Archived threads in /sci/ - Science & Math - 985. page

>>8595345
could probably be done but is too niche and has the production costs are too high

nobody would want to play it

t. someone who loves math

>>8595345
I like.
Make it and I will play.
However, I expect Skyrim-esque quality now that I've seen that meme.

>>8595303
[math]\frac{\partial}{\partial x}[/math]

>>8595309
I use lagrange notation when dealing with functions, and shoving in symbols into a written paragraph looks messy.

>>8595315
>I use lagrange notation when dealing with functions, and shoving in symbols into a written paragraph looks messy.

Why aren't you using latex? Have you ever even read a research paper?

>>8595276
how did he get no pussy being so important and stuff

>>8595281
i assume he just preferred them young and ripe, as one could say

>>8595276
Well...he was, and he wasn't really.

>>8594713
>Faggot computer scientists still try to pretend they are mathematicians
>There is still no axiomatization of computer science

Lol, try again. Wildberger's axioms would actually be pretty good for the axioms of computer science so I say before you start drowning on your own cum you give him a call and start my formalizing your entire field and then you can talk about diving deeper into pure mathematics via CS.

>>8594742

I don't see the problem of using syntax checking etc to see if mistakes were made. From what I understand what he means with the proof checking is assert whether the expected outcome matches the real outcome. This would allow you to create subsets of the proofs, and identify problems faster by being able to check each set individually.

>>8594742
I see no problem whatsoever in implementing Wildbergers system in any language. Go with
"|"
"||"
"|||"
"||||"
...
as natural numbers and write functions between that do arithmetic.
That's basically what he wants.

The brain contains receptors for sex hormones, so it is valid to make a distinction.

>>8594566
This.
We don't know exactly what are the differences but we can be sure that there is differences between male and female brain.

ok so I was on coincidence right..

[math]\epsilon <0[/math]

[math]: \epsilon = - 1/12[/math]

>>8594295
Why would you make it <0 though. It's always >0.

File: 1481638345237.jpg (13KB, 225x225px) Image search: [Google]

13KB, 225x225px

>How relevant a field is = How scientific a field is

>>8594248
Psychologically is categorically a pseudo-science, nothing can be done about that.

But the guy who came up with that classification is a philosopher so, as anything those crackpots publish, you are free to disregard that as the ramblings of some mental drug addict, as are all philosophers.

>>8594248
It not being useless does not mean it is not pseudoscience

People can get results using unscientific but useful applications

>>8594240
You go to Lewis and Clark? You guys are done with break already?

What does that mean op? If it didn't say gender studies on it, my initial thoughts would be that it is saying gender is a scientific concept.

>>8594240
What does it even mean?

Take two lumps of uranium-235 and shoot them at each other.

>>8593462
I second this

>>8593217
They are available here:

19.9026° N, 75.1002° W


Just show up and ask.

Is a meme.

File: 13631553_10209710390981775_3898474023109117815_n.jpg (159KB, 960x960px) Image search: [Google]

159KB, 960x960px

>>8592960
r memes real?

>>8592954
You mean, Free Willy. ? Don't do that in public.

>>8591835
Thats what 18 years of school is for. You're too old to learn anything new now.

>>8591841
Not him but that's not true at all,I've met some >50 year old farmers who got the high school graduate even if it took them 5 years to get it

>>8591835
Enroll at a community college

we won't have plate tectonics and magnetosphere

>>8591648
>Would the Earth be different if it had a cold core?
Yes, because we would all die of radiation. The moving iron/metal creates the magnetic field.

>>8591649
>>8591650
Ouch. Why? Would the big block of iron-nickel at the core not still be magnetic if cold? I know Mars isn't.

>>8590236
to be honest, historically organic chemistry was done at first, and explained later
so obviously, it's like a mish-mash of everything, and it relies more on experience rather than exact knowledge of subject.

physical organic, and computational chemistry are more solid at this regard, but I personally find them less intuitive

The reason that chemistry is remotely useful to anybody is trend: if all examples in chemistry were unique situations with no clear-cut reactivity patterns, it would be a useless exercise except for what you start with and what you end with. The "random rules" describe how >90% of all relevant examples will react. If you think that all of the examples have a unique solution, you clearly do not understand the trend behind it. The question you should ask yourself (and how these things are explicated in textbooks) is "why" a general rule is general.

>>8590236
>random rules
its just acid base chemistry you fucking brainlet

>>8588108
Another important step towards eliminating the cancer of infinity from mathematics. I am proud to have been born at the same time as this man, so that I can witness the end of this fundamentally broken and paradoxical concept.

>>8588108
>>8588108
If infinity doesn't exist, how would you be able to describe your infinite loneliness?

>>8588149
My infinite loneliness is aleph-null. While still a troublesome concept, I can accept countable infinity if mathematicians are willing to drop the rest of the infinities.

>>8587607
The cognitive impairment is not permanent and resides as the drug leaves the body which can take a few days due to the binding of fat cells.

t. pounds in my lungs

On another note marijuana use is impossible to escape if it's in your environment. If you smoke it since you're twelve you might find yourself needing it for stability of your emotions.

I was reading a paper and it wasn't sure if the effects were due to a residual effect of the drug stemming from a withdrawal of sorts, if the drug was active still for days due to binding to fat cells, or if there was permanent impairment.

In my personal experience, it's the first two.

>>8587607
It's not permanent. The problem is that marijuana, like any high (such as always going back to an abusive lover) is addictive. It's a habit like any other, and as such it can be difficult to break, just as with any other habit.

>>8587607
>is the cognitive impairment permanent?

I think so

t. former cannabis user/addict