Archived threads in /p/ - Photography - 509. page

ah

File: img_1590[1].jpg (447KB, 1055x1500px) Image search: [Google]

447KB, 1055x1500px

>>2749365
Janell is always related. Posting a proper pic.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Canon
Camera Model	Canon EOS 5D Mark II
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop CS5 Macintosh
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/4.0
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width	3586
Image Height	5100
Number of Bits Per Component	8, 8, 8
Compression Scheme	Uncompressed
Pixel Composition	RGB
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Data Arrangement	Chunky Format
Image Created	2013:01:16 22:59:06
Exposure Time	1/100 sec
F-Number	f/13.0
Exposure Program	Manual
ISO Speed Rating	500
Lens Aperture	f/13.0
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Subject Distance	1.09 m
Metering Mode	Pattern
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	47.00 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	1055
Image Height	1500
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Manual
White Balance	Manual
Scene Capture Type	Standard

Don't be the fool who buys a Mir 1B. Go for the 1 (also known as 1A). Preferably made in 1971-1974, black barrel, ZOMZ factory.

File: 20150501_154307-1.jpg (454KB, 969x1058px) Image search: [Google]

454KB, 969x1058px

Sigma 70-200mm f/2.8 OS HSM - $900
Tamron 70-200mm f/2.8 Di VC USD - $1,000
Canon EF 70-200mm f/2.8L IS USM - $1,100
Canon EF 70-200mm f/2.8L IS II USM - $2,100

Which one senpaitachi? I need a fast tele for my fool frame 6D. Would like to take it when I travel so I can street-creep from a fair distance.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand

>>2746833
>JPEG And RAW on print?
No. That's not the point of RAW. The whole deal with RAW is that you can pull off so much more dynamic range from recovering blown-highlights and underexposed areas. Allows you to enhance shots to your liking and recover shots which would have been just a throw away if shot on JPEG.

Always shoot RAW (with JPEG if you're lazy), and when you can be bothered enough to post process.

So I've been thinking about getting into photography for a while now but even after hours of lurking on /p/ all these camera brands and model numbers still mean nothing to me. Whats a solid camera I can get to start out?

Im taking a photography class this coming year as well and I think I need one that uses film, but I'm curious if film or digital is considered better at all. Does /p/ have any suggestions for a beginner?

>>2718430
>Catalog
>>2713117

File: strusz.png (2MB, 663x985px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 663x985px

>>2718437
That thread revolves mostly around lulz w33d 420 xdxd stuff. This pertains strictly to humanity's second oldest drug.

>>2718430
I needed motivation to cycle a few miles in a freezing night and lug my tripod and valuable lenses in a cemetary, so getting drunk was a good general numbing candidate. I did ballpark bulb exposures on very forgiving film so it worked out allright.

>>2718488
I never was drunk on a cemetery, must be an eerie experience.

>>2749738
It's a simple diffraction filter, similar to the stocking on a UV filter trick.

So, what you'll need is a UV filter, and a bit of vaseline. If you don't have a UV filter, or a real camera, you can use a flat piece of glass and hold it over the lens and it'll be fine since it's not a high clarity effect by any means. Open the jar of vaseline, smear it on your hand, and with this hand put it up your ass to get the thickest turd possible. Now, smear it over the glass, but don't get it too thick or the image will be too dark.

The physics at work here are similar to a prism, causing the lateral separation of red and green.

>>2749746
why isnt this board ever helpful?

>>2749738
OP, in simple terms, you get to the RGB panel in photoshop, pick and move the channels slightly so they separate and create that look.

>>2749746
what the actual fuck.

>>2749675
So whats your favorite part about being autistic?

File: 20150721_195425.jpg (665KB, 2048x1536px) Image search: [Google]

665KB, 2048x1536px

Can we get a semi-transluscent orange plastic covers of small containers featuring soviet leaders thread going? Took this myself with my crummy Samsung Galaxy Note 2014 edition. Pretty impressed with the result, if I do say so myself!

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	SAMSUNG
Camera Model	SM-P605
Camera Software	P605XXUCNF2
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/2.4
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	32 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width	2048
Image Height	1536
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Created	2015:07:21 19:54:24
F-Number	f/2.4
Exposure Program	Normal Program
Metering Mode	Spot
Focal Length	3.40 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	2048
Image Height	1536
Exposure Mode	Auto
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Night Scene

>>2749699
nice dubs

whats wrong with your thumb?

File: mist.jpg (3MB, 3166x4599px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 3166x4599px

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Canon
Camera Model	Canon IXUS 155
Camera Software	Embettered by PicMonkey. http://www.picmonkey.com
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/3.0
Sensing Method	One-Chip Color Area
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	180 dpi
Vertical Resolution	180 dpi
Image Created	2015:12:18 12:02:25
Exposure Time	1 sec
F-Number	f/3.0
ISO Speed Rating	200
Lens Aperture	f/3.0
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	4.30 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	3864
Image Height	5152
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Manual
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard

File: image.jpg (137KB, 834x899px) Image search: [Google]

137KB, 834x899px

>>2749599
>>2749600
Nice dubs
But why'd you take photos of lampposts?

