Archived threads in /sci/ - Science & Math - 1352. page

>>8378264
Bump

>>8378264
Yeah I have some.

>>8378417
Titles and authors?

math is for smart ppl tho
explain shanghai

>tfw not smart enough for math but uninterested in other STEM subjects
wanna switch?

>>8378308
No way brainlet

>>8378172
x^2+1
let x= 5+d
(5+d)^2+1 = 26+10d+d^2

for 10d+d^2 < e
let d = min{1, e}/11

>>8378184
I don't understand why you let d=min(1,e)/11

Here's a new proof based on your insight I wrote which I think is right
Proof:
Let e>0
Suppose x = 5+d for some d>0
Suppose abs(x^2+1-26)<e

then, abs((5+d)^2-25)<e
=abs(d^2+10d+25-25)<e
=abs(d^2+10d)<e

Note
abs(d^2+10d)>=abs(d^2)-abs(10d)
Since d>0
=> abs(d^2)-abs(10d)=d^2-10d

then
d^2-10d<e
=>(d-5)^2<e+25
=d-5<sqrt(e+25)
=d<sqrt(e+25)+5

QED

>>8378172
>Suppose abs(x^2+1-26)<e
>Is this right?
No, on the chance this thread isn't bait, what you assumed is what you're supposed to prove.

Structure of an epsilon-delta limit proof:
>To prove: [math]\lim_{x\to a} f(x)=L[/math]
>For all [math]\epsilon>0[/math]
>Prove there exists some constant [math]\delta>0[/math] such that
>[math]|x-a|<\delta \Rightarrow |f(x)-L|<\epsilon[/math]

>>8378087
>Prizes that actually matter:
nope
Nobels are just a popularity contest, and are no different than the academy awards

About to win the Nobel priz next week ama

>>8378194
what for?

>>8378003
Because no one is going to give up 1 billion dollars.
Also, having that money doesn't mean it will be used efficiently. Also, who is going to decide who will get that money?

>>8378003
It is because they all have vested interest in outdated or dying technologies, because they control them, they make money from them.

>>8378020
That is bullshit.
If there was even slight chance of new technology, everyone would jump on it. Because if they are the first one, they can make much more money than old products AND give themselves future.

I know that feel OP...

>>8377980
Don't be addicted to stimulants.

t. stimulant addict

>>8377987
20mg a day is a low prescription, he isnt addicted.

>>8377882
Doesn't finance cover more things, including economy?

>>8377882
mathematics
>300k starting
>any job i want

>>8377888
What about nuclear engineering? :(

ZORICH VA
MATHEMATICAL ANALYSIS

honestly, I probably wouldn't bother learning it again, I am too old. I would just wander off and do something else.

>>8377885

The whole question is under the implication you had to and wanted to.

>>8377792
Time machine would be the pinnacle.

>>8377846
Are you from the future, posting among us having a laugh while you change the future now? Whoa.

>>8377792
The ability to detect the formation of bubble universes and jump in them, thus ensuring that we survive the heat death of the cosmos.
I mean that's probably not gonna happen but yeah that would be pretty final.

>>8377571
>take out loan for million bucks
>take trip to mars
>no banks on mars so they can't collect
>nothing left on earth to repossess
>the cost of retrieving me and jailing me on earth is more than what I owe
Yeah they sure got me.

>>8377571
>What are essential personnel?
Implying that counts for people who will be needed upon Mars for colonisation, such as: doctors, engineers; mechanics, et cetera.

File: 1474683610035.jpg (31KB, 601x843px) Image search: [Google]

31KB, 601x843px

>>8377571
Maybe if you majored in computer science you would have enough money.

>>8377531
The re-wiring in high-functioning autistic spectrum disorders, like Asperger's, often lead to academic genius, but practical and social uselessness.

File: maxresdefault.jpg (113KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

113KB, 1920x1080px

>>8377531
A genius would figure out how to be social by observing other people.

So you aren't autistic / a genius anon, don't worry.

>>8377552
Conflating different forms of intellect as one, that's your daily fallacy.

>>8377374
>Falsifiability is part of the scientific method, right?
Yes.
>If there's never been any real effort to falsify evolution, then it's not a proper scientific theory.
No.

Why don't you make a paper disproving evolution then?

>>8377473
No?

You've just contradicted yourself. If falsifiability is part of the scientific method, then if nobody has tried to falsify evolution then it means the scientific method is not being observed.

Going around looking for proof that your theory is right, and ignoring any evidence to the contrary, is what they do on the show Ancient Aliens.

>non-Platonic point of view
>problematic
What did she mean by these?

Multiplication makes it undecidable.

>>8377352
infinite sets exist

>>8377462
Prove it.

"Or are u all retarded shit poster?" Maybe try to get "expertise" in basic English.

>>8377351
I knew you would post.

Reading random publications from other fields is quite possibly the worst way to learn about it if you don't already have training in them.

File: 1469235227078.jpg (269KB, 1200x675px) Image search: [Google]

269KB, 1200x675px

>>8377104

do I look like I know what a .JPEG is?

>>8377111
why does she look better this way? o.o