File: Chris-Gampat-The-Phoblographer-Mint-Camera-InstantFlex-TL70-product-images-4-of-16ISO-4001-100-sec-at-f-4.5.jpg (1MB, 2000x1333px)
1MB, 2000x1333px
InstantFlex TL70 or Leica Sofort?
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make NIKON CORPORATION Camera Model NIKON D500 Camera Software Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 6.6 (Macintosh) Maximum Lens Aperture f/4.0 Sensing Method One-Chip Color Area Color Filter Array Pattern 752 Focal Length (35mm Equiv) 105 mm Image-Specific Properties: Horizontal Resolution 72 dpi Vertical Resolution 72 dpi Image Created 2016:06:13 12:21:38 Exposure Time 1/100 sec F-Number f/4.5 Exposure Program Manual ISO Speed Rating 400 Lens Aperture f/4.5 Exposure Bias 0 EV Metering Mode Pattern Light Source Unknown Flash No Flash Focal Length 70.00 mm Color Space Information sRGB Rendering Normal Exposure Mode Manual White Balance Auto Scene Capture Type Standard Gain Control None Contrast Normal Saturation Normal Sharpness Normal Subject Distance Range Unknown
11 Posts / 3 Images
View this topic
>>
Neither
Automat Magellan
>>
>>3086581
>Automat Magellan
You sure about that? Redpill me.
>>
Just get a fucking Mini 90. The Leica shouldn't even be an option since it has the same exact elements as a Fujifilm.
File: wineStuff.jpg (2MB, 5184x3456px) Image search:
[Google]
2MB, 5184x3456px
I'm not a pro at all. I have not had any training in photography, or art. Tell me what I could be doing better /p/.
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make Canon Camera Model Canon EOS 100D Camera Software Photos 1.5 Maximum Lens Aperture f/7.1 Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 72 dpi Vertical Resolution 72 dpi Image Created 2017:05:25 02:32:55 Exposure Time 1/320 sec F-Number f/22.0 Exposure Program Shutter Priority ISO Speed Rating 800 Lens Aperture f/22.6 Exposure Bias 0 EV Metering Mode Partial Flash No Flash, Compulsory Focal Length 49.00 mm Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 5184 Image Height 3456 Rendering Normal Exposure Mode Auto White Balance Manual Scene Capture Type Standard
11 Posts / 4 Images
View this topic
>>
File: whyDidITakeaPicofaChair.jpg (2MB, 5184x3456px)
2MB, 5184x3456px
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make Canon Camera Model Canon EOS 100D Camera Software Photos 1.5 Maximum Lens Aperture f/7.1 Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 72 dpi Vertical Resolution 72 dpi Image Created 2017:05:21 02:49:37 Exposure Time 1/80 sec F-Number f/6.3 Exposure Program Normal Program ISO Speed Rating 250 Lens Aperture f/6.4 Exposure Bias 0 EV Metering Mode Pattern Flash No Flash, Compulsory Focal Length 55.00 mm Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 5184 Image Height 3456 Rendering Normal Exposure Mode Auto White Balance Auto Scene Capture Type Standard
>>
File: theLightComingDown.jpg (3MB, 5184x3456px)
3MB, 5184x3456px
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make Canon Camera Model Canon EOS 100D Camera Software Photos 1.5 Maximum Lens Aperture f/3.4 Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 72 dpi Vertical Resolution 72 dpi Image Created 2017:05:25 01:54:45 Exposure Time 1/320 sec F-Number f/20.0 Exposure Program Shutter Priority ISO Speed Rating 100 Lens Aperture f/19.9 Exposure Bias 0 EV Metering Mode Partial Flash No Flash, Compulsory Focal Length 18.00 mm Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 5184 Image Height 3456 Rendering Normal Exposure Mode Auto White Balance Manual Scene Capture Type Standard
>>
>>3086429
Start off by learning how to properly expose and focus your images. That's half the battle.
File: 03-Sebastião-Salgado.jpg (58KB, 700x485px) Image search:
[Google]
58KB, 700x485px
Question, /p/.
I have been a digital photographer since 2010 and this week I decided to shoot film. However, my budget is not very broad, so I wanted to ask you: what is a good film yet not expensive camera that can give you something similar to that Leica black and white look. Or is that something you work in post editing?
