post em
I'll go first
Isaac Newton, dude had a gift for science, could of been great.. but instead wasted time on alchemy, bible study crap
tf? The work he did laid the foundation of modern mathematics and physics. He's arguably the most accomplished scientist/intellectual of all time, hardly wasted potential.
>Finding the the philosopher's stone
>Achieving henosis
>Using alignments between cosmic and earthy events to see the true nature of God
>"wasting time"
wtf you're talking about
>what's newtonian physics
>what's calculus
>what's his work on optics
So, why aren't you a Zoroastrian again?
Jesus died on the cross for my sins.
>>2649176
Because my head isn't quite so far up my own ass that I see out of my navel.
>>2649176
Theor holy texts are just fragments. I want the full version
What is your reprobated reason for refusing to understand and accept double predestination?
Muh feels?:
> "a horrible decree"
> "a most ruthless statement"
Or simple denial?:
> "a terrible theological theory"
> "an illegitimate inference of logic"
*loses an argument about the Trinity*
*has Michael Servetus burned at the stake*
*pssssh... nothing personal.... kid*
>>2649148
>accept double predestination
but i do, because its biblical
Julius Caesar was a great leader and didn't deserve to be assassinated. Prove me wrong faggots.
>pro-tip: you can't
>>2649118
If he was not assassinated, Octavius would not have risen to greatness - and that would've denied Julius' glory by extension.
Julius was predestined to die and it was precisely because he died that he was a great leader.
He and his army murdered and raped millions of whites. He was an honorary nigger. Prove me wrong
>>2649213
Warring against themselves is just what Europeans do.
What is the consensus here on this lad?
>>2649048
He's great.
Gets carried away in the storytelling, sometimes exaggerates or embellishes.
You could do a lot worse but as always it's better to read an academic journal or peer-reviewed history book.
Like he repeatedly states: he's not an historian; he's an enthusiast. A good entertaining overview of stuff, and then check out his bibliography if you're interested in the topic and want more scholarly take.
Who was in the wrong?
25 year rule
>>2649009
Koresh the kid fucker.
The ATF really fucked up the initial investigation, the FBI fucked up the raid, and they fucked up royally with the final assault.
But the Branch Davidians set the fire.
Granted, the FBI had been booming loud music at them for so long that they were likely sleep deprived to the point of insanity, and then they followed it up by reenacting the juicy "end of days" parts of the Bible in front of a bunch of Christian fundamentalists.
Is Araboo the most obscure -boo in existence?
How many of you have actually learned Arabic and have extensive knowledge about the middle east? Be honest.
Why is Arab culture and history so ubiquitous yet so unknown on any scale outside of superficiality?
What about this region is so disinteresting for whites, even for us autismos who talk about history on a Kyrgyz horseriding forum?
>>2648950
>Is Araboo the most obscure -boo in existence?
Not even close as Arab culture is spread around the whole world.
9/11 left a scare on all of us during our formative years causing us to welcome our conquerors with open arms.
It's extremely common in areas where primitives encountered rich Arab traders.
West Africa, Southeast Asia, Central Asia.
>You were born too late to experience a country as based as East Germany
feels bad man.
>You were born too late to experience a country as shit as East Germany
feels good man.
>You were born
feels bad man.
>>2648960
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P1CyPjQQTAM
>No muzzies
>no terrorism
Take up the White Man's burden,
Send forth the best ye breed
In patience to abide,
The savage wars of peace
No tawdry rule of kings
Ye dare not stoop to less
Have done with childish days
Your new-caught, sullen Middle- East peoples,
Half-devil and half-child.
Or we could always use the stick!
Pile on the brown man's burden
To gratify your greed;
Go, clear away the "niggers"
Who progress would impede;
Be very stern, for truly
'Tis useless to be mild
With new-caught, sullen peoples,
Half devil and half child.
Pile on the brown man's burden;
And, if ye rouse his hate,
Meet his old-fashioned reasons
With Maxims up to date.
With shells and dumdum bullets
A hundred times made plain
The brown man's loss must ever
Imply the white man's gain.
