Not sure if I'm interpreting this passage regarding what the author names the "epistemological fallacy" in classical and Hellenistic epistemology correctly.
Thoughts?
The book is A New History of Western Philosophy by Anthony Kenny.
pls
>>9935434
How are you interpreting it?
>>9936613
The way I grasp it, knowlege has a transient quality and shouldn't be fatalistically tied to truth, because that would imply that people who deal with knowledge cannot err. But isn't infallibility a requirement of true knowledge?
Maybe I'm a brainlet.
>>9935292
>he's literally named chad
next
so no one has read this book?
>Intelligence did not figure largely in anything Hercules did and was often conspicuously absent. Once when he was too hot he pointed an arrow at the sun and threatened to shoot him. Another time when the boat he was in was tossed about by the waves he told the waters that he would punish them if they did not grow calm.
>His intellect was not strong. His emotions were. They were quickly aroused and apt to get out of control as when he deserted the Argo and forgot all about his comrades and the Quest of the Golden Fleece in his despairing grief at losing his young armor-bearer, Hylas.
>He had sudden outbursts of furious anger which were always fatal to the often innocent objects.
Give it to me straight, /lit/. Was it autism?
>>9935266
He was the Chad of Chads
>>9935266
Nah, being a demigod means you can just flex your muscles and force rivers to move for you. You want cleverness, stick with Odysseus.
>>9935266
It's not hard to tell why Hamlet considers him is opposite. Hercules definitely banged more chicks though.
Hey /lit/, thought I'd stop by to discuss this brilliant author. I've really enjoyed Simulacra and Simulation, which other works of his would you suggest as further reading? General postmodernist discussion in the vein of 'hyperrealities' and solipsism welcome
>>9935262
America is a book I love and actually one of my favorites, but then again I like the whole French-writer-takes-on-the-U.S.-sort-of thing (like Tocqueville)
What would Marx's philosophies (what BOOKS or LITERATURE would he have written) have been if he was born in the 1900's instead
you can't say where he would hypothetically have ended up but the dominate ideas were obviously quite different than 19th century manchesterian liberalism
philosophically he would have to tackle logical positivism instead of german idealism, classical economics was history and the dominate economic ideology was marginal utility, and the political issues were radically different since orthodox liberalism was dead and you had mixed-economies but it still would all boil down to all history is class struggle, etc, etc
the meme manifesto
When did you finally accept the separation of body and soul?
>>9945088
Never! If the soul exists, it's only a different kind of body
>>9945088
When none of the other explanations made any sense
>>9945092
How come? Elaborate senpai
>>9945095
Will they ever tho? I wonder if it's only a matter of scientific development till something of a mind/soul could be identified, since science in itself is a formal logic process, it is a method and pertain to res extensa
Does anyone have an invite to the lit discord?
eat shit
>>9935203
Discord is for redditors. Maybe ask /r/books
maul suck a dick you fat fucking cunt
What is the point of our existence, or any living thing's existence for that matter? We are just mortal clumps of cells who have become self-aware and self-obsessed enough to believe that we are divine creations or special in some way or another.
We are not special we are just huge lumbering piles of atoms whose only true purpose is to procreate and make more dumb copies of ourselves. You are nothing. I am nothing. Why doesn't somebody just press the nuclear button and destroy the whole world so we can stop this fucking travesty we call life.
Everything is a fucking meme, I want to die...
you'll grow out of it. human minds have evolved to adapt. face yourself.
>>9945047
>What is the point of our existence
Hahahahahahahaha How The Fuck Are Existential Crises Real Hahahaha Nigga Just Smoke DMT Like Nigga Hit The Bong Haha
>>9945047
You'll get over it. Especially if you have kids. And maybe find a hobby man, and chill out. Enjoy this thing, whatever it is.
I just bought this edition (left)
Is it a good edition? I just bought it because I saw a photo of David Bowie with that edition (right?)
There's differences between editions but unless you're an academic or a tryhard they don't really matter. There is no definitive text.
Enjoy it anon, it really does live up to the memes
Unless it's containing a poor translation editions dont matter at all. Unless you're into collecting
It's an English book. You will probably read it once and leave it on a shelf
I buy used books for $5 that are whatever edition, doesn't matter for non translations
What was his fucking problem
Thoughts on Joan Didion? Is her stuff worth reading? Where should I start?
>>9935168
Just read Palahniuk.