Also, best first film camera gear thread.
Pic related.
16 Posts / 2 Images
View this topic
>>
>>3086371
What aspects of the "Leica look" are you looking for? Lenses that aren't Leica lenses won't have Leica rendering, but you can get nice black and white rendering with a lot of different lenses. And yeah, a lot of what you see in that photo is darkroom processing.
Look at Canon and Nikon SLRs from the 70s and get a 50mm f/1.8. Canon AE-1, A-1, F-1, Nikon FM, FM2, FM2n, FE, FE2. Or get a Nikon N80/F80 or Canon EOS 5 if you want something that handles like a DSLR.
Or for something more Leica-like in operation, get a Canon P and a Canon 50mm f/1.8.
>>
AEmeme-1
Any nikon F, FM, FE
Leica M
Contax with Zeiss® lenses
Tri-x, fp4, HP5 + rodinal.
Sebastião Salgado is a meme sponsored by commies. Anybody having acess to the guys processing and printing his shit would make good pictures. Also, there's not something as "leica look".
>>
>>3086380
>meme
This word really doesn't mean anything anymore.
ITT photos we took that we like but don't know why.
Also, dat high speed sync.
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make NIKON CORPORATION Camera Model NIKON D810 Camera Software Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 6.10 (Windows) Maximum Lens Aperture f/2.8 Sensing Method One-Chip Color Area Color Filter Array Pattern 850 Focal Length (35mm Equiv) 24 mm Image-Specific Properties: Horizontal Resolution 300 dpi Vertical Resolution 300 dpi Image Created 2017:05:30 16:10:17 Exposure Time 1/8000 sec F-Number f/3.5 Exposure Program Manual ISO Speed Rating 80 Lens Aperture f/3.5 Exposure Bias 0 EV Metering Mode Spot Light Source Unknown Flash Flash, Compulsory, Return Not Detected Focal Length 24.00 mm Color Space Information sRGB Rendering Normal Exposure Mode Manual White Balance Auto Scene Capture Type Standard Gain Control None Contrast Normal Saturation Normal Sharpness Normal Subject Distance Range Unknown
14 Posts / 4 Images
View this topic
>>
>being an annoying assistant and taking photos when your main photography expects you to actually do work
Disgraceful
>>
>>3086269
Bitch, I am the main photographer. That guy is black was a videographer.
>>
>>3086715
aww. that's sweet.
File: IMG_0634.jpg (119KB, 750x938px)
119KB, 750x938px
A lot of people talk about bokeh on here. Sometimes I think the bokeh in a photo is good only to read somebody saying it's bad. Does a portrait always need bokeh? How does this shot look?
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Image-Specific Properties: Comment Screenshot Image Width 750 Image Height 938
29 Posts / 2 Images
View this topic
>>
>>3086132
Bokeh refers to the quality of the blur rather than the quantity. In almost all cases you want the out of focus areas to have smooth roll-off and for the highlights to be perfectly smooth and round at any aperture, so having good bokeh is really a requirement rather than a necessity, unless it's something like a 24mm f/4 lens that will never see an OoF area in its entire life.
When referring to the amount of blur, that's something that's up to taste and the needs of the image. In the pic you posted the lens is clearly stopped down to fit more of the model into the DoF, but the character of the OoF areas is also pleasant, so by definition I'd say this is "good bokeh"
Having good bokeh is also as much about picking a good background and the distance of the various elements within it. Some lenses that look very smooth with objects close-up and far away may have less pleasant bokeh at mid-distances, where the blur is not yet large enough to hide potential issues that it may have.
>>
>>3086145
>a 24mm f/4 lens that will never see an OoF area in its entire life
you are stupid. then it wouldn't need a focus at all. place object to minimal focus distance, background >= hyperfocal point, put object in focus, enjoy your bokeh.
>>
File: IMG_0637.jpg (120KB, 750x498px) Image search:
[Google]
120KB, 750x498px
>>3086145
Thanks for the critique. How about this shot? It wasn't as blurred in the background as I wanted it to be, but is it still "decent"?
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Image-Specific Properties: Comment Screenshot Image Width 750 Image Height 498
File: YN-565EXN.jpg (69KB, 900x650px) Image search:
[Google]
69KB, 900x650px
My flash (picrelated) fell into the floor and broke so I need a new one.
