Archived threads in /sci/ - Science & Math - 984. page

>>8596477
its about tree fiddy

>>8596482
Also ITT discuss what field the niggers of science are.

>>8596477
It was just added as an additional parameter

like as if when
F(x,x') = m · x''(t)
wouldn't work for some experiment and you'd try to reconcile the experimental findings with a modified equation
F(x,x') = m · x''(t) · (1 + q·x'''(t))
where q is tiny, and for q=0 you'd obtain the old equation. It's an ad hoc change of the theory.

>>8596453
You haven't explained the rules or goal, faggot.

I say move all panels according to their RGB values. I win.

RED TILES ARE IMPASSIBLE! YOU CANNOT WALK ON THEM! YELLOW TILES ARE ELECTRIC! THEY WILL ELECTROCUTE YOU! GREEN TILES ARE ALARM TILES! IF YOU STEP ON THEM... YOU WILL HAVE TO FIGHT A MONSTER!! ORANGE-TILES ARE ORANGE-SCENTED. THEY WILL MAKE YOU SMELL DELICIOUS! BLUE TILES ARE WATER TILES. SWIM THROUGH THEM IF YOU LIKE, BUT... IF YOU SMELL LIKE ORANGES! THE PIRANHAS WILL BITE YOU. ALSO, IF A BLUE TILE IS NEXT TO A, YELLOW TILE, THE WATER WILL ALSO ZAP YOU! PURPLE TILES ARE SLIPPERY! YOU WILL SLIDE TO THE NEXT TILE! HOWEVER, THE SLIPPERY SOAP... SMELLS LIKE LEMONS!! WHICH PIRAHNAS DO NOT LIKE! PURPLE AND BLUE ARE OKAY! FINALLY, PINK TILES. THEY DON'T DO ANYTHING. STEP ON THEM ALL YOU LIKE.

>>8596478
This is really not bad lol. Might turn it into a game. Should be easy in Unity

>>8596417
>slaving away when you could be doing something entertaining?

I never slave away. I am always doing something entertaining. And when I get bored of doing said entertaining thing, I put the book down and then go jerk off or something.

>>8596417
Because it's fun. You're getting a glimpse into the mind of a genius.

They enjoy it. That's it; it's that simple.

If you don't get hard over writing down abstract symbols and ideas then it's not for you.

A for anime

>>8596338

M for 1,000, probably

M for millennial

>>8596243
Either their measuring equipment fucked up or everything we know is wrong. Temperature is a measure of how much heat energy something has. It can't have less than none. That's not just impossible, that's advanced impossible.

>>8596243

Literally just take any stat mech course.

>>8596243
That Munich is a meme university.

>>8596242

Infinity duh.

>>8596242
s(n) = (0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,2,...)
too lazy to prove, but every number k appears exactly k+1 times. If we assume absolute convergence, we can rearrange the sum to be
[math]\sum_{n=0}^{\infty}n(n+1)[/math]

>>8596242
Shouldn't this diverge (independent of the base used)? s(n) contains all the numbers in N and more, so the sum of the reciprocals of s(n) should be greater than the sum of the reciprocals of N which we know diverges.

In other words (wokring in base 10):

[math]\sum_{n=1}^{\infty} \frac{1}{s(n)} > \frac{1}{1} + \frac{1}{11} + \frac{1}{111} + \frac{1}{1111} + \dots = \sum_{n=1}^{\infty} \frac{1}{n} > \infty

>>8596231
Well, yes, you're probably smart enough to finish university. That's it.

>>8596235
B-b-but what if I'm not smart enough to understand the engineering concepts?

>>8596248
You'll do just fine, just dig in.

>>8596194

OMG, just pick a book and read it.
There's no "perfect" book.
Time spent shitposting on /sci/ is better used to read the book.

>>8596194
>>Google image search pic b/c too lazy to type the title out to get to the amazon page
>"asian american mental health"

kekeke

>>8596194
http://www.maa.org/press/maa-reviews/principles-of-topology

>>8596171
OC voltage B is at 5V, A is at 225V so Vab=220
Input resistance is just 45Ohms

It = Vab/Rab = 220/45 = 4+8/9 Amps

thank you ill try that.

oh fuck, i already had that answer 2 hours ago. Brain fart. just found it in my notes.

>>8596145
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Binomial_coefficient

I mean I could type it into Mathematica with open bounds and know a closed form representation at once.

If you think of binomial coefficents, the first thing the comes to mnd is
(a+b)^k
you could look what that is.

