File: IMG_1686.jpg (90KB, 750x750px) Image search:
[Google]
90KB, 750x750px
YLYL - Photography Edition
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Image-Specific Properties: Comment Screenshot Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 750 Image Height 750
201 Posts / 77 Images
View this topic
>>
>>3078284
Lost already
>>
>>3078284
Lost
>>
>>3078284
should have bought a sony
File: IMG_6115.jpg (136KB, 640x785px) Image search:
[Google]
136KB, 640x785px
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Image-Specific Properties: Comment Screenshot Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 640 Image Height 785
14 Posts / 2 Images
View this topic
>>
File: IMG_6116.jpg (94KB, 640x775px) Image search:
[Google]
94KB, 640x775px
Blows my mind
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Image-Specific Properties: Comment Screenshot Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 640 Image Height 775
>>
with light probalby
>>
>>3089656
two large soft strobes and a reflector to fill in the front
also dodge and burn for hours till everything is even and silky smooth
File: 18839184_1411239882248166_2556288763147573544_n.jpg (78KB, 960x841px) Image search:
[Google]
78KB, 960x841px
Someone posted this pic as an example of great composition. Could somebody explain why?
The shapes and contrast don't really lead my eye through the scene and I can't make out any interesting geometric shapes, leading lines, whatever. Just looks like a plain old B&W picture with a dutch angle to me.
What am I missing here?
11 Posts / 4 Images
View this topic
>>
File: 18839209_1698804333467674_1336792745697820295_n.jpg (92KB, 960x691px) Image search:
[Google]
92KB, 960x691px
FUCK, attached wrong pic.
>>
>>3089603
I prefer the first pic, OP.
>>
File: fb6917_6122541.jpg (215KB, 1400x788px) Image search:
[Google]
215KB, 1400x788px
Anonymous
First Generation Digital Photography Nostalgia 2017-06-01 06:24:31 Post No.3087453
[Report] Image search: [Google]
First Generation Digital Photography Nostalgia 2017-06-01 06:24:31 Post No.3087453
[Report] Image search: [Google]
File: E28_drift_car,_Norfolk_Arena.jpg (1MB, 2000x1312px) Image search:
[Google]
1MB, 2000x1312px
First Generation Digital Photography Nostalgia
Anonymous
2017-06-01 06:24:31
Post No. 3087453
[Report]
[View this topic]
Will it ever be a thing? Will old DSLRs ever become collectors items for reasons beyond novelty?
Pic related, shot with a Nikon D1. Can you detect anything special about this photograph?
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make NIKON CORPORATION Camera Model NIKON D1 Camera Software GIMP 2.6.11 Maximum Lens Aperture f/5.3 Sensing Method One-Chip Color Area Color Filter Array Pattern 131072 Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 72 dpi Vertical Resolution 72 dpi Image Created 2012:08:24 18:57:24 Exposure Time 1/320 sec F-Number f/9.5 Exposure Program Normal Program Exposure Bias 0 EV Metering Mode Pattern Focal Length 160.00 mm Color Space Information sRGB ISO Speed Used 200 Image Quality LOR White Balance .7M Lens Type Unknown Lens Range 979941.9 - 0.0 mm; f/0.2 - f/0 Auto Focus Right Shooting/Bracketing Mode Continuous/Off
15 Posts / 2 Images
View this topic
>>
as soon as stuff stops being commonly used nostalgiafags will come out
keep an eye out for threads about CCD sensors like the Epson RD-1
>>
File: 19988780171_c498cbee42_o.jpg (122KB, 432x650px) Image search:
[Google]
122KB, 432x650px
No, there's no discernable difference to me. Pic related, 2006 on a D70s
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make NIKON CORPORATION Camera Model NIKON D70s Camera Software Adobe Photoshop CS Windows Maximum Lens Aperture f/1.0 Sensing Method One-Chip Color Area Color Filter Array Pattern 822 Focal Length (35mm Equiv) 0 mm Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 72 dpi Vertical Resolution 72 dpi Image Created 2006:11:23 15:22:21 Exposure Time 1/800 sec F-Number f/0.0 Exposure Program Manual Exposure Bias 0 EV Metering Mode Center Weighted Average Light Source Flash Flash No Flash Focal Length 0.00 mm Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 432 Image Height 650 Rendering Normal Exposure Mode Manual White Balance Manual Scene Capture Type Standard Gain Control None Contrast Normal Saturation Normal Sharpness Normal Subject Distance Range Unknown
>>
>>3087453
>those M5 rims on a dirt track beater
Where is your god now?
