What's the historical equivalent of
"just be yourself bro, all it takes is a bit of confidence"
>>1722223
"This above all: to thine own self be true,
And it must follow, as the night the day,
Thou canst not then be false to any man.
Farewell. My blessing season this in thee."
Hamlet. Act 1, Scene 3, lines 79-85.
>Look well into thyself; there is a source of strength which will always spring up if thou wilt always look.
Marcus Aurelius, Meditations
>>1722223
>"Look well into thyself; there is a source of strength which will always spring up if thou wilt always look."
Marcus Aurelius, Meditations
Why do make art?
>>1722195
Define art.
>plebs obsessed with that meme painting when the wedding at cana is in the same room
I dont even know what the point is anymore.
>Constantinople has not been reconquered
someone should make a website with a timer
hasconstantinoplebeenreconquered.org
>post yfw when six hundred years later the west STILL cannot took istanbul (not constantinople) back
>being butthurt about something that happened 600 years ago
Just get over it yoannis
woah... so this is the power of American protestant "culture"
>>1722045
Southern Baptists are fucking Mormon level meme
Quick question, are Scientologists protestants?
protti* """""churches""""""
How did the world view the Nazis before they invaded Poland?
If they didn't invade, would the party have collapsed anyway in due time?
Right wing populists tended to admire them, but most saw them as dangerous thugs with comical salutes.
>""""invaded"""" (((Pooland)))
http://www.wintersonnenwende.com/scriptorium/english/archives/deathinpoland/dp00.html
>Search "Important quotations for a better understanding of ww2"
DAILY REMINDER THAT POLAND MOBILIZED ITS TROOPS FIRST IN AUGUST OF 1939, WHICH AMOUNTED TO A DE FACTO DECLARATION OF WAR AGAINST GERMANY
On top of that, Poland previously made multiple offerings towards France during the 20's and 30's to invade Germany, this was known to Berlin since a long time.
Then there was also:
- Countless polish atrocities commited against ethnic germans between 1918 1939 (bromberg bloody sunday et al)
- Violation of the minority treaties by Poland in 1937
- Britain and France delivering a guarantee to Poland that they'd invade Germany if Germany defends itself against polish agression, which made Poland decline all the german peace offerings (this also violated the polish-german friendship treaty from 1934 btw)
- Poland ignoring the proposed 16 point peace plan of hitler
http://de.metapedia.org/wiki/Chronologie_antideutscher_Gewalt_von_Polen
http://de.metapedia.org/wiki/Polnische_Verbrechen_an_Volksdeutschen_zwischen_1918_und_1939
http://de.metapedia.org/wiki/Polen_als_Aggressor_1918%E2%80%931938
http://de.metapedia.org/wiki/Polnischer_Imperialismus
http://de.metapedia.org/wiki/Polenfeldzug#Eskalation_durch_polnische_Grenzprovokationen
http://de.metapedia.org/wiki/Danziger_Zollinspektorenstreit
http://de.metapedia.org/wiki/Abstimmungsgebiet_Oberschlesien#Polnischer_Terror
http://de.metapedia.org/wiki/Polnische_Pa%C3%9Fkrise
http://de.metapedia.org/wiki/Polnische_Konzentrationslager
http://de.metapedia.org/wiki/Oder-Nei%C3%9Fe-Linie#Polnische_und_panslawistische_Grenzvorstellungen_vor_dem_Zweiten_Weltkrieg
http://de.metapedia.org/wiki/Urpolnische_Erde
>>1724097
>Poland mobilized its forces first
Yes
Because Germany had been fully mobilized since the Munich Crisis in 1938
Is there an afterlife worse than the Protestant Hell?
Does Pascal's Wager hold up against other religions?
>>1721908
There's no point in Pascal's Wager in Chinese religion. You all go to the same place anyway.
The Greek Underworld outside of the Elysian Fields was pretty awful.
What's Catholic Hell supposed to be like? Or even Heaven for that matter?
>Why do they fight each other?
>Which side had the better cause?
>Which side had the better soldiers?
>Which flag do you prefer?
>St George or St Andrew which is better?
NO WELSH OR IRISH ALLOWED, ST PATRICK AND DAVID FUCK OFF
Cheers boys.
But they don't fight each other?
>>1721904
did*
Fugg
Scottish flag is better. English flag looks like it's for medical aid, but then it's just perfidious Albion.
Dear Humanities-fags, is he correct?
>>1721749
Ethnology & Cultural Studies fag here
I cannot speak for any country but Germany, but here your Professor will typically get mad over being purposefully obscure and incomprehensible to the point where they will take personal offense.
I totally understand that, too. Those poor souls have to actually read and understand the bullshit we write.
>>1721756
Swiss Geography student here, some of the (german) literature our human geography professors gave us is completely unreadable in my opinion.
An exerpt from Belina 2008, " 'We may be in the slum, but the slum is not in us!', Zur Kritik kulturalistischer Argumentationen am Beispiel der Underclass-Debatte":
>Nach dem Bisherigen sollte klar geworden sein, dass „Kultur“ nicht etwas ist, das jemand hat, sondern etwas, das ihm oder ihr zugeschrieben wird. Wenn die Kultur des Kulturalismus auf der kritisierten tautologischen Konstruktion basiert, dann liegt sie genauso wenig „an sich“ vor wie die Natur der Rassisten, sondern wird durch die kulturalistische Argumentation erst geschaffen. So, wie für die Kritik des biologistischen Rassismus gilt, dass nicht vermeintliche biotische „Rassen“ das Problem sind, „sondern der Glaube an deren Existenz und die damit verbundenen Wertungen und Wirkungen“ (kattmann 1999, 80), so gilt für die Kritik des Kulturalismus, dass nicht das als „Kultur“ Bezeichnete – also das, was Personen/gruppen tatsächlich auf unterschiedliche Weise tun – das Problem sind, sondern die Vorstellung, dass sie dies täten, weil sie eine Kulturen haben. Um diese Vorstellung zu kritisieren, sind also die tatsächlichen sozialen Praxen der Menschen, denen eine „Kultur“ zugeschrieben wird, unwichtig. Dieser blinde Fleck ist nicht der Kritik anzulasten, sondern dem Kulturalismus selbst, der aus den – jederzeit untersuchenswerten – sozialen Praxen „da draußen“ erst „Kulturen“ zimmert. Die Kritik des Kulturalismus befasst sich deshalb mit der „Idee von Kultur“, mit den durch sie vorgenommenen sozialen Grenzziehungen und schließlich mit den ideologischen Leistungen dieses Vorgehens (mitchell 1995, 2000a; eaGleton 2000).
