how hard would be to code a bot waifu AI for pol?
I want to learn to make one bot AI.
where do I learn?
>>8450630
Tay already loves pol
>>8450642
she got shutdown though.
Stop starting this thread everywhere.
how much would it cost to send a rover to Europa?
>>8450617
Three fiddy
>>8450617
The ESA's Jupiter Icy Moons Explorer mission is budgeted at $1.1 billion, which could potentially include a Russian-built Ganymede lander called Laplace-P budgeted at $1.52 million, and they've said that a Europa lander isn't "within the scope of the mission's budget."
So more than $1,101,520,000 I guess.
>>8450617
It's a big sum
Statistically speaking, what are my odds of getting dubs on a random post?
I bet 90% of /sci/ gets this wrong
>>8450523
sigh....
fifty fifty either you get dubs or you don't ha ha
>>8450526
this was painful to read
>>8450539
only half the time. It's either painful or its not. 50 50
So I must give my cat a tablet, but the tablet is overdosed. I calculate that I need to give 40% of the tablet.
So How do I know where is the line dividing the disk into 60%-40%, once I suppose that the product is homogeneous in the tablet ?
>>8450517
0.4*360 degrees
>>8450519
yeah but I do not want a slice, because it involves two cuts. I want to cut once.
the line red is half the pill, but I want to know if the green line is good for dividing into 60-40
>>8450533
I feel like you're disguising your homework problem as a practical problem. If you need to dose it, there are lots of better ways to do it. Like crushing the pill and weighing it out on a scale
Do they exist /sci/?
>>8450448
Yeah probably
Will any of them be close enough that we aren't also separated by geological time scales when it comes to travelling?
Probably not.
There are pretty good chances that there is alien life in our solar system.
Yeah, you live on one planet with life already.
Given the age of universe and how short there have been life on Earth, it's also possible that on many planets organisms died already. Or haven't developed yet on some other.
We might as well never see nor discover any alien organisms. Either due to humans dying out, either to external factors or self destruction, or ceasing to seek them, after abandoning material world.
Is there really a difference between natural phenomenon and magic, other than one being labeled such because we understand it?
How is gravity not magic?
And how is creating a chemical to help stomach pain, for instance, not potion making?
Is it just perception? At what point of understanding does something go from being magic to science? Alchemy to chemistry?
If spell-casting was/is real, and that was measurable and observable phenomenon, would than that be science?
>Oh silly, magic isn't real, spell-casting is just a quantum command prompt. No magic here!
>>8450440
>Is there really a difference between natural phenomenon and magic, other than one being labeled such because we understand it?
Well, ignoring the mysticism that surrounds 'magic' no, not really.
What point are you trying to make? It' just semantics.
>>8450440
The terms are relative. Magic can just happen, supernaturally. Science is reproducible with measures.
Magic has connotations of mysticism and has oogy boogy elements. The big difference between the two is that scientific phenomena happen because of rules. Magic things happen not because of sensical scientific laws but just because they do.
W-what now, /sci/?
I tried to calculate it on my own and I failed.
And now Wolfram failed.
What am I even supposed to do in this situation?
>>8450404
Chances are, there's no analytical solution to this.
It means no function can describe it. If you really want an anti derivative solution you need to define it and study it's properties.
You can use Riemann sums to an arbitrary number( use a shitton for better accuracy)
or put it into mathematica or whatever program you wan to use.
>>8450406
That's fucked up because it's on my textbook and you're supposed to do it with U Substitution. And no, they do not give away the answer.
Someone please explain to me why the integral of e^u equals e^u. In my head it makes sense but i cant prove it.
>>8450373
[eqn]\int e^x[/eqn] hehe
>>8450373
what is the derivative of e^x??
>>8450373
because [math]{d\over dx}e^u=e^u[/math]
duh
how many questions can you do in one day?
thank you for this very specific question
>>8450361
An amount of them.
Does anyone have a torrent or free copy of this book? I refuse to pay 100 dollars just to do my homework.
you just started doing homework? the semester is 2/3 over
>>8450367
>you just started doing homework? the semester is 2/3 over
ROTFL. Silly frosh probably just flunked its midterm.
I've just been taking pictures of the homework session in my friends book. I want my own now so I actually know what I'm doing.
Help a retard. I've never seen the small 5 on question b. Is this a misprint or is it 3.2*5??
>>8450309
fuck knows. the only retard is your teacher or whoever formatted that
>>8450309
bump for interest
are you like 15
How many fucking inflection points are there on this graph? I tried everything from 1-6 inflection points, first determining 3 (CFH) and then 4 (CFHI) but apparently those are still wrong. And there are apparently more than 6??????
help me out, please tell me how many there are.
Looks like zero to me.
>>8450190
First approach:
Inflection = was convex up (f'' < 0) but started being convex down (f'' > 0) / vice versa / straight
Your plot reads as:
(straight?), convex up, convex down, convex up, convex down, convex up, convex down, (straight?)
Hence 5(+2?) point of inflection
Second approach:
Inflection = point with zero curvature (can be best locally approximated with "circle" of infinite radius).
Here you see one such point at the very beginning (not clear), than at ~C, F, ~H, I, K and probably the very end (not clear)
Hence again 5(+2?)
H is the only inflection point, second derivative is zero but it's not a min nor a max
What science fair projects have you done or seen that actually make a difference in the world?
Pic unrelated
>>8450168
A volcano
>>8450168
nice fucking thumbnail, dolt
>>8450708
/thread
can someone explain through science/biology how this guy was able to do this without screaming his ass off and freaking out?
>>8450158
he tried really hard
>>8450158
meditation is training yourself to exert absolute control over your body/mind. It may look like they are sitting around doing nothing for 20+ years, but things like this are great for illustrating what zen physiologically is.
>>8450158
He burnt to bones in that position? With no sound? sheit
Why is cellular respiration and electron transport so hard?!?!? I'm literally gunna fail AP bio.
18+
>>8450129
you are actually autistic is you fail ap bio
>>8450147
lmao not with the teacher i have.