Archived threads in /p/ - Photography - 517. page

>>2744483

>>2740540
>>2740540

>>2744488
Thank you good sir/madame.

>>2742550
fuck you and your hairy ass arms advertisingcuck

>>2742550
Those are some long butt cheeks
I like it

File: rsz_25.jpg (582KB, 3008x2008px) Image search: [Google]

582KB, 3008x2008px

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	NIKON CORPORATION
Camera Model	NIKON D750
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop CC (Windows)
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/2.8
Sensing Method	One-Chip Color Area
Color Filter Array Pattern	850
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	70 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	300 dpi
Vertical Resolution	300 dpi
Image Created	2015:07:31 19:05:38
Exposure Time	1/400 sec
F-Number	f/2.8
Exposure Program	Manual
ISO Speed Rating	100
Lens Aperture	f/2.8
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Light Source	Unknown
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	70.00 mm
Color Space Information	Uncalibrated
Image Width	6016
Image Height	4016
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Manual
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Gain Control	None
Contrast	Normal
Saturation	Normal
Sharpness	Normal
Subject Distance Range	Unknown

File: Screen Shot 2015-12-29 at 11.05.37 AM.png (2MB, 1224x1356px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 1224x1356px

>>2731943
Here's mine

bump, will make/upload mine tonight when I get home

>>2732014
>bumping on /p/

>>2743827
you're too excited about your image you're blinded to the fact that it isn't that good

>>2742738
>I live in canada
>645n's are 400-500 alone Just for the body
>Implying you can shoot without a lens ore even a pinhole

File: IMGP0525.jpg (1MB, 1920x1280px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1920x1280px

I was going to start a new thread for this, but I think it could work here just as well. On /k/ they have "arsenal" threads where they post a picture of all their guns.

Post your camera and lens arsenal, critique others, get suggestions for your next purchase.

Pic related is mine. Not pictured: See EXIF data. Thinking about picking up a DA 40mm f/2.8 Ltd pancake just so I can round out the holy trio of pancake lenses. Brilliant idea? Stupid idea? Stupidly brilliant idea?

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	RICOH IMAGING COMPANY, LTD.
Camera Model	PENTAX K-3
Camera Software	PENTAX K-3 Ver. 1.11
Sensing Method	One-Chip Color Area
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	39 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	300 dpi
Vertical Resolution	300 dpi
Image Created	2016:01:12 00:20:37
Exposure Time	1 sec
F-Number	f/8.0
Exposure Program	Aperture Priority
ISO Speed Rating	200
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	26.25 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	1920
Image Height	1280
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Auto
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Contrast	Hard
Saturation	Normal
Sharpness	Hard
Subject Distance Range	Macro

>>2742748
That 70mm

File: 34344535.png (2MB, 1084x1088px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 1084x1088px

>>2740377

Ignoring the fact that it is generic-hipster-instagram crap...

The general photographic term most relevant would probably be 'environmental portrait'.

>>2740379

I should add that the 'environment' term isn't because of the nature/outdoors elements - it's not the definition in that sense.

Just google 'environmental portrait' and you'll see lots of examples.

Not your personal clickbait listicle writer.

>>2743952
The requirements for photo sensors are different than those for video, and the facilities needed to produce sensors, especially in large numbers, are not cheap to build nor maintain. You also have the market for each respective sensor. Nikon and Canon(photo) have a market that is much smaller and less lucrative than the market for RED, and the cost of R&D has to be offset by the money made back by the products. RED makes more per camera than Nikon or Canon do, and although the amount produced is smaller, these cameras are rented out as well, and RED also sells the accessories for these camera and that in itself makes a sizable amount of the profit that they can then place toward sensor R&D. Nikon doesn't make nearly the same amount as RED does, and nowhere near enough to build and maintain a sensor-making facility to cover their whole lineup. It makes sense for them to simply outsource their sensor needs to the proper companies and then focus on the one thing that does bring them money, their optics. Canon is a little different, in that they do have enough money to make their own sensors, but they are not a company the focuses solely on cameras. They've stuck with the sensors they have because they work, though not as well as the competition. Why they haven't updated them is beyond many of our understanding but they continue to use their current gen sensor. They are even less interested in the Cinema market, and they only recently started to actually pay attention to it. Looking at RED, a company dedicated to producing cinema cameras, it makes sense that they would focus on the part that matter the most, which is the sensor, and would pour as much money as possible into creating a sensor that would be able to compete with Hollywood's high end cameras. They only really managed to do that with the Dragon sensor and beyond, their Mysterium sensor is not all that impressive(noisy bastard really). Pt. 2 incoming.

