https://drive.google.com/file/d/0BySUjG3NgLxubVhSN1owTG9sV2c/view
So ... does this look like it might go somewhere?
here you go, I have no idea what to make of it though.
I still think the Stellarator Wendelstein-7x is a more viable concept for longterm usage on a big scale.
I want to see it work just so upset the fags working at ITER. It'll be the biggest scientific cucking of all time when a few aerospace engineers figure out fusion in a matter of months, while physicists have been working on it since the 80s. It'll be an even bigger cucking than the time 3 engineers won the Nobel prize in physics for making a blue LED.
The graph looks like something a sci-fi movie director would make and call it a "beam energy warp drive" or some shit
Hi guys, im trying to learn about the brain and stuff, and lately tractography has piqued my interest
This technique is a way to visualize the movement of the water inside the axons of a neuron, and by giving it a color coding, you can infere the directions of the fibers and tracts.
Anybody knows more about this stuff? Recommended readings?
in this picture, we can visualize the corpus callosum, one of the main commisural pathways of the brain: in red, we se transvere fibers, in green, the antero-posterior ones, and in blue, the ones with supero-inferior directions.
>>8503001
Pic related
>>8503011
Thanks senpai, even though my interest is mainly from an anatomical standpoint, I think I should read a little about the physics related stuff
>>8503001
what are you interested in?
Hello /pol/, I've been looking at the fact that 0.999... = 1 and the people who deny it and I think the problem is the proofs themselves.
They are really weird. They use arithmetic tricks that don't look right. So I tried to come up with a proof by contradiction which would use inequalities and show why 0.999... cannot be smaller nor bigger than 1... but I haven't been able to do it.
Maybe someone here who knows more about the structure of rational numbers could try to come up with such a proof?
Thanks in advance, /x/.
try to find a number between .999... and 1
you cant, so they're the same number
>>8503000
It's obvious bait you tard
1/3 = 0.33..
if 1/3 = 1/3 and 3*1/3 = 1
given 0.33.. * 3 = 0.99..
then 0.99.. = 1
there aren't tricks here
[math]0.\bar{9}\neq 1[/math]
I am serious. I looked at various algebraic and analytical proofs and they are all fallacious. Yet it is widely accepted that [math]0.\bar{9}[/math] indeed equals 1.
Why? Please explain to me without appeal to authority or other fallacies why [math]0.\bar{9}=1[/math] should be true. It does not maky any sense to me.
Let me make a similar example to explain my reasoning. Imagine there is a distance between A and B of 1 meter. Now this procedure repeats infinitely: 1. the distance doubles 2. you move 1 meter towards B. Even after infinite repetitions you will not reach B. Thus,
[math]\sum_{n=1}^{\infty }\frac{1}{2^{n}}=1[/math]
is merely an approximation and not actually true. Just like [math]0.\bar{9}=1[/math] is just an approximation and not actually true.
An other example is the following function:
[math]f(x)=\begin{cases}
1& \text{ if } x \geq 1 \\
0& \text{ if } x< 1
\end{cases}[/math]
Clearly [math]f(0.\bar{9})=0[/math] and [math]f(1)=1[/math].
This is a serious thread so please only make serious replies or don't reply at all.
>>8502793
>Go on /sci/ to escape chat autism
>Find this shit
Neat TeX though, faggot.
>>8502822
/sci/ is the wrong place to go.
>>8502822
>escape autism
what part of you're here forever do you not understand?
>He fantasises about having proved P = NP with a non-constructive proof.
>He then became very famous and rich, but he plays it modest with people, tells them that he's not that smart yet he says some cocky remarks to press.
Probably get a quick 5 minute segment on the news and quickly moved on.
Wonder if they would even bother to interview the person.
>>8502661
Bbut... proving P = NP is big. It'd be against all expectations.
>>8502661
No way. It'd be in the news all day. Normies wouldn't know what is going on, but they'd have people spouting nonsense about flying cars and lightsabers becoming a reality all day on every major news network.
I would like to know what books of fiction do you guys (especially the ones who are studying physics and mathematics) find interesting.
In fiction, for example, are there books that you appreciate because of:
a) A beautiful language, some form of beauty manifested in words (Shakespeare’s plays, for example)
b) Interesting plots or compelling stories (like the mystery books of Raymond Chandler).
c) Great characters (like the works of Tolstoy).
Also, when it comes dow to philosophy, we know that many branches of it have evolved into modern science, and that huge portions of works from the past, whatever the beauties of their language, are now obsolete when it comes down to knowing the truth about the universe. Yet there are some fields of philosophy that might still be relevant today, like:
a) Ethics
b) Politics
>So, what books do you like to read? What philosophical texts do you recommend?
