>New study just released in nature about these giant ass balls that push and pull our local supercluster.
Is this significant? CNN has it on their front page despite all the political drama going on.
Am I right to assume these balls have mass?
Are they clumps of dark matter?
Are they more than empty space?
/brainlet/ here with absolutely no knowledge.
Pic related.
Wow cool shit
I don't see what the big deal is, did we not know that our galaxy was moving until now? I thought that the entire Universe was expanding, including our own galaxy, and I remember reading about Andromeda moving towards the Milky Way as well.
antigravity
for every action there is an equal and opposite reaction
=^)
Are these things the real deal? Will we ever be able to have a Cortana?
When, I first saw the tech, I thought it was only one color and would burn people because it was too high energy.
Yet, some of the new demos look like they are touchable and can produce a couple colors.
How does the plasma work? Can the same air be used forever? Or will change states destroy the ability of air to be used as a hologram?
Any better alternatives to this tech?
I'm sorry to break it to you, but personal glasses or contact lens displays will completely obviate the need for 3d holographic displays. The wearable solution is just so much more tractable and flexible.
The plasma one works like a gamma knife, where they use lasers that individual do not ionize air, but when crossed, produce dielectric breakdown and thus plasma.
>>8643626
Shoot. Well, good to know. Thanks for the detailed explanation.
At least, the HoloLens looks badass. Everything that I have seen about the HoloLens looks amazing.
>>8643645
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AoWi10YVmfE
These guys made it so touching the plasma changed its shape rather than just make the plasma garbled up
shit's got a fucking long way to go before we're tony stark though
Did Darwin mean evolution comes from plants and animals growing together? Just as humans adapt to different foods, so do animals.
>>8643357
ITT
>Kansas attempts to conceptualize a basic concept in Eco evo
>>8643357
>lungfish to coelacanth
>Amphibian to Proto-monkey tree shrew
>three transitions from ape to man
TRIGGERD
anthropocentrism reeeee
>>8643357
I don't know why you are mentioning Darwin.
Yes, that can happen. A term you might want to look up is called "evolutionary arms race".
Where does /sci/ study/work?
What are the places where you're the most alert and productive ? Do you just study in your room or you go somewhere specific ?
I study best at the library or at my parents.
>>8643234
at work where a lot of people are working quietly. I feel like having people notice you adds some pressure to be a good student/ employee and I feel more productive. I fear the judgment I may get when others see me dilly dallying on my phone or computer.
>>8643234
my house
In what order should I learn Mathematics?
Basically, I am NEET and full of time but I want to be busy and fill my brain with knowledge. I already have some knowledge but my autism/OCD tells me to learn 100% not just the essential shit so, I want to start from scratch.
Give me a list starting from basic maths (i.e. Additions, etc...) all the way to the highest of tiers of mathematical subjects.
I am asking for...
>List of subject in order of proficiency (beginner to God)
>Books, Websites, Articles and other resources for me to bookmark/save
>Call me a faggot for "living the life" without education beyond high school
To keep this more /sci/ related...
>What is your favorite subject and formula (doesn't have to be the same subject)? Why?
I like a thing from Geometry called "The Fibonacci sequence" or the "Golden Ratio" because you can find it everywhere if you look hard enough. I would research it a little more to maybe find out how to replicate fingerprints.
>>8643182
>Give me a list starting from basic maths (i.e. Additions, etc...) all the way to the highest of tiers of mathematical subjects.
Why does every faggot who makes this thread ask for this much stuff
There's no point in recommending algebraic topology books to somebody who can't factor quadratics
You won't even be qualified to decide if you want to read it for minimum the next 3-4 years, let alone be ready to actually read it
Pick up the nearest thing you need to learn and start learning it if you actually want to learn math and not just jack off over fantasies about learning math
>>8643190
Thanks. I found what I was looking for on the /sci/ guide website. Well, at least tell me your favorite subject and favorite formula.
>Beginner
Addition (=sequencing in disguise), multiplication (=addition in disguise), exponents (=addition in disguise), substraction (=addition in disguise), dividing (=addition in disguise), fractions (=addition in disguise), functions, relations, defining pi and sqrt(2)
>Introductory level
Derivatives, integrals, logarithms, triangle functions and shit, rings, tensors, vector fields, infinity and limits, probability and statistics, geometry
>Little warm -tier
Riemann hypothesis, Goldbach conjectures, constructing AI girlfriend, P vs NP, spacetime manifolds
>God tier
Defining 1+1 =2
Proving that if 8<6, the statement is false
>Utopia tier
Defining the verb 'IS'
Defining the verb 'CHANGE'
>Legendary Archangel Aria of Endless Tears -tier
Answering the question: why shouldn't I just kill myself now?
>Heart of the God -tier
Finding at least one thing in your existence that you can even remotely consider 'true'
Look closely at this picture /sci/, what do you see?
>>8643169
And then look closely at this paper on the so-called "Penrose notation"
>>8643171
>"A convenient diagrammatic notation for the curvature tensor .... The Ricci identity .... antisymmetry.."
WTF am I reading? has pure maths gone too far??
