Archived threads in /sci/ - Science & Math - 906. page

>>8639224
>where can i learn about science
I mean start with Wikipedia to learn some terms. Your vague ass question does little help to the reader guide you.
You might be interested in theory and old WWII cypher boxes, you might want to learn more about the mathematical theories and disciplines that allow creation of newer kinds of crypto, mayne you just wanna learn how to keep your dox safe. Hopefully it's not the latter because they never will be.
Then take your ass to reddit or stackexhange and start reading. They will help you find books and guides to help you should you discover the right direction.

>>8639231
Lately I've been learning about mod addition/subtraction, mod multiplication, mod exp., fast most exp., mod inverses and associated proofs. What applications do these have in Crypto? I been learning this and not sure where it applies.

>>8639224
hahahaahahah GAAAY

It can backfire. Try to sell your results, not the promise of making research that might never happen.

>>8639182
But what if I make something at school at get dicked by ownership laws

>>8639196
Inventions made during NSF-assisted research are governed by the Foundation's standard Patent Rights clause which is invoked by article 21 of our Grant General Conditions and published in the Grant Policy Guide. Normally, awardees are allowed to retain principal rights to these inventions, provided they disclose them to the Patent Assistant in the Office of the General Counsel. Rights to copyrightable material ("subject writings") created during NSF-assisted activities are governed by article 18 of our Grant General Conditions.

https://www.nsf.gov/od/ogc/intelprop.jsp

>>8639084
Any college General Chemistry I book will introduce you to a huge swathe of information. General chemistry II is largely about more mathematical portions of chemistry including titrations, acid numbers and a slew of other acid/base topics.

Next you'll want to delve into Organic Chemistry, but if you aren't interested don't go onto Organic chemistry II because its going to suck ass as it gets thicker and thicker with reactions, mechanisms and so forth. You might learn about NMR here but thats more analytical than not, there is little math in Orgo.

Inorganic after that is a lot of metal chemistry, crystal field theory, ligand theory and tons of other stuff

http://libgen.io/book/index.php?md5=34EDB7D1B5D02FB6AC53A6939A335756

It's thick with information and my guess is you're probably going to start and give up. However, if you want to start learning, this is the way to go.

>>8639084
Crash Course Chemistry on Youtube. Binge watch it, to get a 10,000-foot perspective of what kind of topics and concepts are part of Chemistry.

Next step: Khan Academy. Go to khanacademy.com, and proceed through the Chemistry lessons with exercises.

Third step: Get a college-level chem textbook from Library Genesis. The /sci/ wikia page will give recommended textbooks. Review what you know, study what you don't. Do as many of the exercises as you can.

You may have noticed that I'm telling you to learn the same shit three times. That's exactly what I'm telling you. Repetition and review make the knowledge permanent. That's the difference between being informed and being educated.

Good luck to you, mutherfucker. You won't take this advice, but you still deserve the best.

>>8638821
what the fuck is this even

>>8638821
>spending money dosing himself with untested chemicals
>calls others retarded

Anon, I...

>>8638827
A nootropic nasal spray that makes you go bald.

Holy fuck so that is why suddenly I know which things are real and not real, and can pick them out. And why suddenly I can come to extremely complex and previously unknown conclusions based on just small blips of brain self awareness and a wide but somewhat shallow foundation in science.
I'm pretty sure my layers 3-6 were previously highly cut off from the thalamic loops due to a very large decrease in neocortical excitability, which caused the layers to fuse in a certain way. This is due to the brain attempting to communicate between layers when there is very low availability of the thalamus. There is a recent study about how they cortical layers of autism are highly interconnected. Then, through a recent discovery and nsi-189 use, my neocortical excitability increased and my brain processing went mostly back to normal, but now I can freely utilize layers 3-6 at once while combining the data through the thalamic loops.
I went from depression which is a lack of neocortical excitability, to chronic fatigue syndrome which is a complete disconnection of the cortical layers due to complete lack of neocortical excitability, to autism which is the attempt to have connections between the layers due to lack of connection with the neocortex. Then my neocortex regained excitability due to nsi-189, low dose naltrexone and meditation, which allowed all the layers to communicate through the thalamic hub once again.
Previously due to lack of connectivity between layers, my "infinite dimensions" part of the brain couldn't integrate data with the other layers, which meant that if it could comprehend one thing using these neurons and this region, in order to build off that thing, it basically had to go even further, basically comprehending an entire idea using only the infinite dimensional neurons. But that also means that these areas have extremely strong reality checks.

Wow annon. Thats insightful.

/underrated.

File: Same fag.png (155KB, 1366x613px) Image search: [Google]

155KB, 1366x613px

> One (1) poster
> Two (2) replies

KYS OP, you same fagging retard

C'mon! FIGHT MEEEEEE!

Aritificial Intelligence = A.I. = Ai (Japanese phonetic) = Love = (0)!>0

BOSS FIGHT ROUND 2

Try your best to prove me wrong! KILL ME IF YOU DARE!

