Archived threads in /sci/ - Science & Math - 1258. page

Anyone?

I'm not sure I follow, but you are mixing 53 vol% and 57 vol% methanol to create 30 liters of 86 vol% methanol? This is impossible IMO, you could only get a solution in the interval (53 vol%,57 vol%). Never less never more.

>>8456848
agreed

Absolutely

>>8456235
this desu senpai

>>8456234
Just don't let it get on the webbernets if you can avoid it. May I ask what's the big idea...?

>>8456181
>white
>race

>black
>race

>race

there's your answer

>>8456181
probably the same reason aluminum is so diverse....quantum mechanics

Phenotype and genotype. Why are feline so diverse?

lorenz attractor. See http://mathworld.wolfram.com/LorenzAttractor.html and https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lorenz_system

I guess you just put the differnetial equation in, and some initial parameters and das it mane

>>8456096
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lorenz_system

>>8455852
>tfw i'm tripping on acid
I swear 4chan turns into one huge solipsist box every time I do so.

>>8455852
put your shoes on, omg

>>8455867

Don't judge the man's corroding feet fetish, Anon. It's $currentyear

>Creationism

Why is this still taught as fact? Is it because Christians fear/hate the idea of being a tiny, minuscule, unimportant speck in the grand scheme of things?

File: eb270d5f99183edefa2c56c50ab9cc92.jpg (43KB, 236x534px) Image search: [Google]

43KB, 236x534px

>>8455844
>dodging the question by using a "no u" argument

>>8455858
Only one of the two ideas proposed is plausible

Figuring out which one left as an exercise to the reader

>>8455790
If you do you'll probably grow to hate one or the other
The way that math takes so long to do anything practical with
The way comp sci uses retard level math and hardly ever uses it properly

>>8455790
minors and double majors are only required if your actual major is not good enough. if you are doing math or CS you don't need a 2nd degree. its a waste of time.

>>8455790
>majoring in compsci

A complete waste of time. Double major in math and CpE/EE.

We are certain now that there's energy in the vacuum of space. So as the universe expands, according to the square cube law, the amount of energy increases far above the rate of expansion. This is why in the early universe the force of gravity dominated but as we expanded the force of dark energy now dominates.

What we don't know yet is the amount of that energy per unit of vacuum, we're still trying to work that out.

>>8455784
retard

File: IsaacArthur.jpg (110KB, 900x900px) Image search: [Google]

110KB, 900x900px

>>8455784

There's a bit of truth in every bait, so I'll explain it to you like you're being genuine.

It's a hard science physicists don't claim to know what "dark matter" or "dark energy" is.

Some people have come up with some hypotheses that can be tested. Some of them have been shown to be false. Others remain undetermined from current observations.

Some people have come up with hypotheses that we're unable to test now, but may be able to be tested in the future. These hypotheses are naturally greeted by more skepticism from others in the field.

These are great intros to the topics:

Dark Matter: https://youtu.be/IhG1kHbRppY

Dark Energy: https://youtu.be/7w1t5ipDkjE

>>8455711
Search "edema"

>>8455711
of all things available, why such a disgusting picture

>>8455716
/tv/ is a minority on this site

>>8455707
HEY GUYS, LET'S BUILD A CAPITALIST ECONOMIC SYSTEM IN WHICH THE MEANS OF PRODUCTION OF TEXTBOOKS ARE IN THE HANDS OF LARGE COMPANIES AND MILLIONS UPON MILLIONS OF STUDENTS ARE IN NEED OF TEXTBOOKS EACH YEAR!

GEE, I WONDER WHAT COULD POSSIBLY GO WRONG!

>>8455717
The issue isn't capitalism. The issue is the fact school is publicly funded and the free market has zero say in determining matters( such as what textbook to use) as there are no penalties in getting it wrong.

>>8455747
BINGO!

>the sun has fallen out of orbit

A fucking dildo
I want to ram something up my ass one last time before the solar system fucking collapses in the next few minutes

>>8455619
>The Sun has fallen out of orbit and is going to crash into the Earth

I wonder how big the crater in the earth would be if that happened. :^)

>>8455619
What if the sun gets deflected by the moon?

>>8455618
How can we formulate QM without reference to imaginary numbers?

so OP how do you wanna become the next einstein if you cant even spell his name correctly

>>8455631
Ok, good question!
Say we have 1 thousand dogs, if W=Fdx and I = Fdt then W/I = |v|

integral diverges, series diverges
it doesn't even tend to zero baka

>>8455612
The argument is not monotonicly decreasing you mong.

File: 1457847208306.jpg (1MB, 1920x1200px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1920x1200px

It's still like 15 years away from full operation. And that's assuming no more setbacks. It has already been pushed back a lot from original estimates.

Assuming it works, it's still only a proof of concept--- that concept being a fusion reactor that puts out more energy than is put in. It would be up to its successors to "blow every other clean energy argument out". It would still be awesome.

>>8455560
this

ITER's goal is to be a test bed for Fusion and "energy out" Fusion. Not as an actual proto-type for a producible fusion reactor.

>>8455519
Fusion research is great, but I can't see this (or anything similar) as ever being viable as a practical energy source.

Fast neutrons make it much harder to get useful energy out, as well as making radiation shielding a nightmare. Capital cost will be astronomical (capital servicing is the primary operating cost for fission).

What problem does this solve that fission isn't a better solution for?

IMO, fusion power is only going to be viable if we can get aneutronic fusion working, and tokamaks aren't going to do that (1H+11B fusion has 1/2500 the power density of D-T, so we'd need something 2500 times larger for the same power).

Can you articulate in a little shorter sentences?

Also, state what you think the theorem is about.

Also
>infinitely small circle of radius r
while you shouldn't even fall for the Descartes meme of thinking it needs points to make up for lines and planes, please don't reason with infinitesimals like properties for finite things apply to them

File: .eJwFwdENhSAMAMBdGIC2tIC6DUGCJioE6pd5u7-7z7zjMps5VPvcAPZz5jZ2O7WNVIutrdWrpH5Om9sNSTXl4y6PTiBcmMURC0og9AHBiTghvwoyxxAECUjiwkgh8uq87U81vz-3byJQ.png (7KB, 600x600px) Image search: [Google]

7KB, 600x600px

>>8455460
.

In mathematics, the four color theorem, or the four color map theorem, states that, given any separation of a plane into contiguous regions, producing a figure called a map, no more than four colors are required to color the regions of the map so that no two adjacent regions have the same color. Two regions are called adjacent if they share a common boundary that is not a corner, where corners are the points shared by three or more regions.[1]