Will any actual sane person marry a robot in the future?
Why?/Why not?
When /sci/ is guessing that if that ever happens will happen?
What is then going to happen to the social position of the woman?
Imagine 1000+ years in the future robots are indistinguisable from the real thing. Imagine that they have even artificial DNA and genes that match their appearance and their personality that they were programmed with. What stops then a sane person being a robosexual, having a real relationship with a robot, loving it, spending the life with it, marrying it, and have descedants?
If /sci/anon lived at that time would he at least partially be robosexual?
Would a /sci/anon that was single even consider loving, marrying, having kids... etc with a robot?
Pic related. A clown that identifies herself as "robosexual".
Sauce: http: //www.3ders.org//articles/20161223-i-do-robot-woman-to-marry-3d-printed-robot-she-designed.html
bomp
>>8562367
>2051
>marriage
Just pump and dump brah
>>8562367
Humans long for a touch of other human, as many of you may know. It's highly unlike a robot can replace that feel.
I recently had a seizure and my neurologist gave me an MRI and EEG. He said that everything came back normal but when I read the report it said that "there is prominence of parietal lobe sulci with widening with respect to patient's young age, suggesting mild peripheral cerebral volume loss. The finding is non-specific". Should I be worried about this as a 21 year old? The rest of the report found that everything else is normal.
pic related triggers me hard, basically a surefire way to get some proteopathic disease.
>>8559485
>when I read the report
Patients shouldn't read their own charts and "reports." It causes all manner of problems; this thread is evidence of that.
>>8559490
But, it depends...
Do you think Space Elevators will ever become a reality?
Is the science just not there?
Are they too tempting a target for terrorism?
>>8557815
The economic reward will be so huge that they will certainly be a thing. Brazil and Nigeria will be superpowers once they get one up and running. The difficulty is a material science one, in that no known material would be strong enough to actually build one. But a new technology could be just around the corner that will solve this, it's really just a matter of time.
It is a brute-force approach to a problem which has much simpler solutions. The engineering and materials science acuity required to create something of this kind would much sooner produce safe, reliable, multi-use rockets in quantities so great it would make such a thing as a space elevator superfluous.
It's a very interesting notion, but we'll find a better way much sooner than that. Space elevators are merely a thought experiment meant to answer that age old question: "How do we escape the gravity well economically."
>>8557833
>Much simpler solutions
Such as? And yes, I know you said rockets, but let's not try to pretend that rocketry will ever be the less complicated science.
From a scientific point of view, why does this video make me teary-eyed?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XpsQimYhNkA
>>8565499
Watch it again but on mute. Does it have the same effect?
Now watch an ISIS murder video on mute but the sound from the space video playing. What do you feel?
>>8565499
You have no religion
You have no pride in your race or country
You have no sense of you past's philosophy, art, or history
You have no identity and science is a stand in for things that have been undermined in our times
Chances are you have a weak family unit if any
Hence the strong emotional reaction
Also, there is no scientific explanation, only conjecture when it comes to this
>>8565517
wew lad, not OP but you just described me, and i always get teary eyed by things like this. please elaborate on what you said?
>tfw im incredibly predictable
Are physics or math majors smarter?
>>8560259
Probably math majors for 2 reasons.
1) It is a more theoretical degree.
2) It is a better economic choice as math majors make more money than physics majors in average.
>>8560263
>2) It is a better economic choice as math majors make more money than physics majors in average.
implying
>>8560259
Probably Physics because they need to know all the math, and apply it too.
ITT /sci/-approved video gaymes.
Ones that are on sale on steam rn, in particular
gaming is degenerate
Dwarf Fortress
I'm used to print them when needed, but I don't think this is practical anymore.
What I do now is bend over the page and carefully read it, underlining if necessary.
Do you guys effectively study staring at the screen of your PC?
That doesn't sound appealing.
Try using a pad if you have one.
I use an old Kindle (not the Fire) from a thrift store for $20. I can load PDFs from a computer, plus it's really light and portable. No screen glare (it uses the ink technology or whatever it's called). The battery lasts forever too.
>>8567571
>Try using a pad if you have one.
I could buy one.
Is it worth it?
Say every 10th reply to a youtube comment the user will get a dollar. You can only reply once with each account.
Millions of people start replying to this youtube comment so they can "earn" a dollar.
Some people even make alts. You are one of them. You decide to make 9 alts, adding up to 10 youtube comments.
Question: What is the probability that you will get a dollar if you reply with your 10 accounts?
>>8567333
Are you asking
A dollar exactly
Or
At least one dollar
?
>>8567333
65.132% for at least one dollar
34.868% for exactly one dollar
34.868% for nothing
>>8567345
edit:
38.742 for exactly one dollar
What would it be like to live on a ringworld if we found one? If it was the size of the Earth`s orbit and the strip was a million miles wide and indestructible? Would the humans who like isolation enjoy being so far away from each other that radio would not reach them? I would love to live here and journey to the edge walls. It would be awesome. Especially if there were massive mountains.
