Archived threads in /p/ - Photography - 402. page

File: Screenshot_4.png (355KB, 389x390px) Image search: [Google]

355KB, 389x390px

How do I do this crumpled/faded look in CS5? Pic related.

So I bought a Chaika 2 without a shutter curtain. Guess I can't use it for shooting right? lol

At least it was only 5 bucks and came with a broken Industar 69

>>2844441

>Industar 69

you could probably use that on a MFT camera

>>2857368
Bright light, over exposure, tan girls. Maybe a bit of vibrance added in post.

>>2857368
>How do I get this effect?

Be rich and not fat.

>>2857378
Haha good one!

>>2857371
Yeah I get that it's bright light, but the photographer must have done something with the colors aswell.. and that's what I'm asking about.

File: Scan80.jpg (235KB, 1000x664px) Image search: [Google]

235KB, 1000x664px

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop CC 2015 (Windows)
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width	3532
Image Height	2380
Number of Bits Per Component	8, 8, 8
Compression Scheme	Uncompressed
Pixel Composition	RGB
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	2400 dpi
Vertical Resolution	2400 dpi
Image Data Arrangement	Chunky Format
Image Created	2016:06:06 18:58:57
Color Space Information	Uncalibrated
Image Width	1000
Image Height	664

File: Scan83.jpg (235KB, 670x1000px) Image search: [Google]

235KB, 670x1000px

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop CC 2015 (Windows)
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	2400 dpi
Vertical Resolution	2400 dpi
Image Created	2016:06:06 18:50:57
Color Space Information	Uncalibrated
Image Width	670
Image Height	1000

File: Scan84.jpg (206KB, 1000x671px) Image search: [Google]

206KB, 1000x671px

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop CC 2015 (Windows)
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width	3532
Image Height	2380
Number of Bits Per Component	8, 8, 8
Compression Scheme	Uncompressed
Pixel Composition	RGB
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	2400 dpi
Vertical Resolution	2400 dpi
Image Data Arrangement	Chunky Format
Image Created	2016:06:06 19:09:32
Color Space Information	Uncalibrated
Image Width	1000
Image Height	671

>>2857296
>Most of them just starting out with their Iphones or posting selfies with their DSLR posting about "OMG just became a photographer!" editing them with instagram filters.

You're one of them. Have some self-awareness. Go do something else.

I actually sell camera equipment as well as take photos so when I'm selling I usually use my photos as a demonstration for certain lenses or bodies. Then sometimes I get asked if I could do a photo shoot for that person. Then every so often one person tells another person and before you know it you've got a stream of customers both looking to buy gear and customers looking to have a shoot done. It's especially nice during wedding and graduation season because people will come in to buy a camera for their kid as a gift and end up buying it as well as wanting a senior photo shoot done.

>>2857296
Go meet people. Become a positive part of the community. Produce photos that people remember/like more than the others around them. Have something unique or interesting to say.

>>2857238
I don't follow him but from what I've seen he mainly finances himself through workshops. He manages to fill these because he has a personality that people like and I think because the directness of his photographs is something people want to learn.

From what I've seen art jobs are just super competetive. You need to have a style that people like and you need to be able to sell yourself really well.

>>2857238
If you want people to pay you for your photos, then you have to take photos that the people around you will pay for. That's usually providing a service, like shooting a wedding, engagement, senior photos, birthdays, etc. If you want to make money with your knowledge, you have to take your time to give it to people through workshops or something online.

Nobody is going to pay you for photos of flowers and sticks and strangers' backs on the street, and why would they? What are they going to do with that?

>>2857238
I'm a scientist and I've made peace with the fact I'll never make money from my hobby, it'll remain just that.

>>2857157
>Guttierez
You have to go back, Paco. Save your money because you're going to pay for the wall. Make America Great Again.

>>2857157
You fuck with the split tone sliders and colour temperature. Put some green/blue in the shadows and leave the highlights white should do it

>>2857166
Sorry not a usafag and it's like what 5am there lol

>>2857172
It helped but it's still not quite the same as the video. I might have to experiment more. Thanks

it must be if you found it on the internet

File: 本文無し.jpg (29KB, 365x593px) Image search: [Google]

29KB, 365x593px

So fuji must be a wholesome woman

You forgot to make fun of filmfags and the rich bastards that shoot digital Leicas and Phase Ones.

The first place you go to for tips or pointers is 4chan? You need a lot more help than just that.

Just go out there and shoot.
Don't copy others and develop your own style.

>>2855967
Exposure triangle, diffraction, depth of field
These are the things you have to look up on the internet. Develop your film at a lab and ask for the negatives.

>>2855655
>throw it in the thrash
>buy a non meme camera

>>2855655
It's on the inside btw. I can only see it's broken when I turn it on

>>2855655
And that's why you buy cameras with viewfinder

The problem isn't consumption, the problem is overpopulation.

>>2854786

you need proles to make goods.

