I'm writing a romance novel. YA/NA, idk. I noticed that the male love interest is always Chad. Nerdy Chad, Intelligent Chad, Bad Boy Chad. They're always good looking.
I want my love interest to have long hair and a long beard. This is not conventionally attractive. Will this be a problem?
>>8956227
The girls will imagine him without it, so it won't really matter.
>>8956229
that sucks. i hate that.
>>8956227
>I'm writing a romance novel.
why? why would you do that? i mean it's as if you posted "i am slowly gouging my eyes out with a potato peeler."
How do you get rid of your old books? Do you sell them or donate them?
If I can sell it for at least a few bucks profit I will, otherwise I donate them.
I sold all my books to a second hand shop a couple of years ago when I realized that I don't want to deal with the hassle of storing and transporting them, since then I'm using ebooks.
What matters is the content.
>>8956223
I'll buy them from you OP. What'cha got
Fill in the blanks.
ar
scarf
Scuff
>>8956084
Scoff
What are some autistic/quirky things you do while reading?
I never have a "bookmark" bookmark.
A bookmark is for me a "ticket" to a book. I use a scrap of paper to mark where I stopped reading and when I finish a book i tear the sheet and for the next book use a different one.
>>8956000
This is interesting. I normally buy spools of ribbon and create my own. I am considering buying a small pocket sized journal and using a page per book, then at the end I will write a summary of the book for review.
I keep a log in Evernote of how many pages I read and from what book every time I read. I time myself when reading and log that too. Then I calculate how fast I'm reading, and estimate how much longer the book will take to finish.
I also make a note for each book with a list of characters and sometimes a few major plot points or things I want to remember.
And I have a couple notes for books I want to read. And I have a note for books I've read with what date I finished them on.
Should I have myself tested for autism?
>>8956123
Not unless you also decide to recollect all the books you've read since the point when you reached literacy.
Is publishing controversial erotica a no no? My friend's mom went off at him for hinting of wanting to write a book like 120 days of Solomon or lolita. Why does Nabokov and women get away with writing the dirtiest smut but men have to stick with safe shit "Oh and she's over 18!!". To you retards who think writing fiction fantasies means my friend do it in real like or my friend somehow promote the acts of illegal activity, are just that , fucking idiots. We don't ban murders in fiction or theft. My friend is not harming anybody and it's not based on any events whatsoever so why the fuck is my friend a monster again lit?
>>8955862
>Telling your mom that you want to write something like de Sade or Lolita
I think she went off at him because he's a total sperg and she loves him. She knows that he'll be fucking ridiculed if he does it.
>>8955888
This.
People have tried in this day and age, and all have failed.
Neither de Sade nor Nabokov were writing erotica you moron.
Just post it on asstr.
Any good Jewish literature?
Jewish Study Bible
The Origins of Biblical Monotheism
The (Wiley-)Blackwell Companions to:
- The Hebrew Bible
- Judaism
- Ancient Israel
The Chosen Few - How Education Shaped Jewish History, 70-1492
The Invention of the Jewish People
You Gentiles
The Diary of a Young Girl
If This Is a Man/The Truce
I And Thou
The Star of Redemption
The Dignity of Difference
The Old Testament
>tfw colorblind
By the big red paste I see I ask. Is that a happy merchant?
www.buzzfeed.com/amphtml/louispeitzman/the-25-most-challenging-books-you-will-ever-read
1. Finnegans Wake by James Joyce (1939)
2. The Sound and the Fury by William Faulkner (1929)
3. The Canterbury Tales by Geoffrey Chaucer (14th Century)
4. One Hundred Years of Solitude by Gabriel García Márquez (1967)
5. Gravity’s Rainbow by Thomas Pynchon (1973)
6. The Female Man by Joanna Russ (1975)
7. Being and Time by Martin Heidegger (1927)
8. Our Lady of the Flowers by Jean Genet (1943)
9. Infinite Jest by David Foster Wallace (1996)
10. Moby-Dick by Herman Melville (1851)
11. The Silmarillion by J. R. R. Tolkien (1977)
12. Blood Meridian by Cormac McCarthy (1985)
13. The Corrections by Jonathan Franzen (2001)
14. The Magic Mountain by Thomas Mann (1924)
15. Atlas Shrugged by Ayn Rand (1957)
16. Ulysses by James Joyce (1922)
17. Underworld by Don DeLillo
18. Nightwood by Djuna Barnes (1936)
19. Simulacra and Simulation by Jean Baudrillard (1981)
20. The Castle by Franz Kafka (1926)
21. Absalom, Absalom! by William Faulkner (1936)
22. The Name of the Rose by Umberto Eco (1980)
23. Cloud Atlas by David Mitchell (2004)
24. To the Lighthouse by Virginia Woolf (1927)
25. The Recognitions by William Gaddis
xe's right, silmarillion was a slog
>>8955784
I'm going to go out on a limb without reading the article and assume those aren't in order of difficulty
>>8955784
Why put philosophy on this list?
And if you're going to there's harder philosophy to understand than Baudrillard and Heidegger.
What is the meaning of life?
I think there isnt a universal one
>>8955756
to shut up
>>8955756
You don't deserve to know.
My collection (so far)
>>8955333
i bet you didn't read any of these and only watched the movies
>>8955333
Nice, I've been eyeing pic related up for a while now...
your collection of what? fire starters?
Why doesn't he like DFW?
You know what my theory is? The Jews control everything and they don't want people awakened
>>8954847
DFW was one of the greatest contemporary authors and the Harry Potter books were good kids' books.
Having either or both of these opinions doesn't stop anybody from appreciating Shakespeare, which is why Bloom is retarded.
>>8954890
>Harry Potter books were good kids' books
I have to agree with bloom that they are not good books, even for kid tier reading.
This doesn't exclude or oppose the fact that people can and will enjoy them, but they are simply not very good at all.
Also I don't remember the argument being that by enjoying x you would stop enjoying or learning from y, but rather about the limit of time and memory each person has, and how an abundance of mediocrity will overfill time and memory, in turn making the person more mediocre.
He goes more in depth and clarity in his stuff, I'd give it a read. You don't have to agree with him, but his arguments are not mere shitposting ala post-/pol/ /lit/.
Isn't it about time you read The Tunnel, anon?
"It's about time you read..." seems to be happening every single day, but I can read only that much.
>>8954813
No, because I haven't even started In the Heart of the Heart.
I bought it a while ago, so sure, probably. But I buy lots of books.
What pen or pencil does /lit/ use to write with?
>>8954739
Notepad.exe
Personally i use a pilot fountain pen. My only real regular writing consists of reading notes.
I use these to write my diary desu
What is the funniest book you've ever read? Has literature ever produced anything that can compete with other mediums like television and film in terms of laughs?
>>8954431
My diary my good man
>>8954431
Hitchhiker's Guide made me laugh out loud a lot when I first read it, but I was quite young at the time, probably like 13.
>>8954450
desu
What is your genuine opinion of Salinger's work?
Even Nabokov called one of his short stories "one of the finest stories I've read in years"
>>8953892
He's a genius. It's a shame he was such an unpleasant autist in his personal life, or he would be held in the same esteem as Joyce, Faulkner, Woolf, etc.
>>8953935
More about his personal life please?
Slavoj Zizek, Sam Harris, Jordan Peterson and Stefan Molyneux get together for a round-table discussion.
What happens?
add Nick Land and Dugin to the mix and that would turn out to be a veritable circus.
Would pay big bucks to watch desu
>>8953559
nothing, as their ideas worth nothing
Why's JP in the same league as those clowns?