Ever since I was about 5 I noticed that random events weren't as they should be. Specifically I noticed that occasionally I could predict a random event and that when playing board games the outcome of the dice was not even close to an even six way split. But I've always rationalized that as observational bias...
>Until now because for once I've actually measured it
I was playing pokemon showdown with a full team of pic related (inb4 /vg/) using only 70% accurate moves and across multiple games with multiple turns per game I quickly had a decent sample size of 100 attacks. Though this large sample size was hardly needed because I was only 25% accurate in practice which assuming the accuracy of 70% is accurate is about a 1 in 10e20 chance.
>1 in 100000000000000000000
Naturally I though that the random number generator was at fault however that is not the case as pokemon hoedown uses a proper pseudo random number generator which though not exactly 70% is extremely close.
Getting to the /sci/ part
>How do you think this works
To be clear I've observed
>statistically impossible odds of random components of games both in and out of my favor
>occasional knowledge of the outcome of a random process before the process has been completed
My bet is on quantum mechanics
You can talk all you want about your anecdotal evidence. Once you get into an actual study and I read about it online in the future then we can talk.
>>8515311
or you misunderstand what random means
Hey /sci/ 1/6 times I roll a die and I predict the number
I must be quantum mechanically psychic huh guys
ask an harvard phd researching triple integrals anything
epic shitpost, faggot
>>8511993
ma dick
>>8511993
ma dick
Hey physics newfag here.
Can i use tons and meters cubed in the density formula? Or do i need to convert to kilograms or something like that
you can use seashells and decimeters if you want it doesnt make a difference.
Newton, Joule, watt etc are always express as function of kg, so use kg.
Ton is a "pop" method to express mass, but don't use it in your problem :)
>>8516986
1 joule is .3 seashells per nu-meter.
easy conversion, brainlet
What are the chances of anything coming from Mars?
>>8516783
just watch the latest vsauce video. now kindly fuck off and do your calc homework
>>8516783
a million to one
>>8516803
So it's said, but do you have any evidence?
Why do I get thirsty after exercising even though I haven't sweated at all? My mouth gets really dry too when I increase my heart rate a lot -- again, not sweating at all though.
I am usually very sedentary if it makes a difference.
you're probably already dehydrated
and you use water in other ways, not just sweating.
renal function ring a bell?
>>8516780
So what does exercising have to do with that
Does /sci/ use twitter? I want to so I can fit more in with the normies, but what is even the point? Do people actually give a fuck about what you are posting? I mean I dont even read anyones facebook posts
>fitting in with normies
>not knowing they're essentially neonazis
SHIDDYDIGGY
i use it to retweet trump tweets, i never actually write anything of my own
the site is very useful for getting up to the second news
>>8516642
I used it to message my ex after she got a restraining order against me.
What is the best way to rank the participants in a tournament?
In the example in the picture, obviously #1 is P and #2 is E. Then it makes sense that #3 would be L and A is #4, because L lost to the better opponent. If we keep going that like, the rankings would be:
1. P
2. E
3. L
4. A
5. O
6. G
7. J
8. D
9. Q
10. F
11. M
12. B
13. N
14. H
15. K
16. C
However, if the participants were seeded based on their performance in the regular season or whatever, this method of ranking gives an advantage to the worse teams. The #1 seed has the best chance of winning the tournament, so the 16 seed has the best chance of being ranked 9th. Does it make sense to reverse the orders of the "levels"? Or what? Does anyone understand what I'm talking about?
If there were no upsets in the tournament, then the ranking with this method would be:
1 seed
2 seed
4 seed
3 seed
8 seed
7 seed
5 seed
6 seed
16 seed
15 seed
13 seed
14 seed
9 seed
10 seed
12 seed
11 seed
>>8516501
to make it fair you need to have a losers bracket to determine second place
and then a losers losers bracket to determine 3rd place
and so on
>>8516578
Well I don't
Was the brutal execution-style murder of Harambe scientifically justified?
Objectively, by analysis of gorilla behavior patterns, he was protecting the child as he would a gorilla child and would have allowed his human mother to save him, correct?