Comfy ringworld doggo.
>size of the earth's orbit
>Indestructible
REEEEEEE
Ok, well, just like life now. People living their lives and facing all their human problems and joys. Not all that different from living on earth.
those were some of favourite books
How many people on /sci/ smoke weed or do any psychedelics?
Did it inspire you or slow you down?
Personally it made me a little more absent minded(forgetting where I put my keys way more often, etc) but ultimately allowed me to get more work done.
I did LSD once and smoke weed more often, I didn't notice any difference except that it's fun.
>tell myself ill get high so my homework is more fun
>literally as soon as im high i spend hours on youtube then fap then bed
erry time
I use mdma. No real side effects in academic work, although I've noticed I've lost some general knowledge I once had or have trouble recalling it, but this may be due to significant acquisition of scientific knowledge.
Anyone else notice the more maths and science they learn the less "space" they have for other knowledge?
Hello /sci/entists
In May, I graduated with a BA in mathematics from a relatively well-regarded New York liberal arts college. Throughout my senior year I put together a thesis, and it's my single biggest achievement so far in life. It's about chess-derived games, how to win them, and the significance therein. The paper contains a handful of original results; nothing truly groundbreaking, but something to be proud of I think. A professor who read it told me it was the best-written thesis he had read in years, which made me very happy. The paper is hosted on the school's server, and it shows me where and when it has been downloaded, which has been fun to track (five continents are represented so far). Anyway, laypeople have suggested I try to publish the paper in some academic journal. How realistic is this? What steps would it entail, etc.? I still think about the thesis a lot, and I might continue with it and/or resolve some of the loose ends in the future.
Where can I see your thesis?
Post thesis link faggot
>>8566887
Just upload to arxiv. Isn't it free to do that?
http://www.bbc.com/future/story/20141010-why-exercise-boosts-iq
If exercise has such a long term proven positive impact on intelligence, why aren't the majority of college professors jacked???
You don't have to be jacked. Just meet a bare minimum standard of physical fitness and not be an utter slob with a trash diet.
Go jog for 30 minutes 3x/wk.
Because there are more psychological and health benefits doing aerobic exercise than anaerobic. From my experience, most intelligent people I know are pretty active.
>>8566731
>study says that brain jogging has no observable effect
>study says that working out makes you smarter
Its all a plot to create more chads and boost birth rates. Im too intelligent for this bullshit.
Can someone clear something up for me that I've never understood about the way special relativity is presented?
In descriptions of special relativity, they often compare a clock on Earth and a clock on a ship traveling close to c, and say the clock on the ship ticks slower relative to the clock on Earth. But a clock is a mechanical device; it isn't literally taking a direct measurement of time, it is a machine designed to move at a rate that matches time. So if I take two identical clocks that are synchronized and gain/ lose seconds at the same rate, and put one on a spaceship that travels close to c for a while and then return it to Earth, will the clocks read the same time, or does the clock on the spaceship literally tick slower and will read an "earlier" time?
I'm not an expert on this, but I think the idea is the clocks tick differently relative to each other.
So, the people on the spaceship see a clock that is going at normal rate. The people on Earth see a clock that is going at normal rate.
However, the people on Earth see a clock on a spaceship that is at a different rate than the one they see on Earth, and vice versa.
When the ship comes back, the clocks are desynchronised even though to each observer they appeared to go at the same rate. However, if the people on Earth were to look at the clock on the ship (when it is traveling), it would appear to be going at a different rate even if the people on the ship see it at a regular rate.
Read up on the twin paradox. Assume the spaceship is moving at a constant speed. If you are in the spaceship and are looking at the Earth clock, it will appear to tick more slowly. If you are on Earth and looking at the spaceship clock, it will appear to tick more slowly. If you are looking at a clock in your frame of reference, it will appear normal. Do you think that's weird and counter-intuitive? Good, you understand it.
clock is made of stuff
that stuff pushes other stuff and makes things move
stuff is made of atoms
atoms push each other by means of electric fields
electric fields excert forces by exchanging photons
photons exhibit relativistic time dilation
clocks exhibit relativistic time dilation in the same way because they are made out of photons
https://www.kickstarter.com/projects/divided-o/beta
What does /sci/ think about this?
>Watches designed with a scientific approach
>direct involvement of actual mathematicians
It looks to me like some basic geometric shapes and then they stick a famous scientist's name on it without a strong connection between the image and the scientist. Thoughts?
I think you should stay in school, study hard, and someday you won't have to buy cheap, tacky POS watches from kickstarter
>>8566510
I'm studying postrgrad mathematics and not interested in buying these watches. I think the marketing is a bit silly here - they don't seem to really have a scientific background. It's just minimalism.
>>8566495
That watch is fucking ugly.
Why is work=F*d? Derrive without using kinetic energy = square of speed times half of mass.
Isnt work just defined to be dW=Fdr?
>>8566105
for some processes yes.
>>8566103
For a conservative force it is the - gradient of the potential. Literally calc 3