How do I take HDR photos with a Canon 5D Mark 2?
No matter what camera you have. HDR is the same process, and you need a software to do it right. Some cameras have been built with HDR rendering, but results are sucks in comparison with what can be done with good software.
http://www.michellhilton.com/2016/06/como-faco-para-tirar-fotos-hdr-com-uma-canon-5d-mark-2.html
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Camera Software PhotoScape Image-Specific Properties: Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 640 Image Height 480
Shill pls go
>>2857965
>tfw my D810 has so much latitude that if you push or pull enough highlights or shadows you get an HDR image from one shot
Feels good when I need it
>>2857981
>tfw my D810 has so much latitude that if you push or pull enough highlights or shadows you get an HDR image from one shot
>Feels good when I need it
eeeiiihh, how tacky
https://www.flickr.com/photos/kylesipple/page1
how is he getting the perfect white balance and toning on every photo? also, does this look like a leica to any of you guys?
>>2856170
>how is he getting the perfect white balance and toning on every photo?
knowing how to use post production techniques to get images to look how he wants?
>>2856173
what
yeah and i'm asking how
clearly you don't know them yourself
>>2856170
> also, does this look like a leica to any of you guys?
she looks more like an Erica or Sandra to me desu
I almost never show my photos to anybody so I'm not sure how bad (or good) I really am; what should I change or whatever.
I guess, it's time.
So I'm looking to expand my collection of art similar what I'll be uploading, and these seemed like the best place to do it. I'll offer up a small dump and then we can discuss etc.
What do you think about it?
I have a lot of good photos.
>(1.69 MB, 5520x4140)
I ain't clicking that shit, nigga.
>>2861355
you probably shot it at f/4 or lower and it blurred out the horse. It would have been much nicer if both subjects were in focus.
>>2861355
>Horse's coat looks like it hasn't been brushed in ages.
>Dog has fleas and a green worm in eye
reported for animal cruelty.
>makes his snapshits the frontpage of 4chan
Seriously, he's got a whole board full of people that post decent photos that he could actually use and rotate through.
>going to the front page in the first place
top plen
>>2860900
this
>>2860898
But he didn't take those pictures, he doesn't post random pictures for the purpose of posting random pictures.
>friend went to Utah for a trip this summer
>she went to Antelope Canyon
>took hella good pictures with her phone
>told me theres a stupidly simple secret technique to geting pictures like it
>all I can find on the internet is about more or less professional rigs and cameras not handsets
Do you guys know what I'm talking about?
Like this. Its one one of hers. I know for a fact that she has no experince with more than her iphone so ISO and exposure shit is beyond her scope.
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 72 dpi Vertical Resolution 72 dpi Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 720 Image Height 960 Scene Capture Type Standard
This one too. I feel like I could dupilcate these images with what I learned in high school but if theres some sort of trick to snaping great pics with a phone I'd like to know it.
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 72 dpi Vertical Resolution 72 dpi Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 960 Image Height 720 Scene Capture Type Standard
>>2860790
Dude that is not a great picture. Setting aside composition (since you're talking about gear), the picture is super soft and doesn't even seem to be focused correctly. There are a thousand better pictures from that same exact spot in antelope canyon.
Can you explain to me why you think that picture is "hella good"? Serious question.
Show me your light trails and stuff.
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make NIKON CORPORATION Camera Model NIKON D3300 Camera Software Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 6.4 (Windows) Maximum Lens Aperture f/5.7 Sensing Method One-Chip Color Area Color Filter Array Pattern 802 Focal Length (35mm Equiv) 82 mm Image-Specific Properties: Horizontal Resolution 240 dpi Vertical Resolution 240 dpi Image Created 2016:05:19 07:58:15 Exposure Time 1 sec F-Number f/5.6 Exposure Program Manual ISO Speed Rating 100 Lens Aperture f/5.6 Exposure Bias 0 EV Metering Mode Pattern Light Source Unknown Flash No Flash Focal Length 55.00 mm Rendering Normal Exposure Mode Manual White Balance Auto Scene Capture Type Standard Gain Control None Contrast Normal Saturation Normal Sharpness Normal Subject Distance Range Unknown
I've been practicing but I've still not got it down pat.
