Archived threads in /lit/ - Literature - 2382. page

>>8802919
Are moomins dogs or what?

>>8802919
In what regard?

A classic children books author would be Otfried Preußler. His most famous works are Krabat and Der Räuber Hotzenplotz. Don't know if that answers your question though.

>>8802919
how do i into comfy moomin lit? is there a standard collection of the complete moomin or something?

>>8802911

Exactly what is this book about?

>>8802943
Women and men familia

>>8802911
don't fuck with me boner OP. provide a source

>>8802882
No, would you recommend it? Why?

>>8802884
No. That's why he says beautiful novel.

File: image.jpg (17KB, 225x225px) Image search: [Google]

17KB, 225x225px

>>8802882
He was a Nazi so that's good enough for me. A hero

>>8802878
Look up "golden retriever" in the archive.

>>8802878
clearly, you need to submit whatever gets dubs.

Just have a guy quote a chapter of Infinite Jest, then close the book and make a declarative sentence about what current social issue the book represents.

Watch more films is probably the right answer...

But of course don't expect to gain understanding on a medium automatically, you'll have to analyze it deeply and start paying a lot of attention

You could even sign to film school but if its not your goal to make films i wouldnt recommend that route

>>8802847
I haven't read the book, but I assume that a widely approved work on film analysis will improve your ability to analyze films. You can also head over to r/truefilm to lurk and practice your movie criticism. I am sending you to r/truefilm because as we all know /tv/ is useless.

>>8802847
You can also check out some of the movie criticism by /lit/ authors such as Zizek and Deleuze. Zizek has a ton of stuff on Hitchcock and Deleuze has two works called "Cinema." Also check out Zizek's Pervet's Guide to Cinema. It has some great stuff if you can put up with his terrible accent.

>>8802833
Stop being afraid and just accept you won't understand everything. This isn't like a video game with achievements, if you miss something that's part of the fun.

>>8802833
Just get an annotated or critical version, like penguin or norton

>>8802842
Honestly I think it'd be depressing to understand everything in a work.

>>8802736
No but I do rape him.

>>8802831
Typical anglo.

shitty shit for shitter

>>8802642
Go to /pol/, retard

This board is for literature

>>8802650
Ethics is a part of philosophy and philosophy is related to literature, retard.

Also, I don't browse /pol/. I am clearly asking about adopting a stance, I never said a right wing one.

Christ, shut the fuck up.

You don't need a moral stance on abortion.

Is this another fucking /polr9k/ thread? Are you trying to troll me? What's your fucking angle, here? Tell me, you piece of shit! Fucking /pol/!

>>8802611
What on earth are you blabbering on about, you nincompoop?!

A cheap sensationalist. Nobody takes his reactionary journalism seriously.

>Hello, my name is James Joyce and this book is called Dubliners. It is a collection of short stories that I think nicely sum up my impressions of the good people of Dublin. Hope you enjoy!
How did this hack ever find someone willing to publish such schlock?

File: pepe what.jpg (50KB, 540x477px) Image search: [Google]

50KB, 540x477px

>He walked out of the church with his jacket collars turned up against the breeze, Finnegan's Wake was over, but how many more would there be?

>>8802544
kek

>>8802422
I'm no expert but I read The Brothers Karamazov, Notes from the Underground, Crime and Punishment, and A Gentle Creature (in that order). Might read Demons or The Idiot next.

>>8802422
Who is she?

>>8802454
Googling 羅小伊 helps but please comment on whether you think I should make the jump to the big magnum opus

che stronzata

p gud famalam

I don't really like it but I can't tell if that's just me trying to protect myself from feeling good about something I've written and allowing myself to be surprised by criticism, or if it isn't very good, or both.

It's probably both.

Are analytics really as bad as they seem?

>>8802380
Pretty fucking bad. Read Collingwood's Autobiography, the part about his time as a teacher of philosophy at Oxford and his experience of the British philosophical milieu that was giving birth to Russell's analytic philosophy among Anglos. It's telling that Collingwood, one of the only good Anglo readers of German philosophy at the time, basically does not interact at all with the nascent analytic tradition. Because it had nothing to do with it, despite thinking it had surmounted it.

They're basically a bunch of pedantic cunts eager to dismiss prior philosophy that they barely read, and jerk each other off over it. When logic comes along, they jump on logicism like a bandwagon. When positivism and dogmatic empiricism come along, they jump on them like bandwagons.

The Anglo-Analytic "style" right from these beginnings up until quite recently was to have a monolithic, preconceived, and disastrously unreflective epistemology (formal logic), hold other philosophical systems up to it just long enough to show that they don't fit into the arbitrary rules, and then take pleasure in shitting on them for it. Fair claims of French and German obscurantism just emboldened Anglos in being cunts, and made them dig in their heels.

>>8802380
what do they even seem like

i don't know what /lit/ thinks about analytics so i can't answer

>>8802362
Describe Muslim immigration. If your teacher is redpilled you'll ace it

>>8802362
You don't set it in Slovenia then?

>>8802366
He is. He gives 0 fuck about PC.

>>8802368
I have to. Its a major part of a task I got.

>>8802345
Zizek, unironically

>>8802349
I've read the Sublime Object of Ideology, Trouble in Paradise and the Year of Dreaming Dangerously. Does he have a specific work that deals with this? I've seen smatterings of it across his work but nothing focused

>>8802352
>zizek
>focused

Makes u think