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	834
Image Height	899
Scene Capture Type	Standard

Have fun being a racist bigot in Europe. I'm sure you'll find lots of like-minded people.

so you asked for my help on /int/
i do have a small studio in the chink area of paris, cheap

this is 2 3 years down the line though and i might have left this shithole so make another thread at this point

>>2748888
>Implying Religion has anything to do with race....
>Implying the project has anything to do with race.

look at the canon website? They have printing options but they may be more suitable for individual books not in bulks to sell.

Also, post a couple photos here, I wanna give a look :)

Dunno why I came here.
Show some photos.

>>2746743
How many are you planning on making?
How much are you planning on selling them for?
Who do you plan to sell them to?
How/where do you plan on selling them?


My best advice would be, if you are planning on selling these, to try and put together some kind of event. Or events.

See if you can find a gallery to do a showing at.

Maybe a local bookstore to do a book signing.

Try and collaborate with other artists and photographers. That way the people they know can find out about you work and the people you know can find out about theirs.


Finally, if you do plan on selling these books online, I recommend printing off business cards with the web address of where you can purchase the book.

Large format camera most likely 200mm with kodachrome film

>>2746691
man that looks incredible

>>2746691
Is probably right, it looks like there was some swing used because the DoF is thin but everyone is equally in focus and so is the fence while everything behind them is soft.

Probably both just to be safe.

>>2739460
just cut it off you amateur

if youre doing it right, you'll be too busy for boners.

if youre doing it righter, she'll want the D.

I would recommend the new PhaseOne XF100MP. It's a bit heavier and more to handle than the Leica but I think that this will actually help your daughter since she will be less likely to drop it or mishandle it.

This is a stupid thread.

>>2749168
Is it now

File: dsc_5370jpg_23822693883_o.jpg (196KB, 1080x810px) Image search: [Google]

196KB, 1080x810px

2/5

File: dsc_5242jpg_24349879085_o.jpg (246KB, 1080x720px) Image search: [Google]

246KB, 1080x720px

3/5

File: dsc_5241jpg_24241667922_o.jpg (284KB, 1080x810px) Image search: [Google]

284KB, 1080x810px

4/5

File: brunswick-heads-wall-23-july_9474162019_o.jpg (3MB, 5184x3456px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 5184x3456px

Second one

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop CS5 Macintosh
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width	5184
Image Height	3456
Number of Bits Per Component	8, 8, 8
Pixel Composition	RGB
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Created	2013:07:24 16:39:47
Color Space Information	Uncalibrated
Image Width	5184
Image Height	3456

>>2748687
>Any tips ?
Yeah, first off read the sticky and resize your shit.

Secondly if you're only going to post two pictures then don't create your own thread, post in the Recent Photo Thread next time.

As for the actual photos, it seems like you got the trails down but you really need to work on composition/subject choice. A good Astrophotograph needs a balance of interesting sky and an interesting subject. Both of these are boring as shit in terms of subject.

I don't like the first shot at all. Underexposed foreground and extremely distracting lens flair, no clear subject, it's just an overall snapshit desu.

Your second shot is a lot better, nicely exposed foreground, however no subject and a boring composition. Try going back to this location, but this time find a nice interesting subject (there are heaps of dead trees/drift wood that I can see). Once you find your tree or whatever, get up nice and close to it and make it your main focus of the image, with the star trails as the background. You could try angling straight out to sea, so there's no distracting features in the comp such as those city lights.

Post more shots please

I apologize for my posting wrong, I have read the sticky now.
Thanks for the tips, will try it out

>>2748404
I hope you get shot. The way you capitalise is fucking abhorrent.

File: IMG_3709.jpg (451KB, 1600x1200px) Image search: [Google]

451KB, 1600x1200px

real explorer here.
not really explored any warehouses in particular but I have been in tunnels quite a lot now

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Canon
Camera Model	Canon PowerShot A2300
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/2.8
Sensing Method	One-Chip Color Area
Lens Size	5.00 - 25.00 mm
Firmware Version	Firmware Version 1.00
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	180 dpi
Vertical Resolution	180 dpi
Image Created	2016:01:17 15:49:20
Exposure Time	1/50 sec
F-Number	f/2.8
Lens Aperture	f/2.8
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Flash	Flash, Auto, Red-Eye Reduce
Focal Length	5.00 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	1600
Image Height	1200
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Focus Type	Auto
Metering Mode	Evaluative
ISO Speed Rating	Auto
Sharpness	Normal
Saturation	Normal
Contrast	Normal
Shooting Mode	Full Auto
Image Size	Unknown
Focus Mode	Single
Drive Mode	Single
Flash Mode	Red-Eye Reduction (Auto)
Compression Setting	Fine
Macro Mode	Normal
Subject Distance	65.530 m
White Balance	Auto
Exposure Compensation	3
Sensor ISO Speed	192
Image Number	128-3709

>>2748272
Original A7 / A7r with a 35mm? Or is that too big?

Fuji X Pro 1 or 2, or X100t if you wanted to go smaller. Fuji cameras feel great to take photos with, especially the X Pro, very tactile and familiar especially if you're accustom to older cameras.

Obligatory Ricoh GR (it really is a good camera though, replaces my DSLR most days)

>>2748272

pentacon six.

ahem

R I C O H G R
I
C
O
H
G
R