[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / bant / biz / c / can / cgl / ck / cm / co / cock / d / diy / e / fa / fap / fit / fitlit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mlpol / mo / mtv / mu / n / news / o / out / outsoc / p / po / pol / qa / qst / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / spa / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vint / vip / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y ] [Search | Free Show | Home]

Archived threads in /p/ - Photography - 499. page

This is a blue board which means that it's for everybody (Safe For Work content only). If you see any adult content, please report it.

File: ZPR-RICOH-GR-II-FRONT.jpg (169KB, 1024x572px) Image search: [Google]
ZPR-RICOH-GR-II-FRONT.jpg
169KB, 1024x572px
I want to start taking photos with something that's not my phone, but I want it to be something that's easy to carry around.

I can't stop hearing about the Ricoh GR here. Do I take the plunge with this, or do I look into the Fujifilm X100S/T?

Which would you recommend for a beginner who doesn't want a DSLR and is probably not going to upgrade this camera for a while.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
81 posts and 5 images submitted.
>>
>>2753880

gear thread you fucking cuck.
>>
>>2753880

Get a fucking DSRL or keep using your phone.


the Ricoh doesn't even have a view finder.

also, gear thread.
>>
>>2753884
>the Ricoh doesn't even have a view finder.
OH NO!

File: 500mmMirrorLens.jpg (56KB, 400x334px) Image search: [Google]
500mmMirrorLens.jpg
56KB, 400x334px
anyone mess with these types of lenses? they look interesting but are they worth getting

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop CS Windows
Image-Specific Properties:
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution72 dpi
Vertical Resolution72 dpi
Image Created2005:02:10 21:59:13
Color Space InformationsRGB
Image Width400
Image Height334
82 posts and 32 images submitted.
>>
>>2752397
Ask Eggy, he has a bunch
>>
>>2752397
i audibly said WHAT THE FUCK IS THAT when i saw this image

seriously

what the fuck am i looking at?
>>
>>2752445
A camera with a catadioptric lens.

File: image.jpg (168KB, 800x800px) Image search: [Google]
image.jpg
168KB, 800x800px
/p/ is Facebook trier when it comes it criticism, but instead of a Like you'll get "your shit sucks" or "kill yourself". While both of these answers are valid for most of the pictures posted on here, because your pictures are Facebook trier as well, they don't really help the photographer improve.
We've had critique threads in the past and they didn't really work out as well, everybody just posted their stuff and very few people actually left a critique. Let's try something new:

I'll take my time to leave you an in depth critique of your work. I'll analyze the technical aspects as well as the picture language. I'll try my best to help you improve and become a better photographer if you follow my simple rules:
>board rules apply
I won't critique at any needlessly large pictures
>no snapshits
I won't critique your holiday pictures or similar stuff, chose a picture you think is worth it
>tell me about your picture
What was your intention of doing it, what did you try to convey? I'll spend my time with your work, so I'm expecting you to help me understand your point of view. A little background is enough, you don't need to write an essay.

That's it. If any of you would like to join in and start a discussion I'd appreciate it. Let's talk about pictures on here for once.

>picture sauce: Karl Peters, Otto Steinert bei der Korrektur, 1965
In case anyone is interested.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop CC 2015 (Macintosh)
Image-Specific Properties:
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution300 dpi
Vertical Resolution300 dpi
Image Created2016:01:20 11:21:52
Color Space InformationsRGB
Image Width800
Image Height800
332 posts and 128 images submitted.
>>
>>2748538
while I like that people are willing to give critique, why not do in in the several photo threads still in the catalog?

(assuming you haven't already done so)

>>2747122
>>2736399
>>2747357
>>2745478
>>2747497
>>2746181
>>2746458
>>2742936
>>2739935
>>2746119
>>
File: Rome-TriX1600-#1-009.jpg (193KB, 667x1000px) Image search: [Google]
Rome-TriX1600-#1-009.jpg
193KB, 667x1000px
first of all, I'm happy (and a little impressed) to see a thread like this and I really hope it turns out well. You're helping making this board better.

I'm interested in your opinion on this shot I took at some busy shopping street at Rome. Already made a whole thread showing some of the shots, but it's gone now.. shot bw film at night and had to push it to 1600 to get some useable shutter speeds, hence the grain. Didn't do anything to the scan except for stamping out dust. Someone suggested straightening it, but as this means cropping out parts that were in the original frame, I chose not to.

thank you in advance and if you don't mind I can also give my opinion on the photos of others.

