Please help me figure out the necessary procedures to buy a fully funtioning tank. It doesn't have to be rare but it has to be able to drive and fire the main cannon.
What licenses do I need? How hard is it to import? What models are cheapest without being some ugly retarded design?
And yes I am American (as you can tell) and assume I live somewhere where I can shoot the gun, like maybe Texas
>>29531825
relevant to my interest
license wise to have the gun operate I believe it falls under the same regulation as an artillery piece, its a basic DD.
however, you cannot shoot HE rounds as each one is ALSO a DD and you basically need a bunker to store them.
but you could just shoot solid projectiles (basically giant FMJ bullets)
of course, you'll need the money to get said tank.
I don't really know about how importing works, so I'm not your man on that.
pic related.
When do you think the next nuke will be launched? Never? During the late 20th century the world held it's breath, waiting for the end that never came. Will it, /k/? Will it change everything?
>>29531797
Best Korea is probably most likely to do it, theyre stupid enough and dont really have anything to lose, but everything to gain.
And no, it wont change everything. It will be endlessly shitposted and reposted around the world in the media as a total fucking tragedy and disaster blah blah but it too, will pass.
Also, waiting for an Oppenheimer response.
>>29531830
Their target? If their target is also armed, will their be a return do you think?
>>29531846
Not sure who the target is. First instinct is that it will be Worst Korea because lol fuck them, but if their aim is occupation and reunifaction, nuking the territory you want to occupy isnt exactly smart. But then again Best Korea isnt all that bright to begin with.
Or it could be Japan or some unlucky USN Carrier group thats the target, but the latter isnt exactly an easy target to hit in the first place. Especially for Best Korea.
Of course there will be retaliation, im fairly sure a Best Korean nuke will only be used in the slim hope of a crippling first strike or as an oh-fuck when they realise theyre getting their shit pushed in hard in a conventional war.
So, whatever happened to the whole getting kubism as an actual religion? The forum someone set up went down, so I'm guessing everyone just lost faith in the murdercube?
>>29531633
There already is a cube religion. We are all going to be members of it soon.
>>29531666
>kebab cube
How about no
>>29531666
Fuck off Germany.
What is the most efficient way to carry in the most amount of states?
No reciprocity with only itself states.
http://www.usacarry.com/concealed_carry_permit_reciprocity_maps.html
illegally
Utah
>>29531433
That's what you do in the reciprocity only with itself states.
Which state has the most reciprocity?
Also we need send Don Jr to liberate A. Samoa and N. Mariana as a thank you for their delegates.
Australian journalism lads
>>29531379
If you look, its the same kind of journalistic "integrity" in the US from the left.
I know how you feel, especially living in a college town and having to explain shit out for the dumb cunts I date on tinder.
>>29531379
Its a fucking lever action shotgun...ffs I hate our media
>>29533356
>mfw I donated $20 to that Allanah and Madeline foundation a few years back because they said they made food/toy bags for homeless/orphan kids. Should have known they'd be gun grabbers. Never again.
Is the SR-22 Rifle a good gun?
Have you fired one?
Would you buy it?
i dunno lol
It's literally a 10-22 in a fancy case.
>>29531605
>>29531605
That ^
So what's gonna replace this thing?
>>29531294
No direct replacement. The CAS role is taken up by a variety of multiroles carrying PGMs, like they already do.
>>29531294
Option 1: Job done by cheap turboprops: A-29 Super Tucano or OV-10 Bronco (or drones)
Option 2: Job done by current aircraft (AH-64/F-15E)
Option 3: Job done by future aircraft (F-35/B-21)
The Air Force will do everything they possibly can to weasel their way out of funding a dedicated CAS aircraft.
Does anyone know where the best place is to find pic related?
>>29531282
Uhm, the grocery store?
>>29531282
The company quartermaster, otherwise send in an ADREP and they will come to you!
>>29531282
If not Ebay or Amazon, then google EU surplus websites for their MREs. American military/civilian are easiest to find and acquire in the states, foreign MREs trickier and more expensive to get. Never gonna be good enough to join the military but I will eat and enjoy their shitty MREs.
