Is German nation naturally inclined towards authoritative or at least strong state government?
No, Protestants just hate themselves. That's why they constantly seek new ways to repress their emotions and desires in various forms.
>>2159540
I'm asking because I keep finding this bit of info in random places. Why did certain Hanzeatic cities prefered to be a part of non-Germanic states despite sizeable German population? Because the monarchy was less authoritative there. Why did the ending of Cabinet of Doctor Caligari had to be changed? Because the original was too anti-authoritarian. Led me to believe that Germans like strong leaders.
>>2159540
pretty much this
catholic Germany was jolly as hell it's the protestant ones that were militaristic
historical persons you would not want to babysit your children
>>2159417
>>2159424
came here to post this
Why do dumbfuck Americans call social-democrats liberals?
>>2159311
democrats co-opted the term in the 60's
>>2159311
a)because they are socially liberal;
b)because everything is in reverse in Murica.
The right-wing party is red and all that.
I was watching at a documentary about America in the 70's until the Regan presidency, but they didn't talked a single thing about Carter.
What went so wrong?
well, look where the film is coming from
He actually meant what he said, it scared the intelligence community.
And he preached an end to mindless consumerism, but this was right when Americans were settling into numbing their minds even more after Vietnam and Nixon so it was not what anyone wanted to hear. He was before his time honestly.
>>2159063
>tfw JC is the president we need right now but don't deserve
Why didn't """"""H"""""""" """""R""""" """"""E"""" (mainly Austria) take advantage of the revolution before it got a foothold?
And finally, how would /his/ act in Austria's situation?
Beacuse Germans are niggers that got the wrong skin colour by accident
>>2158931
They were way too holy to act so pettily
Kill the pope, convert to Protestantism, unite the HRE into one nation without the meddling pope getting in the way.
So who is this guy again?
Uh, 42nd President of the United States who -- even after all the bullshit -- will go down being more popular, liked, revered, and wealthy than you'll ever be.
That's who "this guy" is.
>>2158896
Alright Bill.
>>2158844
The devil himself.
And he will be brought down to the pit of Hell, and all there would stare at him, and ask. Can this be the one who shook the earth and made the kingdoms of the world tremble?
>it will work this time I promise
When will we finally eradicate socialism and all the people that subscribe to that dead ideology?
>>2158741
Did a socialist molest you when you were a kid or something?
>>2158741
We're in the process right now. Communism for example is a shadow of what it was in the 20th century. Modern communism is a bad joke desu, I feel sorry for them.
>>2158741
from the thumbnail i thought these were different types of underwear.
What are some of the most contentious loot in history up to modern times?
>>2158645
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Elgin_Marbles
>>2158656
This.
Along with basically any other object in the British Museum. Go to their Facebook page and go to the comments on any post. There's likely to be at least one person going "REEEEEEEEEEEEE THE BUNGABUNGA DUNG SCULPTURES BELONG IN EQUATORIAL GUINEA WHERE THEY CAN BE TAKEN CARE IF AND RESPECTED !!!!!!!! SEND THEM BACK NOOOOOOOOOWWWWWWW!!!!!!"
It's as regular as clockwork.
The Hope Diamond?
>tfw you realize that the wehrmacht was clean
What, again?
>>2158529
We did this thread litterally 24 hours ago.
>>2158529
WW1 German Army was legit
WW2 German Army was meh
Fite me fag
Just read this book
Thoughts?
>>2158336
Outstanding book all around. I would recommend it to anyone who wants to get into entry level prehistory.
>>2158336
Is this the same guy who took Dawkins' "meme" theory and changed it to be "story", and is touring universities talking about "stories" people had throughout the ages and the way they evolved?
>>2158412
Dawkins's coining of the word 'meme' isn't a theory and stories that get passed on most certainly count as 'memes' in Dawkins' terminology.
Reading this now. I could be a contrarian and say it's overrated, but it's not- it's really fucking good. One quibble, though:
If Marcus Aurelius was so fucking wise, why was his son such a dissolute piece of shit?
