Archived threads in /p/ - Photography - 510. page

There's a gear thread for this.
It's a very nice lens and it's certainly fast enough. It might be longer than you want, though, especially if you're using a crop sensor, which you most likely are.

Lousy. Comas out the ass.

>>2748176
I got some pretty ok shots on a kit Canon 550D 18-55mm lens at F3.5
Lack of tripod messed it up, but the steady ones showed some good star exposure... you should be ok I think

APUG.org

thanks

Any other recommendations?

File: image.jpg (2MB, 4032x3024px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 4032x3024px

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Apple
Camera Model	iPhone 6s
Camera Software	9.2
Sensing Method	One-Chip Color Area
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	29 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Created	2016:01:14 08:18:28
Exposure Time	1/17 sec
F-Number	f/2.2
Exposure Program	Normal Program
ISO Speed Rating	500
Lens Aperture	f/2.2
Brightness	-1.5 EV
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Spot
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	4.15 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	4032
Image Height	3024
Exposure Mode	Auto
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard

File: image.jpg (2MB, 4032x3024px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 4032x3024px

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Apple
Camera Model	iPhone 6s
Camera Software	9.2
Sensing Method	One-Chip Color Area
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	29 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Right-Hand, Top
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Created	2016:01:14 08:21:51
Exposure Time	1/17 sec
F-Number	f/2.2
Exposure Program	Normal Program
ISO Speed Rating	2000
Lens Aperture	f/2.2
Brightness	-4.0 EV
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Spot
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	4.15 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	4032
Image Height	3024
Exposure Mode	Auto
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard

That's clean OP, run some film through it and show us how it looks. I'd save it if I were you.

>>2733662
honestly, if you're planning on shooting with only a 50mm, you can't get a better option than the konica iiia

-great lens, based on the zeiss planar
-outstanding build quality
-very compact, more so than any interchangeable lens rangefinder
-1x magnification viewfinder, very bright, meaning focusing is a breeze, and you don't even have to close the other eye
-dirt cheap compared to other high end rangefinders because hipsters haven't learned about it yet (I got mine in near mint for a little over 100usd)
-leaf shutter, so ultra quiet and flash synch at every speed

only downsides are that the shutter speed only goes up to 1/500th, since it's a leaf shutter, and that they're kinda hard

File: 19e4664aa0e654a5f4970c7a587ff79f.jpg (160KB, 570x545px) Image search: [Google]

160KB, 570x545px

Someone else was going to say it comrade.

>>2733662
I shoot an M3 and a couple screw mount Leicas, the M3 is a tank and lovely to use. That said I enjoy my IIIf for its compact size.

Leica for a film rangefinder, in my opinion is always your best choice because of it's resale value. You will always get your money back when it comes time to sell and sometimes make a little. Prices though range from stupidly expensive to relatively cheap, the same goes for repairs and you will need repairs.

The best viewfinder I have ever seen on a rangefinder was on a Zeiss Ikon. Lovely camera but feels a little cheap to me for the price.

of the cameras I have owned or shot
-Minolta CLE (also Leica CL) - cheap entry into the M mount system
-Leica IIc and IIIf (screw mount variants) - fun compact, can be frustrating having a separate viewfinder and rangefinder
-Leica M3 - beautiful camera that can be expensive or cheap, repairs can be expensive. .91 rangefinder only has lines for 50,90,135
-Leica M6 - had one for a month or so, .72 finder was nice and versatile but it didn't offer anything my m3 didn't.
-Hasselblad x-pan - really neat camera, the panoramic view is great and everything looks like magic with it. I cant justify the price though.
-Zeiss Ikon - best finder - best meter - feels like a Nikon FE

Honorable mention
Rollei 35 - not a rangefinder but interesting little camera. easily pocketable with a great lens (I had the Tessar)

>>2707493
fun to shoot with sometimes, film that isn't made anymore (only made by impossible project) is way too expensive. Find one that uses Fujifilm FP-100C and it's not too bad

File: 11232033_472218902982254_7123273606736586142_o.jpg (311KB, 2048x1152px) Image search: [Google]

311KB, 2048x1152px

Polaroid Cameras!
They are fun and worth it if you do your research.
I stick with B&W 2.0 from the impossible project. Their color film is not quite perfected but they upgraded thier color stocks.
Best results with proper lighting. I wouldn't waste your film indoors.
If you want something super reliable and cheaper gow ith FUJIFILM INSTAX WIDE. Also, lomogrpahy has their version coming out soon

File: Untitled.jpg (353KB, 1027x1258px) Image search: [Google]

353KB, 1027x1258px

Also, don't waste your film at night.
Make sure to clean your rollers or else they will distort your shots.After loading film, don't bother taking cartridge out. Your polaroid will auto eject(and waste your film).

