Archived threads in /sci/ - Science & Math - 1342. page

Person making*

>'grill' namefig gins up a controversy

>>8386242
>namefig
Why thank you for that rousing reply that really contributed to things. I just figure if I'm going to ask something like this, I'll be transparent with people.

I have my reasons, you have no real reply.

Neccessary and sufficient bump.

>>8386148
How much topology/differential geometry do you already know ?

>>8386148
I had Warner and thought it very good. Not easy for me though, it's pretty fast paced.

On to my next point, I have thought about it, and I do not believe matter exists. Scientists have discovered that atoms are composed of quarks and gluons, but these quarks and gluons are believed to have no properties of their own. Rather, their mass, charge, and even what they are (quark, gluon, electron, et. c.) is determined by an arbitrary spin number that can be changed. This spin number can change, but doesn't, as if it is coded to be what it is. Similar to how a computer, when creating a 3D rendering, creates a bunch of data points in an imaginary space. The computer creates these points, and assigns them data to allow them to behave a certain way, but in reality these data points not only are capable of carrying any other data yet they do not, but they also do not really even exist. They are simply energy flowing through the computer's transistors. That is what I believe the universe as we know it to be - all matter is simply an imaginary array assigned to be how it is, but arbitrary in existence. It is merely energy that is not perceived as it really is. Maybe, just like how a computer creates a 3D array and projects it into 2D space, this universe is 3D space in a 4D array that we will never see, being the observers.

(finished 2/2)

>>8385973
>its fallacious assumption that if something can happen
Your assumption that the many worlds theory assumes this is fallacious.

>>8385997
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Many-worlds_interpretation

There is no atmosphere on the moon

>>8385936
see>>8385952

the moon simply cant hold onto one, its a tiny light bitch

>>8385957
dissapointing

Bumping my own thread.
Come on /sci/

>>8385934
Anyone?

>>8385934
>I've just extracted what I believe to be Saltpeter from an old brick wall

How?

>protons

>>8385889
That's what you get when you let engineers do science

>>8385891
>implying benjamin franklin was an engineer

File: 1462198009190.jpg (418KB, 800x1000px) Image search: [Google]

418KB, 800x1000px

How do you know it isn't?

It is, we're just out of mana.

>>8385832
it is, but it only works when people believe in it.

(Cont.)

I haven't worked this one in such detail, but observing that

[math] \displaystyle \| L (u, v) \| ^ 2 = \sum_{n \ge 25} u ^ 2_ {2n} v ^ 2_ {2n +1} / n ^ 2 \le C\|(u_n/\sqrt n)\|_4^2 \|(v_n/\sqrt n)\|_4^2 \le C\|(u_n/\sqrt n)\|_2^2 \|(v_n/\sqrt n)\|_2^2 = C \left (\sum u ^ 2_ {n} / n \right) \left (\sum v ^ 2_ {n} / n \right) [/math]

one can easily find at leat one closed-form solution applying the bubble integral. In the equation, [math] \displaystyle L [/math] is a bilinear operator.

6. Birch and Swinnerton-Dyer conjecture

The problem with former attempts has been in the way elliptic curves have been dealt with. But this really admits a proof with a computer by checking the (finitely many) categories of curves.

I also have a simpler than Perelman's proof of the Poincare conjecture, but it's not worth the prize anymore

P=NP

P/P=NP/P
N=1

File: 1475231192293.png (25KB, 199x200px) Image search: [Google]

25KB, 199x200px

>>8385844
What if P=0?

4chan Pass user since June 2016.

Adamson, I. A General Topology Workbook. Boston, MA: Birkhäuser, 1996.
Alexandrov, P. S. Elementary Concepts of Topology. New York: Dover, 1961.
Armstrong, M. A. Basic Topology, rev. ed. New York: Springer-Verlag, 1997.
Arnold, B. H. Intuitive Concepts in Elementary Topology. New York: Prentice-Hall, 1962.
Barr, S. Experiments in Topology. New York: Dover, 1964.
Berge, C. Topological Spaces Including a Treatment of Multi-Valued Functions, Vector Spaces and Convexity. New York: Dover, 1997.
Bishop, R. and Goldberg, S. Tensor Analysis on Manifolds. New York: Dover, 1980.
Blackett, D. W. Elementary Topology: A Combinatorial and Algebraic Approach. New York: Academic Press, 1967.
Bloch, E. A First Course in Geometric Topology and Differential Geometry. Boston, MA: Birkhäuser, 1996.
Brown, J. I. and Watson, S. "The Number of Complements of a Topology on n Points is at Least 2^n (Except for Some Special Cases)." Discr. Math. 154, 27-39, 1996.
Chinn, W. G. and Steenrod, N. E. First Concepts of Topology: The Geometry of Mappings of Segments, Curves, Circles, and Disks. Washington, DC: Math. Assoc. Amer., 1966.
Collins, G. P. "The Shapes of Space." Sci. Amer. 291, 94-103, July 2004.
Comtet, L. Advanced Combinatorics: The Art of Finite and Infinite Expansions, rev. enl. ed. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Reidel, p. 229, 1974.
Dugundji, J. Topology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1965.
Eppstein, D. "Geometric Topology." http://www.ics.uci.edu/~eppstein/junkyard/topo.html.
Erné, M. and Stege, K. "Counting Finite Posets and Topologies." Order 8, 247-265, 1991.

