[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / bant / biz / c / can / cgl / ck / cm / co / cock / d / diy / e / fa / fap / fit / fitlit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mlpol / mo / mtv / mu / n / news / o / out / outsoc / p / po / pol / qa / qst / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / spa / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vint / vip / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y ] [Search | Free Show | Home]

Archived threads in /sci/ - Science & Math - 1042. page

This is a blue board which means that it's for everybody (Safe For Work content only). If you see any adult content, please report it.

File: why.jpg (34KB, 600x451px) Image search: [Google]
why.jpg
34KB, 600x451px
Will any actual sane person marry a robot in the future?
Why?/Why not?
When /sci/ is guessing that if that ever happens will happen?
What is then going to happen to the social position of the woman?
Imagine 1000+ years in the future robots are indistinguisable from the real thing. Imagine that they have even artificial DNA and genes that match their appearance and their personality that they were programmed with. What stops then a sane person being a robosexual, having a real relationship with a robot, loving it, spending the life with it, marrying it, and have descedants?
If /sci/anon lived at that time would he at least partially be robosexual?
Would a /sci/anon that was single even consider loving, marrying, having kids... etc with a robot?

Pic related. A clown that identifies herself as "robosexual".
Sauce: http: //www.3ders.org//articles/20161223-i-do-robot-woman-to-marry-3d-printed-robot-she-designed.html
21 posts and 4 images submitted.
>>
bomp
>>
>>8562367
>2051
>marriage
Just pump and dump brah
>>
>>8562367
Humans long for a touch of other human, as many of you may know. It's highly unlike a robot can replace that feel.

File: 9H5FxK3L.jpg (18KB, 240x240px) Image search: [Google]
9H5FxK3L.jpg
18KB, 240x240px
I recently had a seizure and my neurologist gave me an MRI and EEG. He said that everything came back normal but when I read the report it said that "there is prominence of parietal lobe sulci with widening with respect to patient's young age, suggesting mild peripheral cerebral volume loss. The finding is non-specific". Should I be worried about this as a 21 year old? The rest of the report found that everything else is normal.
86 posts and 8 images submitted.
>>
pic related triggers me hard, basically a surefire way to get some proteopathic disease.
>>
>>8559485
>when I read the report

Patients shouldn't read their own charts and "reports." It causes all manner of problems; this thread is evidence of that.
>>
>>8559490
But, it depends...

File: SpaceElevatorClimbing.jpg (72KB, 2048x1536px) Image search: [Google]
SpaceElevatorClimbing.jpg
72KB, 2048x1536px
Do you think Space Elevators will ever become a reality?

Is the science just not there?

Are they too tempting a target for terrorism?
111 posts and 16 images submitted.
>>
>>8557815
The economic reward will be so huge that they will certainly be a thing. Brazil and Nigeria will be superpowers once they get one up and running. The difficulty is a material science one, in that no known material would be strong enough to actually build one. But a new technology could be just around the corner that will solve this, it's really just a matter of time.
>>
It is a brute-force approach to a problem which has much simpler solutions. The engineering and materials science acuity required to create something of this kind would much sooner produce safe, reliable, multi-use rockets in quantities so great it would make such a thing as a space elevator superfluous.

It's a very interesting notion, but we'll find a better way much sooner than that. Space elevators are merely a thought experiment meant to answer that age old question: "How do we escape the gravity well economically."
>>
>>8557833

>Much simpler solutions

Such as? And yes, I know you said rockets, but let's not try to pretend that rocketry will ever be the less complicated science.

File: JUPITER AT 18000 KM.jpg (884KB, 3000x1239px) Image search: [Google]
JUPITER AT 18000 KM.jpg
884KB, 3000x1239px
From a scientific point of view, why does this video make me teary-eyed?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XpsQimYhNkA
7 posts and 1 images submitted.
>>
>>8565499
Watch it again but on mute. Does it have the same effect?

Now watch an ISIS murder video on mute but the sound from the space video playing. What do you feel?
>>
>>8565499
You have no religion
You have no pride in your race or country
You have no sense of you past's philosophy, art, or history
You have no identity and science is a stand in for things that have been undermined in our times
Chances are you have a weak family unit if any
Hence the strong emotional reaction

Also, there is no scientific explanation, only conjecture when it comes to this
>>
>>8565517

wew lad, not OP but you just described me, and i always get teary eyed by things like this. please elaborate on what you said?

>tfw im incredibly predictable

File: Math_2f3a52_1123597.jpg (104KB, 780x594px) Image search: [Google]
Math_2f3a52_1123597.jpg
104KB, 780x594px
Are physics or math majors smarter?
121 posts and 10 images submitted.
>>
>>8560259
Probably math majors for 2 reasons.

1) It is a more theoretical degree.
2) It is a better economic choice as math majors make more money than physics majors in average.
>>
>>8560263
>2) It is a better economic choice as math majors make more money than physics majors in average.
implying
>>
>>8560259
Probably Physics because they need to know all the math, and apply it too.

