Why did the magyars migrated while other finno-ugric didn't?
nobody knows?
>>1995488
Because they were hungary
turks pushed them out of central asia
The Bible is different from other ancient texts in that it deals with humans and talks on and on about human existence. While other texts will speak of their gods direct involvement in events or their demigod heroes performing amazing feats, the bible revolves around average human beings who never did anything spectacular save for what God has done.
What is unusual about the Bible is how often it talks of building when on a archeological basis, the Levant does not contain much in the way of grand buildings and cities that we know of. From Noah's Ark to the tower of Babel to the temples, much is spoken of building and crafting. The ancient Israelites esteemed the act of building going so far to autistically including precise measurements and sacred geometry in their texts. Not only building but sailing, jewellery, cultivating the land and other human activities and endeavors. These things are not spoken of in other ancient texts from other cultures. While the Romans spoke of buildings, they did not have the same appreciation for them as the Israelites did. While the Greeks engaged in great acts, they did not always see them as divine, they were simply feats performed by men and recorded for later history.
But my question persists: why would the Israelites constantly speak of building and crafting when in actual fact they produced very little and their living arrangements were anything but glamorous?
>>1995473
maybe big buildings convey divinity. i wonder what they would have thought having been presented with modern skyscrapers.
>>1995473
Because most of the Talmud was composed during and after the Babylonian Captivity where they did encounter such buildings.
If you are nomadic, things like Architecture is more important.
Mongols showcase many of the same... social cues, halfway across the world in a different culture sphere.
And so do Beduins and a lot of tribes.
The Nomadic perspective also means they are foreign to a lot of the things they encountered, and even when settled, the strong written culture and religious social position means some of it was maintained
Do civil law countries put as much of an emphasis on liability as Anglo countries do. I seems Anglo countries are much more litigious than civil law countries and the mere threat of civil action and being held liable dictate many parts of our lives; things like wet floor signs, warning workers overhead, caution etc. Those signs are there to reduce liability they're not legislated to be there.
Anyway, back to first question, is there a large emphasis on liability in civil law countries?
Law thread please
>>1995375
Civil law is interpreted by judges, common law is based on precedent. This means you can be fairly certain what the legal outcome will be in common law countries, but there is an inherent degree of uncertainty in civil law cases. This means common law is better for things like contracts, but also means that common law is more "gameable", especially when combined with the Anglo custom of adversarial trial lawyers. It's a mixed bag, common law helped Anglo countries outcompete civil ones, but it also opens the door to tremendous litigiousity.
>>1995598
The degree of uncertainty is mitigated by higher instance courts, and formation of a legal practice, but the practice is ever changing.
This still makes the people less litigious, however liability is still very important.
Keep in mind i don't know just how important it is in Common law.
What are the reasons for the federal government's growth since its founding?
I mean other than a bunch of assholes wanting more power.
At least FDR had an okay reason to expand thanks to the great depression.
Was Marbury vs Madison's ruling the only positive expansion of the federal government? I mean the supreme court didn't really have any power before this.
>why did a government that presided over mostly yeoman farmers in the 18th century grow to its current size presiding over massive sprawling metropolitan urban centers that rely on a highly complex and integrated global economy
I dunno lol
>>1995343
The state governments seemed to take care of this decently enough though, no?
I thought the entire idea was that both work side by side in order to lessen the pressures of running a country.
>>1995336
>What are the reasons for the federal government's growth since its founding
Corporatist greed and state security, mostly. Not to get all economic structuralist about it, but you'll notice that the periods in which federal power is expanded are either during times where the American business class was struggling and wanted the government to step in so they could stick their fingers in more pies or in periods of either legitimate or perceived threat.
Satan did nothing wrong if anything humans should be blamed for being retarded
>God explictly forbids eating from that one tree
>satan goes ''lol Eve just do it anyway''
>YOLO xD
>God gets pissed off
>Woow how was I supposed to know I shouldn't do it? Bugged eating mechanics.
if I tell someone to cut off his balls and the idiot does it am I the one who castrated him? Then why the fuck is Satan blamed for someone being too stupid to say ''no''?
Satan deliberately tries to keep people from eternal life. But youre right that he cant do it without man's inherently fallen nature
>2017
>taking ancient sumerian myths and legends seriously
It's kind of like when you tell your four year old daughter never to allow anyone to touch see or her pussy and then the neighborhood pedophile convinces her to flash him.
It's like that.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_involvement_in_regime_change
Is there a problem?