>>2748553
because only few people open threads for their photos due to the "critique" usually given in RPT. I guess especially beginners are less likely to open their own thread when single shots they took are already called "shit" in some RPT before.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop Lightroom 5.7.1 (Windows)
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution300 dpi
Vertical Resolution300 dpi
Image Created2016:01:09 23:48:56
>>
File: IMG_6327ss.jpg (905KB, 1600x1343px) Image search: [Google]
IMG_6327ss.jpg
905KB, 1600x1343px
2 landscape shots stitched to make a square because I put a lot of images on insta. Been trying to experiment with pushing saturation in an eye pleasing way, tweaking the hue and altering saturation in relation to specific luminosities. There isn't much meaning to the image its more of a technical/asthetic attempt

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakeCanon
Camera ModelCanon EOS 5D Mark II
Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop CC (Macintosh)
Maximum Lens Aperturef/1.8
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width3983
Image Height3342
Number of Bits Per Component8, 8, 8
Pixel CompositionRGB
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution240 dpi
Vertical Resolution240 dpi
Image Created2016:01:20 12:13:39
Exposure Time1/1000 sec
F-Numberf/5.6
Exposure ProgramManual
ISO Speed Rating100
Lens Aperturef/5.6
Exposure Bias0 EV
Metering ModeCenter Weighted Average
FlashNo Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length28.00 mm
Color Space InformationUncalibrated
Image Width1600
Image Height1343
RenderingNormal
Exposure ModeManual
White BalanceManual
Scene Capture TypeStandard

File: $_57.jpg (84KB, 500x684px) Image search: [Google]
$_57.jpg
84KB, 500x684px
Gear Thread - Anime Edition

If you have questions about a new camera, what lenses to buy and anything related to gear or wondering about getting into photography, post it in this thread.

Do not attempt to make a new thread for your new Rabal, broken glass and being new. You have been warned!

I repeat, ANYTHING GEAR RELATED goes in here!

And don't forget, be polite!

Previous thread: >>2755923
312 posts and 37 images submitted.
>>
File: 1116750.jpg (349KB, 2500x2500px) Image search: [Google]
1116750.jpg
349KB, 2500x2500px
Let's see those compacts /p/

Scored this on sale a couple months ago, normally I don't do low light with compacts but I can handhold 1/5th second at 200 ISO and the flippy screen lets me shoot it like a Hassy or Mamiya RB

For a waterproof and shockproof around 200 it can't be beat. There's an upgraded version with an F2 lens but this one seems to work well. My only complaint is no manual exposure or Av modes but if you're careful you can cheat the program mode into doing what you want. It even does ISO 6400 and the grain doesn't look too horrible for a compact.
>>
File: leica blown out of the water.jpg (282KB, 1000x669px) Image search: [Google]
leica blown out of the water.jpg
282KB, 1000x669px
>>2757788
>>
>>2757788
I have a Pana LX-5 and I love its manual controls and the 1:1 crop ratio. But yeah I wish it has a flippy screen as well for street photography.

File: Edith 01 _sm.jpg (723KB, 714x1000px) Image search: [Google]
Edith 01 _sm.jpg
723KB, 714x1000px
From a photoshoot I did recently.

I want to know what the /p/ros think.

1/5

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakeNIKON CORPORATION
Camera ModelNIKON D610
Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop Elements 12.0 Windows
Maximum Lens Aperturef/1.4
Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color Area
Color Filter Array Pattern938
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)50 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width3949
Image Height5528
Number of Bits Per Component8, 8, 8
Compression SchemeUncompressed
Pixel CompositionRGB
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution300 dpi
Vertical Resolution300 dpi
Image Data ArrangementChunky Format
Image Created2016:01:23 20:20:56
Exposure Time1/125 sec
F-Numberf/4.5
Exposure ProgramManual
ISO Speed Rating100
Lens Aperturef/4.5
Exposure Bias0 EV
Metering ModePattern
Light SourceUnknown
FlashNo Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length50.00 mm
Color Space InformationsRGB
Image Width714
Image Height1000
RenderingNormal
Exposure ModeManual
White BalanceAuto
Scene Capture TypeStandard
Gain ControlNone
ContrastNormal
SaturationNormal
SharpnessNormal
Subject Distance RangeUnknown
79 posts and 20 images submitted.
>>
File: Edith 02 _sm.jpg (486KB, 668x1000px) Image search: [Google]
Edith 02 _sm.jpg
486KB, 668x1000px
2/5

