Archived threads in /k/ - Weapons - 1690. page

File: Contents 2.jpg (43KB, 508x754px) Image search: [Google]

43KB, 508x754px

>>33357586
I have decided to keep the military/civilian split as it allows me to more streamline my process and not repeat myself to much.

File: pdf View.jpg (387KB, 1197x797px) Image search: [Google]

387KB, 1197x797px

>>33357590
Finally this is just a brief overview, there will be a lot more additions before this is complete however I thought I'd give you guys a taste of it's current scale.

Oh any questions comments and suggestions can also be sent here

Prepperpdf(at)Gmail(dot)com

>>33357573

Out of sheer curiosity, what are you basing this glowing statement on?

>>33357573
>singapore
>freedom

>>33357573
Are you indonesian by any chance ?

It would swap the aesthetics of two whole generations of fudds and mall ninjas.

>>33358264
>Digital tiger stripe dipped ARs

>>33357379
I don't know if it's real, but why would anyone pay $1,350 for an abused handgun?

>>33357400

Mostly an assumed collector value, some people like the been there done that look. And you can tell people that a Marine Raider, like, totally wasted a dozen ragheads with it or whatever.

File: SIG SAUER P226 Elite Scorpion in FDE2.jpg (110KB, 800x559px) Image search: [Google]

110KB, 800x559px

>>33357379
>being this dum

>>33357301
People like different things and it's silly to hate on people preferences. Lets see how many (you)s you get with this tired worn out rehashed .45 vs everyone thread where nothing will be decided or changed by the end.

45ACP is a round of it's time. Large and slow. When a huge chunk of lead of needed to impact a target and penatrate deep.

Then modernized ballistics started to come on the scene. FMJ was no longer the flavor when JHP where getting sweet penetration and wider kill holes in a smaller package like the newer 9mm and 40SW.

45ACP, if it floats your boat, rock it wit your cock out

>>33357362
fpbp

File: running system.jpg (78KB, 800x600px) Image search: [Google]

78KB, 800x600px

>>33357184

>>33357184
Because the military took a lesson from Ivan chesnokov and said FUCK YOU EQUIPMENT IS FINE

? Every military on the planet that isn't complete dog shit has old starting points for their equipment with new upgrades.

Colt 1860 army or an 1851 Navy are both under $300. Avoid the brass frames like the plague

File: P4170003.jpg (3MB, 3216x4288px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 3216x4288px

>>33357145
Thanks, I hadn't really considered a revolver, but it does seem like a lot of fun.

A long gun would be used mostly for target shooting and potentially durr.

File: 1397013808092.jpg (100KB, 799x522px) Image search: [Google]

100KB, 799x522px

Fun ron to bumb

they're shit m8

>>33357121
Cheap, lightweight, ultimately functional but will show greatly accelerated wear if you do a lot of magdumping or if you try to use it as you would an AR or AK, so don't look at it as a substitute for either, it can't take it.

Slow shooting at the range with generous pauses every 10 rounds or so, and it'll last well enough. It can handle some magdumping, but not a lot of it, and not frequently.

The handguards can be folded down into a bipod but this is a wasted feature, too flimsy, keep them folded up. Lower can fold up for storage, and stock can store one or two magazines (one 30 or two 10).

So, it has some pros, but also some cons, it'll work well enough but know it's limitations and what to expect. If you want a cheap gun which could save your life in a home invasion, it can do that.

>>33357121
They are super light and it makes 556 recoil more. I'm not a fan but done people love it. It's great for going hiking with because of its concealability

File: 03e54d3c8c5cd1750a71771cca14f019.jpg (39KB, 517x502px) Image search: [Google]

39KB, 517x502px

>>33357057

Garage gunsmithing is never a good idea, kiddos
Good luck trying to make your little blowback hackjob not to explode

File: 1488741997573.jpg (96KB, 1080x1080px) Image search: [Google]

96KB, 1080x1080px

>>33356906
>Is it feasable to build my own semi automatic guns?
Certainly!

>>33356906
What restrictions are you looking to dodge?

>80%
1911
1991
Sig P228/P229
Glock 17/17L/18/22/24/31/37
Glock 19/23/25/32/38

for all intensive purposes Australia could EASILY defeat the US forces in fact we would receive a Notice of Surrender within first the 48 hours of the war

>>33356898
Fuck off, we're full.

become an emu breeder.

The wrong one. He should try again.

Fun fact, he did it just so he could include the clip of him doing it in his rap video, but he fucked up the recording and couldn't properly rap afterwards because of the gunshot wound.

Also it was apparently 38 caliber.

File: manlet sighting.gif (2MB, 400x206px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 400x206px

>>33357022
kek, sounds like somebody didn't go to brain school.

>>33356539
not at all

don't need to sever it to render it ineffective

File: 2222.jpg (807KB, 1500x1500px) Image search: [Google]

807KB, 1500x1500px

>>33356539

>>33356524
>Fighter
F-35
>Transport
C-130
>Helicopter
AH-9

File: 1489726246449.jpg (35KB, 926x515px) Image search: [Google]

35KB, 926x515px

Jet, cause bitches love fighter pilots.

>>33356524

>Fighter
Rafale C or JAS 39 Gripen

>Transport
C-5 Galaxy or C-17 Globemaster III

>Helicopter
Mi-24P Hind F

>>33356520
22, if ya cant kill it with that ya just aint a goodnuf shot.

2 gauge shotgun.
No, that's not a typo.

File: 6.gif (4KB, 209x105px) Image search: [Google]

4KB, 209x105px

>>33356520