I need ir and full articulations. Must be €77 or cheaper. Must be more resistant
11 Posts / 1 Images
View this topic
>>
>>3086060
Just don't drop your shit, you butter arsed faggot.
>>
>>3086060
Why would you let it fall on the floor, you retarded gorilla?
>>
>>3086062
I have no clue whether I should turn the knob clockwise or anticlockwise
Anonymous
BS marketing catchphrases 2017-05-30 06:59:32 Post No.3085990
[Report] Image search: [Google]
BS marketing catchphrases 2017-05-30 06:59:32 Post No.3085990
[Report] Image search: [Google]
File: NO_FILE_GIVEN (0B, 0x0pxpx) Image search:
[Google]
0B, 0x0pxpx
>built like a tank
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Image-Specific Properties: Horizontal Resolution 72 dpi Vertical Resolution 72 dpi Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 306 Image Height 306 Scene Capture Type Standard
31 Posts / 12 Images
View this topic
>>
>>3085990
I've never seen that in actual marketing. I have heard it a million times from fanboys though. That would make a better thread: Stupid shit fanboys say.
>>
File: ca7be54cc51ed5b570622f4e9ba3c652.jpg (53KB, 553x586px) Image search:
[Google]
53KB, 553x586px
>sony
>>
File: 1471713690299.png (639KB, 573x683px) Image search:
[Google]
639KB, 573x683px
>film simulation
Can someone explain how DSLR scans work with film?
Looking at tutorials you backlight the film, get a macro lens and just take a photo, probably just my lack of much/any understanding but wouldn't this fuck with the film? I'd guess it would still be sensitive to light so having it out and lit to take photos would ruin it? I know there's a way to process film, but how would you do this at home? I don't have the space to set up chemicals or a dark room, and to make it I might as well buy a flatbed scanner.
Total newfag to film, only ever shot digi, please don't rape
Ta
12 Posts / 4 Images
View this topic
>>
Film stops being sensitive to light after being developed, so after that you can expose it to light all you want
Look into how film development works/what it does
>>
Yeah film is developed in a darkroom. Until developed any light will ruin the exposed part.
What it almost sounds like you are talking about is using a dslr as a scanner for negatives.
>>
>>3085654
With dslr scanning, you just shoot your film then unwind ot from the canister and take a macro photo of it, very easy, very cheap.
I used to frequent this place a lot back around 2013-2014 when I was really learning how to take photos for the first time but I haven't been around much since.
Maybe you guys still give good critiques.
Here's some stuff
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Camera Software Adobe Photoshop CC 2017 (Windows) Image-Specific Properties: Image Width 4437 Image Height 2762 Number of Bits Per Component 16, 16, 16 Compression Scheme Uncompressed Pixel Composition RGB Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 3200 dpi Vertical Resolution 3200 dpi Image Data Arrangement Chunky Format Image Created 2017:05:28 11:46:43 Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 1000 Image Height 622
23 Posts / 13 Images
View this topic
>>
File: stripes.jpg (713KB, 1000x1619px) Image search:
[Google]
713KB, 1000x1619px
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Camera Software Adobe Photoshop CS6 (Windows) Image-Specific Properties: Image Width 2055 Image Height 3328 Number of Bits Per Component 16, 16, 16 Compression Scheme Uncompressed Pixel Composition RGB Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 2400 dpi Vertical Resolution 2400 dpi Image Data Arrangement Chunky Format Image Created 2017:03:30 11:36:46 Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 1000 Image Height 1619
>>
>>3084788
Which film ?
>>
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Camera Software Adobe Photoshop CC 2017 (Windows) Image-Specific Properties: Image Width 3328 Image Height 2095 Number of Bits Per Component 16, 16, 16 Compression Scheme Uncompressed Pixel Composition RGB Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 2400 dpi Vertical Resolution 2400 dpi Image Data Arrangement Chunky Format Image Created 2017:05:28 11:50:40 Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 1000 Image Height 630
JohnLOL (ID: !!cKt8bKm1c6H)
Have /p/ edit one of your RAWS 2017-05-28 04:39:19 Post No.3084532
[Report] Image search: [Google]
Have /p/ edit one of your RAWS 2017-05-28 04:39:19 Post No.3084532
[Report] Image search: [Google]
File: 34127052283_b92c0e092e_k.jpg (2MB, 2048x1363px) Image search:
[Google]
2MB, 2048x1363px
Have /p/ edit one of your RAWS
JohnLOL (ID: !!cKt8bKm1c6H)
2017-05-28 04:39:19
Post No. 3084532
[Report]
[View this topic]
Does anyone want to try a thread where we post up a RAW file and see how other users would process it?
