chemists are making FUCKING MOLECULAR CAGES

>>7746419
Because chemistry is only interesting in applied situations. Pure chemistry doesn't have some deep interpretation like pure physics does.

>>7746437
it does, for biochemists

>>7746412

use something like anki or even physical flashcards so you can always be grinding out memorization during down time

Where are you right now in your journey?

>>7746412
do you believe math will unlock the secrets of the universe that we are looking for?
No, because math does not reflect reality.

>>7746363
i believe this is a small part of why alot of scientist believe in a creator.
Just like we create a videogame world its inhabitants have no idea of the world outside but are able to study how things work, study the code,
our games are rather primitive since they are made from 1s and 0s and it ends there, but the game of our world well it seems to just go on and on and on and on and on and on with no end in sight
i can but wonder how deep will it go until we reach the "1s and 0s". And thats not even what you asked about.

When we talk of infinity can you really think of something in reality be infinite, are these infinite mutliverses really infinite? try to grasp this, we apply infinite in math and in reality differently.
In reality infinite is something we arent able to measure the number is too great that we dont have a number for it, hell numbers arent enough to count all of it, its that much, so the term infinite has a different meaning. In reality everything has a beginning and an end. Before there was time there could have been nothingness it ended and time began. Now the better question comes when will it stop going deeper and deeper? When will the "infinite" layers end and what comes after? Is it all just ever expanding? what can hold all of this expansion? nothingness? The same nothingness that started time a start? why? Well fuck if i know.

To answer your question, multiverses alone might not be all that exciting but when you add in the rest of the reality and go deeper and deeper adding more detail its just gonna fucking blow the mind up, and its just keeps going and going and going , i truly wish immortality would be a thing so i could have my brain fucked vertically "forever"

And yes in the mutliverse theory everything happens i think it explains that in any source you have

File: Dove-doves-31209127-1024-768.jpg (87KB, 1024x768px) Image search: [Google]

87KB, 1024x768px

The multiverse theory is a failed attempt to ignore the Creator's intelligence and will. It pretty much implies heaven and hell, magic and randomness, whilst a smart Creator is a simpler and more coherent explanation for our fine tunning. Multiverse theory is Modern Paganism.

>energy can neither be created or destroyed.

This is wrong. Energy can be pulled so far it becomes flat.

File: mqdefault.jpg (10KB, 320x180px) Image search: [Google]

10KB, 320x180px

Ha ha! You fool! You fell victim to one of the classic blunders - The most famous of which is "never get involved in a land war in Asia" - but only slightly less well-known is this: "Never start a thread in which the title image is more interesting than the post"!

Ha ha ha ha ha ha ha! Ha ha ha ha ha ha ha! Ha ha ha...

>>7746385
but transgender stuff is never really interesting ...

>>7746358
>Trans gender individuals
Holy fuck I'm dying

>>7746270

you've yet to define time using anything other than fragile calculus equations

>>7746275
Bu-but i didnt post any equations...

>>7746276
Then post some

There are also Morgan, Mendel, Miller & Urey, Dawkins, Altman, and many others.

File: 1421536183436.jpg (24KB, 330x486px) Image search: [Google]

24KB, 330x486px

>>7746269
According to the demarcation criterion of pseudoscience originally proposed by Lakatos, a theory is pseudoscientific if it fails to make any novel predictions of previously unknown phenomena, in contrast with scientific theories, which predict novel fact(s).[14] Progressive scientific theories are those which have their novel facts confirmed and degenerate scientific theories are those whose predictions of novel facts are refuted. As he put it:

"A given fact is explained scientifically only if a new fact is predicted with it....The idea of growth and the concept of empirical character are soldered into one." See pages 34–5 of The Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes, 1978.

Lakatos's own key examples of pseudoscience were Ptolemaic astronomy, Immanuel Velikovsky's planetary cosmogony, Freudian psychoanalysis, 20th century Soviet Marxism,[15] Lysenko's biology, Niels Bohr's Quantum Mechanics post-1924, astrology, psychiatry, sociology, neoclassical economics, and Darwin's theory.
Darwin's theory

In his 1973 LSE Scientific Method Lecture 1[16] he also claimed that "nobody to date has yet found a demarcation criterion according to which Darwin can be described as scientific".

Almost 20 years after Lakatos's 1973 challenge to the scientificity of Darwin, in her 1991 The Ant and the Peacock, LSE lecturer and ex-colleague of Lakatos, Helena Cronin, attempted to establish that Darwinian theory was empirically scientific in respect of at least being supported by evidence of likeness in the diversity of life forms in the world, explained by descent with modification. She wrote that

our usual idea of corroboration as requiring the successful prediction of novel facts...Darwinian theory was not strong on temporally novel predictions. ... however familiar the evidence and whatever role it played in the construction of the theory, it still confirms the theory.[17]

>>7746286
but Darwin actually did novel predictions of previously unknown phenomena