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakeNIKON CORPORATION
Camera ModelNIKON D610
Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop Elements 12.0 Windows
Maximum Lens Aperturef/1.7
Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color Area
Color Filter Array Pattern938
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)85 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width4016
Image Height6016
Number of Bits Per Component8, 8, 8
Compression SchemeUncompressed
Pixel CompositionRGB
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution300 dpi
Vertical Resolution300 dpi
Image Data ArrangementChunky Format
Image Created2016:01:25 21:11:37
Exposure Time1/125 sec
F-Numberf/3.5
Exposure ProgramManual
ISO Speed Rating200
Lens Aperturef/3.5
Exposure Bias0 EV
Metering ModePattern
Light SourceUnknown
FlashNo Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length85.00 mm
Color Space InformationsRGB
Image Width668
Image Height1000
RenderingNormal
Exposure ModeManual
White BalanceAuto
Scene Capture TypeStandard
Gain ControlNone
ContrastNormal
SaturationNormal
SharpnessNormal
Subject Distance RangeUnknown
>>
File: Edith 03 _sm.jpg (383KB, 1000x668px) Image search: [Google]
Edith 03 _sm.jpg
383KB, 1000x668px
3/5

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakeNIKON CORPORATION
Camera ModelNIKON D610
Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop Elements 12.0 Windows
Maximum Lens Aperturef/1.7
Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color Area
Color Filter Array Pattern938
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)85 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width5525
Image Height3688
Number of Bits Per Component8, 8, 8
Compression SchemeUncompressed
Pixel CompositionRGB
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution300 dpi
Vertical Resolution300 dpi
Image Data ArrangementChunky Format
Image Created2016:01:25 21:47:12
Exposure Time1/250 sec
F-Numberf/4.5
Exposure ProgramManual
ISO Speed Rating100
Lens Aperturef/4.5
Exposure Bias0 EV
Metering ModePattern
Light SourceUnknown
FlashNo Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length85.00 mm
Color Space InformationsRGB
Image Width1000
Image Height668
RenderingNormal
Exposure ModeManual
White BalanceAuto
Scene Capture TypeStandard
Gain ControlNone
ContrastNormal
SaturationNormal
SharpnessNormal
Subject Distance RangeUnknown
>>
File: Edith 04 _sm.jpg (543KB, 714x1000px) Image search: [Google]
Edith 04 _sm.jpg
543KB, 714x1000px
4/5

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakeNIKON CORPORATION
Camera ModelNIKON D610
Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop Elements 12.0 Windows
Maximum Lens Aperturef/1.7
Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color Area
Color Filter Array Pattern938
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)85 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width3586
Image Height5020
Number of Bits Per Component8, 8, 8
Compression SchemeUncompressed
Pixel CompositionRGB
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution300 dpi
Vertical Resolution300 dpi
Image Data ArrangementChunky Format
Image Created2016:01:27 22:13:38
Exposure Time1/200 sec
F-Numberf/3.5
Exposure ProgramManual
ISO Speed Rating100
Lens Aperturef/3.5
Exposure Bias0 EV
Metering ModePattern
Light SourceUnknown
FlashNo Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length85.00 mm
Color Space InformationsRGB
Image Width714
Image Height1000
RenderingNormal
Exposure ModeManual
White BalanceAuto
Scene Capture TypeStandard
Gain ControlNone
ContrastNormal
SaturationNormal
SharpnessNormal
Subject Distance RangeUnknown

File: 1802615511.jpg (61KB, 600x450px) Image search: [Google]
1802615511.jpg
61KB, 600x450px
http://www.dpreview.com/news/3240829197/sony-announces-24mp-a6300-mirrorless-camera

>a6300
>24Megapickle
>not even bsi
>a-at least we got copper wiring, right?
>same old body
>could have made the screen swivel
>same old 16-50

