Archived threads in /p/ - Photography - 497. page

>>2758672
Get Premiere Pro, if you want to pay for it - so do it.

>>2758675
Aren't adobe products all subscription based?

Premiere Pro. On the Single App CC plan it will be $16 a month.

>>2758656
no seas un trip fag

also, check the sticky
(and post more pics)

>>2758514
Learn how to use google dumb shit.

>>2758542

>i don't know the answer

>>2758544
Not that guy but I do know the answer.

I want you to Google it though because I think it builds character.

There is.

we fisheye now

https://www.google.com/webhp?sourceid=chrome-instant&ion=1&espv=2&ie=UTF-8#q=focal%20reducer

File: kiev-60-front.jpg (1MB, 1500x1122px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1500x1122px

>>2758398
Notice the mirror lockup button on the right?

>>2758398
You should resell it to collectors. Not to mention that crack on the front... looks like you're going to get some serious light leaks from it unless you don't cover them.

It's a common modification, it doesn't make it worth anything really. Use it if you want, sell it if you don't.

>>2758205
cappadocia perhaps?

File: Screen Shot 2016-02-01 at 4.07.04 AM.png (259KB, 829x689px) Image search: [Google]

259KB, 829x689px

Here's a larger photo. I don't want to include his face because I don't want to embarrass him. However, if you can tell me a way to see if it's photoshopped I can publicly embarrass him on Facebook if you want.

>>2757863
what you're pointing to is a jpeg artifact. Facebook compresses photos when you upload them, meaning you get artifacts like that. There are ways to tell if something is photoshopped, but I'm 99% sure this isn't.

It's the lighting in the picture that gives him the shadow under his jaw. Now fuck off you little jealous prick

File: Screen Shot 2016-02-01 at 4.34.56 AM.png (303KB, 441x656px) Image search: [Google]

303KB, 441x656px

>>2757868
you're right, probably just lighting

>>2757857
come on, man,

this is creepy.

It is for a bobblehead for my girlfriend. She likes the show the office so i figured she'd like a bobblehead like dwight got

>>2757857
Uncanny valley - a phenomenon in which humanoid robots (or bobbleheads) bearing a near-identical resemblance to a human being arouses a sense of unease or revulsion in the person viewing it.

File: frases-de-marilyn-monroe-10.jpg (215KB, 800x1200px) Image search: [Google]

215KB, 800x1200px

classic one

>>2757828

im pretty sure lads with the women smoking fetish enjoy abuse towards them and are literal cücks. women arent supossed to smoke btw.

I will do a exposition about smoking, so I thought that some good photography will make an impression, yeah talking about the tomen don't smoke thing. I tried some google research but in this community you can always get better results.

>>2757660
You sure it's not a press fit on a splined shaft, with that screw to stop it coming off?

>>2757665
Good idea, that would make sense, but I tried lifting it off and carefully prying it up and it doesn't move one bit.

File: DSCF9893_v1.jpg (313KB, 502x1000px) Image search: [Google]

313KB, 502x1000px

>>2757665
Thanks a ton for your comment anon.
Turns out the screw was completely unimportant, but the little fork thingie on the inside of the camera could be pried off the advance shaft, and then it's easy to pull out.

>>2757580
They are very different lenses with very different purposes. Likely, if you actually have needs, one will suit those needs better than the other, and without you telling us about your style, we can't even begin to tell you the things you should realistically already know on your own.

Also,
>the gear thread

>>2757585
Hmmm I'm really keen on taking portraits mainly and street photography. And bokeh. Lots of bokeh.

I'm just scared that the crop factor applied to the 50mm may make it become a tele.

>>2757590
>crop factor applied to the 50mm may make it become a tele.

It does. It would be nice for portraits though. While not fixed rules, many prefer slight tele for portraits and wider than 50mm equivalent for street photography.

The 35mm would be the more versatile of the two, but I personally love a little tele and the 50mm would still be usable if you ever want to go for fool frame.

>>2757432
Damn you didn't actually shoot them. With a gun. I had high expectations of gore on here from a local YMCA massacre...

Second is probably better as the head is level and that hair, but I think the facial expression from the first was more interesting.

General focus on the subject and background bokeh was consistent in both.

Can't say I thought either photos was great given the subject is less than appealing and would be better off taking photos themselves or maybe lose some weight.

>>2757461
Was my terminology inappropriate or unprofessional?
I also think I'm going to go for the second one, I just feel that the closed eye makes the photograph look very armature.

>>2757465
Terminology is not an issue.

For the photos I would say the closed eyes would work well if there is was some appeal to the subject, but this is my opinion.

kill yourself

>>2757133
Buy a Rolleicord with a Schneider lens - budget
Rolleiflex with a Tessar or a Planar - higher end
Any 6x6 folder from ebay vintage camera section with a half decent name and lens such as Zeiss Ikon Voigtlander. Forget Holga - they suck.

Alternatively, consider what exactly you want to do with MF film, what workflow, expectations, goals, subjects, results you want to work with/have photos of/achieve and realise you've listed absurdly differing tools to work with 120 film - a horrid quality point and shoot guesstimate absolutely no control over image acqusition toy, and two absolutely arbitrary flavours of waist-level finder-using TLRs which give you control over image parameters but force you to adapt to a unique method of image framing that has both pros and cons that are hopefully obvious and not necessary to list, given any amount of thought.

This random retard's opinion? Never go holga, get any available brand of TLR with a good, fast lens and a wide aperture and shutter speed range and eschew favouring a brand name over actual photographic flexibility. They're as cheap as a holga on ebay and are actual good cameras.

>>2757080
>What do you use for displaying your prints
>displaying your prints
>your prints
>prints

Where do you think you are?
This is /p/, mothafucker.

>>2756983
lynda.com