Was it blasphemy?
>>1781208
Nah,
Just shit
Why were the late 90's/early 2000's so edgy?
Why was Ancient Greek culture so important?
>>1781182
B/c demograsy xDDD
because people don't care about the sumerians for whatever reason
>>1781182
Because enlightenment era European philosophers decided it is and retroactively created a "western culture" that was born in Greece even though during that time Western Europe was mostly christian tyrannical monarchies not at all related to Ancient Greece.
Don't get me wrong, Ancient Greece and their works were extremely important stepping stones for all of Mediterranean civilisations including Arabs but so were achievements of Babylonians, Sumerians, Persians, Egyptians. The reason why Ancient Greece is put ahead of them is classification of what is western civilisation and where it originated from.
Seems more /his/ related than /lit/ so :
Does anyone know of a good introductory book on the history of Ireland from medieval times to present?
Pic related is available at my library, is it a good place to start?
>>1781123
Did you know that the Irish Saved Civilization? Patrick McCuckerson thinks so.
>the hibernian conspiracy
>>1781200
High quality reply right here. Is /his/ always like this?
Are chimpanzees miserable?
They're smart, smart enough to form abstract models of the external world in their minds. Smart enough to have complex social behavior and customs. But they're not smart enough to have an expressive spoken language that lets them share these abstract models of the external world with their friends
Do they experience constant confusion and a desire for a high level of social bonding with their fellow chimpanzees? Do they constantly feel like they're on the cusp of a social breakthrough, as if their desire for social connection with other chimps may someday be fulfilled if they eat a few more bananas, but it never is?
It must be hard to be a chimp
>>1780934
No they dont have the mental capacity to feel depressed they are either happy or aggressive like a certain type of melanin enriched human today.
Are NEETs miserable?
They're smart, smart enough to form abstract models of the external world in their minds. Smart enough to have complex social behavior and customs. But they're not smart enough to have an expressive spoken vocabulary outside of stuttering that lets them share these abstract models of the external world with their friends
Do they experience constant confusion and a desire for a high level of social bonding with their fellow NEETs? Do they constantly feel like they're on the cusp of a social breakthrough, as if their desire for social connection with other NEETs may someday be fulfilled if they make a few more shitty threads, but it never is?
How would George Washington view Mahatma Gandhi in his approach of attaining independence from the British colonialist?
>>1780592
George probably would have rooted for Ghandi while at the same time being skeptical of his methods.
>>1780658
Wasn't Ghandi actually somewhat evil, regardless of his pacifist protests?
>>1780666
don´t know about him but his daughter wanted mass sterilization of men
If you go back far enough all these main religions must stem from one single subject right? As an understanding and unbiased person to all religions I just don't understand why more people don't believe in the bahá'í faith. Opinions? Arguments?
>>1779862
Baha'i isn't origin of all religions, just another attempt to create new one.
>>1779877
Correct me if I'm wrong but isint it the belief of all religions stemming from 1?
>>1779936
No.
how did they do this?
A broken watch is right twice a day
Either photoshop or gimp, that's the usual way to fake images.
>>1779716
kys
Is it true that Archaic Greece was a better place to live as an ordinary prole than Ancient Greece in any other period?
>ywn horseback ride naked on largely uninhabited fields, without fear of trespassing someone else's property
>>ywn tie your horse on a random tree while you bathe in a river on a hot, sunny afternoon
>ywn hunt your own food with your trusty crossbow
>ywn sleep by the fire under the starry sky without fear of being robbed
>ywn be truly free
>>1779111
>ywn spend all day everday fearing the gods wrath
>ywn make an offering to the gods before every single major decision
lol hell no. There was a bunch of droughts still persisting, dynamic population growth, and overpopulation in areas. City-states were fucking laughably small still, so you wouldn't find kick-ass architecture, art events, or eminent thinkers later on.
Aristocrats and Monarchs were far more predominant and powerful over the states. Most of the city-states probably had serfdom systems with regarding the laborers, like Thessaly, Sparta, and Crete had during the Classical age.
Wealth circulating into Greece was also much lower. As city-states established over-seas colonies and enslaved and waged war against the local populaces there, that established foreign slaves to be the under-class in the home-cities. Even if you were a poor and landless citizen in Athens or some other major Greek city-state, the State could ask you to move to some newly conquered foreign city, and have land and estate alloted to you there, to repopulate it with the presence of the State's citizens.
>"My son ask for thyself another Kingdom, for that which I leave is too small for thee"
What did he mean by this?
NEAR TO THE EAST IN A PART OF ANCIENT GREECE
WAS AN ANCIENT LAND CALLED MACEDONIA
WAS BORN A SON TO PHILIP OF MACEDON
Wasn't it Manuel I who doomed Byzantium?
