>you don't need calculus for biology
Yeah for most biology you don't.
>>8562647
t. Marine (meme) """"""""""biologist"""""""""""" cunt.
someone, please post an article where biologists have reinvented calculus
What did Bill Nye mean by this?
that he is a faggot whos biggest career is sucking the dicks of little boys
ebin mspaint skills
https://www.amazon.com/Undeniable-Evolution-Creation-Bill-Nye/dp/1250074223
>>8562389
>Posting Bill Nye
Kys
How the fuck do I get out of B range and into A range in analysis, algebra, topology etc? I suck at studying. What are your tips /sci/?
you don't
>>8562047
Repetition
>>8562047
>What are your tips /sci/?
You study from textbooks without rushing.
If you don't understand something you don't skip it.
That's how you obtain a solid basis.
How much brain damage does exposure to pesticides cause?
Enough to create this thread
>>8561976
rude
>>8561974
Depends on the pesticide and the dose.
This thread is worse than any conceivable pesticide.
What is needed for humanity to abandon our petty differences and unite as one race and work together?
Extermination of niggers and jews.
>>8561932
>unite as one race
No, unite as one faith.
>>8561933
which in turn demonstrates the need to exterminate divisive elements like white supremacists
I like vegetarianism. It is good for some aspects of mind. But what do you think about be vegetarian and become deadlift champion? Is it necessary to eat animals for being very very strong? I've heard 'bout Patrik Baboumian. But his record 360kg is not very big (vs 460kg of Valentin Dikul).
>It is good for some aspects of the mind
That would be your ego
Vegetarianism is utterly pointless, I was a vegetarian for almost ten years
>>8561904
>muh diet
Kys
>>8561911
>almost ten years
Why did you stop it?
Fundamental theorem of algebra says:
Polynomial of degree n has n complex roots.
So x^2 = 0 should have 2 solutions.
But... Looksies here.
x = sqrt(0)
So x = +0 or x = -0... So x just equals 0.
Nice try maths. Man you math suckers so fucking dumb lol. Nice fake theorem.
Actually its n complex roots counted with multiplicity. In that case there is only one unique root, which is 0, but the fundamental theorem of algebra only states that the unique roots are at most n.
>>8561648
LOL so you can say...function has 2000 roots
But there all the same...
LOL
just like I have 2000 life's
but they're all the same life at the same time LOL
>>8561660
>shit posting on Christmas
What a sad man you are.
So why is it so fucking cold?
>>8561357
because you touch yourself at night
>>8561357
It's too far from the sun
>0.6% of Earth's sea-level pressure
Why are labs required as a physics major?
Just tell me what the fuck will happen why do I have to do all this bullshit. I guess I'll just switch to math.
>>8560864
Yeah switch to math and be even more useless to humanity
>>8560865
How is physics more useful than math?
>>8560869
>how is architecture more useful than fingerpainting?
Mathematicians explain what this is?
faggotry
>>8560767
really?
>>8560840
Yes
t. expert
Protip™: you can't.
>he doesn't know .9999999=1
Top zozzers m80
You will never get a circle, because you will always have corners left. Nice try brainlet.
>>8558266
>repeat to infinity
Found it. It's never a perfect circle.
Does anyone else feel existential dread about the fact that humanity is trapped in our solar system by physics and we'll never be able to leave it?
>>8551211
*known physics
>>8551215
The speed of light is a hard stop.
everyday
can anyone decipher this? what does it mean?
>>8563196
It's a Lagrangian
>>8563201
thank you. is there anything interesting about this particular function?
>>8563196
The first line with the F is a Yang-Mills term, describing the behavior of a gauge field (like the EM field).
The second line is a Dirac term describing the behavior of a fermionic field, the D in this term couples it to the gauge field.
The third line is some coupling term, I think it is coupling the fermionic field to the Higgs field.
The last line describes the Higgs field.
Want to have some fun /sci/?
I am having a problem with this very dense, hard to fathom proposition. Lets work through this, /sci/ please help.
https://www.stmarys-ca.edu/sites/default/files/attachments/files/On_the_Equlibrium_of_Planes.pdf
Proposition nine. Book two. II. fucking 9. This shit is hard. But one of the most complex things I don't understand is perhaps rather simple to explain. Right in the beginning there, I understand everything up until three. (3) makes NO SENSE. At ALL. What the fuck? It almost looks as if someone just added the numerators and denominators of the two equivalences of ((a-c)/(c-d)). But that's not possible. So I'm stuck.
This is famously a very hard proposition, but the translator T.L. Heath has made it a little easier by introducing algebraic variables.
here is the section in particular for those too lazy
>>8562985
whats the problem really? just solve that equation with d in it for d. then use that equation to replace d in (b+c)/d and you get what you are looking for.
>>8562999
From the 2 above: lhs=[b+c]/d = [a+b]/c
lhs*d = b+c
lhs*c = a+b
lhs*d +2lhs*c = b+c + 2(a+b)
lhs*(2c+d) = 2a+3b+c
lhs = [2a+3b+c]/(2c+d)
What's it like being a statistics major? What do you learn?
Statistics.
How to count things with respect to how you count other things.
>>8562623
It's not particularly challenging. Social scientists will think you have godlike intelligence because they can't do maths and mathematicians/natural scientists will laugh at you because you're learning baby maths.
I'd suggest minoring in statistics since it's undoubtedly very useful, but there's not much to it.
>>8562634
This is correct.
>>8562636
Are you talking about standardization?