>No dark energy
>No accelerated expansion
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7UNLgPIiWAg
What is your thoughts on this recent PBS Space Time video?
>>8514268
>What is your thoughts on this recent PBS Space Time video?
I think astronomers should do their thinking for themselves, instead of trying to get /sci/ to do it for free.
Fuckers are getting paid, after all.
What I get from it is that apparently there may be less dark energy than previously thought.
I mean, constant expansion still requires a cosmological constant, i.e. dark energy
I've read the actual paper and it's total crap. They're abusing the press release system. All they do in this papers is reanalyse a single cosmological data set (Supernova Union 2.1) using different methods than everyone else and find no acceleration is only rejected at ~2.8 sigma. (Convientently it doesn't reject their pet model and no it was not blinded). They have made a big fucking deal about this but it's nothing. Take a look at their main plot, no acceleration is the green line, the data favors acceleration. The major issue is that there are dozens of cosmological datasets such as Planck Cosmic Microwave Background Constraints, Baryon Acoustic Oscillation data, local Cepheids, redshfit space distortions... They have ignored all of these when in real cosmology we combine these different datasets to find out what the joint constraint is. So even accepting their work dark energy is still very necessary in cosmology, you don't get to ignore the vast majority of data and then make big claims. Even their bullshit logic for rejecting this data doesn't hold because they admit in the press release that there is another test (the ISW effect) which meets their "dynamical" definition (also bullshit) but they ignored that data too.
They try to make a big deal that in this wider dataset the significance hasn't improved over smaller ones but that is utter bullshit, they haven't used their method on the smaller datasets.
What's the deal with antibiotics?
China fed all our best ones to livestock and bred a superplague we can't cure, probs gonna b fine though lmao
>>8514243
Antibiotics provide an evolutionary selective pressure that results in more resistant microorganisms.
>>8514243
We should stop using them and save them for very serious illnesses, and get the public educated about how they DONT WORK on viral infections.
Since the cascade of new and more advanced antibiotics and further efforts to get better ones has been underway, we've noticed an improvement in the effect of the oldest antibiotics, Penicillin for example hasnt' been used widely since the late 80s and its starting to pay off.
If we reduce antibiotic use, they will become more effective because bacteria have limited ability to acquire resistance, if they're not being pressured by the antibiotics killing them, they will eventually lose resistance to it.
Would it be possible in the near future to use a supercomputer to simulate and experience the past to a very fine detail? This of course would all just be a simulation and not actual time travel by any means
basically no because the universe is a chaotic system.
The supercomputer pretty much have to be able to simulate the whole universe. he'd also have to know the current state of the universe and how each physical law can be reversed.
But to be more realistic, I think it woulf mostly be ebough to simulate the solar system backwards.
But that is still impossible.
What I could imagine are VR scenarios where you can experience a specific time with extremely high detail and historical accuracy. A computer could realistically place you in the 18th century and have you experience some story that could have happened in the 18th century. It wouldnt be a stpry that actually ever happened but one that you generated in a high detail approximation of the 18th century. So you might hear people talk about the french revolution and live in old paris but each detailed interaction with your surroundingd would be made up.
>>8514310
Well it would only really need to simulate what conscious observers are experiencing, it wouldn't need to simulate distant stars and galaxies
>>8514215
Wouldn't it just be easier to timetravel?
Whacha reading?
>>8514004
This stupid thread
reading? i'm taking a full course load. how do you have time to read for leisure unless you're NEET
fucking when ?
Why reinvent the wheel? Anyways, we're not even close. Check back in like a thousand years.
>>8513878
k I will, thanks for the tip
What's wrong with regular trees?
I want to learn calculus from the very basics,but i dont trust the internet. Recommend me a good calculus textbook or whatever book that can teach me everything
>>8513747
Stewart Calculus?
Easy as fuck: Calculus 1 by Stewart
Mid level: Spivak
Hard as fuck: Advanced Calculus by Lynn H Loomis and Sternberg
>>8513747
Just read Apostol, nigga. You literally do not need any other calculus book. I mean if you really are autistic enough to want to learn absolutely everything about calculus (you shouldn't be).
Hello, /sci/. What is the best precalculus book in your opinion? Cohen? Larson? Axler? Aiming at something for self-study
>>8513673
What really is precalculus? Polynomials and stuff? You probably don't need a book, there are plenty of online materials
>>8513677
fundamentals, functions (exponential, logarithmic, trigonometric), polynomial, limits, vectors, sequences and series
>>8513686
I've heard good things about Cohen. What's your end goal?
Why do cities remind me of circuit boards?
pretty much autism
>>8513597
because they're a similar shape? idk but this is a shit thread and you should feel bad.
>>8513602
great post goym
How the hell do people cope with going to one of innumerable the mediocre or bad universities in the USA? Their Wikipedia pages depress me. Why build giant campuses with giant buildings and pretend to care about the sports team when just standing there makes you look stupid in the eyes of society? The degrees are like dunce caps.