>>8502594
>I would like to know what books of fiction do you guys (especially the ones who are studying physics and mathematics) find interesting.
massamune shirow has some interesting plots
>>8502594
I read a lot of Agatha Christie.
Have read a lot of non-trash also, but she's my favourite.
>>8502594
bump
What is free will? Is it real?
>>8502511
Free will is your will being bound only to itself/you.
>>8502511
It's real enough. You can make choices, but the choices were predetermined. As long as there's no way to perfectly predict these things, free will is can seem real.
>>8502551
How are they predetermined?
>Set up Double Slit Experiment
>Put up a measuring device to see which slit the particles pass through
>Perform the experiment
>But don't look at either the projection screen nor the results from the measuring device
>Completely destroy the measuring device
>Look at the projection screen
What pattern do I see?
>>8502486
You won't see an interference pattern because your experiment is too simplistic. For the real way to do it look up quantum eraser.
are you fucking retarded? the results don't depend on whether there's some divine "consciousness" observing them, it depends on whether your measuring device interacts with the electron (which it has to).
>>8502506
Not exactly. The result depends on whether information is "leaked." So you can in some sense measure the electron/photon and then destroy the information in order to maintain the interference pattern. However OP's experiment doesn't actually destroy the information, just one result of that information.
Anyone have experience with calculators malfunctioning or miscalculating? I can confirm because the results I got from the calculator were different from wolfram and mathway. It was like two integers off on my calculator. Do you know how disappointing it is to go over an album length problem and be that little off? Fuckin sucks. Would re-flashing the expensive piece of shit calculator work or something?
>>8502335
you typed something in wrong.
Your inputs were off.
it's over gasoline is finished
>Iranian scientist Alaeddin Qassemi unveiled his new invention, a car that he says is powered by water, in Karaj, Sunday. The car can reportedly run on 60 litres (15 gallons) of water and is able to travel up to 900 kilometres (559 miles) in 10 hours. The power is generated after H2O is split into hydrogen and oxygen which react chemically to produce energy.
>According to the inventor, the car's engine only produces water vapour, causing next to zero air pollution. A litre (0.26 gallons) of water can reportedly generate some 96 megajoules (MJ) of energy while a litre of gasoline produces only 29 megajoules (MJ) of energy.
http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=63d_1480300743
I've heard about cars supposedly running on water during the Korean war.
But then again
>Iran
This is one of those old scams
>>8502271
>Solar freaking roadways
Yep, expect to see a kickstarter soon.
I get a thousand bucks a month in disability cheques thanks to schizophrenia.
Once my mother dies I'll most likely end up homeless because that shit is not enough to live on yo.
In the meantime, would it make mathematical sense to blow all of it every month on mega millions and various other high pay out lotteries?
pic unrelated but doggies are cute
No.
Your best bet is to probably buy an apartment somewhere to supplement your disability checks with rent income. Or you could stop being a lazy nigger and get a job.
>>8502194
It makes more sense to blow it all on heroin, that way when you overdose you'll solve two problems with one stone:
>You won't have to worry about being homeless
>We won't have to worry about your faggoty threads.
'if there is no color in space, why are pictures of earth taken from the orbit always colored?
>>8502000
nice digits, brohio
and to answer your question, are you fucking retarded?
>>8502000
he does look like a rich faggot doesn't he. good on him.
They are Photoshop colored
I am scared of antibiotic resistant diseases.
Comfort me /sci/.
I think we can continue to develop stronger antibiotics if we start funding that research again. The trouble is for the past thirty years or so we stopped developing antibiotics because it is much more profitable to offer treatments rather than cures. But if shit ever hits the fan, I imagine the government might override that.
>>8501766
It's going to be fine, OP. You are such a smart boy.
>>8501766
Earth needs a good monkey cleansing. You know deep down inside it's going to be something mother nature concocts if we don't manage to do it ourselves. At this juncture, the sooner the better.
What is the gravitational constant? How was it derived?
>>8501502
DUDE GRAVITATIONAL CONSTANTS LMAO
>>8501531
>>850150
this part of 4chan is so tame what is going on
is pic related legit?
>>8500645
>is pic related legit?
wtf kind of question is that? no calculator?
i can prove this for you but i wont, im to smart.
>>8500646
no. is this how post numbers are assigned to each post?
TRUMP POSTERS GET THE FUCK OFF MY PLANET AWOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO