Can someone explain to me how it's known/ proven that what math is possible in 2D and 3D space is known to be valid for infinite dimensions in Hilbert space? I just don't see how this conclusion can be drawn.
Dont even know what youre referring to hilbert space but answer should be simple in my logic, since all the math in n-1 dimensions is possible in n dimensions, all math for 2d and 3d are valid in n dimensions
Think about this, you can do every geometry of 2d in a 3d space but cannot do the inverse
A lot of finite dimensional linear algebra breaks down in infinite dimensions, even in Hilbert spaces. I don't know where you get that from
>>8562207
It's just gorillaposting, anon. Sage
What is the evolutionary purpose of sleep?
Let's say the body does X while asleep.
Why doesn't the body just do this while being awake? It would be an evolutionary advantage because your chances of being killed by a predator are higher while you are sleeping.
Why does the body need sleep? Why doesn't the body just do whatever is being done while being awake?
>>8561401
The body can more readily divert resources to healing than it can while awake and active.
>Why doesn't the body just do this while being awake? It would be an evolutionary advantage because your chances of being killed by a predator are higher while you are sleeping.
the trait youre looking for isnt sleeping, but having the sense to dig in somewhere safe to sleep. Creatures that lack the ability to develop that idea would die out pretty quickly.
also id imagine never sleeping and being in a constant state of metabolic overdrive to repair oneself is far too taxing on the body to be a viable evolutionary trait.
I wish I could sleep forever, but people tell me that's called "suicide" and it's supposed to be something bad I guess?
sounds bretty good to me
>>8561411
>The body can more readily divert resources to healing than it can while awake and active.
Well, why? Is it because while awake it needs more resources/energy for body/muscle movements?
Then why don't we just get more hungry the more active we are?
Why does lack of sleep instead result in the effects shown in the OP image?
does IQ really mean anything?
>>8560938
why does /sci/ make so many memes relative to its size?
>>8560945
It's not a /sci/ made meme just because it's posted on /sci/.
>>8560949
didn't the brainiac wojak meme originate from /sci/ and spread to other boards afterwards?
Why is this meme so fucking popular, /sci/?
>>8550658
>learning about the quadratic formula in college
wat
also who would pay good money to learn how to do their taxes? pick up a fucking book or use google or something
>>8550658
>Quadratic formula
>College
American "education" at work everyone
>>8550658
Why do people perpetuate this meme? If you want to learn how to do taxes or have a good marriage, pick up a fucking book or use google, like the other anon said. And the quadratic formula should be common fucking knowledge. Why are people so stupid?
Firstly, this post relies on 3 assumptions:
1. The universe is infinite, therefore fixed points do not exist
2. All speed is relative, thus, without fixed points, any meaningful definition of speed of objects in space (3-d) is impossible
3. The universe moves at a constant speed of 1s/s in the 4th dimension
Under these assumptions, the speed of light (barring conservation of speed from the light source) is higher than the calculated 3.0E, and in fact impossible to calculate without any means of measuring distance in the 4tj dimension (I.e. converting seconds to meters)
Debate me faggots
Dis gun b gud
Prove your case mathematically first.
>>8565304
We are already traveling faster than the speed of light.
what defines an event as being irreversible, and is there an inherent link between this notion and the definition of time?
i ask because i struggle with a proper definition of time. to me, time was always just what we used to connect light, that is, when light has traveled a certain distance, time has elapsed. but to me, the process doesn't seem to have any direction to it. you can traverse a distance in any axis of space you want, but time itself is of one axis and it always moves forward. so in that regard, what is time? is it merely a measurement in this context, or is there a deeper relationship between time and entropy that we haven't really unraveled?
i feel like it's been neglected, due to how general relativity combines space and time. I still feel that the principles of events occurring in one irreversible manner is missing axioms or rules, because if time is just one direction, then what about processes where an object is repaired, or a basketball bouncing itself up from the ground? they're improbable, but not impossible are they? energy can have resonant peaks right?
to clarify, im talking about where the state of a system is fully reversed while conserving energy and momentum.
>>8565118
Why is that bullet still in the casing?
Consider a system of n particles and m positions for them to occupy.
There's n^m possible combinations.
Now consider that a system is in a certain state and then changes to a different one. The chance for the process to be reversed from position 2 to 1 is extremely unlikely to haopen randomly.
Time is a measurement in the change of states.
If a state of a system never changed, thered be no way of knowing if something "happened".
We only perceive time because we know things do change states and they don't reverse.
Can there exist a parallel universe where mathematical constants are different?
Could there be a parallel universe where pi has a different value, for example?
