Why did Case try to throw coffee on Armitage when they first met?
>>7874015
I forget.
If I rember right he's still in his nhilistic death wish phase then, not mention he's nuerotic and unpredictable like any drug user.. He just lashes out I'd say.
Is this book more reddit or less reddit than Snow Crash?
Can erotica be good literature?
Discuss.
Good literature can have elements of erotica. If you mean erotica as in genre fiction then no. Genre fiction can't be considered good relative to anything outside of its genre.
nice calabash, data.
>>7873981
I mean a book where the main selling point is the sex. You read that book fully expecting that you may fap to it at some point.
I want to learn more about gnosticism. Which books do you recommend?
I'm also very interested in Catharism.
Don't leave me hanging, lads.
>>7873770
Stephan A. Hoeller:
-Gnosticism: New Light on the Ancient Tradition of Inner Knowing
-The Gnostic Jung and the Seven Sermons to the Dead
-The Gnostic Bible
-The Nag Hammadi Library
-Voices of Gnosticism - Miguel Conner
>>7874140
I forgot:
-This Way: Gnosis Without "Gnosticism"
and
-How to Think Like a Gnostic
both by Jeremy Puma
His views on gnosticism are a bit off the beaten path, having been influenced by Philip K. Dick and Buddhism.
How do we revive Cynicism, lads?
Autistic fedora-wearing teenagers are already reviving it.
>>7873721
How so?
>>7873721
This is literally a meme. There is no such thing.
Honest srs questions from a guy who has read many patrician books.
Why should I judge books on anything other than entertainment? Bear in mind that I'm a proud Stirnerite.
Why is it that "literary value" or whatever seems so much like marketing pushed by the academia-publishing-media industrial complex?
Why should I take the social critique / philosophy / "insights" of fiction books seriously AT ALL when the authors only present it in a vague and half assed way? It seems like dilletante pseudo intellectual posturing to me. Nabokov would agree. Dostoevsky obviously couldn't hack it on a wet and windy Thursday night in any worthwhile Psychology department.
Why, in the age of the internet, should I only take books seriously if they have the stamp of a publisher with a large enough revenue?
Why should I instantly dismiss all new artforms as not even being art? Why should I instantly dismiss new artforms as not being art due to them taking advantage of philosophy?
When "high brow" authors say they like "low brow" stuff is that them admitting that they don't even have the willpower to stay within their bubble of ascetic snobbery? We all know the bubble is made of bullshit but they don't even pretend that it's not these days.
Do you think that books have been a failure in terms of comedy?
You can know about a spook, and thus be freed from it, while still using it for whatever reason you want.
In this case you know the idea of a Western Art Canon is a spook, and judging things through it would be spooky, but you can choose to do so anyways, placing certain works higher than others because they stretch the boundaries of that spook.
>>7873591
>this entire post
This is why we need religion.
Literary value is just a particular flavour of fun that certain people like for various reasons, one of them being that it's a more challenging flavour of fun and another one being that it is a more prestigious form of fun, prestige being something enjoyable in its own right.
It's a certain frame that you can opt into if it makes things more enjoyable for you, elitism can be very rewarding for the ego. If it's something that you consider an obstacle you should simple not buy into it.
What matters is if elitism works for you. Ultimately it's all just muh feelsies.
/lit/ what will the generation who grew up reading Jonathon Greene write like? [serious responses only].
borne in le wronge genereshun amirite
+1
>>7873563
Well tell us more about yourself OP, you're clearly one of Greene's biggest fans who reads him all day erry day and feels compelled to share your love of him by posting him on /lit/ all day erry day
>>7873563
They will write shitty books like Jhon Green's books
How many copies has your No. 1 Bestseller sold anon?
What's that, you don't have a No. 1 Bestseller?
>>7873528
Maybe if I incorporate more Jewish bidding!
No. In fact I've never written a thing outside of mandatory school assignments.
>Implying having what you perceive as success is what we should all strive for
>Implying what is popular has literary merit
>Implying your work only has worth if it has this specific achievement, and is not only completely pathetic if less than that but those who have achieved this are untouchable to criticism
>Implying I'm not taking my time writing so my work isn't a complete piece of shit
>Implying I want my work to be popular, or even published, and not just something I want to do for non-profit and business reasons
>Implying we should be writing what will make us successful and not what we want to read or write.
>check threads
>all shit
Time for a Lit battle.
Pick any author or fanbase and tear them to shreds like you're in a rap battle.
No rules. No mercy.
kysmm
scrolling through /lit/ what do i see
a brand new thread made by the fag OP
just as i thought his concept was shite
but he mentioned battle raps so i said 'aight'
you can't fuck with me - i'm the keyboard champion
try all you want, my style can't be dampened
you're wasting my time so i gotta dip
OP keep your day job - eating dicks
my name is jeff and I'm here to say.
anyone read john green? nigga you fuckin gay.
suckin Dicks and lickin titties look at me I'm keisha damn girl where you get these titties. itty-bitty bitty baby itty-bitty boat habeeb it
Oh, literature? Yeah I use to read that, years ago when I was still a child. But I soon graduated to more sophisticated mediums more capable of expressing the complexities of the human conditions - such as jazz and film.
Jazz is shit music and film is an inferior medium.
>>7873389
You'll grow up one day son.
>>7873408
When that day comes, I hope I'll know how to use commas.
>People who couldn't enjoy themselves on a cruise
>People that would go on a cruise
>>7873090
>tfw losing at chess against little girl.
I don't know. That essay was honestly very hilarious, and I'm not sure if it really was 'nonfiction'
WHY THE FUCK DO WE READ
WHY DO WE PROCESS WORDS
WHY DO WE CRAVE THE FINITE BUT THE WORLD HAS PROVEN IT'S ANYTHING BUT
WHY WHY WHY???????
Start with the Greeks.
>>7872920
>WHY DO WE CRAVE THE FINITE BUT THE WORLD HAS PROVEN IT'S ANYTHING BUT
because you touch yourself at night
Is Don Quixote hard to read?
What are they gonna make me read /lit/?
>Intro to women's lit
>British authors after 1800
>American authors after 1900
>Intro to metaphysics
I'm 25. Haven't been to school in 4 years and just enrolled for fall 2016.
start with the greeks
Good luck finding time for leisure reading
Ready Player One
Pls recommend some good books/series set in medieval Europe
>>7872754
Faerie Queene
>>7872754
Hamlet
Does /lit/ read picture books?
>>7872714
only if Dore is illustrating them
>>7872718
Or Blakes illustrations for his poetry
I bought this for my nephew. He likes it.
Non native speaker here, which one is the correct term?
>for each tree we determined the percentage of bad apples per total apples
>for each tree we determined the percentage of bad apples of total apples
Those two of's in a row sound so retarded. And per feels kinda wrong. I apologize for even asking. But please reply.
pic more or less related
Total apples is implied.
>for each tree we determined the percentage of bad apples.
Could use proportion instead of percentage too.
per total apples is implied so you can say
>for each tree we determined the percentage of bad apples
first is technically correct but makes you sound mentally impaired
second is wrong
write: the ratio of bad apples to good apples
now delete your thread please