Is my 2017 reading list missing anything, /lit/?
•George Orwell - Road to Wigan Pier
•Friedrich Nietzsche - Beyond Good and Evil
•Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn - Gulag Archipelago
•Allan Bloom - The Closing of the American Mind
•Milton Friedman - Capitalism and Freedom
•Jordan B. Peterson - Maps of Meaning: the Architecture of Belief
•Plato - The Republic
•TS Eliot - Christianity and Culture
•Carl Schmitt - Political Theology
•Lionel Trilling - The Liberal Imagination
•Falguni Sheth - Towards a Political Philosophy of Race
•Vladimir Lenin - Imperialism: the Highest Stage of Capitalism
•Judith Butler - Gender Trouble
•William F. Buckely - Nearer My God: An Autobiography of Faith
•William F. Buckely - God and Man at Yale
•David Foster Wallace - Infinite Jest
Real books.
haha very interesting list my friend! by the end of 2017 you will have surely attained enlightenment and possess the dialectical skills of connoisseur such as myself
may allah (pbuh) bring you prosperity
>>8961144
I mean, its kinda all over the place.
Maybe find a subject you enjoy and focus on that. Looks like you have a stronger interest in Christian theology, perhaps look into introductions first.
As for Orwell, do read Wigan Pier. I haven't read it, but if its anything like his other works I suggest it.
Asking people who doesn't have English as their first language and kinda ignored it in school.
Other then just reading books in English, have you done anything else to try to improve your English?
shitposting on 4chan
>>8961126
this, and playing videogames.
>>8961136
forgot to add watching movies and most of all, go on vacation and actually use the language.
i also sometimes skype with some creepy guys and do weird stuff. but i'm not sure i should recommend this. but it helps with my english.
What books do you recommend that can be read in a day?
>>8961102
This Immortal
>>8961102
travesty by John hawkes.
The death of Ivan Ilyich
Notes from the underground
The trial
Any one else read the saga of darren shan?
>>8961078
I tried reading Lord Loss when I say younger but it was far too spooky
I loved these when I was around 13. They were so unashamedly gory.
>>8961078
When I was twelve this was all my best friend would read. Darren Shan was a memey inside joke in our friend group back then.
I guess they were the UK equivalent of Goosebumps.
what lit does one have to read to be granted access to this boards circlejerking?
>>8961054
Joseph Mcelroy
>>8961054
>read books
Just browse the board for a few weeks until you learn the proper shitpost in any context.
>>8961142
pls
i have seen your thread
>he doesn't read Russian /lit/s
Good luck being a failure in life my man...
>>8961017
>Because how else would we know how to do this were we not able to emulate Russian literature.
I read Chekhov
Pyccкaя литepaтypa eщё тo гoвнo, фaмпaй
Where do I start with this beautiful hombre and why do you like him? Also anybody know of any good spanish translations?
Thanks
>>8960998
>why do you like him?
His perfect face
>>8960998
He anticipated hip hop.
I watched the Leonardo Dicaprio movie about Rimbaud from 1995.
I didn't expect the awkward gay sex scenes. I saw it with my mom.
What a shit movie about such great subject material.
So.. this is... the power of mexican journalism?
Woah
>>8960962
I'm redpilled and fucking proud. Built the wall for Lord Kek's sake!
>>8960985
weak/10
>>8960962
>Instrucciones para vivir en México
¿Norte o sur?
Name one thing Plato was ever wrong about.
>>8960958
The government should lie to its people.
(and well... its hard to say what he actually believed, for example, in the republic, if he truly believed all he said; but he implied having no problem with slavery? And did he not suggest it would be ideal for parents to give up their children to the state to be indoctrinated (which, I guess is pretty much what happens anyway)
The assertion of the Forms is unfalsifiable garbage tantamount to religious dogma and even Aristotle blew him the fuck out over it.
being a kiddie diddler
Why do writers habitually idolize women?
because every man does. some just try harder to hide it
tropic of capricorn should clear that up for you, OP. if it doesn't, try brideshead revisited.
>Plato is published by HACKett
it's like poetry...
Plato ain't nothing.
ever heard of Sisyphus tho?
>>8960903
That's the best complete works of Plato though.
>>8960903
What did he mean by this?
How does one improve their grammar?
Are there any helpful books on the subject?
Is there a website with remedial courses?
I feel that my education was not adequate.
>>8960897
how often do you write?
>>8960908
Rarely. I write essays every now and then for my BA, and in a journal although the journal writing is more of a brain dump with no structure,
They're
How do I start with Wittgenstein?
I've tried reading Tractatus but it's all nonsense to me. I want to know how he ended philosophy.
>>8960869
start learning what is philosophy instead of jumping to its """end"""
You get a BA in philosophy... he really isn't taught until grad school although some unis have 20th century analytic courses that touch on tractatus.
lel git gud pleb
>/lit/ manual
Have you read it? I think that the perspective of books distilling themselves in our assumptions of them and because of us forgetting their contents is very interesting.
Take Ulysses. I guess that less than 10% of this board posters have read it. Yet a lot more people talk about it, basing their opinions on previous discussions and wikipedia summaries. If such poster will actually go and read the book, he will not encounter the book itself, but will have his reception distorted by whole of discussion about the book he witnessed. There cannot be a pure, ideal text reception. So you can stop worrying about "not getting the book", not comprehending enough etc. That's what's the book about. I recommend you reading it. It's a frivolous way of doing theory of literature, a light-hearted, not pretentious, not clustered with overly complicated terms theory of literature.
So it's basically a book about 4chan reading Joyce.
>>8960867
isn't a rip off of some french author from long time ago?
>>8960867
I think you are right that less than 10% of people read it, but I also think that those who didn't read it ignore posts about it.
At least I do. Meanwhile I wouldn't find it hard to believe that 50% here read the book. Reading books isn't hard and if people even browse a board about /lit/erature, surely they'd quickly catch up with lit's most recommended books.
>>8960895
well, not-reading is a thing among French people (although it's not actually not reading the books), so some french authors mention it. Valery could be one example.
I like Lovecraft but I have to say that after a while it gets repetitive with all his prose "unnameable, horror that no man would ever dare to etc..."
So now I decided to switch to William Hope. Is he good? I just got The Night Land, the premise seemed very interesting.
Fell free to suggest other good horror authors.
>>8960809
what bore me in lovecraft is the use of first person
>>8960833
all the tales are all the same shit. Space monsters to ugly to be described.
>>8960840
hes extremely creative, i admit
but, IMO, it would be awesome if he used all that mythology in an unified novel