File: hqdefault.jpg (41KB, 480x360px) Image search: [Google]
hqdefault.jpg
41KB, 480x360px
ITT /sci/-approved video gaymes.

Ones that are on sale on steam rn, in particular
62 posts and 11 images submitted.
>>
File: 1.jpg (32KB, 400x400px) Image search: [Google]
1.jpg
32KB, 400x400px
gaming is degenerate
>>
>>8557475
Daily reminder that /sci/ isn't >>>/pol/
>>
Dwarf Fortress

I'm used to print them when needed, but I don't think this is practical anymore.
What I do now is bend over the page and carefully read it, underlining if necessary.
Do you guys effectively study staring at the screen of your PC?
That doesn't sound appealing.
7 posts and 5 images submitted.
>>
File: 4561561.gif (922KB, 480x270px) Image search: [Google]
4561561.gif
922KB, 480x270px
Try using a pad if you have one.
>>
I use an old Kindle (not the Fire) from a thrift store for $20. I can load PDFs from a computer, plus it's really light and portable. No screen glare (it uses the ink technology or whatever it's called). The battery lasts forever too.
>>
File: 1482229942222.gif (64KB, 384x216px) Image search: [Google]
1482229942222.gif
64KB, 384x216px
>>8567571
>Try using a pad if you have one.
I could buy one.
Is it worth it?

File: 1445304129673.png (552KB, 610x457px) Image search: [Google]
1445304129673.png
552KB, 610x457px
Say every 10th reply to a youtube comment the user will get a dollar. You can only reply once with each account.
Millions of people start replying to this youtube comment so they can "earn" a dollar.
Some people even make alts. You are one of them. You decide to make 9 alts, adding up to 10 youtube comments.

Question: What is the probability that you will get a dollar if you reply with your 10 accounts?
7 posts and 2 images submitted.
>>
File: FB_IMG_1482826029770.jpg (24KB, 480x480px) Image search: [Google]
FB_IMG_1482826029770.jpg
24KB, 480x480px
>>8567333
Are you asking

A dollar exactly

Or

At least one dollar

?
>>
>>8567333
65.132% for at least one dollar
34.868% for exactly one dollar
34.868% for nothing
>>
>>8567345
edit:
38.742 for exactly one dollar

File: 15270587._SY540_.jpg (57KB, 384x540px) Image search: [Google]
15270587._SY540_.jpg
57KB, 384x540px
What would it be like to live on a ringworld if we found one? If it was the size of the Earth`s orbit and the strip was a million miles wide and indestructible? Would the humans who like isolation enjoy being so far away from each other that radio would not reach them? I would love to live here and journey to the edge walls. It would be awesome. Especially if there were massive mountains.
9 posts and 2 images submitted.
>>
Comfy ringworld doggo.
>>
>size of the earth's orbit
>Indestructible
REEEEEEE

Ok, well, just like life now. People living their lives and facing all their human problems and joys. Not all that different from living on earth.
>>
those were some of favourite books

How many people on /sci/ smoke weed or do any psychedelics?
Did it inspire you or slow you down?
Personally it made me a little more absent minded(forgetting where I put my keys way more often, etc) but ultimately allowed me to get more work done.
10 posts and 2 images submitted.
>>
I did LSD once and smoke weed more often, I didn't notice any difference except that it's fun.
>>
>tell myself ill get high so my homework is more fun
>literally as soon as im high i spend hours on youtube then fap then bed

erry time
>>
I use mdma. No real side effects in academic work, although I've noticed I've lost some general knowledge I once had or have trouble recalling it, but this may be due to significant acquisition of scientific knowledge.

Anyone else notice the more maths and science they learn the less "space" they have for other knowledge?

File: readership.png (431KB, 1266x689px) Image search: [Google]
readership.png
431KB, 1266x689px
Hello /sci/entists

In May, I graduated with a BA in mathematics from a relatively well-regarded New York liberal arts college. Throughout my senior year I put together a thesis, and it's my single biggest achievement so far in life. It's about chess-derived games, how to win them, and the significance therein. The paper contains a handful of original results; nothing truly groundbreaking, but something to be proud of I think. A professor who read it told me it was the best-written thesis he had read in years, which made me very happy. The paper is hosted on the school's server, and it shows me where and when it has been downloaded, which has been fun to track (five continents are represented so far). Anyway, laypeople have suggested I try to publish the paper in some academic journal. How realistic is this? What steps would it entail, etc.? I still think about the thesis a lot, and I might continue with it and/or resolve some of the loose ends in the future.
7 posts and 1 images submitted.
>>
Where can I see your thesis?
>>
Post thesis link faggot
>>
>>8566887
Just upload to arxiv. Isn't it free to do that?

File: p028dmlv.jpg (58KB, 1280x640px) Image search: [Google]
p028dmlv.jpg
58KB, 1280x640px
http://www.bbc.com/future/story/20141010-why-exercise-boosts-iq
If exercise has such a long term proven positive impact on intelligence, why aren't the majority of college professors jacked???
12 posts and 3 images submitted.
>>
You don't have to be jacked. Just meet a bare minimum standard of physical fitness and not be an utter slob with a trash diet.


