Archived threads in /sci/ - Science & Math - 1135. page

>>8515878
http://www.wolframalpha.com/widgets/view.jsp?id=4a882b546a46d492fdbf3679cbac49d4

>>8515878
Nah mank, triangles are the alpha shape.

>>8515878
>>8515914
Square is the best because it allows us to make grids.

>not playing 07

>>8515851
I have over 10 mil on my rs account.
Get on my level noobs.

>>8515885
I had about 12mil in items, faggot. That was before I was banned for macro using. Happened 1 month ago, I still cry every night.

>>8515769
Well, for starters stop being lazy and actually scan your shit for better comprehension.

Holy fug, OP. A 39 in Algebra II?
Go to tutoring.

>>8515752
that picture is bullshit.
other scientists are peer reviewing you as a scientist in the same way that the police is investigating you as a police officer

>>8515784
also to answer your question, or at least give you acounter question.
who, other than scientists would be competent enough to peer review a scientist?

How is a scientifically illiterate person going to verify science research is done correctly? You don't bring in a random guy with no electrical experience to inspect an electricians work.

With peer review you have people who know their shit from other universities checking over research. This is similar to how independent investigations of police misconduct are supposed to be handled. You get cops from LA to investigate cops from NYC so nobody is covering for their bros.

analytically

>>8515757
What does that mean?

>>8515744
It's false

you have to go de vuelta a tu puto pais
also, just apply: [math] e^{i \theta} = cos( \theta )+i \space sin( \theta )[/math]

>>8515677

Can you explain how this works in detail? Are you saying that this identity can be applied to any scenario? Most of my research suggests a "Left Side, Right Side" method.

>>8515658
let the unit vector in the x axis (1, 0) be
⌈1⌉
⌊0⌋
and the unit (basis) vector in the y direction be
⌈0⌉
⌊1⌋
Then the matrix A(ϕ) that rotates (counter clockwise) a vector by ϕ will take the unit vector in x direction to
⌈cos(ϕ)⌉
⌊sin (ϕ)⌋
and takes the y vector to
⌈-sin(ϕ)⌉
⌊cos(ϕ)⌋
Thus A(ϕ) equals
⌈cos(ϕ) -sin(ϕ)⌉
⌊sin (ϕ) cos(ϕ)⌋
Therefore the unit vector at θ to the x axis will be rotated to θ+ϕ after applying A(ϕ)
⌈cos(ϕ+θ)⌉=⌈cos(ϕ) -sin(ϕ)⌉*⌈cos(θ)⌉
⌊sin (ϕ+θ)⌋=⌊sin (ϕ) cos(ϕ)⌋*⌊sin (θ)⌋

Multiply out to get the relationships of the angle sum to the product

>>8515620
Carbon 14

>>8515621
https://answersingenesis.org/geology/carbon-14/doesnt-carbon-14-dating-disprove-the-bible/

>>8515620

>must have been homosexuals

Topkek.

>Helped gather fruit and used their incredible strength to turn lemons into delicious, fresh lemonade.

Give me line and verse.

>>8515582
You don't want the rear engines to ingest the exhaust from the wing engines. Also debris from wing engines risk destroying the rear engines.

>3 engine jets with 1 engine in the tail have all stopped being produced because of safety concerns over an engine in the tail

lol no, Its because of ETOPS

>>8515717
This, hard to reach, hard to fix, harder to pay for.

>>8515508
>podcasts

It's like reading popsci and wanting to get enlightened.

Philosophy textbooks for High-Schools are a good choice if you want to have a general view of the history, movements, technical terms and philosophies.

Then it depends on what interests you. Politics ? Ethnics ? Art ? Metaphysics ? Epistemology ? Modern philosophy ?

The most " question everything about my or rather our existence" philosopher out there might be Schopenhauer, albeit he is extremely depressive and not fun to read, or Nietzche, who is fun to read, but very easy to misinterpret.

File: All Smiles.jpg (33KB, 379x449px) Image search: [Google]

33KB, 379x449px

>>8515529
I request one "Politics ?", please.

>>8515529
>Schopenhauer
ty familia

>It's like reading popsci and wanting to get enlightened.

just need something to listen at work

numero 2

>>8515405
2

File: Untitled.png (19KB, 1000x1000px) Image search: [Google]

19KB, 1000x1000px

Do you change?

This is some of the lowest tier bait ever, anyone who does not understand this, or falls for this. should put a gun in their mouth.

>>8515390

never heard of sushi?

>>8515413
Not an argument.

>>8515415
I meant raw meat we can't eat.

1. make a functional website
2. pick up freelancing jobs
3. when they ask you how good you are at building websites, link them 1. and tell them "i made dis"
4. get money
also, you'd probably get more detailed answers on /g/ or /adv/

Not a degree. You just need to know how to read other people's code on github.

>>8515387
What the fuck does being a Web Developer have to do with science and math? >>>/g/tfo

IE for a*(b*c) = (a*b)*c to be true is it required there be 3 different members in a group?

>>8515380
No. ({0}, +) is a group, although it's not particularly interesting to say that 0+(0+0) = (0+0)+0

>>8515394
How am I supposed to infer associativity from it if the definition uses 3 differently marked members (a,b,c)? Why can I just put the same number as all of them

it would be noticed through its gravitational influence

>>8515374
>without us knowing it?
Nope, we would have been able to detect perturbations in the orbit of other planets/moon also I think the Lagrangian points would be different if there was another planet shadowing us.

Short answer no. Longer answer it would not be possible for such a massive object to be 'hidden' as it would interact with other objects in the solar system due to its gravitational effect.

No but really. Anyone who passes you an analysis book that does not say the words metric space, and have the chapter on topology before the chapter on limits is doing you no favors. You need to know what compactness is when you get out of an analysis course. And it's lunacy to start talking about differentiation without it. It's possible, sure, but it's a waste of time and energy. To say a continuous function is one where the inverse image of open sets is open is way cooler than that epsilon delta stuff. Then you prove the epsilon delta thing as a theorem. Hows that for motivation?
Anyway, if this review comes off a combative that's because it is. It's unethical to use another text for an undergraduate real analysis class. It insults and short changes the students. Sure it was OK before Rudin wrote the thing, but now? Why spit on your luck? And if you'r a student and find the book too hard? Try harder. That's the point. If you did not crave intellectual work why are you sitting in an analysis course? Dig in. It will make you a better person. Trust me.
Or you could just change your major back to engineering. It's more money and the books always have lots of nice pictures.

Nice pasta

File: 1112481.jpg (59KB, 500x539px) Image search: [Google]

59KB, 500x539px

>>8515300
>tfw this shit actually got spammed with upvotes on Amazon