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make NIKON CORPORATION Camera Model NIKON D3300 Camera Software Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 6.4 (Windows) Maximum Lens Aperture f/5.7 Sensing Method One-Chip Color Area Color Filter Array Pattern 802 Focal Length (35mm Equiv) 82 mm Image-Specific Properties: Horizontal Resolution 240 dpi Vertical Resolution 240 dpi Image Created 2016:05:19 07:53:20 Exposure Time 10 sec F-Number f/5.6 Exposure Program Manual ISO Speed Rating 100 Lens Aperture f/5.6 Exposure Bias 0 EV Metering Mode Pattern Light Source Unknown Flash No Flash Focal Length 55.00 mm Rendering Custom Exposure Mode Manual White Balance Auto Scene Capture Type Standard Gain Control None Contrast Normal Saturation Normal Sharpness Normal Subject Distance Range Unknown
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make NIKON CORPORATION Camera Model NIKON D3300 Camera Software Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 6.4 (Windows) Maximum Lens Aperture f/5.7 Sensing Method One-Chip Color Area Color Filter Array Pattern 802 Focal Length (35mm Equiv) 82 mm Image-Specific Properties: Horizontal Resolution 240 dpi Vertical Resolution 240 dpi Image Created 2016:05:04 03:43:53 Exposure Time 0.8 sec F-Number f/5.6 Exposure Program Manual ISO Speed Rating 800 Lens Aperture f/5.6 Exposure Bias 0 EV Metering Mode Pattern Light Source Unknown Flash Flash, Compulsory, Return Detected Focal Length 55.00 mm Rendering Normal Exposure Mode Manual White Balance Auto Scene Capture Type Standard Gain Control Low Gain Up Contrast Normal Saturation Normal Sharpness Normal Subject Distance Range Unknown
Why isn't Sony anywhere near as popular as Nikon or Canon when it comes to non point and shoot cameras?
I've never seen anything bad about them. Got a free Nikon D70 and spent nothing but $15 for a charger. When I scrounge up enough money to buy something better I plan on going with a Sony, possibly a mirror less
JESUS FUCKING CHRIST STOP WITH ALL THIS FUCKING BRAND THREAD FAGGOTRY!
This
>>2860589
>Why isn't Sony anywhere near as popular as Nikon or Canon when it comes to non point and shoot cameras?
Because they didn't start in that market until decades later. Now delete this thread.
no pp, straight outta camera.
went for golden hour but it was blocked by the skycraper jew.
c&c pls
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make Canon Camera Model Canon EOS 1000D Camera Software Adobe Photoshop CS5 Windows Maximum Lens Aperture f/4.0 Image-Specific Properties: Image Width 2592 Image Height 3888 Number of Bits Per Component 8, 8, 8 Pixel Composition RGB Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 240 dpi Vertical Resolution 240 dpi Image Created 2016:06:10 19:45:18 Exposure Time 1/160 sec F-Number f/8.0 Exposure Program Manual ISO Speed Rating 1600 Lens Aperture f/8.0 Exposure Bias 0 EV Subject Distance 19.10 m Metering Mode Center Weighted Average Flash No Flash, Compulsory Focal Length 126.00 mm Color Space Information Uncalibrated Image Width 2592 Image Height 3888 Rendering Normal Exposure Mode Manual White Balance Manual Scene Capture Type Standard
>>2860563
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make Canon Camera Model Canon EOS 1000D Camera Software Adobe Photoshop CS5 Windows Maximum Lens Aperture f/4.0 Image-Specific Properties: Image Width 3888 Image Height 2592 Number of Bits Per Component 8, 8, 8 Pixel Composition RGB Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 240 dpi Vertical Resolution 240 dpi Image Created 2016:06:10 19:45:49 Exposure Time 1/160 sec F-Number f/8.0 Exposure Program Manual ISO Speed Rating 1600 Lens Aperture f/8.0 Exposure Bias 0 EV Subject Distance 7.05 m Metering Mode Center Weighted Average Flash No Flash, Compulsory Focal Length 184.00 mm Color Space Information Uncalibrated Image Width 3888 Image Height 2592 Rendering Normal Exposure Mode Manual White Balance Manual Scene Capture Type Standard
>>2860565
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make Canon Camera Model Canon EOS 1000D Camera Software Adobe Photoshop CS5 Windows Maximum Lens Aperture f/4.0 Image-Specific Properties: Image Width 2592 Image Height 3888 Number of Bits Per Component 8, 8, 8 Pixel Composition RGB Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 240 dpi Vertical Resolution 240 dpi Image Created 2016:06:10 19:44:26 Exposure Time 1/2000 sec F-Number f/4.0 Exposure Program Manual ISO Speed Rating 1600 Lens Aperture f/4.0 Exposure Bias 0 EV Subject Distance 19.10 m Metering Mode Center Weighted Average Flash No Flash, Compulsory Focal Length 70.00 mm Color Space Information Uncalibrated Image Width 2592 Image Height 3888 Rendering Normal Exposure Mode Manual White Balance Manual Scene Capture Type Standard
>>2860568
I like this one, looks like a good painting
In the others however, the ducks are quite centered, giving these a kind-of snapshot (bad) look. Off center, more level photos would have made these much better.
I DO however like your use of framing the photos with leaves, but in the first two they are a little bright, which takes the eye away from the subject(s).
I went hiking near Edinburgh, Scotland a couple of days ago. I'm looking to get better at shooting nature. These are the photos I took, any comments / criticism would be welcome.