HAHAHA what the fuck
Alright guys, I have a week where I can basically sit around and do nothing for the entire day. I've decided that I wanna make some serious brain gains this week instead. I'm gonna need book recommendations of the non-coursework sort (AKA, don't recommend a topology textbook). Standards are easy:
>Should be non-fiction
>Minimal memes
>Preferably not horribly boring.
>>8643164
Erwin Schrodinger - What is life?
It's short and fun. You do need some knowledge of Thermodynamics and Calculus to understand it, tho.
>>8643164
>I have a week
>I wanna make some serious brain gains
>I'm gonna need book recommendations of the non-coursework sort
>>Preferably not horribly boring.
>>8643164
again you? if you find science and math horribly boring then stop looking for it and go do something else
What do your science brains thinks about the actual wave of feminist movements? Good to allow women start work in science? Or just some season bullshit?
it all depends, if you have something to contribute to the lab, welcome on in, if not, quit wasting our time
STEM seems to be the one field where feminist agendas cease to apply. There are plenty of successful female scientists, and almost every STEM major says >>8643137 this or something similar.
Contribute. Not to make some kind of political statement or focus on SJW bullshit. Contribute because you love your work. "Dont act like hot shit and you'll be fine" is all you'll ever get.
We need women to clean the labs during the night shift
Many people struggle with self-control/discipline..
Increased self control would be immensely beneficial for both the individual and society, it is like the marshmallow experiment, get one now or get two if you wait a bit.
Instead of getting one marshmallow you get two, thanks to some self-control, still many of the subjects failed to wait and got only one.
But what if you could physically enforce self-control? For example, imagine a person who wants to eat healthy and lose weight but fails all the time, maybe this is an individual who is destined to never succeed in their diet goals.
What if there was a magical button that this individual could press, that would physically force the person to have a perfect diet.. the button is pressed and obviously it would work, no matter how much it sucked for the person.
This would work as long as the person actually presses the button, but pressing the button one time would be a hell of a lot easier than trying to suppress all dietary temptations whenever they come up.
Personally I think I would press that button, but if it only lasted a week, would I press it again, I don't know.. but surely it would be easier than suppressing every temptation. What do you think?
This ''button'' doesn't have to be magical, you could lock yourself up and have someone with instructions of only delivering and exact amount of healthy food for example.
I think with food it would work, you could physically enforce it, only question is would you get tired of pressing the magical button.
But what about working, I've though about it and you could do as with the food, lock yourself up and only allow a schedule that you've made beforehand to enforce that schedule.
This would be harder but I think possible, to only allow certain things on the computer for example so work is possible.
This would mean you have 2 choices, work or don't work, not working means you would have nothing to do but think/sleep/eat, there could also be punishments if you do not work to further physically enforce self-control.
What do you think, would something like this be effective to increase productivity/self-control?
>>8643020
I didn't have enough self discipline to read this whole post.
except there's nothing that forces you to adhere to the schedule.
Is there a point where you just know so much science that nothing impresses or fascinates you anymore?
>tfw to smart too be unimpressed
it's called depression
>>8643027
Hippy mysticism bullshit.
Quantum mechanics is the bastard child of physics.
Hi guys, i have a math question for you. Let's see how smart you are. You have to explain the answer aswell.
Luke finds a ladder of 100 steps with 1 oz of gold on the First step, 2oz of gold on the Second step, 3 oz on the Third and so on...on the last step there are 100 oz of gold.
Knowing that 1 oz of gold costs 50 dollars, what is the total value of the gold collected by Luke?
-1/12
252500
>>8642853
whats an oz?
Vertical farming could be beneficial to humanity in several ways, from making better use of the land to decreasing costs of food transportation from country to city.
What does /sci/ think of this concept in general and, more precisely, why isn't it done en mass?
I believe that if this is done right, the entirety of the planet could be covered with cities and skyscrapers because there would be no more need for conventional agriculture.
>>8642838
I was very skeptical, but the more I see it progressing over time, the more excited I become.
The catch is I think it only works really well for certain types of crops, and I doubt it would be practical to serve as a complete replacement
Building a skyscraper is way more expensive in ft square than buying a field.
>>8642844
>being a poorfag
Why is it that - with regards to gear ratios - these two systems are not the same?
>>8642433
Why would they? B and C share the shaft in the upper picture.
Get some lego technic if you can't understand. I was obsessed with gears when I was a child.
B and C have same RPM at the top while different RPM at the bottom
what is the inverse of gear ratio?
What is the date or discovery period of the existence of a black hole at the center of great spiral vortex?
>>8642351
The wut?
>>8642351
If that's a black hole, why is it white?
>>8642351
So, black holes exist?
>Neils Bohr
>1
What was Landau thinking?
>>8642243
Bohr solved one of the biggest open problems in physics at the time, in doing so he created the old quantum theory. Sure, he ended up not quite being right, but it was an incredibly important step in the right direction. He also contributed to new quantum theory.
>>8642248
He's like a WWE jobber. Talented but his career consists of letting the actual talent kick his shit in
>>8642256
t. was bullied by bohrs grandson in school