In all its 1400 years of history, was there an emperor born in the purple who wasn't a sociopath? Name some based children of wealth and power who weren't complete shits and why.
>>2157690
Alexander the Great.
is it really sociopathy if you were raised from birth to consider the plebs lower than the shit on the bottom of your sandals?
>>2157785
People are rarely raised that way. Humans, like chimps, naturally hate people who are at the bottom of the social hierarchy.
>>2157690
>complains about sociopaths while posting in a website filled with them
Seneca, cicero,plutarch,livy,marcus aurelius.
All philosopers/learned men that extolled the virtues of friendship among other things that go against the common symptoms of being a sociopath
this >>2157790
they weren't sociopaths, they were normies
A sociopath would promote commoners and carefully cater to the masses so their Empire functions properly whereas a normy would intentionally treat them like doormats even at their own expense.
>>2157800
None of those men you mention were born to the purple.
Actually very few emperors in the first few centuries were. Many were usurpers or adopted children.
>>2157769
Bait.
>>2157769
I don't think being the scion of the king of a hellenic backwater counts.
>>2157785
Is that how Commodus was raised? The excuse for Caracalla was that he had a severely traumatic childhood, but I don't think he was raised that way either.
>>2157798
Naw, they just ate too many paint chips growing up.
>>2157835
Right. The 4 or 5 good emperors chose a mature man from outside of his family, because none of them had children. Basically, monarchs should not be allowed to breed, or should have their children disinherited.