Show your pics of random objects or the floor.
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make OLYMPUS IMAGING CORP. Camera Model SP570UZ Camera Software Version 1.0 Maximum Lens Aperture f/2.8 Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 72 dpi Vertical Resolution 72 dpi Image Created 2015:12:13 05:07:28 Exposure Time 1/13 sec F-Number f/2.8 Exposure Program Creative ISO Speed Rating 125 Exposure Bias 0 EV Metering Mode Pattern Light Source Unknown Flash No Flash, Compulsory Focal Length 4.60 mm Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 3648 Image Height 2736 Rendering Normal Exposure Mode Auto White Balance Auto Scene Capture Type Standard Gain Control Low Gain Up Contrast Normal Saturation Normal Sharpness Normal Compression Setting SQ Macro Mode Normal
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make Canon Camera Model Canon EOS 550D Lens Size 18.00 - 55.00 mm Firmware Version Firmware Version 1.0.9 Serial Number 2035022030 Lens Name EF-S18-55mm f/3.5-5.6 IS Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 72 dpi Vertical Resolution 72 dpi Image Created 2015:12:22 02:14:04 Exposure Time 1/25 sec F-Number f/5.6 Exposure Program Manual Lens Aperture f/5.7 Exposure Bias 0 EV Flash No Flash, Compulsory Focal Length 20.00 mm Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 5184 Image Height 3456 Rendering Normal Exposure Mode Manual Scene Capture Type Standard Exposure Mode Manual Focus Type Auto Metering Mode Evaluative ISO Speed Rating Auto Sharpness Unknown Saturation Normal Contrast Normal Shooting Mode Manual Image Size Large Focus Mode Manual Drive Mode Single Flash Mode Off Compression Setting Normal Macro Mode Normal White Balance Auto Exposure Compensation 3 Sensor ISO Speed 320 Color Matrix 130
this is dumb man
>>2726470
no it is pretty smart.
I've been shooting with an X-E1 and then X-T10 for 5 or 6 years. I got to wondering whether the full frame thing actually mattered or if Zack Arias wasn't swallowing a shill pill.
Borrowed a D750 and damn. This thing fucking delivers the IQ goods. But the shutter is loud as a fucking earthquake.
Is the IQ boost a sugar pill? Am I seeing what I want to see? Help me out /p/ before I sell my shit and buy some comparable bigger heavier louder shit.
>>2724904
That image irks my OCD. Where is the view angle? Why would you photograph laserlight?
You artschoolers really should go back to school for some basic physics.
>>2724904
porque no los dos? i have an x100s for discrete, portable shooting and a d810 for serious tripod work.
the iq boost is real, but it comes with the serious compromise of portability and overall "fun-ness" of shooting. You could go with a used A7, but the battery life and overall kludgy feel (especially coming from fuji) is an issue.
look at all that wasted light on the crop sensor. global warming.
Why is /p/ so obsessed with film?
It's easier than learning how to take a good picture
It's fun and challenging. It makes you appreciate photography more.
>>2723433
>samefagging your shitty troll thread from your smartphone
shake my head family
I'm looking to start up my own company but I've been trying to find engineers that create camera and they are very hard to find.
I've been suggested to go to camera companies such as Canon or Nixon and ask but why would they give me their engineers?
Any other suggestions?
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Camera Software Image-Specific Properties: Image Width 901 Image Height 1200
you need to offer the engineer more money and more benefits then the current company he/she is working for. But judging bu your post you're either kid or an idiot.
>canooon kneekooon gimme engineeer plzplz
>>2723254
Or a better opportunity in general. You can get the thousands of engeneers that wish they could have worked for Canon or Nikon, but they can only hire 20 people or whatever, so you can get to the ones who want to work on cameras, and find the ones who are willing to take a chance on a guy who visits /p/ and his great ideas...
the problem is going to be startup capital though. The stuff inside a camera is pretty expensive to make, and only made manageable by economies of scale.
Get a petapixel article about it. They'll blast the fuck out of it, and people will contact you. Be sure to make it trendy and indy.