I'm torn between buying A S&W 686 SSR or a Ruger GP100 Match Champion. I currently shoot a police trade-in Model 10 for combat league, but I'm looking to step up to more of a "big boy gun"
Opinions?
>>29531135
S&W M&P R8
>>29531135
S&W 686. S&W generally makes better revolvers than Ruger.
>>29531154
but I hate that gun in cs:go.
Also, for comp, we can only load 6 rounds, so I'd rather keep it to a 6-shooter.
Why does new ammo usually come scratched/dented?
Granted, I usually buy cheapo stuff like blazer, but even these federal HST are pretty scratched up.
Machining, storage, jostling?
I have a better question, what's the deal with these pictures? Are some cartridges really squared-off like this? Haven't seen any in real life or in video so I'm guessing it's a trick of the light but you never know.
http://world.guns.ru/ammunition/pistol-cartridges-e.html
>>29531024
Good choice for a pistol, shame they gave you the inferior version though.
>>29531024
Wait until you buy federal 5.56
Okay /k/, I need your help.
Could a propeller plane be deployed successfully if it was dropped vertically from a floating hangar? Say, if it were hanging from clamps inside a giant zeppelin with a big enough hole in the bottom to allow this sort of thing?
Basically, if the propellers were fired up before the thing was dropped, could a plane actually right itself after being dropped like this, provided sufficient height?
>>29530999
Yes it could.
If you had enough altitude.
>>29530999
Off course. All it needs to do is pull up when it reaches a high enough speed.
Why wouldn't it?
>>29531018
I dunno, I figured maybe the velocity of the plane falling might be too much for the pilot to right it before it hit the ground. I'm not an avialogist.
If this is their only argument then why are 9mm fags taken seriously?
>>29530993
>stopping power
>real
lol
>>29531011
>Hurr America only uses 9mm now becuz it's best
Ever notice how we haven't won a war since we stopped using the 1911?
>>29531040
no lewd loli >:(
Why don't we put this symbol (or any symbol) on our equipment anymore? The Bundeswehr still puts the Schwarzes Kreuz on their stuff. Commies still put the red star on their stuff.
>>29530923
Because we dont live in the past, we look towards the future
>>29530957
That's totally the reason.
>>29530923
>Why don't we put this symbol (or any symbol) on our equipment anymore?
Because we're the fucking U.S.A.
sig sauer autoloaders.
i can't help but think of them as cheap, ugly guns.
i'm sure they are reliable but honestly i think they are hi-point tier nigger guns.
>>29530760
>literally some of the most expensive and reliable handguns
>i can't help but think of them as cheap, ugly guns.
>>29530760
Cheap? Not really compared to some other sidearms.
They are metal framed firearms and very robust so you are also paying for whatever semblance of Quality-assurance and Craftsmanship SIG has left.
I have not seen any "niggers" using sig autoloaders.
You will find Sigs and Glocks are probably two of the most popular brands for sidearms with law enforcement and among special forces.
>>29530760
>i think they are hi-point tier nigger guns.
It's because you've never held one, shot one or even seen one in person.
Well it looks like FN is finally going to be moved out of the limelight along with KAC...Kraut based weapons when?
http://www.armytimes.com/story/military/2016/04/01/army-picks-heckler-koch-sniper-rifle-replace-m110/82526646/
I just don't understand desu. I get replacing M14s or whatever DMR the army used to use with an AR10, but this is simply replacing an AR10 with an AR10. They tout the QD suppressor as a feature, but M110s have them too. The weight loss isn't impressive either since the M110 barrel is like 3 inches longer than the G28s and has a bunch less plastic parts. What an inscrutable waste of cash.
>>29530870
Well because M14's are outdated and a new one ha not been made for over 50 years, and 110 is Remshit.
>>29530870
M14 was not a great choice but they made do with what they had.
M110 was an excellent replacement for a variety of reasons.
It seems that this new rifle is not offering anything except a new HK contract (along with their 416 and IAR contracts)
I am a fan of pistons but the M110 had no issues. Now we have a heavier and less accurate weapon for the sake of a minor increase in reliability and a major decrease in logistics.