File: 1k-June_01_2017.jpg (632KB, 1000x1000px) Image search:
[Google]
632KB, 1000x1000px
Let's have a /p/ cringe thread.
34 Posts / 9 Images
View this topic
>>
File: article12043_0.jpg (28KB, 575x394px) Image search:
[Google]
28KB, 575x394px
>it's not soft, it's just the "Leica Glow™!"
>>
The xpan is a shit camera that does almost nothing that modern digital can do other than taking 135 film, prove me wrong.
:3c
>>
• 20 Frames per second
* Unlimited buffer
* Self-immolating
File: The_6D_Mark_II_Will_Be_Canon_s_First_Full_Frame_DSLR_with_an_Articulating_LCD_-_2017-05-29_19.00.35.png (300KB, 832x829px) Image search:
[Google]
300KB, 832x829px
How will Canons competition compete against such innovations?
65 Posts / 6 Images
View this topic
>>
by offering better products but worse gestalt and still getting blown the fuck out in sales volume and professional use.
>>
>>3085497
I remember when photographers thought articulating LCD was such an amateur feature that didn't belong on professional-tier cameras
>>
>>3085497
It's impressing how the body is EXACTLY the same as the mark1, except for this abortion of articulated screen.
Fuck, I'm unhyped about it. Gotta give my mony on sony instead.
File: maxresdefault.jpg (96KB, 1280x720px) Image search:
[Google]
96KB, 1280x720px
https://youtu.be/xxGl9Tl6Sao
Can we skip the "Sony sucks" and dive into the technical aspect of this. I really want to understand this. Why is this still happening? Generation after generation and they can't fix this problem? Why? Why doesn't any other brand have this issue? Why won't Sony ever take steps to truly fix it? So far all they've done is updates to increase max temp rating, but that just leads to a camera that gets too hot to hold in your hands. Couldn't a simple change to the body composition fix this? Or even a small surface area increase. I don't get it.
101 Posts / 19 Images
View this topic
>>
other than including tiny ass micro fans, sony could simply have better air flow by either opening up gaps or making the body larger, OR make more efficient firmware for processors and/or sensors, whichever is heating up as their on-time is ridiculous.
idk why and how they can't fix a simple design flaw being a huge company.
>>
>>3084657
i think they should buy panasonic processors instead of qualcomm housefire.
>>
>>3084657
buy a white or silver camera, goy.
File: AM6A8770web.jpg (1MB, 922x1382px) Image search:
[Google]
1MB, 922x1382px
What is something you wish you were told as a starting photographer? Is there something you regret?
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make Canon Camera Model Canon EOS 5D Mark III Camera Software Adobe Photoshop CC 2015 (Macintosh) Maximum Lens Aperture f/1.4 Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 72 dpi Vertical Resolution 72 dpi Image Created 2016:05:14 17:35:11 Exposure Time 1/125 sec F-Number f/2.8 Exposure Program Manual ISO Speed Rating 160 Lens Aperture f/2.8 Exposure Bias 0 EV Metering Mode Spot Flash No Flash, Compulsory Focal Length 50.00 mm Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 922 Image Height 1382 Rendering Normal Exposure Mode Manual White Balance Auto Scene Capture Type Standard
41 Posts / 4 Images
View this topic
>>
>>3082848
the vast majority of art models are glorified prostitutes
>>
no, everything has gone according to plan and i cant imagine missing any step, whether i liked it or not.
>>
Start networking early on. It's more important than your gear.
File: ced4d3ab18f980dec954c54977d28ac4_original.jpg (42KB, 680x378px) Image search:
[Google]
42KB, 680x378px
What does /p/ think of this thing? Just a gimmick or something you'd actually use?
https://www.kickstarter.com/projects/2092430307/arsenal-the-intelligent-camera-assistant-0/description
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Image-Specific Properties: Horizontal Resolution 72 dpi Vertical Resolution 72 dpi Image Width 680 Image Height 378
17 Posts / 1 Images
View this topic
>>
>>3088623
Landscapefags ruin everything
>>
looks interesting
>>
>>3088649
what's being ruined? just don't buy it if you don't want one
File: napoli_intro.jpg (380KB, 1500x986px) Image search:
[Google]
380KB, 1500x986px
Hi /p/, it's been a long time.