>>2723291
Not a bad idea, thanks.
Would be approaching a big company that already has a similar product, to ask for their help/work in collab work?
Hi guys. Just putting up a thread for a 3 month trip away. Currently in Abu Dhabi airport waiting 7 hours for flight #3. Kill me.
Here's the first photo, coming in over the alps, editing on a pos laptop, so fuck knows what the colours are like.
I hope you enjoy.
m-moar p-pls...
gud jub
>>2719351
i like i liek
DESIGNATED
post more
Ok so trying to sort out this image to go onto canvas, loses all detail, by any chance can some one do me a huge favor fix the pic resolution so it can go onto a decent 50cm wide canvas, have done all the editing from my phone.
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 696 Image Height 387
Here's the original
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 953 Image Height 536
Let me see if I'm understanding you. You have a .5 megapixel original and want to print onto a large canvas?
Was taken from a 13mp phone, it's not hard to do, just don't have my computer here.
I bought my first camera 5 months ago, and recently, 2 books from Bresson and Harry Gruyaert that really help me a lot. Some critique will help a lot, i struggle a lot with the framing and what things to cut off from it.
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make FUJIFILM Camera Model X-E1 Camera Software Adobe Photoshop CS5 Windows Maximum Lens Aperture f/2.8 Sensing Method One-Chip Color Area Focal Length (35mm Equiv) 27 mm Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 240 dpi Vertical Resolution 240 dpi Image Created 2015:12:18 20:58:11 Exposure Time 1/250 sec F-Number f/11.0 Exposure Program Manual ISO Speed Rating 1000 Lens Aperture f/11.0 Brightness 7.1 EV Exposure Bias 0 EV Metering Mode Pattern Light Source Unknown Flash No Flash, Compulsory Focal Length 18.00 mm Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 1000 Image Height 737 Rendering Normal Exposure Mode Manual White Balance Auto Scene Capture Type Standard Sharpness Normal Subject Distance Range Unknown
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make FUJIFILM Camera Model X-E1 Camera Software Adobe Photoshop CS5 Windows Maximum Lens Aperture f/2.8 Sensing Method One-Chip Color Area Focal Length (35mm Equiv) 27 mm Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 240 dpi Vertical Resolution 240 dpi Image Created 2015:11:28 22:41:55 Exposure Time 1/200 sec F-Number f/11.0 Exposure Program Manual ISO Speed Rating 1000 Lens Aperture f/11.0 Brightness 5.7 EV Exposure Bias 0 EV Metering Mode Pattern Light Source Unknown Flash No Flash, Compulsory Focal Length 18.00 mm Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 1000 Image Height 774 Rendering Normal Exposure Mode Manual White Balance Auto Scene Capture Type Standard Sharpness Normal Subject Distance Range Unknown
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make FUJIFILM Camera Model X-E1 Camera Software Adobe Photoshop CS5 Windows Maximum Lens Aperture f/2.8 Sensing Method One-Chip Color Area Focal Length (35mm Equiv) 27 mm Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 240 dpi Vertical Resolution 240 dpi Image Created 2015:12:18 21:23:09 Exposure Time 1/400 sec F-Number f/10.0 Exposure Program Manual ISO Speed Rating 1000 Lens Aperture f/10.0 Brightness 4.8 EV Exposure Bias 0 EV Metering Mode Pattern Light Source Unknown Flash No Flash, Compulsory Focal Length 18.00 mm Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 1000 Image Height 564 Rendering Normal Exposure Mode Manual White Balance Auto Scene Capture Type Standard Sharpness Normal Subject Distance Range Unknown
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make FUJIFILM Camera Model X-E1 Camera Software Adobe Photoshop CS5 Windows Maximum Lens Aperture f/2.8 Sensing Method One-Chip Color Area Focal Length (35mm Equiv) 59 mm Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 240 dpi Vertical Resolution 240 dpi Image Created 2015:12:18 21:24:34 Exposure Time 1/250 sec F-Number f/9.0 Exposure Program Manual ISO Speed Rating 1000 Lens Aperture f/9.0 Brightness 3.3 EV Exposure Bias 0 EV Metering Mode Pattern Light Source Unknown Flash No Flash, Compulsory Focal Length 39.00 mm Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 1000 Image Height 635 Rendering Normal Exposure Mode Manual White Balance Auto Scene Capture Type Standard Sharpness Normal Subject Distance Range Unknown
Why the hell can't I get the film to consistently spool on the roll? I'm using pic related and 35mm film.
