Archived threads in /g/ - Technology - 7653. page

>>55987549
You're using a bloated as fuck OS famalampai

>>55987549
>he fell for the m.2 meme

File: 2.jpg (21KB, 372x260px) Image search: [Google]

21KB, 372x260px

>>55987549
>8GiB RAM
>7GB VRAM
>Windows 10
>Home Edition
>Air Humidifier SSD
>SSD Not on Port 0
Nigga

If you have to take features out to make it usable by women, it's not good UI.

I don't even understand why you would want to do that.

>>55987591
Women aren't high end users.

If women and old people can use it without having to ask questions/ be afraid of a feature not explained so they understand, and if all of the options are presented in an easy to locate/select manner I'd say it's good. It's all about minimizing the amount of clicks/touches they have to use, because god knows they need to focus more on the road.

I don't believe it

>>55987541
It's from staples and from PNY

here's the link again if you miss it

http://www.staples.com/PNY-Turbo-128GB-USB-3-0-Flash-Drive-P-FD128TBOP-GE/product_338634?externalize=certona

Why the fuck do you need 128gb of removable storage?

>>55987405
>I'm specifically asking about Go and Rust because I want to better understand the strengths and weaknesses of C
What? You might be better off asking about C if you want to know about C.

>>55987405
Rust is a meme. Go is a meme but you can get paid to use it.

>>55987405
They have completely different use cases. Go is for writing network services, like the backend of a web app. Rust is for doing high speed low level work where you have to talk to the OS or the hardware directly.

Maybe youre not familiar with the 50 or so file extensions that can cause code to be executed on Windows

>>55987406

It's not OP, run wild and free and laugh at all these suckers.

File: 1468907027742.jpg (14KB, 376x376px) Image search: [Google]

14KB, 376x376px

>>55987432
this.

I'm gay but I'm not sure how my parents will react, what do I do?

>>55987378
>is desktop programming dead?
Pretty much, if not the stalest field of programming

>is JS the future?
Of web dev, yes.

>>55987399
what?

>>55987326
one that people will actually use.

>>55987480

10/10 suggestion.


Filehosts turn a lot of money apparently but they come at the catch of legality issues.

Top Ten lists churn money out at a stupid rate.

I'm trying to get into this myself, I'm quite amazed at some people on flippa posting results within 1.5 months and it's only about 10 posts, I assume these are luck but the idea is since hosting and domains are cheap, you can take over 30 chances with $100

>>55987280
AMD Fury X.

File: keys_a.png (6KB, 36x33px) Image search: [Google]

6KB, 36x33px

>>55987376
Why?

whichever one you can get the cheapest

File: Koala.jpg (763KB, 1024x768px) Image search: [Google]

763KB, 1024x768px

tl;dr I'm planning on getting a new computer.

I'd like some advice and discussion.

A simple vote for making it myself or having something else do it is fine.
But I wanted the discussion to potentially be deeper than a poll. So I omitted it.

So yeah. Put it together for more? Have something else put it together for less? Go for a quad-core laptop or something? Something else?

Just asking.

- Also here's a picture of a Koala. It is the runner-up to the question mark for the decided opening post. Which would be better? You decide.

File: 80074_1452456394.png (362KB, 700x700px) Image search: [Google]

362KB, 700x700px

>>55987250
>buying parts and paying someone to build it/having someone else buy parts and build it
>somehow cheaper than just buying parts and building it yourself
how exactly do you come to the conclusion that paying extra for the service of having someone build you a computer is cheaper than building a computer sans said service, that's not how it works
>"I'll just disassemble it and then re-assemble it myself"

>basically my plan is to ask manufacturers if they can assemble it like $500 or at least $100 less than ordering the parts and doing it myself

you're so silly, anon, it's cute
you can't just call up dell and ask them to build you a computer as if you were ordering a pizza
there might be some manufacturers that do something -kind of- like that, or maybe some places that offer a custom build service, but you can absolutely expect to spend extra for something like that


to answer your question:
a large part of the reason why people build their own PCs is that it's almost often always cheaper than buying a prebuilt of any sort
furthermore, if you want to go really nig-tier you have the option to buy used parts and cheapo xeons and shit
you do the math

also, next time, >>>/sqt/
>>55976659

File: 98.jpg (96KB, 700x700px) Image search: [Google]

96KB, 700x700px

>>55987515
>buying cheaper parts instead of buying more expensive parts
>somehow more expensive than buying more expensive parts and dealing with that
how exactly do you come to the conclusion that paying extra for the parts of having someone overcharge you parts is cheaper than customizing a computer sans said price, that's not how it works
>you're so silly, anon, it's cute

>you can't just call up dell and ask them to build you a computer as if you were ordering a pizza

you're so silly, anon, it's cute
i never said you can just call up dell and ask them to build you a computer as if you were ordering a pizza, you came up with that on your own.
there are manufacturers that do something like that, manufacturing "custom build service" same thing, but you can absolutely expect to spend less for something like that


to answer your response:
a large part of the reason why people customize their own PCs is that it's almost often always cheaper than buying a prebuilt more expensive part of any sort
furthermore, if you want to go really nig-tier you have the option to buy more expensive parts and shit
you do the math

also, next time, >>>/trash/
>>>/trash/

File: 1467856875501.webm (2MB, 1280x720px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 1280x720px

>>55987156
No

>>55987156

No. Wages are about to fall off a cliff, between H1Bs and offshoring, talent glut, and job consolidation. And corporate America hates IT, culturally. Go comp sci, or MBA, or become a plumber.

After reviewing the extensive list of things you like and hate, I can tell you'd be perfect for a career as a system admin

GET OUT OF MY BOARD YOU FUCKING UNDERAGE /V/ERMIN

NIGGGEEEEEEEEERRRRRRRRR

>>55987131
Not a /v/irgin sorry

>>55987121
Probably going to go used in that case?
Or an 880k+gtx 1060? How cheap is an a10 7890k?

Idk europrices

I N S T A L L. G E N T O O
N
S
T
A
L
L

G
E
N
T
O
O

>>55987255
Been better off sticking with the retards on google and android forums. Thanks for the bump I guess

Maybe try getting a different ROM on the g3

>>55986975
>NOAA reports weather conditions that are unorthodox
>'BTFO ANDROIDFAGS iKEKMASTERRACE.jiff'

le wew lad

>>55987012
Basically I want to know the best weather source.

> not using klwp with android.
Go back to apple.

no one needs a command line anything

>>55986879
I really need.

>>55986875
lynx

>>55986778

also forgot the biggest thing

theres an autism mode in CM called performance which is supposed to save battery by throtling the CPU

and the battery still drained

meanwhile stock HTC rom has just the developer mode menus and its stock battery options has a "saver" mode that lets you select thigns, one of them is "exclusive exceessive cpu usage" and theres also a feature to disable background cpu/data usage

all of that and more is in the CM menus yet didnt do shit, just made the phone run like shit when on "battery saver mode"

Just werks on my device been running nightly cm 13 on my s5 with no issues

>>55986778
Running CM 13 on a 1st gen Moto /g/, works really great.