Where were you when apsc is kill?
cucked.
sony probably didn't want to cannibalize their a7 by making the apsc really good.
96 posts and 3 images submitted.
>>
>>2759724
>http://www.dpreview.com/news/3240829197/sony-announces-24mp-a6300-mirrorless-camera

Awesome, finally!

the a6000 will get a price drop and i can BUY ONE
>>
>>2759724
I'm pretty excited about the better EVF, that was the main thing holding me off. And if the AF is even marginally better, that'll be a big win as well. Shame it's so similar to the a6k tho.
>sony probably didn't want to cannibalize their a7 by making the apsc really good.
and they also didn't want to waste a fuckton of R&D money when they can just camp on the A6000 specs because there's still nothing that can directly compete with it. Plus it's selling extremely well.
>>
>>2759724
What happened to the 6100 and 6200?

File: color_prymax.jpg (157KB, 1440x960px) Image search: [Google]
color_prymax.jpg
157KB, 1440x960px
ITT: General film thread.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution70 dpi
Vertical Resolution70 dpi
328 posts and 61 images submitted.
>>
my question, anybody knows this brand of film in thread picture?
>>
>>2751468
Prymax Color
>>
>>2751469
Are you serious, aren;t you? Go be funny somewhere else!

File: rekt.jpg (168KB, 1068x492px) Image search: [Google]
rekt.jpg
168KB, 1068x492px
Behold the 1dx-II killer

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop CC 2015 (Windows)
Image-Specific Properties:
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution72 dpi
Vertical Resolution72 dpi
Image Created2016:02:03 21:49:02
Color Space InformationsRGB
Image Width1068
Image Height492
12 posts and 1 images submitted.
>>
>>2759761
nifty.

>Nex 6: 2.3m dot EVF
>a6000: 1.4m dot EVF

2016
>a6300: 2.3m dot EVF
>NEW NEW NEW
>>
>>2759761
I have an a6000 and this new camera is definitely not worth the upgrade
>>
>>2759773
Since you don't film

I posted up 3 months ago or so and you guys helped a painfully new noob with the basics and since then I've gotten bit pretty good with the photography bug. I've run a couple rolls of black and white through my camera and called up my developer and they don't do black and white anymore, so I called another place, they pointed me to a place in TX, and they pointed me to a place in CA neither of which do it anymore.

I'm sure I could find a place on Google, but if I'm going to send them off, I would rather go to a place that I know others have had good success with them.
26 posts and 2 images submitted.
>>
I do it in my bathroom, it's very simple and cheap
>>
>>2758847

Real hardcore motherfuckers like me do it themselves, but you could try indie film lab, the darkroom, dwaynes, old school photolab etc
>>
>>2758848
>>2758849
Eventually I will do it myself, but I'm still in the early phases where I'd like to know my pictures are coming out well before I add another variable in the mix.

File: Praha-IMG69182.jpg (542KB, 1280x854px) Image search: [Google]
Praha-IMG69182.jpg
542KB, 1280x854px
>mfw I order expensive Canon lenses from amazon for 4-5 days trips
>snap wonderful pictures then return them
>portfolio ranges from wide-angle to telezoom
>always get full refund in 14 days no question asked
ayy
11 posts and 2 images submitted.
>>
>>2758706
well jew'd, congratulations
>>
>>2758709
14 day limit is basic euro law but what op is doing is basically what canon pro service already does for free (joining req is owning a cine camera or 3 L lenses idk) so I dont really see the point
>>
>>2758706

>Im a poorfag

coolstorybro.nef

File: 1454398954737.png (765KB, 577x521px) Image search: [Google]
1454398954737.png
765KB, 577x521px
went to a wedding recently and the "professional photographer" was using a 10d and a kit lens. why the fuck is this allowed?

>inb4 it's not the camera it's the photographer
14 posts and 3 images submitted.
>>
>>2758673
He still seems to get booked. Either is pictures are good enough or the couple tried to save money, you get what you pay for.
>>
Shut your bitchass up lmao.
>>
>>2758673
If he takes good photos, why the fuck does it matter? If he gets booked a lot, why the fuck does it matter? If the clients are happy, why the fuck does it matter?