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand

File: cropped.jpg (227KB, 533x800px) Image search: [Google]

227KB, 533x800px

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	NIKON CORPORATION
Camera Model	NIKON D600
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop CS5 Macintosh
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/2.8
Sensing Method	One-Chip Color Area
Color Filter Array Pattern	1034
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	70 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width	6016
Image Height	4016
Number of Bits Per Component	8, 8, 8
Pixel Composition	RGB
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Created	2016:01:21 00:48:28
Exposure Time	1/125 sec
F-Number	f/2.8
Exposure Program	Not Defined
ISO Speed Rating	800
Lens Aperture	f/2.8
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Light Source	Unknown
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	70.00 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	533
Image Height	800
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Auto
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Gain Control	Low Gain Up
Contrast	Normal
Saturation	Normal
Sharpness	Normal
Subject Distance Range	Unknown

File: there.jpg (183KB, 383x501px) Image search: [Google]

183KB, 383x501px

>>2748710

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	NIKON CORPORATION
Camera Model	NIKON D600
Camera Software	GIMP 2.8.10
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/2.8
Sensing Method	One-Chip Color Area
Color Filter Array Pattern	870
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	70 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	300 dpi
Vertical Resolution	300 dpi
Image Created	2016:01:20 19:16:40
Exposure Time	1/125 sec
F-Number	f/2.8
Exposure Program	Not Defined
ISO Speed Rating	800
Lens Aperture	f/2.8
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Light Source	Unknown
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	70.00 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	383
Image Height	501
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Auto
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Gain Control	Low Gain Up
Contrast	Normal
Saturation	Normal
Sharpness	Normal
Subject Distance Range	Unknown

>>2748403
know the matrix effect? freeze in the air? there you go ..

>>2748804
or of course picture-based 3d modelling. or stupid 360° turning product pictures. or panorama shots (turn the cams ofc). or simple picture stitching (arrange frontal).

because he was out taking pictures and marketing himself and you're on an albanian shadow puppet appreciation network

>>2747411
I don't know what that's supposed to mean

But how exactly does someone get so big? There are millions of photographers how can you make something like this an actual career.

jelly

>>2735201
does he use a tilt-shift lens?

>>2735216
No, he did use a 24-70L and a 70-200L.. as far as I can remember.

>>2735201
>remember when this board was COOL AS FUCK
never?

>>2748692
bentax m is the easiest to do.
olympus, canun, konica are over engineered mess.

>>2748701
what about old minolta?

>>2748706
ive done it with an old md lens, wasnt that hard

File: FOTO9716_v1.jpg (385KB, 1000x681px) Image search: [Google]

385KB, 1000x681px

These are all infrared btw. Prepare for occasional white.

>>2747497
isi I'm usually a fan of your stuff, but this is just awful

File: FOTO9714_v1.jpg (416KB, 1000x681px) Image search: [Google]

416KB, 1000x681px

Vignette tbqh familique

File: Girlzine2_2.jpg (217KB, 988x1425px) Image search: [Google]

217KB, 988x1425px

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Canon
Camera Model	9000F
Camera Software	VueScan 9 x64 (9.2.23)
Image-Specific Properties:

File: Girlzine2_3.jpg (301KB, 988x1425px) Image search: [Google]

301KB, 988x1425px

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Canon
Camera Model	9000F
Camera Software	VueScan 9 x64 (9.2.23)
Image-Specific Properties:

File: Girlzine2_4.jpg (261KB, 988x1415px) Image search: [Google]

261KB, 988x1415px

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Canon
Camera Model	9000F
Camera Software	VueScan 9 x64 (9.2.23)
Image-Specific Properties:

Link?

>>2745342

change "people" for "humans". be cheeky.

>>2745347

or huMANSCAPE

>>2748626
The left is pretty obviously a 100% crop in on the image (maybe even more) and the right isn't. Also, assuming its an interchangeable lens camera, lenses have a tremendous effect on the final product. As does light, processing, and the technique of the artist.

despite what /p/ will tell you, a quality image comes from a talented artist, not a more expensive camera with high numbers on a test chart.

>>2748626

Good thing we don't have a thread for stuff like that >>2723069

The ISO was most likely higher on the left picture. ISO controls the sensitivity of your sensor, controlling how it reacts to light. The higher your ISO, the brighter your pictures. ISO 100 won't give you good results in the dark, while ISO 16000 does .. for a price though: noise.
The sensor noise is what you see in your picture, the ISO was simply too high and the sensor couldn't really take it anymore.

>>2748639
>>2748635
Thanks I'll delete the thread

>>2748609
Acting normal, being nice. Smile a little bit.

>>2748609
Shoot with film.

>>2748610
This is all there is to it.