>yfw someone says present day humans are worse than previous generations
>yfw they imply humans haven't always been the same meme loving fucks
>>1731202
>In one bar, a picture depicts two men playing dice. One shouts, "Six!" while his opponent holds up two fingers and says, "No, that's not a 'three', it's a 'two'".
>>1731233
Is this an ancient version of this?
>“There is no greater love than this: that a person would lay down his life for the sake of his friends.” John 15:13
Depends on the context
What about the love I feel for myself
>>1731041
Whatever context you feel like.
Explain to me Belarus, /his/. Who are the Belarusians and what is their relation to Russians?
Belarus is the back door of Europe, little and poor slavic USA. There is not major nation in Belarus, we are mixed. It is Lithunian territory in the past. Relation to Russians is neutral, because of economical links. Russian language is major.
You know how cat is pet version of a tiger? Belarus is a pet version of a Russia.
>>1731150
Russia is a part Asia. China has rised so fast because of good partnership with Russia. Belarus is a border between Asia and Europe.
Islam makes the bold claim that the Bible (New and Old Testament) and all other previous revelations have been corrupted and have lost their original meaning. Is there any evidence for this?
Tbf they've been run through google translate several times
But other than that, no, you just take it as a thing of faith, like Abraham looking at God's ass in the OT or Jesus walking on water.
>>1730844
Moses, not Abraham. My bad
>>1730837
I think it is something Mehmet took from certain gnostic sects with marcionist background.
Are there any good books on the Hundred Years War? I've read about some major battles and the Burgundy antics, but now I just want a comprehensive overview book.
Game of Thrones
>>1730828
Barbara Tuckman's "A Distant Mirror" deals with the 14th century and thus part of the war, but its really a survey of the times rather than an in-depth focus on any one thing.
>>1730875
Seconding this. It's a great read.
What were the strengths and weaknesses of the American and British militaries in WW2?
>>1730686
At what point in the conflict? Both militaries enormously changed their approach to things over the course of WW2?
>>1730690
Towards the end of WW2
What a gross simplifications.
American Military: Well armed. Obscenely well supplied. Plentiful. Minimal training. Low levels of experience. Large Navy. Well supplied great Air Force.
British military: Well armed. Well trained. Extremely experienced military structure. Irregularly supplied. Old fashioned slow to innovate command structure in the Army led to obsolete technology lasting far too long into the war. Back to the wall.
The Royal Fucking Navy speaks for itself.
What percentage or how many Roman Legionaries wore Lorica Segmentata compared to Lorica Hamata throughout different ages? I always assumed that Hamata was more commonplace - even when Segmentata was around, but most Roman Era depictions of Soldiers show the Romans wearing Segmentata and only showing Hamata on Auxilia troops.
>>1730490
Segmentata is extremely iconic and was used in the most commonly represented period, but hamata was always the most commonly deployed armor. I can't give you percentages but I doubt segmentata ever reached above the 20% mark.
What was missing from Roman metallurgy understanding to make full plate-mail?
Or was it possible but unpractical given the way the Roman armies operated?
>>1730532
>Or was it possible but unpractical given the way the Roman armies operated?
Probably this, as something similar to full plate (albeit in bronze form) existed all the way back to the Archaic age.
How can Socrates' claims to knowledge be reconciled with his standard disavowal of knowledge?
>>1730441
He didn't "disavow knowledge", he admitted that he "knew nothing".
>>1730446
he admitted he knew nothing and that's what set him apart from everyone else who claimed to know something. While everyone knows nothing, Socrates was the only one to acknowledge his own ignorance
>>1730455
And?
Why is jewish history so uninteresting?
It's just a compilation of losses, being massacred and merchantile\banking adventures
I mean, every culture has a story of at least fighting and winning for once while this guys just get massacred
>>1730363
>what is the old testament
>what is ancient Mesopotamia
>>1730371
the old testament is literally the story of slaves struggling with death and misery. They amounted very little in the end and their neighbours were always more powerful
>>1730363
Modern Israeli history is full of epic wins against numerically superior foes
So there is that
Also antagonizing their conquered people, but every nation does that, they are held to higher standards because of holocaust
How do atheists cope with the fact that their lives are worthless? Why not just off themselves now instead of 60 years later? It must be hell being an atheist and thinking of yourself as just the smartest primate.
> Live a good life.
> God just erases it from existence.
> Nothing personal, my fellow believer.
> It was all part of my plan.
How did theists cope with the fact that their entire life means nothing in presence of all might God of incomprehensible nature that can just rewrite is in a second by a whim?
>>1730274
How exactly does theism give ones life any worth?
Living a life which is just a series of tests to prove that you should be ascending to heaven seems like a pretty worthless life aswell.
Atheist or not, you should have a greater purpose to your life than life itself m8, does not mean that it should be a universal one.
Don't care fagort I'll just keep being me.
What are you probably going to be reincarnated as?
As myself.
>>1730156
A cockroach.
And not the muslim kind.
a chad
What made the Ottoman Navy (for a time) so good? How were they able to consistently BTFO Venice, a Naval juggernaut in its own right?
many ports to winter; including the french ones
islam. everyone else's sailors and canoners were drunk as fuck everyday. drunk as fuck.
They didnt. They got cucked by Portugal.
How did Russia, as quoeted seemed to have "an endless supply of men"?
Following accounts beginning operation Barbarossa, the Germans encircled, captured and crushed HUGE amounts of the Russian army in the first year alone. A few million soldiers knocked out of the battle. In the following years major battles resulted in the death millions of more Russian soldiers. Stalingrad alone costed them almost 2 million. It's possible that they gave all the man power they could but then how come Germany couldn't do the same? Looking at pick related it seems they were able to flood Europe with this huge invasion army. How???
>>1729667
The population of Russia is double the population of Germany, plus the Russians allowed/forced almost one million women to serve, so their pool of manpower was much greater than Germany.
Also the Russians relied more heavily on conscription than Germany at that time.
Soviet Union, not Russia you dumb negro.
>>1729688
It's was still called Russia by many people. Besides, what nationality lives in the Soviet Union you fucking gook
Who do you trust, /his/, man or God?
>>1729663
*man or man claiming to speak for God
>>1729663
God.
>Man or (nothing)
ftfy. Oops only one option left
What is the Good?