>>2743952
>>2743978
Pt. 2
But they've managed to do that because they focused on the sensors and have had control of the entire manufacturing process, as well and custom tailoring their cameras to these sensors. RED is a company that depends on their sensors performance, unlike Canikon, which depend on their system(lenses, cameras, accessories) being able to cover the needs of professionals. If RED sensors don't perform at the level Hollywood demands, they won't be able to command the price that they do. That said, I'm willing to bet the F5 sensor preforms on par with the RED Dragon, and the F65 on par with the Weapon. Though in all honestly, despite it's lower resolution, the Arri Alev sensor still looks best in my opinion.

>>2743981
you've no idea what you're talking about.

>>2743704
Classes give you skills that you can easily get without the class, however, classes keep you working on a regular basis, and focus you towards skills and processes that you might get more slowly without it.

You don't need a class at all, but as a beginner, being given focused projects, interspersed with basic compositional theory and technical information can get you going a lot faster than merely having a camera around while you lay in your living room.

>>2743704

You don't need to, but it can be useful. Classes are usually as useful as you want to make them.

If you have critiques in class, and/or if your teacher offers them, it will be one of the few times people HAVE to look at your stuff.

Conversely you can see the work of people around your skill level, and their process.

You will also most likely have to select VERY few of the pictures you take to show, so you will learn to edit down, too.

But if you are very contrarian to all this stuff, it will be a waste of time.

There was some anon one here a while back who was pissed their teacher wanted to take photos without cropping. If you aren't willing to try to roll with stuff like that, don't bother.

>>2743736

People get pissed for those kind of things? With me being a curious type of guy I will be more than happy to experiment with new things, it actually looks fun.

File: Edited-0635.jpg (874KB, 4698x3264px) Image search: [Google]

874KB, 4698x3264px

>>2736548

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	FUJIFILM
Camera Model	X-T10
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 6.1 (Windows)
Sensing Method	One-Chip Color Area
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	42 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	240 dpi
Vertical Resolution	240 dpi
Image Created	2016:01:04 19:14:49
Exposure Time	1/500 sec
F-Number	f/1.0
Exposure Program	Manual
ISO Speed Rating	200
Lens Aperture	f/1.0
Brightness	1.0 EV
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Light Source	Unknown
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	28.00 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Manual
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Sharpness	Normal
Subject Distance Range	Unknown

File: Edited-0308.jpg (847KB, 4896x3264px) Image search: [Google]

847KB, 4896x3264px

>>2736551

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	FUJIFILM
Camera Model	X-T10
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 6.1 (Windows)
Sensing Method	One-Chip Color Area
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	75 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	240 dpi
Vertical Resolution	240 dpi
Image Created	2016:01:04 19:14:26
Exposure Time	0.6 sec
F-Number	f/1.0
Exposure Program	Manual
ISO Speed Rating	200
Lens Aperture	f/1.0
Brightness	-10.3 EV
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Spot
Light Source	Unknown
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	50.00 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Manual
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Sharpness	Normal
Subject Distance Range	Unknown

File: Edited-0324.jpg (928KB, 3611x2612px) Image search: [Google]

928KB, 3611x2612px

>>2736553

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	FUJIFILM
Camera Model	X-T10
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 6.1 (Windows)
Sensing Method	One-Chip Color Area
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	75 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	240 dpi
Vertical Resolution	240 dpi
Image Created	2016:01:04 19:14:34
Exposure Time	1/180 sec
F-Number	f/1.0
Exposure Program	Manual
ISO Speed Rating	200
Lens Aperture	f/1.0
Brightness	0.9 EV
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Light Source	Unknown
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	50.00 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Manual
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Sharpness	Normal
Subject Distance Range	Unknown

>>2743899
>goyim cant into art market speculation

>>2743908
No, so please into it for me, kike.

If he flooded the market with photos, he would obviously just be another dog photographer instead of a srs artist.

Use google dumbass.
30 seconds of searching and you would've found out it's retina DKL mount not c-mount.

>>2743254

its fucking nothing. post more.

It reminds me of Rome in the evening, the way the light falls on the buildings

If it doesn't have people in it then the picture is boring.

please don't even humor this thread

>>2742642
>a focal length which everyone mostly has
>most hipster

If there is a most hipster its probably fish eye.

>>2742648
But everyone including my dad has a GoPro. I'd say wide angles in general as everyone has a hard on over 50mm and ~70-200mm teles.