>"Not so fast there little man, there's a toll for passing through here."
>"You don't have any money? I guess we'll have to figure out some other kind of payment then, hehe..."
wat do?
go to /tg/ you fucking faggot
go to /tg/ you fucking faggot
go to /tg/ you fucking faggot
JUST
>>1998461
;_;
J U S T
JUST
Does anybody have any photos on this subject that are reasonably high res and interesting? I know that these photos exist but all that seems to be accessible is photos that are blurry and don't make you feel anything, I doubt /p/ would have anything good either. Anybody have anything cool? I'll start
Not hi-res, but enjoy a little Irish hospitality.
How has our understanding of world history changed since 1960?
Especially our understanding of WW2, the Civil War, and the Middle Ages?
>>1998224
Basically this.
>>1998230
>normative statements and values-based judgments
So it got worse in every conceivable way?
>>1998254
Ding ding ding
Pre-colonial history is, however, a lot better if you ignore commentary and look at the sheer archeological evidence.
Unironically, what did he mean by this?
>>1998025
literally don't know what that is or where it came from, but it seems to say that someone is always thinking about you, especially if you well liked. And that the more remarkable you are, the more well liked you are and v v
>>1998025
Is this MUNDUS?
>>1998269
Yeah
This little shit ruined the entire planet
>hey guys, we're having a workers revolution! How do we inspire them?
>Lets follow in the footateps of the worlds best rebellion and massacre tens of millions of people!
>What if capitalist nations just prop up asset holders via black markets?
>Just kill them, haha!
If he didnt exist, commies wouldve had a chance in the cold war.
>>1997677
lol who cares about your commie shit
>>1997677
>It's Robespierre's fault that others copied his methods without understanding the context [spoiler]except for the Cult of the Supreme Being. That shit is inexcusable, and the only reason it isn't totally garbage is because it's a step down from the Cult of "Reason"[/spoiler]
Of course commie sympathizers would look for outside excuses to blame the collapse of their shitty ideology. The well was poisoned, true communism has never been tried, blah blah blah.
Robespierre enforced Terror (which, in his vocabulary, was but swift and unflexible justice) as a reaction to Coalition-financed royalist uprisings while the country was literally at war with all of Europe. It's 'spectacular' death toll (pro-tip: less than the number of men who died in one day at Austerlitz) included the uprisings in Lyon, Toulon and the Vendée. The only flaw with the Reign of Terror, though a very big one (though debatably a justifiable one considering the state of emergency) was the lack of fair trial. Compare Lenin's little slaughterparty and Marx's slaughter party on steroids, both of which started and continued in times of peace when Russia was entirely out of harm's way (the Russian Revolution ended WW1's eastern front, remember?).
But please, keep blaming eveything but communism. What next, Rousseau inspired totalitarianism? Napoleon III's socialism ruined communism?
>>1997708
Cia sad market subterfuge was much more drastic, perhaps not in terms of ratio but certainly scale.
They need only contain the system from global markets and they will whither.
Not sure if this belongs on /lit/ but I consider it a humanity. Are there any good lectures or books on sex?
>>1997581
Heavenly Bridegrooms and Psychic Wedlock by Ida Craddock.
>>1997581
Sperm Wars and the Red Queen are very good books on the subject.
Sex at Dawn is kind of on the hippie side, but makes for a nice counterbalance between the two other suggestions. If you include all three, you should get a good balanced understanding of human sexuality.
F O U C A U L T
O
U
C
A
U
L
T
Are we a bridge?
>>1997567
No, we became ubermensch now that Trump is President.
Define we.
personally I'm more like a pier with no handrails on the edge of a drained lake so when you get to the end you fall and break your neck
>>1997550
Germanic barbarians always hate the Roman Civilization.
>>1997550
Slavs (Czechs, Slovaks) and Hungarians were overwhelmingly protesyant too, but the Habsburgs counter reformed the shit out of them in 17th century.
The Czech did try to embrace it though, they even had their own mini reformation before the rest of Europe it.
Latvia and Estona too were quick to adopt the reformation.
A reason that the Germanic factions were more likely to adopt Protestantism was that they had lesser influence over the papacy compared to nations like Austria, France and Spain and only were sucked dry by its greedy monks and clerics. Austria, also a Germanic faction, stayed Catholic as they had more direct influence over it.
No idea why the Poles or Irishmen did stay loyal to the Catholic Church considering how often they got fucked in the ass by it,.
>>1997556
But the Catholics had destroyed it since long?
Am I kawaii? Uguu~
datass.mosaic
>>1997508
Imagine if she had married Charlemagne. Would the roman empire still exist today?
>>1997508
Irene is cute! CUTE!
Why is sexual desire so ingrained into us? Why does it keep coming back even after copulation? Why do we start developing carnal desires at such a young age? Why do sexually appealing traits commonly no longer appeal to us post-orgasm? Why do a lot of us value purity? Why do a lot of us seek existential knowledge and value it more than sex? I can't fathom this inherent burden.
For all save your last question; biology is your friend. Look for the answers there.
>>1997437
Strong population increasing tool. The younger you start the more kids.
We value purity because it prevents illegitimate children and all animals hate illegitimate children. There are animals that kill the young if they find out that another animal fathered them.
Existential knowledge is about denying what makes you primal which sexual desire does. Sexual desire is like hunger and thirst. Many people fast like muslims do and Christians do to cleanse their minds and focus on bigger things than basic human needs. They try to rise above their human roots and try to get closer to enlightenment and possibly God.
>>1997450
I'm sick of answering everything on an evolutionary basis
This is the only moral guideline humanity needs. You can't prove me wrong.
>>1997404
>not the Ten Commandments
>>>/reddit/
>Trusting something with illuminati eye on top of it
>>1997404
>morality
Was he the first true nationalist?
No.
>>1997351
No.
>>1997351
Yes
Were all slaves really treated badly by their masters or is it just a liberal meme? I find it hard to believe how someone who is whipped, raped, physically and mentally abused everyday will just willingly plough the fields, herd the cattle, do the laundry and cook your dinner.
>>1997230
How would you treat your slave?
>>1997230
They didn't have a choice. That's what slavery is...
>>1997241
I-I-I don't know...
Was this the greatest rival of the Roman empire?
>>1997108
>Goyman
>Goyim
>Goy
On topic, I'd say the Carthaginian empire was. Even though that might be seen as a meme.
>>1997127
But Carthage always lost, while the Sassanids manage to bully Rome's eastern front until they collopsed
>>1997127
Rome never had a psychological enemy on the level of Carthage (excepting maybe the Gauls), but Carthage at its height wasn't as great as Rome at its height, when it was facing greater enemies than during its republican phase.