Go jog for 30 minutes 3x/wk.
>>
Because there are more psychological and health benefits doing aerobic exercise than anaerobic. From my experience, most intelligent people I know are pretty active.
>>
>>8566731
>study says that brain jogging has no observable effect
>study says that working out makes you smarter
Its all a plot to create more chads and boost birth rates. Im too intelligent for this bullshit.

File: relativity_time_dilation.jpg (28KB, 563x413px) Image search: [Google]
relativity_time_dilation.jpg
28KB, 563x413px
Can someone clear something up for me that I've never understood about the way special relativity is presented?

In descriptions of special relativity, they often compare a clock on Earth and a clock on a ship traveling close to c, and say the clock on the ship ticks slower relative to the clock on Earth. But a clock is a mechanical device; it isn't literally taking a direct measurement of time, it is a machine designed to move at a rate that matches time. So if I take two identical clocks that are synchronized and gain/ lose seconds at the same rate, and put one on a spaceship that travels close to c for a while and then return it to Earth, will the clocks read the same time, or does the clock on the spaceship literally tick slower and will read an "earlier" time?
8 posts and 2 images submitted.
>>
I'm not an expert on this, but I think the idea is the clocks tick differently relative to each other.

So, the people on the spaceship see a clock that is going at normal rate. The people on Earth see a clock that is going at normal rate.

However, the people on Earth see a clock on a spaceship that is at a different rate than the one they see on Earth, and vice versa.

When the ship comes back, the clocks are desynchronised even though to each observer they appeared to go at the same rate. However, if the people on Earth were to look at the clock on the ship (when it is traveling), it would appear to be going at a different rate even if the people on the ship see it at a regular rate.
>>
Read up on the twin paradox. Assume the spaceship is moving at a constant speed. If you are in the spaceship and are looking at the Earth clock, it will appear to tick more slowly. If you are on Earth and looking at the spaceship clock, it will appear to tick more slowly. If you are looking at a clock in your frame of reference, it will appear normal. Do you think that's weird and counter-intuitive? Good, you understand it.
>>
File: 660px-Time-dilation-002-mod.svg.png (18KB, 660x233px) Image search: [Google]
660px-Time-dilation-002-mod.svg.png
18KB, 660x233px
clock is made of stuff
that stuff pushes other stuff and makes things move
stuff is made of atoms
atoms push each other by means of electric fields
electric fields excert forces by exchanging photons
photons exhibit relativistic time dilation
clocks exhibit relativistic time dilation in the same way because they are made out of photons

File: Newton Watch.png (436KB, 680x510px) Image search: [Google]
Newton Watch.png
436KB, 680x510px
https://www.kickstarter.com/projects/divided-o/beta

What does /sci/ think about this?
>Watches designed with a scientific approach
>direct involvement of actual mathematicians

It looks to me like some basic geometric shapes and then they stick a famous scientist's name on it without a strong connection between the image and the scientist. Thoughts?
12 posts and 3 images submitted.
>>
File: DSC_1516.jpg (1016KB, 1500x1004px) Image search: [Google]
DSC_1516.jpg
1016KB, 1500x1004px
I think you should stay in school, study hard, and someday you won't have to buy cheap, tacky POS watches from kickstarter
>>
>>8566510
I'm studying postrgrad mathematics and not interested in buying these watches. I think the marketing is a bit silly here - they don't seem to really have a scientific background. It's just minimalism.
>>
>>8566495
That watch is fucking ugly.

File: slide_3.jpg (44KB, 960x720px) Image search: [Google]
slide_3.jpg
44KB, 960x720px
Why is work=F*d? Derrive without using kinetic energy = square of speed times half of mass.
27 posts and 1 images submitted.
>>
Isnt work just defined to be dW=Fdr?
>>
>>8566105
for some processes yes.
>>
>>8566103
For a conservative force it is the - gradient of the potential. Literally calc 3

Pages: [First page] [Previous page] [1032] [1033] [1034] [1035] [1036] [1037] [1038] [1039] [1040] [1041] [1042] [1043] [1044] [1045] [1046] [1047] [1048] [1049] [1050] [1051] [1052] [Next page] [Last page]

[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / bant / biz / c / can / cgl / ck / cm / co / cock / d / diy / e / fa / fap / fit / fitlit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mlpol / mo / mtv / mu / n / news / o / out / outsoc / p / po / pol / qa / qst / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / spa / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vint / vip / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y] [Search | Top | Home]

I'm aware that Imgur.com will stop allowing adult images since 15th of May. I'm taking actions to backup as much data as possible.
Read more on this topic here - https://archived.moe/talk/thread/1694/


If you need a post removed click on it's [Report] button and follow the instruction.
DMCA Content Takedown via dmca.com
All images are hosted on imgur.com.
If you like this website please support us by donating with Bitcoins at 16mKtbZiwW52BLkibtCr8jUg2KVUMTxVQ5
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties.
Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.
This is a 4chan archive - all of the content originated from that site.
This means that RandomArchive shows their content, archived.
If you need information for a Poster - contact them.