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Image-Specific Properties: Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 1000 Image Height 482
>>2723265
because youre a retard.
try cutting the anterior edges of the film in a 45° angle. make sure to only cut a small part away and do NOT cut into the sprockets. It's a little hard to do in the dark, but you get used to it.
Because you're bad at it and plastic reels are trash. Buy a stainless Hewes reel and practice with it a few times and that will fix both issues.
welp, my work here must come to an end.
i had a stroke a couple months ago & shit just ain't lookin good for old bass.
i walk with a cane, my arms shake like michael j fox & i seem to have forgotten a couple weddings and vacations.
so.. you guys take care, stay outta trouble & take some fuckin photos.
bass out.
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make NIKON CORPORATION Camera Model NIKON D7100 Camera Software Adobe Photoshop CS6 (Windows) Maximum Lens Aperture f/2.8 Sensing Method One-Chip Color Area Color Filter Array Pattern 802 Focal Length (35mm Equiv) 38 mm Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 382 dpi Vertical Resolution 382 dpi Image Created 2013:07:25 00:21:35 Exposure Time 1/3 sec F-Number f/4.0 Exposure Program Manual ISO Speed Rating 100 Lens Aperture f/4.0 Exposure Bias 0 EV Metering Mode Spot Light Source Unknown Flash No Flash, Compulsory Focal Length 38.00 mm Color Space Information Uncalibrated Image Width 800 Image Height 1000 Rendering Normal Exposure Mode Manual White Balance Auto Scene Capture Type Standard Gain Control None Contrast Normal Saturation Normal Sharpness Normal Subject Distance Range Unknown
>>2722073
document your death, faggot!
>>2722073
oh fuck, shit dude. that suck man, take care man; see you on the other side.
>>2722073
What the fuck...
BASS NOOOOOO
I want to get into this I just only have 175 you can go under as much as you want just I need a good one with video and picture in a kinda high quality.
>>2721152
Your cell phone.
>>2721153
Mine is shit
Save up some more and get a 550d / eos m. For 175.. Thats D40 region, isnt it? There is no video though.
So I'm making a website and for some reason I have a pretty big attachment to these set of images. I would love to include the set on my website but would like to get some opinions about it as a whole as well as the image order (which I think is very important). The basic concept is the passing of summer. The set will be named Dog Days. So yeah, comments/crit encouraged. If you think it sucks tell me why or don't bother commenting. If you think it works please tell me why so I can maybe use some of those reasons while making the other sets for my site. Cheers in advance.
1/13
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Camera Software Adobe Photoshop CS3 Windows Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 415 dpi Vertical Resolution 415 dpi Image Created 2009:07:01 19:37:35 Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 800 Image Height 533
2/13
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Camera Software Adobe Photoshop CS3 Windows Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 511 dpi Vertical Resolution 511 dpi Image Created 2009:06:16 20:47:44 Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 800 Image Height 533
3/13
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Camera Software Adobe Photoshop CS3 Windows Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 504 dpi Vertical Resolution 504 dpi Image Created 2009:07:20 13:53:45 Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 800 Image Height 533
4/13
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Camera Software Adobe Photoshop CS3 Windows Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 555 dpi Vertical Resolution 555 dpi Image Created 2009:06:16 20:39:48 Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 800 Image Height 533
hello /p:
long time lurker here, I occasionally post a photo or two in threads but mostly just read and attempt to learn, amidst the gear threads, shitposting, and noise.