I'm dumping a series of shots I've taken during my last trip, feel free to comment if you care enough.
I also have 7 rolls to develop and eventually scan from this short vacation, but given how slow I am I don't know when they see the light. Hf
30 Posts / 20 Images
View this topic
>>
File: napoli-station-crowd-south.jpg (315KB, 1500x994px) Image search:
[Google]
315KB, 1500x994px
>>
File: napoli-station-crowd-north.jpg (193KB, 1500x994px) Image search:
[Google]
193KB, 1500x994px
>>
File: napoli-subway-nun.jpg (366KB, 1500x994px) Image search:
[Google]
366KB, 1500x994px
File: pentacks43.jpg (29KB, 480x480px) Image search:
[Google]
29KB, 480x480px
Last Thread: >>3083360
Anything about lenses, cameras, mounts, systems, buying, pricing, selling, etc. GOES IN HERE!
Do not open new threads for gear-related issues.
No pointless (brand) arguments and dick waving allowed! You have been warned! Just questions, answers, and advice.
And don't forget, be polite.
321 Posts / 57 Images
View this topic
>>
File: DSC01938-02.jpg (364KB, 1616x1080px) Image search:
[Google]
364KB, 1616x1080px
First for What you shoot with is irrelevant
And there is literally no point to this thread
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make SONY Camera Model NEX-5R Camera Software Snapseed 2.0 Maximum Lens Aperture f/1.0 Focal Length (35mm Equiv) 0 mm Image-Specific Properties: Horizontal Resolution 350 dpi Vertical Resolution 350 dpi Image Created 2017:05:31 00:06:24 Exposure Time 1/400 sec F-Number f/0.0 Exposure Program Aperture Priority ISO Speed Rating 100 Brightness 3.5 EV Exposure Bias 0 EV Metering Mode Pattern Light Source Unknown Flash No Flash, Compulsory Focal Length 0.00 mm Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 1616 Image Height 1080 Rendering Normal Exposure Mode Auto White Balance Auto Scene Capture Type Standard Contrast Normal Saturation Normal Sharpness Normal
>>
File: Screenshot_20170531-053240.png (265KB, 1280x720px) Image search:
[Google]
265KB, 1280x720px
Which one /p/? Pretty much all the same price. Use case would be holidays, hiking and trading photos of Paris (where I live).
>>
>>3086638
How much should I pay for a 645 film camera?
Is the mamiya a good option for 450 bucks with lenses and acessories?
Anonymous
New thread for people trying to get better at shooting people? 2017-05-30 05:44:13 Post No.3085955
[Report] Image search: [Google]
New thread for people trying to get better at shooting people? 2017-05-30 05:44:13 Post No.3085955
[Report] Image search: [Google]
File: IMG_4940.jpg (1MB, 4096x2723px) Image search:
[Google]
1MB, 4096x2723px
New thread for people trying to get better at shooting people?
Anonymous
2017-05-30 05:44:13
Post No. 3085955
[Report]
[View this topic]
Ive never been good at getting good shots of people, and I want to improve. I feel like I lower people's self esteem with my crappy shots of people making people look ugly, when they're expecting good self portraits of their self espicially when they're being tooken with a camera that looks expensive to the person being shot. I've never been a people person so that might contribute to my lack of inexperience. Please give honest feedback.
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make NIKON CORPORATION Camera Model NIKON D700 Camera Software Maximum Lens Aperture f/1.4 Sensing Method One-Chip Color Area Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 72 dpi Vertical Resolution 72 dpi Image Created 2017:02:21 16:52:57 Exposure Time 1/500 sec F-Number f/9.0 Exposure Program Manual ISO Speed Rating 400 Exposure Bias 0 EV Metering Mode Pattern Light Source Unknown Flash No Flash Focal Length 50.00 mm Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 4256 Image Height 2832 Scene Capture Type Standard
30 Posts / 4 Images
View this topic
>>
>>3085955
First thing you should do is just to keep shooting, and to look at lots of portraits and analyze them to see what you like about them. Take a number of frames one after the other when you're shooting a portrait, but do it quickly enough that the subject doesn't get bored. Then pick the one that looks best and try to figure out why you like it.
In this photo, I probably would have had her step a couple of steps to camera left so that she was centered in the frame, but the stream was still visible. The photo is unbalanced with her way over to the side.