>>8385763
Evans, J. W.; Harary, F.; and Lynn, M. S. "On the Computer Enumeration of Finite Topologies." Commun. ACM 10, 295-297 and 313, 1967.
Francis, G. K. A Topological Picturebook. New York: Springer-Verlag, 1987.
Gardner, M. Martin Gardner's Sixth Book of Mathematical Games from Scientific American. New York: Scribner's, 1971.
Gemignani, M. C. Elementary Topology. New York: Dover, 1990.
Gray, A. Modern Differential Geometry of Curves and Surfaces with Mathematica, 2nd ed. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press, 1997.
Greever, J. Theory and Examples of Point-Set Topology. Belmont, CA: Brooks/Cole, 1967.
Heitzig, J. and Reinhold, J. "The Number of Unlabeled Orders on Fourteen Elements." Preprint No. 299. Hanover, Germany: Universität Hannover Institut für Mathematik, 1999.
Hirsch, M. W. Differential Topology. New York: Springer-Verlag, 1988.
Hocking, J. G. and Young, G. S. Topology. New York: Dover, 1988.
Kahn, D. W. Topology: An Introduction to the Point-Set and Algebraic Areas. New York: Dover, 1995.
Kelley, J. L. General Topology. New York: Springer-Verlag, 1975.
Kinsey, L. C. Topology of Surfaces. New York: Springer-Verlag, 1993.
Kleitman, D. and Rothschild, B. L. "The Number of Finite Topologies." Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 25, 276-282, 1970.

>>8385766
Lietzmann, W. Visual Topology. London: Chatto and Windus, 1965.
Lipschutz, S. Theory and Problems of General Topology. New York: Schaum, 1965.
Mendelson, B. Introduction to Topology. New York: Dover, 1990.
Munkres, J. R. Elementary Differential Topology. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1963.
Munkres, J. R. Topology: A First Course, 2nd ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 2000.
Oliver, D. "GANG Library." http://www.gang.umass.edu/library/library_home.html.
Praslov, V. V. and Sossinsky, A. B. Knots, Links, Braids and 3-Manifolds: An Introduction to the New Invariants in Low-Dimensional Topology. Providence, RI: Amer. Math. Soc., 1996.
Rayburn, M. "On the Borel Fields of a Finite Set." Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 19, 885-889, 1968.
Renteln, P. and Dundes, A. "Foolproof: A Sampling of Mathematical Folk Humor." Notices Amer. Math. Soc. 52, 24-34, 2005.
Seifert, H. and Threlfall, W. A Textbook of Topology. New York: Academic Press, 1980.
Shafaat, A. "On the Number of Topologies Definable for a Finite Set." J. Austral. Math. Soc. 8, 194-198, 1968.
Shakhmatv, D. and Watson, S. "Topology Atlas." http://at.yorku.ca/topology/.
Steen, L. A. and Seebach, J. A. Jr. Counterexamples in Topology. New York: Dover, 1996.
Thurston, W. P. Three-Dimensional Geometry and Topology, Vol. 1. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1997.
Tucker, A. W. and Bailey, H. S. Jr. "Topology." Sci. Amer. 182, 18-24, Jan. 1950.
van Mill, J. and Reed, G. M. (Eds.). Open Problems in Topology. New York: Elsevier, 1990.
Veblen, O. Analysis Situs, 2nd ed. New York: Amer. Math. Soc., 1946.
Weisstein, E. W. "Books about Topology." http://www.ericweisstein.com/encyclopedias/books/Topology.html.

File: gif.latex.gif (673B, 86x46px) Image search: [Google]

673B, 86x46px

wrong one whoops

What the x value you're asked to find the limit of?

>>8385515
> take the limit

Are you asking how to take the derivative or just the limit, if the limit then what limit are you trying to evaluate?

>>8385446
because we're going to Europa:
http://www.thespacereview.com/article/3025/1

IT'S NOT JUST A GOOD IDEA, IT'S THE LAW.

It's also a law that NASA has to use the SLS to do it.

File: 2001-a-space-odyssey-original_0.jpg (340KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

340KB, 1920x1080px

>>8385446
Because we would get a trippy trip and return to be fetuses, apparently...

>>8385446
Because that would make us stupider XDDDDDDDDD.

And NASA is too much of a pussy to wait that long for shit to go to jupiter.

There have been plans for deep entry atmo probes though

And they could get to like 200 bar XDDDDDDDD

this is why u learn CS dum fuck
math and physics are super automabable thanks to quantum computers

>20 years
being a bit pessimistic arnt we?
I give it 5.

>>8385380
this is the biggest meme I've seen today

>>8385327

Nah. Nate Silver actually make correct predictions.

>>8385333
maybe in years before 2015.

Nate Silver makes a new prediction every week, which means at minimum he is wrong 51 weeks a year.

thx, I was just thinking about buying the book

*introduces myself*

ask me anything

>>8385274
What are you good at?

>>8385276
maths

I self taught programming at 12 and calculus 1&2 from 14-15

File: 51X6fv-nrYL.jpg (35KB, 423x500px) Image search: [Google]

35KB, 423x500px

i ate playdoh when i was like 4 and my poo poo turned green

is that what happened t oyou?

>>8385271
No my diet isn't playdoh anymore, mostly little caesers and papa John's, whenever I go to their restrooms for a checkup their poo poo always green. Why?

It's one of the last great unanswered questions in medical science, actually. One that's appeared in the medical texts of every civilization in recorded history, and defied every attempt to explain it.

It's up there with aging and afterlife.