If the coefficient, there are rules to make them smaller (like how to transform one to a sum of two smaller ones)

Pretty sure that suffices

>>8596145

Huh, TIL you can put in negative number in binomial coefficients. You learn something new everyday.

>>8596066
idk but id start with a pre-calc book if you were ever comfortable with geometry, trig, and algebra basics.

Ultimately it depends on your level, and no one could even begin to guess where you're at.

khan academy
/thread

>>8596068
I have a pathetic level on maths, I just tried to do fractions and it was impossible... (I have been stying English at an Institute since I finished high school)

What do you recommend to a fucking idiot¿?

>>8595955
Checked.

You're fucked, though. Sorry, lad. Best you can do is compensate. Try out spaced repetition software for memorizing pure text, or nootropics for getting a bit of a mental boost.

>>8595955
You probably can't. But you don't need to either. Learn to think with base low level principles instead of high and abstract forms.

searched around the web and found some articles on it, cant verify legitimacy though, but most seem to say the same thing. got a 127 iq and feel like shite

>>8595751
Hahaha good one. /pol/ is my main board, necer seen it there though

>>8595751
Before you waste more of your precious time let me tell you that this algorithm has nothing to do with removing real world minorities, nor will running it actually remove black people from your neighbourhood.

I am sorry.

>>8595982
Fuck, wasted three weeks on nothing

>>8595703

I would like to write about this problem a bit, in the course of thinking about it.

I will suppose for initial thought that I have an infinitely long line to work with, though it occurs to me that the distinction between "infinite" and "very long" is very important to this problem, as the problem seems to involve notions of statistics, probability, and the continuum. I am also concerned about the formulation of the problem, and I wish to hold open the idea that its formulation be changed slightly, in thinking through your formulation. The problem's final language even supposes and assumes that there is a telos, or "end" to the iterations, also important. Finally, the idea of non-dense points is immediately suggestive of the naturals along the real line, but your OP picture is an excellent illustrative choice in that it supposes the possibility of irregularity.

Tacit in your problem is the idea that points are marked off one-at-a-time. This is also extremely important. the L is uniform among all such consecutively placed points, in your language - it doesn't vary, but is a constant L. At this point one ought to start thinking of open vs. closed intervals, dedekind cuts, etc. This regularity implicit in the formulation again implies a regularity of a natural number point-spacing, but let's keep thinking speculatively a bit more about your problem, before attempting anything definite.

I must confess to not knowing statistics very well. Therefore I would ask that you provide your own definition of "final average spacing", for example. It seems to me that we might have an infinity of points to work with, which might complicate matters. We might well conclude that such a metric does not exist.

>>8595703
Let T be the length of the line
Let x be a random real number between 0 and T

Then there is a 1-2L/T chance that the line will be split into two lines with length x-L and T-x-L

There is an L/T chance that the line will be shortened to length T-x-L

There is an L/T chance that the line will be shortened to length x-L

The answer will be the number of times this can recur divided by T

Let us attempt engagements with the thrust of OP's problem. The following thoughts are also offered without proof by way of sketch, and deserve checking.

1) Say that the space is R, the real number line (which serves for a true line, in the literal mathematical sense, extending infinitely in both directions). L meanwhile is some finite radius (open, half open, closed? I don't see how it's material at this trivial case). P1 is generated anywhere on the real line, RANDOMLY, excluding its radius. Can't do P2 anywhere inside P1's L radius. We have an iterative process. now do P2, RANDOMLY. same thing, same L.

Clearly infinitely many P's may be generated in a a straightforward iterative fashion (is the axiom of choice tacit in this?), in an irregular way. OP's question is thus still valid in this version and I don't know how to go about it, here.

2) Consider instead of the line R, the ray [0,inf) , or the appropriate caveat(?) (0,inf). We still have infinitely much space to work with, generating infinitely many P's per the above treatment. Again, I don't know how to approach this.

3) Now the interesting part. Consider some finite line-segment-tier subset of R, being either closed, open, or half-open intervals as subcases and interest require, now apply the above P-L logic. Having only finite space to work with, (with respect to some L), it seems reasonable that the space should be finitely exhausted, in a general way. Thus OP's thing of "very long line" as opposed to "infinite line" proves to be germane after some thought. Some boilerplate about intervals, points, etc needs to be pinned down I would suggest, along with the statistical stuff that I admitted to not knowing.

I invite others to develop this train of thought further.

File: but I do.gif (64KB, 500x278px) Image search: [Google]

64KB, 500x278px

bump

>>8595453
It's probably no different than just eating an orange.

>>8595453
no known effect I've heard of.

not that my input matters, I'm a maths student