On overcast days, the light tends to fall straight down on people and shadows tend to hang around their features, which isn't flattering. You can use a reflector to bounce light from below and minimize this, or have them lift their chin so their face is more evenly lit, or find some naturally reflective body in the area to use.
>>
File: Untitled-3.jpg (131KB, 1338x890px) Image search:
[Google]
131KB, 1338x890px
>>
>>3085965
Thanks a lot man. I'll really take your advice into affect next time I shoot. I'll be able to shoot people more confidently now.
File: 33885252524_447592a5a2_o.jpg (3MB, 4592x2576px) Image search:
[Google]
3MB, 4592x2576px
I really wanted to get into photography, but my budget wasn't very high. I bought a sony a350 from craigslist, and have been using it the past few months but have begun to feel self conscious. I feel like I'm shooting on some outdated piece of shit that is ultimately going to waste my time. I understand high megapixels are really only important when printing but I still feel like shooting on a ten year old camera just isn't right.
tl;dr can decent photos be taken with an old dslr and why should I/when should I invest in a better camera?
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make SONY Camera Model DSLR-A350 Camera Software Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 6.0 (Windows) Maximum Lens Aperture f/1.8 Focal Length (35mm Equiv) 75 mm Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 240 dpi Vertical Resolution 240 dpi Image Created 2017:05:14 18:43:51 Exposure Time 1/30 sec F-Number f/2.0 Exposure Program Normal Program ISO Speed Rating 1600 Lens Aperture f/2.0 Brightness -1.9 EV Exposure Bias 0 EV Metering Mode Pattern Light Source Unknown Flash No Flash, Compulsory Focal Length 50.00 mm Color Space Information sRGB Rendering Normal Exposure Mode Auto White Balance Auto Scene Capture Type Standard Contrast Normal Saturation Normal Sharpness Normal
25 Posts / 5 Images
View this topic
>>
Yes decent shots can be taken, at one point old DSLRs were The Thing to get. A tool is only as useful as you can make it in your hands. Get a new DSLR when you have mastered your current. I was on a Kodak Point and Shoot for YEARS man, 5 megapixels, but I still tried to get the best I could with the tools I had.
>>
>>3084622
Just curious why were they the thing to get? I understand old film cameras but why outdated DSLRs?
>>
>>3084600
Don't shoot at 1600iso if possible
megapixels aren't that important, just get some good sharp lenses, probably a few old primes, and go to town with the basics
File: 052117_8092_stacked.jpg (257KB, 600x900px) Image search:
[Google]
257KB, 600x900px
Hey, NatureGuy here, book will be late. I had a lot of stuff come up in personal life that has trashed my time to work on stuff, including photos. Work will be over the school year next week and the show I've been prepping for since Febuary will be done the week after so I'll have plenty of time to finish it up by mid-June.
Shit sux, sorry.
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make Canon Camera Model Canon EOS 5DS Camera Software Adobe Photoshop CC 2015.5 (Macintosh) Photographer www.reagandpufall.com Maximum Lens Aperture f/2.8 Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 72 dpi Vertical Resolution 72 dpi Image Created 2017:05:21 15:21:53 Exposure Time 1/125 sec F-Number f/8.0 Exposure Program Manual ISO Speed Rating 100 Lens Aperture f/8.0 Exposure Bias 0 EV Metering Mode Pattern Flash No Flash, Compulsory Focal Length 100.00 mm Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 600 Image Height 900 Rendering Normal Exposure Mode Manual White Balance Auto Scene Capture Type Standard
22 Posts / 8 Images
View this topic
>>
File: 052017_8032.jpg (178KB, 604x900px) Image search:
[Google]
178KB, 604x900px
No clouds makes focus stacking possible, which is nice. Photoshop seems occasionally confused by reflections though.