It looks that all ills of the state started in his reign, including the spread of pronoia and the growth of corruption. On top of that the emperor was squandering state's thin resources on useless adventures abroad while failing to deal with one actual threat - the Turks.
>>1779025
Everyone was a threat. The Turks just happened to be the ones you single out as more important with hindsight.
>>1779125
>Everyone was a threat.
Like who?
>Italians
Mainly concerned with squeezing trade concessions
>Pope
More like an ally
>Arabs
Completely irrelevant, recked by eveyone
>Crusaders
Capable of stinging at best
>Normans
Just plundering here and there
>Pechenges
Exterminated by his father
>Coumans
Ally and backbone of the army
>Hungarians
Conflict over Serbia only
>HRE
Ally
Nope, just Turks were the real enemy. All other enemies were made by Manuel and his retarded policy.
>>1779228
I said everyone. Once again dismissing each with one liners doesn't change what the Byzantine court understood about them. The Italians and Crusaders for example were clearly a major threat considering the damage they did with some very violent squeezing and stinging. Each one of them presented a major danger to the state in their time, and it's only luck that things went one way or another.
Was Singapore the unique country to be "expulsed" from another in /his/tory?
>Despite last-ditch attempts by PAP leaders, including Lee Kuan Yew, to keep Singapore as a state in the union, the Parliament on 9 August 1965 voted 126–0 in favor of the expulsion of Singapore, with Members of Parliament from Singapore not present
>126 - 0
lol
>>1778586
Shit, I didn't even know this was a thing. Can we do this with California? Or Florida, maybe?
>>1778512
Uruguay was expulsed from both Argentina and Brazil
Ghulams, Mamluks, Janissaries... in one form or another, most if not all historical major muslim empires made extensive use of military slavery. Why?
I can understand the benefits of an independent force that has no external loyalties, but why make them the whole army or at least the bulk of it? Why repeat the mistake again and again when they get involved in pretorian-like court intrigues and even out-right usurp empires? Why didn't the rest of muslim polities gradually stop using warrior slaves after Mahmud Ghazni overthrowed the Samanids, for example? Why didn't dynasties of slave-warriors not stop using this system in order to not get usurped themselves?
Are there examples of this kind of behaviour outside the islamic middle east? In the same scale?
>>1778205
>Are there examples of this kind of behaviour outside the islamic middle east? In the same scale?
Ancient Egypt
>>1778205
You'd have to understand that as the imperial infrastructure of the early caliphate crumbled, power was increasingly concentrated in the hands of families that divided power among its leading members according to appanage. If there wasn't good relations between family members, which was often, that left these increasingly granular dynasties isolated among a sea of local tribes.
Rather than wade into those murky waters it became preferable for the ruler and the bureaucracy around his household to monopolize power and wealth for themselves by employing a private army rather than hand it off to one or more local magnates who could organize very dangerous revolts if given free reign.
As to why military slaves specifically (as opposed to mercenaries and foreign guards), that's because of how the household worked in Arabic-Persian cultures at the time. Any males who weren't family, adopted, or slaves were verboten, so if you were looking to bring in as many men as possible under your roof you had just one option unless you were patient enough to fuck 1,000 women and wait to raise 1,000 children into soldiers.
Incidentally, this is also why many Middle Eastern rulers began to favor slave concubines over noblewomen as wives and eunuchs as courtiers. A local wife and courtier brought in their family's politics, but a concubine or eunuch is more loyal to the ruler's personal household.
>>1778258
Care to develop this statement?
>tfw you will never convert to zoroastrianism so you can fuck your qt sister
>>1778159
kek
what a madman
>>1778159
>[citation needed]
>[who?]
>[citation needed]
>[who?]
Wikipedia truly is a cesspool of revisionism.
How did racism look in the middle ages, and wasn't it based more on culture and class distinctions than the modern racial superiority viewpoint?
>>1778128
There was no racism within most societies because most societies were mono-racial.
People have always thought that their tribe/race was superior.
>>1778136
but what about the Byzantines who had both balkaners and turks in there along with armenians and some georgians?
and germans were far from seen as one people
>>1778136
Something like this, "racism" as the boogie man who we know today is a more or less creation of the European imperialism (social Darwinism, we conquered them, therefore we must be superior)
>>1778156
People always hated each other's guts, but nobility and religions had an interest in keeping the peace.
Ergo there were prob. Some clashes between Ethnic or religious groups in cities like Constantinople, but city guards kept the conflicts at bay (like riot police)
How does it feel knowing, anon, that no matter what you do, no matter how much you read or study, you'll never know enough about the subjects that interest you? You'll always feel incomplete in terms of knowledge.
>>1778091
I'm still pretty much the number one consultant on mid 2000s narrative driven webcomics.
feels good nigga
>>1778091
Exhausting the well of knowledge is the definition of hell, so IMO that's great.