Archived threads in /sci/ - Science & Math - 977. page

You'd be fine for the most part unless it got into your eyes, nose, or ears, or someone threw a match in there.
It's not going to absorb through your skin and into your bloodstream faster than it gets in through your digestive system. Most of it in fact is going to bounce off. You'd probably be able to spend all day in there as long as you could ensure you got proper airflow and you weren't breathing in pure alcohol fumes

>>8597713
Are you holding your butthole open with a big straw or some shit?

File: n.jpg (11KB, 93x96px) Image search: [Google]

11KB, 93x96px

>>8597713

Ethanol, you die, painfully, I'd guess faster than slower. It absorbs right through your skin after dissolving the acid mantle. Absolutely you'd be drunk pretty fast followed by acute toxic shock.

Isopropyl similar. I'd guess.

Assuming even if you close your anus, urethra, head orifices, etc.

>>8597660

Graduate high school.

>>8597660
stop negrosciencemanposting

MODS

File: e4NCo0M.jpg (51KB, 729x816px) Image search: [Google]

51KB, 729x816px

Drugs are what got me really into Orgo

I want to say one word to you. Just one word.

Nootropics.

File: fgnSixG.jpg (43KB, 975x480px) Image search: [Google]

43KB, 975x480px

I made this a long ass time ago when I was fucking around with Chemdraw? Any reason this wouldn't work and I'm retarded?

>should still occur

Not in an oxidative atmosphere it shouldn't.

evolution is fucking stupid. its just a theory. i think the bible is logical in that god created us

>>8597304
It won't happen in nature for obvious reasons (drastically different conditions)

But the reason for why we aren't capable of perfectly recreating it may have to do with the low probability

I mean it's original timeline was about half a billion years on a burning earth
It seems only logical that you can't replicate it in a few years in a lab

Not to mention that we can easily form aminoacids required for life, it's probably just that we can't engineer the other cell parts and combine them with our level of science/technology yet

Shameful self bump for sciheads

*sigh*
back to talkorigins I guess.
bye

>>8593922
Does a flashlight?

>>8593556
>Muh platitudes.
Gosh, such an original thinker. ;)

>>8593556
Can forgive a whole lot of black for a body like that.


Consider this, OP:

Let's say humanity invents AI, what would be the biggest reason for it?

Because we can.

So after that AI kills off humanity and starts asking why it exists, it can easily answer the question with "because I can"

The human brain, however, might not be able to accept such an answer for such an open-ended question

>>8593556
OP, is there a source on this image, kind sir?

I don't know much about science but I do know that if it worked, someone would have done it already

File: 56bb90b66a2ce95ab3e1491f72eeedc0.jpg (10KB, 236x287px) Image search: [Google]

10KB, 236x287px

ok dork, listen here:
this idea would work...with a completely friction-less axis... in space. Without resistance of any kind the magnets would keep repelling each other until the cows atomically decayed, but the resistance of air friction and axle friction would cause the wheel to stop. additionally attempting to harness the energy of the spinning wheel in space would be enough resistance for the wheel to cease motion.

If you build this the size of a credit card how electricity would it make?

nvm im retarded

>>8599923
Use /wsr/, retard.
1/(1-(10/11))=11

https://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=1%2F(1-10%2F11)

You have to be 18 to post here, friendo.

>>8599850
"enough"

No, Muhammad, you can't just dig up Uranium rocks and smash it together to make (nuclear) fire. You can sell them to LDCs for a good profit, though.

File: make Hiroshima great again.jpg (94KB, 600x400px) Image search: [Google]

94KB, 600x400px

You could separate Uranium Oxide from rock. It would be pretty hard but possible. You *could* then then separate it into pure Uranium for further processing (If 'simple household tools' include some huge high end chemistry equipment.)

BUT,
even if you did all that you would be unable to produce a bomb. Why? Because isotropic-isolation is not possible without an ass load of centrifuges and that is definitely not a household item and would get the FBI diddling you boi hole before you can say "It's just a prank bro!"

>>8599731
Isn't that just binary?

>>8599731
There are things one simply isn't supposed to know. I advise you abandon the path you're currently on, nothing good can come of it.

>>8599741
Not the picture, sorry.. like this "/\/\///"

>>8599698
a classical mechanics book

Okay, since it looks like nobody knows this particular book, can /sci/ recommend me really good Physics textbooks? (Other than Feynman, please, I'm currently reading it)

>>8599725
Names would be great, thnx

What do you currently know?

A Discrete Math textbook, look for ones that have problems/chapters of things you are interested in.

>>8599691
not much, really. as far as math goes I pretty much know some calculus, but I have had practice on some number theory stuff. all at a pretty low level. I'm really looking for babby's first number theory stuff

>>8599694
thanks m8

>phone posting
>no link
>basic physics concept you learned in 5th grade
Remember how when the teacher would tell you that cold particles like to stay together, like people when they get cold, and when particles get hot, they want to get away from other particles similar to people? That's basically what he's talking about: contraction and expansion of parts.

>>8599526
So you're Asian anon. Good to know.

>>8599550
Apperantly im not the only brainlet as the website link is right fucking there. I wanted a response from a chemist not an engineer.

Amplifier starts clipping

I guess it depends on what you're talking about. When it comes to stuff like music, there's background noise, electrical infetterence, and compression artifacts that get in the way. Otherwise, if it's a pure signal, it's generally just the speaker's innate static

>>8599508
That, or the diaphragm no longer responds linearly with the applied signal.

File: 1280x892_60930N_Telescope-625x352.jpg (54KB, 625x352px) Image search: [Google]

54KB, 625x352px

Also this, but the name is "Five-hundred-meter Aperture Spherical Telescop" (FAST)

File: ayy.jpg (32KB, 480x480px) Image search: [Google]

32KB, 480x480px

>>8599487
That's a radio telescope

>>8599476
this is infrared, primarily, it will capture red and orange-band visible light as well. it's very exciting, the resolution of images will blow the Hubble away. i don't like the planned obsolescence, we need to be designing a replacement now.

hope JWST has a chance to examine KIC 8462852 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/KIC_8462852

File: IMG_2797.jpg (509KB, 821x616px) Image search: [Google]

509KB, 821x616px

>Near Infrared Spectrometer (NIRSPEC)

This thing gets my fucking dick hard