Is this a case of "those who can't do, teach" or "physicial heal thyself?" Was he just a terrible parent? Even if his son was naturally horrible and distant- why couldn't Aurelius be a better psychologist- and influence him?
Art Of The Deal, nigga. Persuasion. Dale Carnegie shit, senpai.
He was the emperor of Rome, he probably couldn't be near his son given all the governing and warring that comes with the job
>>2158244
A great deal of people are nothing like their parents and in fact purposely try to be as unlike them as possible.
Also something to consider is Marcus Aurelius spent a great deal of time either governing or up in Germania fighting the Marcomanni. He never really had the time to raise a child.
Commodus was a spoiled brat who had no interest in the job of being emperor but loved the power it brought.
I can hardly blame Marcus for not being a better father and I think he can only be partially blamed for not adopting a son, as had been tradition.
>>2158244
The guy spent like 20 years on the shitty swampy frontier of Slovakia. I don't think he had much time to rear his son well.
Let's try to make a Zionist FAQ thread.
Ask a moderate right wing Zionist anything about Zionist history & ideology
>>2158139
What did Theodor Hertzl's armpits smell like?
>>2158144
Like qetoret
>>2158144
Like gefilte fish.
Can we please talk about this fucking talking walking miracle of spying.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Juan_Pujol_Garc%C3%ADa
>>2157873
He's not so much a miracle of spying as a miracle of counter-spying.
>people like this exist while I have trouble looking the 7/11 clerk in the eye when I mumble asking for a pack of cigarettes
fucking genetic lottery man
>>2157873
People who made faces like that in the old black&white photos were enormous trolls.
> Aristotle explains in the Politics the great disadvantages which the Spartans brought upon themselves by granting too much to their women, by allowing them the right of inheritance and dowry, and a great amount of freedom; and how this contributed greatly to the fall of Sparta. May it not be that the influence of women in France, which has been increasing since Louis XIII.‘s time, was to blame for that gradual corruption of the court and government which led to the first Revolution, of which all subsequent disturbances have been the result?
-Arthur Schopenhauer
It is not unreasonable to believe that the main issue of nations and civilizations currently facing decline is the female in it's modern form. Every societal ill and personnal feeling of resentment is brought forth mainly by womens inherent destructive power.
It is also not unreasonable to believe that delegating the power of mate selection to the female was quite the mistake, it causes the breakdown of traditional pair bonding relationships in favor of frivoulus "cock carousel" rides until the woman is used up and unfit for marriage thus bringing forth populational decline.
Is there a way we can fix this problem or do we just watch it all go down?
>>2157868
>not toasting your marshmallow on the flames of civilisation
I don't think it'll change. You can join an isolated religious community, though.
Without getting into r/TheRedPill styled pseudosociology, I personally wonder if universal suffrage (in this case, specifically women's suffrage) was a bad thing.
Women are traditionally not raised with either the values that lead to more sound, rational voting nor are they expected to make the sacrifices on behalf of their nation and society that men do. Men are drafted to fight in a war if they so choose to call for one. Men hold the careers that provide for families, being the financial backbone of the family unit and play a greater roll in the economy.
There was a good reason that suffrage was limited to white, land-owning males. While it was not egalitarian, it was probably more prone to making the better decisions.
>>2158052
>There was a good reason that suffrage was limited to white, land-owning males. While it was not egalitarian, it was probably more prone to making the better decisions.
Yeah, like WW1. What a great decision, especially for Germany.
In all its 1400 years of history, was there an emperor born in the purple who wasn't a sociopath? Name some based children of wealth and power who weren't complete shits and why.
>>2157690
Alexander the Great.
is it really sociopathy if you were raised from birth to consider the plebs lower than the shit on the bottom of your sandals?
>>2157785
People are rarely raised that way. Humans, like chimps, naturally hate people who are at the bottom of the social hierarchy.