In the UK I went to University of [City Name] which was established before the USA existed, has old buildings, a history with a few Nobel prize winners... yet it was still a shithole with brain-dead easy classes and dumb normie students with zero intellectual curiosity and which would be better off knocked down to save taxpayer money.
>>8513250
> The degrees are like dunce caps
You know how on /fit/, some people develop body dysmorphia and start saying ridiculous things because of their extremely skewed perspective?
>>8513250
Science is built piece by piece. Groundwork is often done by those "shit" universities and then the final, more abstract pieces are put into place by the top tiers.
Not everyone can be the best. We need average workers, too. A Ph.D. in EE from MIT isn't going to be satisfied maintaining a power plant but a bsce in EE from state university will be.
You're welcome, faggot.
>>8513250
It's 2016 and all information is freely available on the internet. There's no advantage from a geographically centralized building of learning, no matter how "prestigious" it is. All knowledge is the same and expensive/competitive unis only exist for the purpose of perpetuating this elitist classist system we all are unfortunately forced to live in.
Fuck off OP you conceited ass. Science has no use for you.
There is no future.
Prove me wrong faggots.
>protip You can't.
Yeah, because it only "exists" in the finite present as a construct that most people predict poorly.
>sage in all fields
>>8513202
we dont know the future because it doesnt exist
we can only know the past
i predict the end of this post will be 7
Chemistry really soothes my autism, but I don't really like not understanding the physics behind a lot of it. What books or more general things should I look into to understand physics, with the goal of applying that to chemistry?
>>8513058
What's your math level, chem level, and physics level?
>>8513058
quantum chemistry by mcquarrie is bretty good
>>8513092
0 in all 3, well HS level math
and I guess I never will.
>I understand Planck's Constant
Its why it takes a radio transmission 40 seconds to reach earth from the moon
>I understand nuclear fission
heat and pressure cause atoms to split and release energy
>I understand gravity
the more mass an object has, the greater its attraction to other objects
>I understand nuclear fusion
a stars gravity converts hydrogen into helium, producing energy
But for the life of me, I just don't understand time.
To me, time moves in one direction, forward, and it moves at the same pace no matter where you are. I don't understand how time can move faster in one place than it does in another, or move faster or slower relative to the observer.
It just doesn't make any sense to me.
>>8512865
Radio transmissions are delayed due to the finite speed of light, not Planck's constant.
Heat and pressure do not cause nuclear fission, being hit by neutrons does.
Imagine you have two clocks that measure time using photons. They stand upright and the photons move on the y-axis and get reflected by mirrors. Every time a photon hits a mirror the time count of the clock that registrated it goes up by one. The numbers of photons and the lspeed of light are always the same. Now one clock remains where it is and the other one moves by the distance x while its photons (photons b) move by the distance y on the y-axis. The photons b now have moved by sqrt(x^2 + y^2). If time went by the same pace everywhere this wouldn´t be possible because the speed of light is ALWAYS the same (if it stays in the same medium). It means there are two initial systems with different time (S(steady) and S'(moving)). The time diletation would be t= t' / sqrt(1-v^2/c^2)
>>8512865
>I don't understand relativity
What's to understand? It's bullshit.
The only reason anyone "Agrees" with relativity is to keep their job.
>Eidetic memory is typically only found in young children, as it is virtually nonexistent in adults.[6][8] Hudmon stated, "Children possess far more capacity for eidetic imagery than adults, suggesting that a developmental change (such as acquiring language skills) may disrupt the potential for eidetic imagery."[8] Eidetic memory has been found in 2 to 10 percent of children aged 6 to 12. It has been hypothesized that language acquisition and verbal skills allow older children to think more abstractly and thus rely less on visual memory systems.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eidetic_memory
>>8511878
Take a 10mg daily cycle of sunifiram for about a year.
>>8511878
Obviously you just need to forget how to speak.
>>8511948
Can you please elaborate about your experience?
Mind you, I'm willing to do it if it really works.
Post unis, discuss your major etc
> University
Universitat de Girona, Spain
>Major
Computer Engineering
98% males, the only female is an ogre. Teachers are high school tier. Everyone is a normie.
For example doing the four color theorem someone raises their hand:
"Sir, do we have to bring pencil colors in order to study this theorem?"
Everyone laughs.
Doing Data Bases:
"I connected the TRUCK entity to the INTERNET entity"
"But trucks don't have wifi!"
Everyone laughs.
Mfw stuck with these people for four years.
>University
Universidad de Castilla-La Mancha, Spain
>Major
Chemistry
We all make drugs all day and spend the time using carbon tetrachlorure on all guys lolz
Jk we all fail exams and go on parties drinking all the alcohol we can
everyone's happy
F
>https://www.nasaspaceflight.com/2016/12/roscosmos-progress-ms-0465p-to-station/
>>8509701
Not that long since the last time this happened, right?
>>8509701