Archived threads in /sci/ - Science & Math - 2042. page

Those proofs are often quite fun desu.

>>7749114
I hate that shit.
>Thing exists because if it doesn't then it means our assumptions are wrong.

>>7749114
>>7749174
i bet you hate how we assume self equivalence.

>>7749075
He wasn't great but he could have been if he had not died young.

He was a good mathematician
Not at the level of gauss or Euler though.
He was remarkable at noticing patters and else was average .

>>7749075
It is said that he had his deepest mathematical insights while he was outside on the street, defecating.

>>7749033
You messed up the middle part on the side

>>7749033

What is this? EE?

>>7749047
Yes I ignored E1 to calculate the current from E2
>>7749048
Yea

>>7748994
>Waterman expert fountain pen
>Either some puka square ruled paper
>or a hard backed, square ruled notebook if I can get them.

Just use supply provider free pens and cheap notebooks

File: Scriva-Kugelschreiber-DJ88_dj88_051745_A051745_01[1].jpg (20KB, 700x700px) Image search: [Google]

20KB, 700x700px

>>7748994
scriva dj 88 inferior race
I don't write all that much anymore, there is almost nothing to write

>>7748895
Who's this semen demon?

>>7748960
I don't remember. A name I remember is something like "Lisa" or "Rena" but I'm shit at that.

Just reverse-image search it next time.

>>7748895
I am no EE, but it sounds decent to me. But I thought voltage spikes were more dangerous to most setups as the large potential can make the power surge in unpredictable ways (i.e. jump to place it shouldn't be) and the smaller more integrated circuits only need a small fraction of an amp to fry which is why newer stuff is so EM sensitive. The smaller the transistor the faster and more efficient, but the less it takes to fry.

There are lots of ways to break hardware with software, despite all the modern safeguards. What is the goal of this breakdown? And what is the setting?

On a cool side note, I knew one of the electrical material engineers that got called in for the US mass ICBM failure, and he helped save the day. Apparently running the ICBMs on high alert standby for years wore out some of the capacitors, which lead to many circuit failures in the ICBMs. When a good chunk of your nuclear arsenal suddenly stops working you can understand why the Pentagon secretly panicked during the cold war.

Something as simple as using the same batch of capacitors beyond their life expectancy nearly triggered WWIII. With some new capacitors they quickly fixed the ICBMs once they figured out what caused the mass shutdown. There was a near two week window when nearly half the ICBMs didn't work, plenty of time for something interesting to happen (thankfully nothing really did).

W-what?!

>>7748649
holy shit anon

>>7748649
Has Anyone Really Been Far Even as Decided to Use Even Go Want to do Look More Like?

Dark force powers are powered by anger, fear, pain, sadness, and strength. He was doing it to amplify his power. Or alternatively doing it to distract himself from the pain.

Physically agitating his flesh excites the midichlorians, read a book

Why do gorillas smack their chest causing damage to their hearts?

Get a degree and then a job as a lab assistant.

>>7748444

Johnny was real thirsty
Now Johnny is no more
For what he thought was H2O
Was H2SO4

>>7748444
don't do it, you'll either kill yourself or kill someone else

>>7748371
>Lightsaber
fuck you Steve jobs

A guy already made a very weak one http://todayinawesome.com/blog/2015/12/17/the-guy-who-made-a-real-mjolnir-is-back-with-a-real-lightsaber

>>7748382
That's an overdriven laser diode, I would hardly call it a lightsaber

>>7748331
Is that Paul Sally?
I only know him by the little cartoon he draws at the end of his proofs.
He died before I got to Uchicago.

I don't think math ever becomes Ivory Tower bullshit, but then again, I don't think any pursuits that contribute to human knowledge are wasted efforts.

>>7748331
As soon as the word "pure" applies to it.

Pure mathematics has never given us anything useful in real life.

>but m-muh number theory for cryptography
Until computer scientists and APPLIED mathematicians started using it to break large-bit ciphers, number theory was just jerking off to taxpayer money. Even now, the best number theory work comes from cryptographers.

File: 1429516153412.png (5KB, 386x308px) Image search: [Google]

5KB, 386x308px

>>7748331
>americans in charge of being classy

File: iwenttocollegeforthis.jpg (29KB, 478x266px) Image search: [Google]

29KB, 478x266px

>>7748313
"picture the CRX back on a honda prelude, only it does not open into any compartment, it is just a back. surely by the virture of the stock horizontal bar and also not needing to open it is more rigid

the car's weight is more on the front now too, but this is only phase 1, there is more we can do to the prelude
we have lost a lot of weight and unnecessary space on this prelude by doing this
people make carbon fiber trunk tops
fuck that thats stupid"

File: thesis.jpg (33KB, 480x360px) Image search: [Google]

33KB, 480x360px

i think its solid

File: THESISS.png (49KB, 800x600px) Image search: [Google]

49KB, 800x600px

concept art drawn up from a designer at WAT

>>7747820

just do pure math for 300k starting. faggot.

>>7747825
Nice meme, friend. How many gbp did you get for it?

>>7747820
why do you want to major in physics?

bump. intetesting topic

>>7746132

Some basic questions to phy/sci/sists:

What are the smallest minimum dimensions of a black hole? Specifically radius and mass. Feel free to give multiple models of these if they exist (Hawking vs. Thorne vs. others)

Is there any sort of maximum on these dimensions, for a black hole?

What's the deal with spinning vs. not-spinning? How can a body not have some "spin" going on?

Has a black hole ever been photographed, or has a real photograph/movie of any region of space illustrated the presence of a black hole?

What are the smallest and largest "known" black holes?

Due to expansion the earlier in the universe a black hole forms, the more matter it can bring into itself and can become larger much more quickly.

File: 1439373464729.png (358KB, 502x419px) Image search: [Google]

358KB, 502x419px

>>7745565

File: doppler8.gif (116KB, 400x100px) Image search: [Google]

116KB, 400x100px

>>7745565

Picture the Dopplereffect. Even on a moving source the first wave front won't arrive faster at the destination, but it will cause the wave fronts to become shorter/wider depending on your view causing a blue or red shit.

From the perspective of the light source of course no shift at all happens

>>7746060
Well, I see what you mean, but it doesn't really help. I get how the doppler effect applies to both sound waves (an ambulance driving past) and light (blue or red shift). But doppler effect is wavelength, not speed.

For example, your gif is showing doppler effect of sound waves propagated by the car, and unlike light, sound waves are not independent of movement of the source or the observer. This is show in your gif by how the sound wave arriving at the right hand side arrive fast when the car is standing still, and slower once the car starts moving away to the right (so for an observer standing at the right hand side of the gif the sound waves would be arriving slightly slower than the standard speed of sound through air.

I guess this is what I'm trying to get at. You can make a gif represent sound waves, or waves in water, but it would be impossible to create a gif of how light waves work. Even though I get the concept on paper or in an abstract sense, I can't visualize it or create a visual or metaphorical representation.

I get that this doesn't matter, and that in a way there is nothing to get, but still...

I mean some people just seem like vessels for propagation of memes, it seems like they have never in their life stopped to reflect on what they are doing or why they are doing it, which stands to reason that they may be completely self unaware.

Has there ever been a study which attempts to measure varying levels of self awareness, rather than just being a thing that you either have or don't have?

Research in to AI seems to suggest that self awareness is not necessary in order to pass as human.

>>7744511
yes, because most of us aren't self aware most of the time imo.