This is the only moral guideline humanity needs. You can't

>>1997404
>not the Ten Commandments

>>>/reddit/

>Trusting something with illuminati eye on top of it

File: IMG_5530.jpg (36KB, 372x362px) Image search: [Google]

36KB, 372x362px

>>1997404
>morality

>>1997404
Inspired by the us constitution

File: noicefforrt.jpg (99KB, 599x602px) Image search: [Google]

99KB, 599x602px

>>1997404
>dude liberalism lmao
fuck off reactionary

>>1997505
Not even the first bill of rights mate, that was probably the Code of Hammurabi. America and France were riding the same liberalism wave, true, but it was only France -first and unique in this regard- that declared these rights to be universal. The rights of MAN and citizen. Burke even threw a gigantic hissyfit on how this "man" doesn't exist.

>>1997404
If rights are really "universal" and "human" why do you need to write them down? Checkmate humanists

>>1997542
Legal certainity, I'd wager.
Still, despite considering the French Revolution a good thing overall I'm not a fan of trying to justify universal moral values while at the same time removing its universal grounding.

>>1997538
the code of hammurabi and OP are not descriptive lists of natural rights, but prescriptive lists

the first ten amendments are a descriptive list of natural rights that exist DESPITE a piece of paper

>>1997557
>the first ten amendments are a descriptive list of natural rights that exist DESPITE a piece of paper
What does this even mean? The right to fair trial exists DESPITE the amendment concerning a right to fair trial and not because of it?

>>1997538
Lafayette wrote it with thomas Jefferson's help

>>1997404
>completely baseless claims
>we should accept these as true because reasons

>>1997404
>This is the only moral guideline humanity needs.
But why?