>>8516476
Male sexual organs outside of our pants for the death of C̶h̶i̶t̶o̶g̶e̶ Harambe
>>8516492
In your case, dx out for Harambe.
>>8516476
The thing is that there was a seizable chance of him reacting badly, so they had to execute him as not to take any chance
I'm curious if cancer is still at the same fatality/ diagnosis rates as it was centuries ago. Everytime I hear someone was taken away because of cancer, I can't help but wonder if it's just a natural human phenomenon, or is it a product of modern times.
I dont mean modernization, btw, is what caused it. But rather, if we have in someway increased its rate
longer average lifespan and more exposure to carcinogens in daily life so obviously higher diagnosis rate today. why is this even a thread. jesus
>>8516323
>more exposure to carcinogens in daily life
Okay, so I wasn't being paranoid in thinking this, then. How does one go about reducing these things anyway? Just setting yourself on a lone island for the rest of your life? I doubt the sun gives enough chance of causing cancer, especially if you're not in direct exposure of it all day
What're some /sci/ approved science experiments I can do at home that aren't for brainlets, other than engineering stuff.
Home-made crystals. I don't have the image but someone here surely might have it.
Decarb the weed with your lighter lol smoke weed 420 later nerds
Quick question: Let's say a fly flew into a car and didn't land, but continued to hover in one place. And the car begins to move, what happens to the fly?
relative to the car, it would move towards the back.
relative to the ground it would remain where it is.
>>8516247
>Let's say a fly flew into a car and didn't land, but continued to hover in one place.
I've never seen a fly hover in one place.
>>8516247
And it probably doesn't understand the. Question?
>tfw the singularity will happen in 5 years and save me from spiraling depression
Imagine the look of disappointment on your parents' face when you show up to thanksgiving with a robotic gf.
(I can't wait)
>>8516149
lmao. try 50
you'll have suicided by then
>>8516158
> Implying OP doesn't show up with his sex doll anyway.
How come I can bench press 100 pounds 10 times, but I can't bench press 1000 pounds 1 time? Did I just disprove conservation of energy?
>>8516092
Looks like it. Step forward and claim your Nobel prize, Mr. Anon!
>not using a gorilla image
shiggy
How come a spring can lift a 100 pound weight repeatedly over the course of its lifetime, but never a 1000 pound weight?
Does anyone know a good rechargeable digital scratch pad that I can buy to save trees and money? I'm in my 3rd year electrical engineering and I use up A LOT of paper for my maths and physics.
P.S. I'm not a conservative.
>>8515916
why get a scratch pad when you can just get a surface pro? then you can get a wabbitemu calc emulator and keep all your notes on onenote
>>8515928
I can't afford it lol, my budget is around $100
>>8515930
>my budget is around $100
Then just get a generic Android tablet like the Kindle Fire or the Asus Zenpad
Or you could get 2500 sheets of Roaring Spring Paper Products Engineer Calculation Fillerâ„¢ paper. Your precious electronics and the electrical systems you will build are less eco-friendly than current forestry practices.
>I'm in my 3rd year electrical engineering
>P.S. I'm not a conservative.
>"environmental conservation = US political conservative"
you could save paper AND electronics by dropping out of the program, dipshit
okay faggots let's build an iron man armor.
i'll start
>8 litre tanks for jet fuel spread on the back and in the boots
>armor plating made out of titanium and alluminum alloy mixed with ceramics spread on top of graphene sheets
>hybrid electric and kerosene jet engine on the back and on the boots
>parachute for safety
your turn
>>8515911
Just one question. Is there any like sexy masturbation stuff happening to your penis while you in that suit? And where would your cum go? Do you just shoot it at your enemies?
>>8515919
it's not forbidden as far as i know, this is a /sci/ group project. if you want to stick a fleshlight in there go ahead m8
my turn
>latest and most powerful software
>motion capture suit
>expertly crafted models
>expensive cameras
>green sheet
>2 well payed gfx artists
your turn