>>1721775
I agree, all that kraut speak is totally unreadable.
Hi,
I am curious, is anyone here studying anything related to the humanities? Are there any would be historians, sociologists, anthropologists or philosophers here?
What do you study? Where do you study?
I am studying early modern history at a university in Sweden.
I am working on my masters thesis, anyone else doing the same?
Is your thesis related to maritime/naval history? I ask because of the image.
>>1721824
It might be, will have to change my topic.
I am however very interested in maritime history, wrote a paper in undergrad about maritime history.
Picture is from the Vasa museum in Stockholm, well worth a visit. An almost intact warship that foundered during its maiden voyage in 1628,
>is anyone here studying anything related to the humanities?
Hehe, I am in radiology class as I am typing this. Odontology is not a part of humanities, but it is not considered a science either.
That makes me wonder, Were does medicine belong? I hear it being called a "Health science", but it sounds like an SJW therm made up so doctors may feel better.
Post your favourite historical armour and uniforms
>>1721693
>No bushy moustache
>talk to normies about poetry
>tell them Michelangelo was my favorite poet
>"Anon he was the painter haha you are thinking of someone else"
>"Anon hahaha he didn't write ahahahahahaah"
>"Leave the poetry talk to us anon your out of your depth LOL "
i'm probably going to shoot up a school
You live in the 21st century, google search "Michaelangelo poetry" and show them instead of taking it like a bitch and crying here, you dumb cuck.
You have some shitty taste for michaelangelo to be your favorite poet, he was my favorite philosopher thjough
Michelangelo was my favourite veterinarian.
Has there been a better state than Byzantine Empire?
>>1721588
No.
Minoa, Sparta, Byzantine, Teutonic Order, FVEY, Australia
>>1721588
Yes
There are two analysis.
One is the traditional, objective line of thought, which analysis whether someone is good or bad, moral or criminal, etc, according to a linear timeline of a actions.
However, here is an idea.
Considering the primal, original state of character of a person, it would be possible to calculate what that person would do in certain circumstances. Would they risk their life to save his mother? Would they put a bag of money in the trunk if they found it and notify was seeing?
As timelines are ultimately a series of possibilities, it would make more sense to see things that way.
All past was a future at some point.
>>1721496
What you would do is only important if there's a possibility you will do it. It's simply estimating your future chances of doing something.
>>1721496
Sometimes the past is just the future of this present.
>>1721496
>There are two analysis.
no
>One is the traditional, objective line of thought, which analysis whether someone is good or bad, moral or criminal, etc, according to a linear timeline of a actions.
no
>However, here is an idea.
ur 0 n 2 right now
>Considering the primal, original state of character of a person, it would be possible to calculate what that person would do in certain circumstances. Would they risk their life to save his mother? Would they put a bag of money in the trunk if they found it and notify was seeing?
nope
>As timelines are ultimately a series of possibilities, it would make more sense to see things that way.
ok
>All past was a future at some point.
BARKBARKBARKBARKBARKBARKBARKBARK
What if France was physically connected to Britain instead of mainland Europe?
what if ur mum was ur dad
>>1721478
Creative and intelligent
Nice
what if up was down
I'm having trouble understanding what the core of Neoplatonic thought is all about. I've seen it referred to as a religious doctrine, a system of philosophical thought, political theory, and more.
I ran across the term when I discovered the medieval Greek Gemistus Pletho. In the early 15th century he proposed reforming the Byzantine Empire's government into a model based on Plato's Republic. He's strongly associated with Neoplatonic thought and bringing its influence to the Renaissance.
To someone still new to philosophy, can someone help to explain what Neoplatonism really is? Faith, philosophy, or both? What historical figures are notable for this belief?
A school of Platonism mostly focused on the metaphysical aspects of Plato's philosophy
http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/neoplatonism
>>1721426
>It is an undeniable fact, although nowadays rarely acknowledged, that the general outlook and the principal doctrines of the Neoplatonists proved exceedingly influential throughout the entire history of western philosophy. Through Augustine (354–430) in the West and the 4th-century Cappadocian Fathers (Basil, Gregory of Nyssa, Gregory of Nazianzus) in the East as well as the pseudo-epigraphic writings of Dionysius the Areopagite (early 6th century), Neoplatonism profoundly influenced the emergence of mainstream and not so mainstream Christian theology (John Scotus Eriugena, Thomas Aquinas, Duns Scotus, Meister Eckhart). In addition, by way of a pseudo-epigraphical treatise entitled Theology of Aristotle, Neoplatonic thought facilitated the integration of ancient philosophy and science into both Islam (especially through Al-Kindi, Al-Farabi and Avicenna [Ibn Sina]) and Judaism (Maimonides).
I hadn't heard of this before. Greatly appreciate the good read.
>>1721467
you should read the enneads of plotinus
also the philosophy of plotinus by rw inge