I think it might be fun. I'll start.
Link to RAW file:
https://drive.google.com/open?id=0B_OSvfb_VsopcjI0bHBDb3JJanc
93 Posts / 47 Images
View this topic
>>
>>3084532
do u know me from the way i post
>>
File: rawedit-7004221.jpg (642KB, 1000x665px) Image search:
[Google]
642KB, 1000x665px
I'm drunk, so don't mind too much my edit
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make NIKON CORPORATION Camera Model NIKON D700 Camera Software Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 6.0 (Macintosh) Photographer John Lemieux Maximum Lens Aperture f/2.8 Sensing Method One-Chip Color Area Color Filter Array Pattern 832 Focal Length (35mm Equiv) 35 mm Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 300 dpi Vertical Resolution 300 dpi Image Created 2017:05:28 02:40:39 Exposure Time 30 sec F-Number f/6.3 Exposure Program Manual ISO Speed Rating 200 Lens Aperture f/6.3 Exposure Bias 0 EV Metering Mode Pattern Light Source Fine Weather Flash No Flash Focal Length 35.00 mm Comment John Lemieux (c)2016 Rendering Normal Exposure Mode Manual White Balance Manual Scene Capture Type Standard Gain Control None Contrast Normal Saturation Normal Sharpness Normal Subject Distance Range Unknown
>>
File: nikonlensclock3.jpg (42KB, 550x472px) Image search:
[Google]
42KB, 550x472px
I have a D3400 and looking to get a new set of lenses.
Looking long term, I want to buy glass that I could use with future camera upgrades (going Full Frame at some point), so the lenses also have to be FX compatible (if possible)
So, with that in mind:
What lenses could I get for the D3400 that could allow me to shoot:
1- Micro
2- Landscapes
3- Portraits
4- Street Photo
12 Posts / 1 Images
View this topic
>>
>>3084353
>asking for a lens to be everything
pick one that you will be using it the most and ask again
>>
>>3084376
Portraits
>>
>>3084353
1 - a macro lens
2 - a landscape lens, UWA-wide zoom and a 70-200
3 - a portrait lens, 70-200 can be used
4 - a street photo prime, wide, 28-35 equivalent, has hyperfocal markings.
File: 2017-0525-_DGL0011-crop.jpg (169KB, 1280x852px) Image search:
[Google]
169KB, 1280x852px
Sony A9: Pattern/Banding Noise at ISO 100
https://diglloyd.com/blog/2017/20170525_2056-Sony_A9-PatternNoise-at-ISO100.html
wew lad
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Image-Specific Properties:
38 Posts / 3 Images
View this topic
>>
>digital hacks
>>
>>3084096
>brand new camera gets released
>universally praised
>someone makes an article about a fatal flaw
>find out more by buying our article!
>no one else can reproduce
Yea, not suspicious at all.
>>
>>3084111
>universally praised
by Sony, their shills and splogs that depend on sales commissions.
File: pentacks16.png (1MB, 1104x900px) Image search:
[Google]
1MB, 1104x900px
Last Thread: >>3080724
Anything about lenses, cameras, mounts, systems, buying, pricing, selling, etc. GOES IN HERE!
Do not open new threads for gear-related issues.
No pointless (brand) arguments and dick waving allowed! You have been warned! Just questions, answers, and advice.
And don't forget, be polite.
309 Posts / 29 Images
View this topic
>>
First for A6000 is for faggots.
>>
File: 14714636185053.gif (1MB, 320x240px)
1MB, 320x240px
>>3083362
>>
File: IMG_6450.jpg (24KB, 470x313px)
24KB, 470x313px
When building up your portfolio, is it more important to have an attractive models in your photos and good lighting equipment than a good lens and camera? I'm thinking of upgrading my current gear since I want to become a pro photographer. However, should I just invest in paying and shooting attractive models and buying lighting equipment as compared to buying a better camera and lens?
