What is the consensus here on this lad?

>>2649048
He's great.

Gets carried away in the storytelling, sometimes exaggerates or embellishes.

You could do a lot worse but as always it's better to read an academic journal or peer-reviewed history book.

Like he repeatedly states: he's not an historian; he's an enthusiast. A good entertaining overview of stuff, and then check out his bibliography if you're interested in the topic and want more scholarly take.

>>2649048
he's not a historian...... can you imagine

>>2649070
>>2649073
I thought he had a history degree.

>>2649053
>Gets carried away in the storytelling
B-But that's my favorite part about history

>>2649048
I could listen to King of Kings ah-geen and ah-geen and ah-geeeeeen

>>2649082
yeah, he really brings this stuff to life, and makes it very compelling

maybe it's not as accurate as it would be otherwise, but it's great to listen to

>>2649082
>mfw reading about Magellan and getting caught up in the whole story and thinking how great of a movie this would be
Maybe there's a good dramatization out there.

>>2649086
>King of Kings
I didn't find it very entertaining. Is there something wrong with me? I thoroughly enjoyed khans and blueprint

>>2649103
>Is there something wrong with me?
No. Not everyone is interested in the same things.

File: images.jpg (5KB, 225x225px) Image search: [Google]

5KB, 225x225px

>>2649048
The consensus is QUOTE: "He has no academic pretentions and he's pretty fucking fun to listen to" END QUOTE.

his quote voice is hilarious to me by now but Dan is great