What filter and camera should I use to achieve this effect? First

>>2976124
Looks like a smartphone/compact camera snapshot with a strong magenta tint.

Be more specific. What do you like about it? Then we can help you do it to a different photo.

File: cover.jpg (178KB, 439x380px) Image search: [Google]

178KB, 439x380px

>>2976128
it's a really hipster-looking photo? not sure how to describe it. I know nothing about photography.

pic somewhat related

File: girl.jpg (48KB, 960x960px) Image search: [Google]

48KB, 960x960px

>>2976128
this one is pretty cool too.

>>2976130
They look like poorly stored instant film, yeah.

VSCO has a few filters for that. Any camera will do, like your phone.

>>2976135
This one's more involved, you'd need Photoshop. It simulates multiple exposures (when you take many pictures without advancing the film). Also looks a little like instant film. You can try buying a Fuji Instax and play with it. They're a little unpredictable but in a fun way.

>>2976138
is there a distinct term for the first two pics? poorly stored instant film?

>>2976141
Just film that is old and shitty

>>2976141
Not that I'm aware. VSCO's Chromatic Collection would probably get the job done.

Add magenta to the highlights through the app and voi la.

I do recommend learning post-processing if it interests you, not because you wouldn't depend on presets (they're too useful) but because you would know what you're looking at in a photo that you like.

>>2976151
>>2976150
What film?

Also, thanks for telling me about vsco. looks cool

Hasselblad H6D-100c
Ektar 25 VSCO

>>2976159
I bet expired kodak 400 would look like this

>>2976174
And as far as the camera, just go to a thrift store and buy any of them there under 4$

File: 309rh2c.gif (851KB, 374x211px) Image search: [Google]

851KB, 374x211px

>>2976124
ugh

>>2976176
what's wrong faggot? ugh ugh ugh ugh ugh

>>2976174
>>2976175
Any camera? Where do I buy the expired film?

sorry for being a pleb, i only go on /fa/ and /lit/

File: autisticOP.gif (41KB, 418x200px) Image search: [Google]

41KB, 418x200px

>>2976177

File: retardOP.gif (27KB, 441x273px) Image search: [Google]

27KB, 441x273px

>>2976184

>>2976188
>>2976187
spoon feed me, older sister :^)

>>2976184
Just get something like

http://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/Olympus-OM-10-SLR-35mm-Film-Camera-Zuiko-50mm-F-1-8-Lens-Case-No-1748689-/132019321359?hash=item1ebcf6fa0f:g:h7YAAOSwHMJYPrVT

And forget the expired film, buy a roll of Portra 160 or 400, then do the modicum of research needed to operate the thing.

U too can be a /p/hotographer m8, as you can see it doesn't take much.

>>2976200
Why is it always film fags who try to sink their teeth into newbies? You realize that they should probably learn about exposure first, right?

>>2976124
As for you faggot, just buy some VSCO filters and edit your phone pics, then get back to your dayjob like every other slob.

>>2976204
I'm categorically not a film fag, and "modicum of research" relates. Om 10 was my first cam so I know it's idiot proof is all.

>>2976208
it needs to autist proof

>>2976211
I kno. Wat was I thinking.

>>2976124
Bad ones

>>2976224
w2c bad ones

>>2976124
By the distortion on the edges of the photo I'd say an old film compact or a toy camera like a holga.

Could be expired colour negative film, or could quite easily be just a filter. If you wanted to simulate it in lightroom or on your phone or whatever just raise the black point and add some magenta. You could try to make a fake fringing/unsharpness effect if you wanted that lo-fi look as well

File: pallday.jpg (133KB, 750x551px) Image search: [Google]

133KB, 750x551px

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop CS6 (Macintosh)
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Created	2016-12-02T20:17:49-08:00
Flash	No Flash Function
Image Width	750
Image Height	551

OP's picture is a film snapshit, done on a film compact, by a photographer who didn't know how to focus and recompose or whose camera didn't allow for that. Judging from the awful magenta flare, I'm guessing this could be a disposable camera, and the girl is closer than minimum focus distance for the fixed-focus optic in those things.

Or it's just straight-up backfocused. Could be that.

File: blue steel.jpg (72KB, 250x280px) Image search: [Google]

72KB, 250x280px

>>2976439
shhh its art; OP is effay

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop CS5 Windows
Photographer	Paul
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width	219
Image Height	245
Number of Bits Per Component	8, 8, 8
Pixel Composition	RGB
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	96 dpi
Vertical Resolution	96 dpi
Image Created	2011:01:14 10:35:44
Color Space Information	Uncalibrated
Image Width	250
Image Height	280

>>2976124
maria?

Is this the missing zapruder footage