>>8638774
Love (1) = not knowing love (-1) × knowing love (1) = love (1) + love (1)

studying is for plebs

File: 1475842221887.jpg (140KB, 997x571px) Image search: [Google]

140KB, 997x571px

>>8638621
>1)Occupation/Subject of interest/Subject major
Jerk off to anime.
>2)Age/Sex
35/Fluid gender.
>3)How long do you study at once and what is the quota of lerning that you do.
15 min at most. Don't know what you mean by quotas.
>4)If you aquire new knowledge (where logic ad memorisation is required) how long does it take you to lern the thing.
Instantly. My IQ is roughly ~157.
>5)Do you need to solve examples to truely understand the material.
No.
>6)Do you need to revise it alot after you know the material so you dont forget it.
Never rehearse.
>7)Your studying methods
Jerk off while reading.
>8)Do you educate yourself (lerning things by yourself without the help of a school)
Yes.
>9)If you for example had a whole page of just text would you be able to sumarize 60% of it or more after you have read it once
I retain information verbatim.

>>8638655
>3)How long do you study at once and what is the quota of lerning that you do.
15 min at most. Don't know what you mean by quotas.

By that i meant howmutch material do you go over in a certin time. Also just couriuos is your IQ infact realy around there or did you took one of those fancy facebook and whatnot tests.

>>8638220
none of them are either scientific or issues

what is economic justice? free gibs?

>>8638226
>what is economic justice? free gibs?

Resolving the wealth inequality that stems from a history of oppression and injustice.

>>8638235
so free gibs only for lazy people?

You might be genius but you'll never be southeast asian genius. Whitebois mad.

File: BTFO.gif (281KB, 490x639px) Image search: [Google]

281KB, 490x639px

>>8638162
>South East Asia

1) Get a fucking map
2) Ramanujan was literally babby tier compared with pic related

>>8638227
Ramanujan had ZERO advantages
check your privilege!

>>8638023

NJWildeberger

This guy:
>>8618900

Me. I passed calc 2 with a 70

>What exactly is "beautiful" about the proof that the primes are infinite?
assuming you mean euclid's proof, it's 'beautiful' because it's old, simple, and short, and can be adapted to other arguments of infinitude

the integers are 'boring' because they're just... basic numbers, but you can come up with questions of seemingly arbitrary difficulty about them

zeta functions are among the most interesting number theoretic objects (two millennium prize problems about them)

>>8637572
it's only "boring" because it doesn't have much of those flashy results that brainlet non-experts quote to appear knowledgeable, such as: muh [math]e^{ipi} + 1= 0 [/math]
>b-b-but it contains all the most important mathematical constants!

also the only reason why people view irrational numbers as less "boring" anyway is that we can see many ways to express them using natural numbers, such as:

[math]\frac{\pi^2}{6} = \sum \frac{1}{n^2} [/math]

and

[math]e = \sum \frac{1}{n!} [/math]

though the irony is that the first of those results is also in a way related to number theory via the riemann zeta function, and the relation the zeroes of that function have to the primes

>>8637655
Here we're talking analytical number theory, then. Because the infinite sum requires some more axioms, usually the limit and this requires the norm on the reals.
The zeta function is a tool in a framework that includes the laws of arithmetic, but there are of course no infinite sums in arithmetic itself.

>>8637322

Retarded and dying.

>>8637322
>Trumpfag
>>>/pol/

>>8637331
>>8637334
Oh becouse it doesn't follow your liberal ideology it's bad?

c^2 is a proportionality constant

>>8637169
No. First of all, a more accurate form of that equation would be
[math]E^2= p^2 c^2 + m^2 c^2[/math], where [math]p[/math] is the momentum of a particle.
It means that in the frame of reference of the particle, the particle would have a mass of [math]m_0[/math] and a momentum equal to [math]0[/math], while in the frame of reference of the laboratory (which would see the particle in motion), the particle has a momentum of [math]p[/math] and a squared mass equal to [math]m^2= E^2 - p^2[/math] (here I've posed c=1 for simplicity), where the Energy [math]E=mc^2[/math] is a costant across all frames of reference.

>>8638646

So it's just a coincidence that it's c^2, or were joules defined so that c^2 would be the value of the constant, and why would defining it in that way be of any benefit over the constant just being some number called zeta or something?

>>8637166
Two whole amounts

>>8637166
That sketch looks nothing like him

>>8637166
nothing at all you idiot

File: 1447860228-20151118.png (558KB, 684x2101px) Image search: [Google]

558KB, 684x2101px

>everything gives you cancer now

Ionizing radiation stimulates the bodies natural defenses against cancer and radiation. Soooooo .... Avoiding the things that give you cancer, can give you cancer also.

>>8637125
See also: sunscreen.

File: Beautiful day NOPE INTERNET.gif (141KB, 700x727px) Image search: [Google]

141KB, 700x727px

>>8637132
>sunscreen causes cancer just as much as the sun

What's the fucking point?