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Image-Specific Properties: Horizontal Resolution 72 dpi Vertical Resolution 72 dpi Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 470 Image Height 313 Scene Capture Type Standard
15 Posts / 3 Images
View this topic
>>
>>3082626
your portfolio should have good photos. gear doesn't matter.
>>
>>3082626
If you're trying to get work with other models, you want your best photos in there because you want them to feel confident in your ability to make them look as pretty or even more pretty. No model is going to ask you wtf you shoot.
Just as long as it's not an iphone or a sony they won't question you.
>>
>>3082629
With good photos it is more important to have attractive models even though the composition and lighting is sub par as compared to photos with normal looking people but with good composition and lighting?
File: P5180014.jpg (777KB, 750x1000px)
777KB, 750x1000px
>>3070774
Last one is about to kick the bucket.
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make OLYMPUS IMAGING CORP. Camera Model E-M5 Camera Software Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 6.10 (Macintosh) Maximum Lens Aperture f/1.7 Color Filter Array Pattern 804 Focal Length (35mm Equiv) 30 mm Image-Specific Properties: Horizontal Resolution 240 dpi Vertical Resolution 240 dpi Image Created 2017:05:18 22:50:00 Exposure Time 1/320 sec F-Number f/4.5 Exposure Program Aperture Priority ISO Speed Rating 200 Lens Aperture f/4.5 Exposure Bias -0.3 EV Metering Mode Pattern Light Source Unknown Flash No Flash, Compulsory Focal Length 15.00 mm Color Space Information sRGB Rendering Normal Exposure Mode Manual White Balance Auto Scene Capture Type Standard Gain Control None Contrast Normal Saturation Normal Sharpness Normal
247 Posts / 151 Images
View this topic
>>
File: P5180026.jpg (744KB, 750x1000px)
744KB, 750x1000px
This and the previous one were taken in Amsterdam today.
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make OLYMPUS IMAGING CORP. Camera Model E-M5 Camera Software Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 6.10 (Macintosh) Maximum Lens Aperture f/1.7 Color Filter Array Pattern 804 Focal Length (35mm Equiv) 30 mm Image-Specific Properties: Horizontal Resolution 240 dpi Vertical Resolution 240 dpi Image Created 2017:05:18 22:50:05 Exposure Time 1/125 sec F-Number f/4.5 Exposure Program Aperture Priority ISO Speed Rating 200 Lens Aperture f/4.5 Exposure Bias -0.3 EV Metering Mode Pattern Light Source Unknown Flash No Flash, Compulsory Focal Length 15.00 mm Color Space Information sRGB Rendering Normal Exposure Mode Manual White Balance Auto Scene Capture Type Standard Gain Control None Contrast Normal Saturation Normal Sharpness Normal
>>
File: 20170518-DSC_6342.jpg (916KB, 960x1200px) Image search:
[Google]
916KB, 960x1200px
>lost the plate for my tripod
>try to shoot long exposures handheld
This is the only shot that really turned out, but I'm pretty happy with it.
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make NIKON CORPORATION Camera Model NIKON D750 Camera Software Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 4.4 (Macintosh) Maximum Lens Aperture f/4.0 Sensing Method One-Chip Color Area Color Filter Array Pattern 728 Focal Length (35mm Equiv) 24 mm Image-Specific Properties: Horizontal Resolution 300 dpi Vertical Resolution 300 dpi Image Created 2017:05:18 16:34:42 Exposure Time 1 sec F-Number f/14.0 Exposure Program Manual Lens Aperture f/14.0 Exposure Bias 0 EV Metering Mode Spot Light Source Unknown Flash No Flash, Compulsory Focal Length 24.00 mm Rendering Normal Exposure Mode Manual White Balance Manual Scene Capture Type Landscape Gain Control None Contrast Normal Saturation Normal Sharpness Normal Subject Distance Range Unknown
>>
File: EDIT-HP5.jpg (212KB, 369x1000px) Image search:
[Google]
212KB, 369x1000px
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Image-Specific Properties: Horizontal Resolution 300 dpi Vertical Resolution 300 dpi