I've always found it interesting why constants are the way they are, gravitational, etc etc and why some forces like electromagnetic are so much stronger than gravitational, so if there were multiple universes that would be cool to know how forces and other constants vary
>>8564956
>confusing physical constants and pure mathematical constants
zeta(-13) = zeta(-1) = -1/12
can we prove that s = -13 and -1 are the only rational whole numbers in the zeta function that
= -1/12?
>>8564463
Shut the fuck up
>>8564463
>rational whole numbers
>>8564538
>implying that -1 and -13 arent rational whole numbers
I'm not 100% sure this is the right board for this discussion but there's something I've always wondered.
Does anyone else notice the second or third time they enter a new place it seems a bit different than the first time the first time you were there? Like nothing actually changes, but psychologically it appears different somehow. Have there been experiments on this before? Am I just weird? I've never thought to ask before but I think its interesting if our perception is affected from being somewhere multiple times
Yes. It feels different. Have people told you they don't feel like it?
That's because they tend to avoid self-analysis. And I bet some actually noticed, but are self-conscious about looking weird and they decide to not telling you or saying "no".
>>8564179
How come it feels so different though?
Is it just how our perception works?
I remember a long time ago my best friend telling me about how we draw a mental map when we enter a new area for the first time. Does that have anything to do with it too?
>>8564181
>I remember a long time ago my best friend telling me about how we draw a mental map when we enter a new area for the first time. Does that have anything to do with it too?
Why is this simple thing interesting again?
Are you american, for a chance?
Hi, my name is Britfag and I'm looking to move to Japan to work in STEM after I've had a decent education in the UK.
I recently graduated from sixth form with four A-levels back in August, all maxed A's which would be a 4.0 GPA.
They are: mathematics, further mathematics; chemistry and physics.
I was going to study engineering/physics into nuclear engineering/physics, but with the recent issues in Japan around nuclear power it doesn't seem like they'll be opening their reactors again any time soon.
So, what I'm asking you guys is: what STEM field based around mostly mathematics, engineering and physics would be best for me, I don't mind doing chemistry if needs be?
Thank you, /sci/.
>A-levels
>hard
MAte go ask a real school advisor and stay off 4chan wtf lol
>asking life advice from these people
It is like those /b/ threads "hey /b/, what is this on my balls" and 300 replies will say cancer or aids
dono daigaku nimo ukehaireteru no
Looking at requirements for undergrad most good engineering programs require low to mid 90s as the cutoff. Physics and math programs tend to be mid to high 80s as the cutoff. Is engineering truly the master race?
>>8562383
>grade inflation is proof of a hard subject
Lol
>>8562394
I thought engineers had the lowest GPAs on average.
>>8562394
OP is talking about the highschool grades required to get into an engineering program.
>>8562383
It's a supply and demand thing. Engineering programs accept a limited number of students and lots of people want to be engineers so the entrance requirements are driven up. For a university to give engineering degrees it needs approval from the society of professional engineers so they can't easily scale up the number of students they accept to meet demand.
>attempt maths problem
>can't get the answer, algebra going nowhere
>feel so fucking awful and like such a brainlet
>cave in and look at answer
>"Consider [the last fucking thing I ever would've fucking considered]"
REEEE
When will this meme end?
Consider not giving up after an hour
Consider some problems have nontrivial and inelegant solutions and an author may resort to esoteric techniques to avoid subscription to a 2 page contradicting construction.
Consider killing yourself.
These are the most cited papers in computer science
http://citeseer.ist.psu.edu/stats/articles
They don't all seem like trivial code monkey shit
Did /sci/ lie to me?
>>8560732
The most cited papers in a field aren't typically what's covered in a bachelor's degree.
it's because nobody knows what computer science is
the people who are super psyched about going into computer science and becoming professional javascript programmers have no clue what computer science is; they think it's just how to program or some shit
universities DO know what it is, but they adjusted their curriculum to cater to the less inclined crowd (aka javascript monkeys), and pass off programming 101 as "computer science"
many of the javascript monkeys drop out because computer science isn't the art class they thought it would be
because of the above, those who don't know what computer science is get a bad impression because there's so many object oriented social justice losers on the surface and it makes the whole field look bad
and it's obvious that the most cited papers are going to be actual computer science papers - nobody is going to cite java for dummies
Are there any numbers for which this true?
>>8560700
A = C = 0
Any more?
http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=a%2Fb+%2B+c%2Fd+%3D+(a%2Bc)+%2F+(b%2Bd)
If you rang the bells completely randomly, what is the expected number of rings it would take before you solved it?
>>8564453
One in three times five, so one in 243.
This board is for people 18 and up.
>>8564458
*one in three to the fifth power, I meant.