>>2854786
What does overpopulation mean?
Maybe that more products need to be produced?
But then again, there is an overabundance of
products.
So, the main problem is even distribution.
Right now, as in all of human history, distribution
of goods is all but uneven. Systemically uneven.
The production unit in pic related is not meant to
serve people equally, it is made to produce profit.

Because they probably don't own it unless they are very rich. You would either rent the camera when you needed it for a shoot or it would belong to the agency/company which you work for and which would provide it to you.

And that lens is a cine lens, it's not for photographers it's for movie studios which rent those lenses from rental companies that stock and maintain all that type of equipment.

And why don't you just shitpost in the gear thread instead of making more threads?

>>2854117
"people" don't buy them. Major studios, agencies, and rental houses buy them and then spend the rest of the gear's lifetime renting them out to artists who will use them.

The fujinon is a cinema lens, so it would be a rental house or a movie studio that would buy a lens like that and make its money back very quickly.

The hasselblad is a top-tier commercial product that will deliver unrivaled images and blows anything you'd produce from your shitty consumer dslr out of the water. It's something you'd use to shoot a 4 million dollar ad campaign, not the senior photos down in Fuxacousin, Alabama.

Use the gear thread you stupid prick

>>2851645

I am using this older version of Tamron 17-50/2.8 and I like it. http://www.photozone.de/canon-eos/289-tamron-af-17-50mm-f28-sp-xr-di-ii-ld-aspherical-if-canon-test-report--review
New version seems to have much worse optical quality.

>>2853813
Either Canon 15-85mm, which is a great lens, or
>Constant aperture very much preferred
Canon 16-35 f4 is/ f2.8
Sigma 18-35 f1.8

File: 20160530-R0015659.jpg (716KB, 1000x750px) Image search: [Google]

716KB, 1000x750px

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	RICOH
Camera Model	GR Digital
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 5.0 (Macintosh)
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/2.3
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	300 dpi
Vertical Resolution	300 dpi
Image Created	2016:06:01 20:13:22
Exposure Time	1/1500 sec
F-Number	f/6.3
Exposure Program	Aperture Priority
ISO Speed Rating	1600
Lens Aperture	f/6.3
Brightness	4.6 EV
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Light Source	Unknown
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	5.90 mm
Exposure Mode	Auto
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Sharpness	Hard

File: 20160530-R0015658.jpg (714KB, 1000x750px) Image search: [Google]

714KB, 1000x750px

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	RICOH
Camera Model	GR Digital
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 5.0 (Macintosh)
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/2.3
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	300 dpi
Vertical Resolution	300 dpi
Image Created	2016:06:01 20:13:21
Exposure Time	1/1700 sec
F-Number	f/6.3
Exposure Program	Aperture Priority
ISO Speed Rating	1600
Lens Aperture	f/6.3
Brightness	4.9 EV
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Light Source	Unknown
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	5.90 mm
Exposure Mode	Auto
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Sharpness	Hard

>>2853599
>>2853600
>>2853601
dude you had that one image that worked with your shitty editing, give it up, you seem retarded

>>2853521
The creator is either completely clueless or a scammer.

>>2853521
I think it's complex, technologically very difficult, and a final product is necessarily less easy to use, and worse quality, than just getting a digital camera. Especially with a lot of "retro styled" digital cameras coming out these days.

Timing the shutter with the sensor, battery life, space constraints, heat dissipation, the necessity to make a different cartridge for different shaped/designed bodies, etc.

>Micro Four Thirds or ASPC

lmaooooooooooooooooooo

File: image.jpg (147KB, 800x640px) Image search: [Google]

147KB, 800x640px

>>2848888
>just posting in the FGT doesn't make you gay, unless you shoot 110

Guess I'm a little bitchboi then. Would really rather have an Auto 110 over this though.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	800
Image Height	640
Scene Capture Type	Standard

File: Canon_110_ED (1).jpg (182KB, 704x340px) Image search: [Google]

182KB, 704x340px

>just posting in the FGT doesn't make you gay, unless you shoot 110

I've had a canon 110ed for months that I picked up mint in box at goodwill and I've been debating whether or not to throw a test roll through it

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Canon
Camera Model	Canon PowerShot G7
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop CS5.1 Windows
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/4.0
Sensing Method	One-Chip Color Area
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width	704
Image Height	340
Number of Bits Per Component	8, 8, 8
Pixel Composition	RGB
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Created	2012:01:12 21:43:40
Exposure Time	1/50 sec
F-Number	f/5.6
Lens Aperture	f/5.6
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Center Weighted Average
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	25.03 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	704
Image Height	340
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Manual
White Balance	Manual
Scene Capture Type	Standard

File: Retro80S120001-8mini.jpg (128KB, 557x800px) Image search: [Google]

128KB, 557x800px

>>2848908
>having to tell your family you were just experimenting
Forget that, assert your masculinity with patrician 6x9.