Real talk
Are viruses alive?
Can they reproduce with eachother, can we distinctly tell them from bacteria and do they have a mega structure they use to reproduce
Are they alive
>>8640378
Do viruses really been far even as decided to use even go want to do look more like? You've got to be kidding me. Viruses have been further even more decided to use even go need to do look more as anyone can. Can "alive" really be far even as decided half as much to use go wish for that?
>>8640392
You sound like a retard
>are viruses alive?
Yes. Viruses are subject to evolution by natural selection. This is a property that all living things have and that that all non-living things do not have.
u have 1 b usd a lab on a private with no regulations how fast would it take to make human plant hybrids
>>8639544
43 years 12 months 4 days 6 hours 37 seconds 2 millseconds
>1 billion USD
That's barely buy you a genetic engineering starter kit.
>>8641050
He mentioned already having the lab.
Then again, define hybrid, do you mean a person with a sunflower growing on their head? I can do that in a day or two.
They might lose a lot of brain function, but I just need to install a planter pot in their skull.
He was an expert in mathematics not only in logic. How does one git good like Godel? Most undergraduate programs don't even teach logic outside of basic "intro to proofs". The logic taught in those courses will get you no where close to the serious mathematical logic research Godel was into.
Plus Godel wasn't just a mathematical logician. He was supreme in general. How does one become a solid mathematician like him? I feel like most mathematicians alive today aren't nearly as smart as he was.
Same applies for Turing. He was apparently working in other areas of math like Lie Algebra
>>8639014
If you have to ask you never will.
>>8639014
>master of logic
>dies because he eats his own shit because he thinks his food is poisoned
choose one
>>8639056
Implying his food wasn't poisoned
ITT things scientifically uneducated people say that bother you
>That's not evolution, it's adaptation
>>8631665
>ITT things scientifically uneducated people say that bother you
Evolution
>>8631665
>ITT things scientifically uneducated people say that bother you
anything 2bh
>free will
>consciousness
>science can't
Nothing rustles me more.
How do I stop procrastinating and start studying? How do I make studying more fun? Tips please.
what are you doing instead of studying
>>8642144
>Tips please.
what's the black magic of mathematics?
negative """""""""""""""numbers"""""""""""""
>>8642116
Mathematical Finance.
>>8642116
Anything related to engineering.
Its heresy but its hella useful.
0k is literally possible
in a perfect vacuum, yes.
Tfw to smart to fuck black chicks
Is there any reason as to why people would prefer to use shit without the fucking joints?
plastic reacts with some chemicals
>>8641824
why doesn't chemicals wanna react with glass?
>>8641827
because you're too fat and jesus knows you masturbate
How old is science? Was everything done before 1500 either unscientific religious guesswork?
>>8641990
>either unscientific religious guesswork?
Or pure idiocy?
The scientific method has existed since prehistory, whether it was widely applied or not.
A caveman who eats a berry and takes note of whether it makes him sick is doing scientific research.
>>8642015
No he isn't. He never hypothesized it would make him sick.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sULa9Lc4pck
What the fuck this notation is so good, why is it not wildly used ? Do you think it has a flaw I can't think of ?
you have to draw a triangle when normal notation works fine anyways
Does it work with squares?
>>8641878
That argument is not acceptable, the proposed notation is objectively faster and clearer for every equality shown in the video and any equality I can think of.
If you can't find a case where this notation is inferior to the default one, it need to be changed.
ok so I was going to reply to an internet argument about addiction but thought I'd check my sources first, googled a bit about rat park and apparently theres some kind of vague dispute going on despite the study being older than I am.
so what the fuck is it? is there a credible argument for addiction being mind control magic after all?
>>8641850
Yeah, addiction is physiological. When I had been presented with the rat park experiment, my professor explained that, given a healthy lifestyle, the appeal of drugs would not be that strong.
But, after getting addicted, you do develop physiological dependencies on drugs.
>>8641892
nice complete lack of sources you fuckface
>>8641897
OP already knows the experiment and it takes 2 seconds to Google.
Don't be lazy...
Here is the wiki anyway,
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rat_Park
Your laziness and rudeness has been rewarded.
Have a nice day asshole
As an exercise I'm trying to figure out what the index matrix of an order relation looks like.
Anyone who's willing to join the thread is welcome.
>>8641754
>index matrix
what?
>>8641754
Here, the matrix we use to represent [math]P[/math] depends on the linear order of [math]\mathbb{N}[/math] and on how [math]f[/math] is defined.
>>8641757
>what?
I don't know whether there is a name for it.
Since [math]\leq \subset P^{2}[/math] and finite, we can place its points on a grid.
I'm going to write down what I have left on paper now.
Let's make a hypothetical scenario.
Light travels with light speed. If something is bright and one light year away, it'd take one year for the light to travel between the star and the earth.
When we look at the sun, it's about 15 light minutes away. So if you look at it, you'll see the sun as it was 15 minutes ago. If the sun exploded right now, you'd only see it in 15 minutes!
Now let's say, we have a ship and a huge telescope. We travel a couple light years and then stop. Now we look through the telescope, looking directly at the earth.
The earth is, say 10 light years, away. Since light has to travel 10 years to reach us—are we looking at the earth as it was 10 years ago?
What exactly are we seeing then? If we zoom in enough, are we actually gonna see things as they were in 2007? If we traveled enough, would we be able to see 80 years ago, looking at Hitler giving a speech for example?
>>8641532
I don't know anything about physics, but wouldn't you be looking at a Future Earth since light travels faster than your ship?
I dunno but in my scenario I decided that we don't travel with any speed, we just teleport ourselves to a certain place which is 10 or 80 light years away from earth.
What is the scientific reason why we've never built massive underground cities of stone and metal, /sci/?
It's pretty expensive.
>>8641220
Difficult and often costly, very hard to get good airflow, ground water becomes polluted, smoke from all the lights you need is very hard on the lungs, also apparently very noisy.
>>8641235
Looks cozy with bright electric lighting, but imagine having to live in this with nothing but candles and torches for lighting?
- 5 points of methamphetamine per day (smoked in a glass pipe)- so glass pipes (they don't last)
- bic lighters
- tailor made cigarettes
Keeping the rest a secret, though i am happy to discuss more with anyone willing to sponsor.
Then i will quit methamphetamine after 14 weeks, and need nothing.
>>8641170
why anon?
>As his cell lay in the basement, nobody could hear his screams. He eventually lost 24 kg (53 pounds) of weight.[2][3] 18 days later on 19 April, an officer who had unrelated business in the basement opened his cell after noticing the stench that was emanating from it.[4] He needed several weeks to regain his health.[2]
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Andreas_Mihavecz
>>8641170
>Keeping the rest a secret, though i am happy to discuss more with anyone willing to sponsor.
You mean, buy you methamphetamine?
Fuck off meth head.