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Camera Software Adobe Photoshop CC 2015 (Windows) Maximum Lens Aperture f/3.5 Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 240 dpi Vertical Resolution 240 dpi Image Created 2016:06:10 15:39:52 Exposure Time 1/640 sec F-Number f/3.5 Lens Aperture f/3.5 Brightness 9.8 EV Exposure Bias 0 EV Focal Length 4.30 mm Color Space Information Uncalibrated Image Width 1000 Image Height 750 Rendering Normal Exposure Mode Auto Scene Capture Type Standard
>>2860389
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Camera Software Adobe Photoshop CC 2015 (Windows) Maximum Lens Aperture f/5.6 Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 240 dpi Vertical Resolution 240 dpi Image Created 2016:06:10 15:39:46 Exposure Time 1/320 sec F-Number f/5.6 Lens Aperture f/5.6 Brightness 9.5 EV Exposure Bias 0 EV Focal Length 16.43 mm Color Space Information Uncalibrated Image Width 1000 Image Height 750 Rendering Normal Exposure Mode Auto Scene Capture Type Standard
>>2860390
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Camera Software Adobe Photoshop CC 2015 (Windows) Maximum Lens Aperture f/3.5 Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 240 dpi Vertical Resolution 240 dpi Image Created 2016:06:10 15:39:21 Exposure Time 1/6 sec F-Number f/5.6 Lens Aperture f/5.6 Brightness 3.7 EV Exposure Bias 0 EV Focal Length 4.30 mm Color Space Information Uncalibrated Image Width 1000 Image Height 750 Rendering Normal Exposure Mode Auto Scene Capture Type Standard
Did I fuck up /p/ I just bought the Canon EF 50mm F1.8 II for 70$ Its the older version, the only thing I've seen wrong with it is the five bladed aperture.
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make Canon Camera Model Canon EOS 1000D Camera Software Adobe Photoshop CS5 Windows Maximum Lens Aperture f/5.7 Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 240 dpi Vertical Resolution 240 dpi Image Created 2011:08:10 19:43:04 Exposure Time 1 sec F-Number f/8.0 Exposure Program Manual ISO Speed Rating 100 Lens Aperture f/8.0 Exposure Bias 0 EV Subject Distance 0.52 m Metering Mode Pattern Flash No Flash, Compulsory Focal Length 55.00 mm Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 3093 Image Height 2062 Rendering Normal Exposure Mode Manual White Balance Manual Scene Capture Type Standard
>>2860093
It doesn't matter if you flushed it down the toilet. You can't "fuck up" with $70. Just go take photos.
No
You'll be fine
>>2860096
Not him, but why are Canon 50mm lenses so expensive after being produced since the 1980's and being the most commonly bought lens along with being the kit lens of Canon bundles for years?
Eat my ass mods
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Camera Software Adobe Photoshop CC 2015 (Windows) Image-Specific Properties: Image Width 600 Image Height 589 Number of Bits Per Component 8, 8, 8 Pixel Composition RGB Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 72 dpi Vertical Resolution 72 dpi Image Created 2016:06:01 06:51:52 Color Space Information Uncalibrated Image Width 1000 Image Height 490
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Camera Software Adobe Photoshop CC 2015 (Windows) Image-Specific Properties: Image Width 3437 Image Height 3586 Compression Scheme Uncompressed Pixel Composition Unknown Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 72 dpi Vertical Resolution 72 dpi Image Created 2016:06:01 08:07:05 Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 1000 Image Height 515
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Camera Software Adobe Photoshop CC 2015 (Windows) Image-Specific Properties: Image Width 736 Image Height 735 Number of Bits Per Component 8, 8, 8 Pixel Composition RGB Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 72 dpi Vertical Resolution 72 dpi Image Created 2016:06:01 05:06:52 Color Space Information Uncalibrated Image Width 1000 Image Height 500
>>2860060
This fuckin twat.
Going to several abandoned buildings within a week, anyone got tips or suggestions on this subject of phototherapy?
On mobile sorry for shitty pic, bump
>>2859284
do i have a problem if i think every new thread is a troll thread?
>>2859290
Nah, you're probably only wrong about 14% of the time.
What is the best camera? Forget the price for a bit, if you could choose one body and one lens what would they be and why?
Latest Hasselblad and some top 30-35mm equivalent lens.
Other option - unlimited time on James Webb Space Telescope
>>2859256
Fujifilm X-T1 is the best camera, my lens choice would be the FUJINON XF 16mm f/1.4 R WR lens, why this lens? Because it is optically perfect and 16mm is the PERFECT and only correct choice for shooting architecture.
An X-Pro2 would be an equally perfect choice depending on your shooting style and the subject with any Fujifilm lens because they are all amazing.
>inb4 shill
Yeah, because I would be that fucking autist walking around with a MF camera setup that thinks his images would be better in any way by lugging a brick around.
Contax 645 with the planar 80 f2 and a Phase One iq3 back
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Camera Software Adobe Photoshop CS5 Macintosh Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 72 dpi Vertical Resolution 72 dpi Image Created 2012:09:12 19:37:33 Color Space Information Uncalibrated Image Width 919 Image Height 821