I have an honest question for the amateur/pro photographers - it seems there is a fair amount of hate for any sort of borders on photos - and not just the cheesy VSCO or Instagram type borders. Is it artistically "better" to leave off any sort of border whatsoever with your photos?
Question two - watermarks. I would think it would be better to protect your images, even though anyone halfway adept with photoshop can remove them. But is it an unpardonable sin to use watermarks to protect your images online? just a basic "copyright 2015, photographer name" is all I am thinking of, not some big logo or cheesy byline.
While I am at it:
I hope the /p 2015 photobook gets made
Isi is not too shabby of a photographer
Daido Moriyama is GOD
Eric Kim rustles my jimmies
Kai is a cute (ok no homo)
My first 10,000 pics are indeed sucking
>pic related - one of the only pics of mine I actually like
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make Panasonic Camera Model DMC-GX1 Camera Software Adobe Photoshop Elements 14.0 (Windows) Maximum Lens Aperture f/5.6 Sensing Method One-Chip Color Area Focal Length (35mm Equiv) 84 mm Image-Specific Properties: Image Width 4592 Image Height 3448 Number of Bits Per Component 8, 8, 8 Pixel Composition RGB Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 72 dpi Vertical Resolution 72 dpi Image Created 2015:11:22 20:05:22 Exposure Time 1/200 sec F-Number f/6.3 Exposure Program Normal Program ISO Speed Rating 160 Lens Aperture f/6.3 Exposure Bias 0 EV Metering Mode Pattern Light Source Unknown Flash No Flash, Compulsory Focal Length 42.00 mm Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 1200 Image Height 901 Rendering Normal Exposure Mode Auto White Balance Auto Scene Capture Type Standard Gain Control Low Gain Up Contrast Normal Saturation Normal Sharpness Normal
>>2727234
Borders are unnecessary when posting online. They add nothing to the photo
Watermarks are an acknowledgment that you think your photos are good enough to be stolen. Until someone actually steals your photo, don't worry about it.
>>2727234
1. I hate borders, for many reasons, but do whatever you feel.
2. You probably just answered your own question. I think it detracts from the image and anybody who will steal it will either crop it out or edit it out. Maybe if it is shared without attribution and not edited/cropped out, but I've only looked up those photographers to make fun of them.
Another way to look at is if any of the photographers you like do this stuff?
Daido doesn't even have borders in his PRINT work (at least in bye bye photography)
How does Luke Fontana (or whoever processes his stuff) achieve this look? It seems like just 1 or 2 lights but how's the color grade done? I can't put my finger on it.
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make NIKON CORPORATION Camera Model NIKON D300 Camera Software Adobe Photoshop CS6 (Windows) Maximum Lens Aperture f/1.7 Sensing Method One-Chip Color Area Color Filter Array Pattern 790 Focal Length (35mm Equiv) 52 mm Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 240 dpi Vertical Resolution 240 dpi Image Created 2014:02:06 13:14:20 Exposure Time 1/200 sec F-Number f/7.1 Exposure Program Manual ISO Speed Rating 200 Lens Aperture f/7.1 Exposure Bias 0 EV Metering Mode Spot Light Source Flash Flash No Flash Focal Length 35.00 mm Color Space Information Uncalibrated Image Width 750 Image Height 1000 Rendering Normal Exposure Mode Manual White Balance Manual Scene Capture Type Standard Gain Control None Contrast Normal Saturation Normal Sharpness Normal Subject Distance Range Unknown
another example
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Camera Software Image-Specific Properties: Image Width 750 Image Height 1000
>>2725604
and
/p/ tier movies.
Post movies with great lighting or generally well composed shots. I know there are a few out there but none spring to mind other than the lighting in Skyfall.
>>2724770
Is this an excuse to post cinegrids?
this entire movie is a cinematographer's dream
>>2724774
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Image-Specific Properties:
Hi /p/hotoshoppers.
Please help me out.
I need a picture of a zebra with a cow's head on a white background.
seems like you already have that
>>2727012
Without the watermark, obviously :)
>>2727014
Go fuck yourself