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make Canon Camera Model Canon EOS 5DS Camera Software Adobe Photoshop CC 2015.5 (Macintosh) Photographer www.reagandpufall.com Maximum Lens Aperture f/2.8 Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 72 dpi Vertical Resolution 72 dpi Image Created 2017:05:20 19:34:20 Exposure Time 1/125 sec F-Number f/8.0 Exposure Program Manual ISO Speed Rating 100 Lens Aperture f/8.0 Exposure Bias 0 EV Metering Mode Pattern Flash No Flash, Compulsory Focal Length 100.00 mm Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 604 Image Height 900 Rendering Normal Exposure Mode Manual White Balance Auto Scene Capture Type Standard
>>
File: 051317_8014.jpg (215KB, 900x600px) Image search:
[Google]
215KB, 900x600px
>>3084318
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make Canon Camera Model Canon EOS 5DS Camera Software Adobe Photoshop CC 2015.5 (Macintosh) Photographer www.reagandpufall.com Maximum Lens Aperture f/2.8 Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 72 dpi Vertical Resolution 72 dpi Image Created 2017:05:13 22:07:04 Exposure Time 10 sec F-Number f/22.0 Exposure Program Manual ISO Speed Rating 100 Lens Aperture f/22.0 Exposure Bias 0 EV Metering Mode Pattern Flash No Flash, Compulsory Focal Length 63.00 mm Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 900 Image Height 600 Rendering Normal Exposure Mode Manual White Balance Manual Scene Capture Type Standard
>>
Quit posting make the book we're almost halfway through the year
Hi /p/
So I went to Northern Ireland when I had a few days off last month, and created a small body of work about the remaining peace walls separating Loyalist Protestant and Republican Catholic neighborhoods. There are about 100 of these designated "Interface Points" in the six counties, with the majority of them being in Belfast.
I'm currently finalizing my edit, dusting the negs, and shopping it around to a few editors I know, either as a printable story or as a precursor to some more projects I'm hoping to produce in the summer.
C&C welcome. I will try to add captions and pertinent info as I go.
This image was in North Belfast, in a Loyalist area. My caption info notes are elsewhere so I can't tell you exactly what street, but this is relatively new construction (since 98), and the wall has been built up from a lower concrete structure into this. Often the walls are built in this fashion, with each addition getting thinner and serving different purposes. The highest points are almost always this type of fencing, which sits high enough to prevent bottles or balloons full of paint from being thrown but eliminates the danger of collapse by allowing airflow.
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Camera Software Adobe Photoshop CC 2017 (Macintosh) Image-Specific Properties: Image Width 5258 Image Height 5364 Number of Bits Per Component 8, 8, 8 Pixel Composition RGB Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 2400 dpi Vertical Resolution 2400 dpi Image Created 2017:05:24 12:28:06 Color Space Information Uncalibrated Image Width 1225 Image Height 1250
26 Posts / 11 Images
View this topic
>>
>>3082218
Cluan Place can be seen as an island of Loyalism inside of a densely populated Republican stronghold in East Belfast. Bordered on two sides by thoroughfares that are used by the working class Republicans in surrounding neighborhoods
and butting up to the Short Strand neighborhood on its other sides, it is home to only a few dozen homes and residents and has been a flashpoint for sectarian violence for decades. It's residents refuse to forfeit any ground to Republicans and likewise oppose most non-sectarian potential residents, leading to a dwindling population and unoccupied homes.
Side note for those interested: All images were Hasselblad 501c with either 50mm, 80mm, or 120mm. The first was 120mm and this is the 80mm. I shot exclusively Portra 400, all handheld, Lightmeter was a Sekonic 758. I've mentioned previously I don't carry a bag just a great jacket with pockets and a few belt pouches from ThinkTank.
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Camera Software Adobe Photoshop CC 2017 (Macintosh) Image-Specific Properties: Image Width 5306 Image Height 5363 Number of Bits Per Component 8, 8, 8 Pixel Composition RGB Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 2400 dpi Vertical Resolution 2400 dpi Image Created 2017:05:24 12:28:08 Color Space Information Uncalibrated Image Width 1237 Image Height 1250
>>
why dont you post process your images?
>>
>>3082227
I do what I'd call a fair amount of adjustments, multiple s curves and painting contrast with a soft light layer, but I enjoy a muted palette and a flat image, especially concerning this sort of work. The banality of the situation was something I wanted to highlight across the entire spectrum, from my exclusion of people to waiting for overcast times (not hard in NI). The post I did is evident here from a flat file to my print ready final. Scans are on a V700 using Alex Burke's guidelines.
This is a wall in Alexandra Park. It cuts the public park in half, with roads that formerly facilitated foot traffic and bicycles being closed. There is one gate that is opened in the day time only, so at night the only access for movement is to circumvent the entire park.
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Camera Software Adobe Photoshop CC 2017 (Macintosh) Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 300 dpi Vertical Resolution 300 dpi Image Created 2017:05:24 13:20:23 Color Space Information Uncalibrated Image Width 1500 Image Height 772