Pile on the brown man's burden,
compel him to be free;
Let all your manifestoes
Reek with philanthropy.
And if with heathen folly
He dares your will dispute,
Then, in the name of freedom,
Don't hesitate to shoot.
Pile on the brown man's burden,
And if his cry be sore,
That surely need not irk you--
Ye've driven slaves before.
Seize on his ports and pastures,
The fields his people tread;
Go make from them your living,
And mark them with his dead.
Pile on the brown man's burden,
And through the world proclaim
That ye are Freedom's agent--
There's no more paying game!
And, should your own past history
Straight in your teeth be thrown,
Retort that independence
Is good for whites alone
>>2648984
Who the fuck writes this shit?
Is it possible not to fear death?
yeah
>>2648892
Define "fear"
>>2648892
Not sure desu
Speaking as someone who's had to (and I guess still is) facing uncertainty over his life, I can say you can definitely rise over the fear and carry on living once you accept the inevitability of it. Like they say, courage is not the absence of fear but the ability to rise above it. It's cliche but there is some truth to it.
Why did serrated bayonets make everyone chimpout during WWI?
Just a way for propagandists to ramp up hatred for the Germans.
>>2648854
They apparently created a wound that would drop peoples guts on the floor. Not a lot of evidence for it, though.
>>2648885
Are you telling me huns didn't really pike babies?
Recently I decided that I wanted to know the Bible more. So I decided to get into Biblical studies for the New Testament and the how the early Christians are.
But I see a problem, as an Evangelical, I expected that these Christians would be like us, born again, bible believing faithful without the excess of Catholicism. Yet, I get something biazarre.
Why did they fast and follow the Jews?
Why did modern New Testament scholarship think Jesus' disclosure in John 6 is about the Eucharist
Why did it seem that Paul is ok with works and ignore the fact that Jesus died for our sins which we deserve?
Why did the key figures of early Christianity after the Apostles appear to be some sort of proto-catholic?
>>2648800
Because newsflash, Christian doctrine didn't remain constant for 2,000 years.
>>2648805
Does this mean I am wrong?
>>2648800
Why did they fast and follow the Jews?
Because most early Christians were Jews.
>Why did it seem that Paul is ok with works and ignore the fact that Jesus died for our sins which we deserve?
Because Paul was writing 1500 years before sola fide was a thing.
>Why did the key figures of early Christianity after the Apostles appear to be some sort of proto-catholic?
Because their theology would go on to become Catholic orthodoxy.
is it pretty much the autistic version of Randian Objectivism
>>2648696
The *stolen* autistic version Randian Objectivism
It's Jewish ethics with atheistic theology.
I'm doing an essay on the factors that caused the ultimate decline of the Roman republic and need a hand finding good sources and subjects to cover. So far I have chosen two subjects to cover: Economic and social unrest and the military. What others should I cover, and is Plutarch's fall of the roman republic a accurate source?
Birth rates. The Romans lost theirs much like other more modern civilizations.
There is considerable evidence to show that Roman society in the late Republic and early Empire was afflicted by a low birth-rate. Augustus in 18 B.C. found it necessary to pass the "lex Iulia de maritandis ordinibus" in the hope of raising the birth-rate by
penalizing the unmarried and the childless.
In 9 A.D. he attempted to supplement this law with the "lex Papia Poppaea". The very existence of this legislation indicates that the problem of childlessness was widespread and long-Iasting.
Frankly, Romans stopped getting married and having kids pretty much en masse across the Empire.
These provisions didn't work of course but it shows the lengths rulers were willing to go to in order to attempt to halt the decline.
>>2648729
thanks for help bud, got any others that would be good to cover?
will dump some roman pics while I wait.
>Hé, p'tit! Qu'est-ce que tu regardes? T'es pédé ou quoi?
How do you respond?
>>2648652
>implying I was not already /fitlit/ before the merging.
>pic related me
>C-ca doit etre v-vous m'suier
>>2648652
>Throws dog poop disrespectfully in your general direction