Archived threads in /k/ - Weapons - 4128. page

>>29832447
gunbroker.com

>>29832447
big5, cabelas, any local gunstore

>>29832447
i have a brand new unissued perfect in any way. M48- the all milled version

>>29832297
Because Colt is retarded. And I love their guns

Your second question answers your first question.

Anything similar that isn't stupid expensive?

It's not bad by any means, but I'd get a Springfield Mil-spec model before I bought it. Is it a fair price though? I'd say so.

>I'd actually recommend a Sig 1911 or Springfield Loaded/TRP, but I wanted to answer your actual question instead of only shoving my opinion into the reply like 90% of /k/

>>29832295
Turns out you might have just saved me 30 bucks.

>>29832319
Find a deal on a Springfield or something?

You should send that design to Keltec

>>29832155
normal scopes already do that. this is why larger objective lens exist - they allow more light to enter and in turn allow better vision at the ocular lens.

passive night vision also works along the same principle, by massively amplifying existing light - they've been doing that since the late 40's.

the problem is that to collect a significant amount of light would require significantly large apertures for ingress, and you would purposely narrow your field of vision in order to avoid distortion. likewise another issue is sheer size and weight.

you can avoid parallax by only using one eye. you sacrifice some depth perception for this.

>>29832185
What he said. Just get a bigger front lens. Only problem is that it's not really practical or feasible to have a 100 mm objective lens. If they could it would be prohibitively expensive. Not many people would drop 10 large+ on a scope

>>29832090
Fuck this place I'm going to the Muddy Fudd

krusy?

>>29832090
I'm so tough I load my own rounds

...Without a press

>>29831914
i'll give you $250 for it

File: 14jucxy.jpg (492KB, 1600x900px) Image search: [Google]

492KB, 1600x900px

>>29831914
more pics

>>29831914
>How much you think I can get for it
>lol just not interested.
faggot

the main problem for miniguns has been power supply and ammo supply. 1000 rounds of 223 is roughly 30 pounds. a battery to run such a thing is not really fun to haul around. now, you're going to be chewing through a lot of ammo with that thing, so that means a lot of both will have to be carried by the operator and his compatriots.

use? high volume firepower is always nice to have. practicality? not very because of the above.

File: AngelArms_IPC_ammunition_400.jpg (25KB, 400x331px) Image search: [Google]

25KB, 400x331px

The main issue would be the ammo. How the hell could you fit ONE THOUSAND .223 rounds in a helical magazine that only holds one hundred 9mm??

Pic related. I think a few modifications to the basic principle behind this Angel Arms concept would make it possible.

I'm thinking about the entire cartridge being only slightly larger than a .223 bullet.

A copper jacket surrounding a hard cast lead core(to discourage excessive fragmentation), and a small hollow cavity at the back containing the most efficient propellant it can. It would not be able to use traditional smokeless powder.

No primer, either... something like a plastic explosive, except it deflagrates very rapidly instead of deronating... that way it would be electrically ignited. Waterproof propellant, too.


Is it realistic or feasible?

A soldier could easily carry this weapon and a few magazines, having THOUSANDS of rounds on his person.

I think a weapon like this would be amazing.


Please help me out, give me some advice and let me know what you think.

File: lyWY7yn.png (160KB, 1605x643px) Image search: [Google]

160KB, 1605x643px

>>29831763

You missed what I said. The ammo would not have a cartridge. It would fire the entire bullet, and the base of the bullet would be hollow like a minie ball, containing a waterproof and rigid propellant that could be electrically ignited.

It wouldn't take much electricity, it could have rechargeable li-ion batteries that get the barrels spinning and from then out the rest of the barrels could spin without battery assistance by redirecting gas or mechanical action. The battery could recharge from a recoil mechanism, or something like an alternator that charges the battery when the barrels are spinning under their own power.


It would be complex at first but after development, it could be become much more simple.


Imagine it, dude. Each soldier could carry 5 thousand rounds of ammo.

>>29831672
Grip and slide doesn't match/10

>>29831681
Yeah, but it still looks cool I think.

I named her Purple Rain.

>>29831604
pic unrelated?

File: IMAG0460.jpg (3MB, 1520x2688px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 1520x2688px

>>29831645
This is a box.

File: IMAG0461.jpg (2MB, 2688x1520px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 2688x1520px

>>29831657
Hey what happened with my box

File: ~sage.gif (14KB, 93x31px) Image search: [Google]

14KB, 93x31px

>>29831581
>strong
>battlefield
.50 keks

>>29831581

So is China's military actually good or are they just a meme? Have they ever actually fought anywhere?

File: Second_Sino_Indian_War.png (180KB, 621x1372px) Image search: [Google]

180KB, 621x1372px

>>29831628
This was the last time they fought a War against any noteworthy enemy.

You decide.

>>29831525
That's not bad for a Blackhawk with ammo.

>>29831525
>CVA Optima 50. Cal.
wait, what?

>>29832419
its BP

>>29831393
>this is going to kill illegal suppressors that are already illegal

t. Liberal moron

Protip, oil filter suppressors are already not legal, same goes for baffle stacks that happen to easily mate with mag lite tubes without tax stamps you dumbass

Literally changes nothing

>>29831437
What about those registered endcaps for oil filters? Those are legal.

>>29831437
pretty sure he's talking about serialized barrel adapters that can be registered as a suppressor and have a oil filter slapped on.

>>29831287
RIP obviously.

>>29831287
ayy, I got my shield yesterday.

>Which ammo is best for my baby?

As in for cc? I'm going to either buy 115gr gold dots or 124gr hst.

124gr jhp, ranger t series

Magneto speed sporter.

>>29831492
>Magneto speed sporter.

>200 dollerydoos

Fuck me, really?

>>29831201
get the caldwell chronograph from amazon for $75 shipped to your door. I love mine, best $75 I ever spent. It doesnt make my reloads any more accurate but it is really nice to know the numbers behind things and why certain loads perform better. I shot mine with a 45 not too long ago. something tells me it is not a good idea to use a phone to aim down the sights and video. I'll end up buying another one next time I just run into $80 cash. It would be nice to have one again but I have adequate data on all my loads and I dont really intend to ever change anything.

OOh yeah, the app that you can use with that chronography is amazing. It saves all your data and calculates ES, avg, SD, fps all that good shit. you can save target pictures and any other relevant data with your data string.

>>29830886
FDNY hat, Oakley brand Oakley shades, and a beard that could conceal a basketball.

>>29830886
Skills and training. Gucci and Calvin Klein Klein is fine, but do you have the skills to keep you safe when your life's on the line?

File: 1451751445513.jpg (51KB, 436x800px) Image search: [Google]

51KB, 436x800px

>>29830886
>m frames
>endo apparel tee
>conceal carry a glock 19 with 10 spare mags

It should be obvious that you're conceal carrying, but the key is to not print. A beard helps with concealing a good portion of those mags

Remember, you're never out of the fight brother.