>>1995241
Follow the Monroe Doctrine.
>>1995241
What are you getting at?
How many obelisks throughout history do you think were intentionally supposed to look like phallic symbols to represent masculinity?
Zero.
I bet the patriarchy is responsible for this.
>>1995228
There were probably a few but most of them were just religious based and were structures attempting to "reach the heavens". Or in general show off how tall/high a building can get with the right architectural talent.
It's kinda dumb that sociologists and anthropologists have been saying that this is a sign of male patriarchal domination or whatever. It's like saying that because the Washington monument is white than it must be promoting white supremacy.
>tfw you could be a communist, but you hate its aesthetics
>tfw fascism is so much dapper, but you just can't ever be one
>>1995164
But commie music is 10 times better
>>1995168
That's maybe the only thing. But then they fuck it up with those socialist realist sceneries while playing it.
>>1995164
What do you mean? What does communist aesthetic mean? Why are the visual arts so important in choosing an ideology?
I feel as though you're just making up imaginary problems. Stop it.
How did this rich Capitalist exploiter manage to convince the working man that Jews were behind everything?
Are people actually that stupid and instinctual? Could they not see what he was doing?
>>1995127
gee i wonder who is behind this thread
>>1995135
Yes, it is true.
I am a Jew.
Us Jews have already planned your extinction via repeated posts on this board. You will not win.
Look at this thread, they still can't. Blaming the Jews is always the right answer, just look at how Romans got away with crucifying Jesus.
Ayyyy
>>1995111
This is the quality of the 3rd centurt emperors
>>1995111
Niggas died after winning the war lmao
what is the symbolic difference between a musician and an artist?
>>1994997
Music is a subset of art? As is masonry, painting etc.
A musician is an artist too, so is a painter or a writer or etc
>>1994997
what makes a musician a musician?
huh, really nudges your neurons
>>1994966
As Maine goes so goes Vermont
KEK
He got the polio vote
>>1994977
The Polish vote?
Was he just a meme? Was he actually a good marshal?
>>1994833
Gotta be a meme. No way anyone could take a guy with a collar like that serious.
>>1994833
Ney = giraffe confirmed?
>>1994833
won far more than he lost and was well loved by his men, Napoleon thought he was great, Ney probably was his best commander overall I think
For the reaguard action at Berezina and the holding of Kovno bridge alone he's fucking based and deserves all the praise he gets
>half your troops are unarmed and injured, or actual civilians
>still nearly win anyway against an army 20,000 men stronger and fully supplied and armed
kek, why were the french so amazing at war?
So, /his/, I want to go to an Orthodox church.
I'm not here to debate legitimacy of tradition or theology or anything. I want to just go and observe and participate and see what it's all about.
What the heck should I expect? What is expected during the services? How should I be dressed? What are some do's and don'ts?
I grew up in your typical basic bitch Protestant fundie house, and I tend to be pretty all over the place with my own spiritual beliefs, mind you. I'm about to go to the local Hindu shrine and give an offering of an expensive statue of Shiva I've had for some time, just to give you an idea of where I'm at.
Really, what is it all about? How do I get the most out of the experience?
>>1994547
Romaniafag here
Don't expect much. Lots of prayer and church songs. Lots of reading from the bible. Most of the churches that i have atrended are very open to the masses and as long as you don't wear shorts and a t-shirt, nobody will bother you. If you go for the lithurgy (or whatever it's called in english), do not interrupt the priest. A good priest will stay after it for any questions the attendees might have. Just be pious, cross when others do if you can and want, and do not be obnoxious. If you are merely visiting, nobody will tell you anything as long as you respect the church.
>>1994599
You think anyone will have a problem if I smell a little like weed, or cigarette smoke?
I don't smoke much anymore but everything I own fucking reeks like it.
>>1994547
are you LARPing?
Also where is Constie when you need him?
If people knew about the existence of planets since ancient times did they also believe in aliens?
Like did they assume that the other planets were also like Earth and had life on them?
>>1994490
>Like did they assume that the other planets were also like Earth and had life on them?
That's what got Giordano Bruno burned at the stake.
>>1994490
Planet didn't mean the same thing to them. In Greek it means "wanderer" because, unlike the stars, they moved very quickly through the sky. They didn't know that Earth was also a planet, or that planets were like Earth. Mostly, they thought of them as higher beings.
>>1995287
This, that's why most planets have names of Greek and later Roman gods and dieties