Why should someone's gear be a barrier to entry? Terry Richardson almost exclusively (or used to, anyway) used cheap point and shoots for his work, and he's been in just about every magazine there is to be in

File: ff.png (3MB, 2496x780px) Image search: [Google]
ff.png
3MB, 2496x780px
How can I use Photoshop to make the face he is making in the reflection on the right his reflection on the pic on the left
11 posts and 2 images submitted.
>>
>>2758580
Careful selecting and transparency I guess. I suppose you'd have to somehow remove the original reflection. Maybe you could just burn it out because of the black background.
>>
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6Wq-ku3AwTA
>>
File: 1454388740898.jpg (631KB, 1172x780px) Image search: [Google]
1454388740898.jpg
631KB, 1172x780px
pls no bully

File: landscape-options.jpg (2MB, 3290x1307px) Image search: [Google]
landscape-options.jpg
2MB, 3290x1307px
Quick question /p/, I'm not a photographer, bust I need to choose one photo out of this set. pic related

Which one is the most appealing to you?

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakeApple
Camera ModeliPhone 5c
Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop CC 2015 (Windows)
Sensing MethodOne-Chip Color Area
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)33 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width1224
Image Height1632
Number of Bits Per Component8, 8, 8
Pixel CompositionRGB
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution72 dpi
Vertical Resolution72 dpi
Image Created2016:02:02 11:30:50
Exposure Time1/653 sec
F-Numberf/2.4
Exposure ProgramNormal Program
ISO Speed Rating50
Lens Aperturef/2.4
Brightness8.1 EV
Exposure Bias0 EV
Metering ModePattern
FlashNo Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length4.12 mm
Color Space InformationsRGB
Image Width3290
Image Height1307
Exposure ModeAuto
White BalanceAuto
Scene Capture TypeStandard
12 posts and 2 images submitted.
>>
>>2758519
I like #3 more.
>>
>>2758519

what is this for. we dont like being bribed for homework, anon.
>>
Its for a cityscape charcoal drawing I'm doing, so I still we be doing most of the work, I just need your help choosing a photo

Pictures that capture the personal essence of humanity.
24 posts and 11 images submitted.
>>
File: 1406089736567.jpg (79KB, 374x570px) Image search: [Google]
1406089736567.jpg
79KB, 374x570px
>>2758302

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop CS3 Macintosh
Image-Specific Properties:
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution75 dpi
Vertical Resolution75 dpi
Image Created2012:05:16 12:14:10
Color Space InformationUncalibrated
Image Width374
Image Height570
>>
File: 1446592484322.jpg (349KB, 1280x1291px) Image search: [Google]
1446592484322.jpg
349KB, 1280x1291px
>>
File: 1280.jpg (30KB, 720x438px) Image search: [Google]
1280.jpg
30KB, 720x438px

Am I only one who is afraid to use he's gear any any other place exept indoors?
14 posts and 1 images submitted.
>>
Also nowd ays I just try to hoard alot of film shit that I dare to use, but I just can't get myself to use my 5D outdoors.
>>
>>2758292
If you're that worried, get some insurance on your 5D.

Damn, a big part of photography is the adventure aspect. Searching for subjects in your environment, and expressing yourself through how you capture them in a photo is a great feeling. You're missing out, man. It's your thing, but you're definitely missing out.
>>
Sure, a ship is safest in port, but that's not what it's really meant for

Pages: [First page] [Previous page] [489] [490] [491] [492] [493] [494] [495] [496] [497] [498] [499] [500] [501] [502] [503] [504] [505] [506] [507] [508] [509] [Next page] [Last page]

[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / bant / biz / c / can / cgl / ck / cm / co / cock / d / diy / e / fa / fap / fit / fitlit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mlpol / mo / mtv / mu / n / news / o / out / outsoc / p / po / pol / qa / qst / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / spa / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vint / vip / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y] [Search | Top | Home]

I'm aware that Imgur.com will stop allowing adult images since 15th of May. I'm taking actions to backup as much data as possible.
Read more on this topic here - https://archived.moe/talk/thread/1694/


If you need a post removed click on it's [Report] button and follow the instruction.
DMCA Content Takedown via dmca.com
All images are hosted on imgur.com.
If you like this website please support us by donating with Bitcoins at 16mKtbZiwW52BLkibtCr8jUg2KVUMTxVQ5
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties.
Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.
This is a 4chan archive - all of the content originated from that site.
This means that RandomArchive shows their content, archived.
If you need information for a Poster - contact them.