>>9935214
Literally what
>>9935168
Didion is fantastic and, to me, underappreciated. She had an obvious influence on BEE (particularly with the fantastic and minimal Play It As It Lays). Her non-fiction is superb, too: I liked Slouching Towards Bethlehem and The White Album and then after those you can go to The Year of Magical Thinking
The two characteristics that really distinguish Didion are her wit and her uncanny observation. She writes concise, beautiful non-fiction, and perspicacious fiction (though I personally far prefer the former). Anon already mentioned Sloudhing Toward Bethlehem. If that doesn't get you into her, I would not recommend continuing. If you enjoy StB, give After Henry a go. That is her best essay collection, in my opinion. If you want to read some of her essays standalone in order to sample her writing and determine if you want to continue, "On Keeping a Journal", "On Self-Respect", "Where I Was From" (a reflection on growing up in and being shaped by California), and "In The Realm of the Fisher King" (a takedown of the Reagan administration) are great pieces with which to begin.
For her fiction, "Run, River" is as good as any.
Happy reading.
Why are you still reading fiction? Grow up man. Read something that has to do with reality fag.
Shitposting is the anime of 4chan.
>>9935092
Anime is the shitposting of America
I studied Latin, Greek, and Syriac at a few different points in my academic career, and now I want to learn something for the sake of having something to read for pleasure--ideally a lot. For those of you that are bilingual or multilingual or who are in the know, what contemporary living language has a burgeoning and/or strong literary scene? Does your country or a country you know have a literate culture? I want to learn a new language that has a literary culture that has parity with English--I say this innocently enough...I don't mean to privilege one language over the other. By that I mean, my criteria are that people are freely writing novels, they're publishing poetry and short stories in literary magazines, writing for the stage and the screen, censorship and community morals aren't a (major) problem, etc. I'm considering one of the following--Arabic, Cantonese, Czech, French, German, Hindi, Italian, Japanese, Korean, Portuguese, Russian, Spanish, Swahili, and/or Turkish. Basically, my end game is that I want to be able to enjoy a language and its culture. Any insight is appreciated.
I know right off the bat there might be issues with Arabic in terms of censorship and community standards, but maybe there's a greater literary culture in Tunisia or Morocco versus Saudia Arabia, etc. I don't know. Maybe you do. I can't speak to Turkish. My hunch is that French, Japanese, or Russian might be a good choice. Anyway, I'm interested in what you have to say. Thanks.
>>9935079
>Cantonese
Any reason you list this but not Mandarin? I'm not well versed on the state of contemporary Chinese lit but I have to assume the Cantonese market is much smaller.
Anyway, one thing you would want to keep in mind (and I know that this sounds obvious but still): some languages are much easier to learn than others. Assuming your native language is English, any of the Indo-European languages on your list would be much easier to learn than Arabic or Japanese. With dedicated study (i.e. a few hours a day, every day, and a teacher or friend you can speak the language with) you could be reading German very comfortably in under a year. Not Nietzsche, but well-respected novels would be within your grasp, for example.
Learn French.
You know English and you've studied Latin. This means French will be fairly intuitive and you also can easily branch out to Spanish, Portuguese and Italian.
>>9935079
Classical Chinese. There are probably tons more Chinese Classics than Latin Classics because of how much they valued keeping historical records. It's to the point where their academic have yet to analyze all of it, and there are still works being unearthed.
But, if you're focusing on contemporary lit, then probably Japanese.
Any recommendations for a books on learning architecture and design? A lot of books I've looked over so far don't seem to be all too great.
>>9935055
Learning as in doing it? Hertzberger Lessons in Architecture, Francis DK Ching, Neufert for quick reference. That's the rice and beans, then you might want some theory, so find out who your favorites are and go through their influences, a lot of architects have written at some point.
Protip go strait to rem koolhaas, great read not only as architecture but as literature, graphic design tour de force, sociology and so on
Something else entirely would be christopher alexander's Pattern Language, but it might be a bit too much for a start
ITT: We post pairs of books from separate authors that have significant characteristic overlap, then we say which one we liked better.
I'll post a few to get the ball rolling
I liked TSWF more out of these two.
They're about equally "enjoyable," AP is better, Corrections is more fun.
>>9935014
>not posting the whole trilogy
Bob Dylan's 115th Dream
why haven't you abandoned literature for genre fiction? you're not a manlet, are you?
Why not both?
But I am a manlet
>>9944869
This.