If I like Bob Dylan, what poets will I like?
The Beat poets. Ginsberg, Kerouac, etc. also Rimbaud and probably Baudelaire.
Dylan is a poet.
>>9228796
Ok.. (that's debatable, but) what other poets will I like?
>he doesn't read the Greeks in the original language
Surely you aren't a brainlet. Right, anon?
>wasting your time on the Greeks
Now who's the brainlet? If the Greeks were so great they wouldn't be extinct.
>>9228654
>extinct
Uh... there's an entire country called Greece, bro.
Are self help books worth it if my main goal is self improvement?
If yes, what are the best self help books you read since i assume most are cheesy, washed down shit for desperate people trying to make money
If a book has lasted for decades, it probably has something of value to it. New stuff is just recycled old stuff.
basically to find the good ones u just have to sample them all...i torrent the fuck out of every self-help audiobook that i can find, many are shit, many are repetitive with the same points i hear a million times before, but maybe one in five is worth listening to all the way through for some motivation, and maybe one in ten has some real useful shit...when u strike gold it's like holy shit i can't believe i went through life not knowing that!
>creates another worthless shit thread while there's already one on the same topic >>9223654
kys yourself retard
Is this good supplementary reading after you've finished WD?
>>9228490
I know I sound like a stupid pleb but is Watership Down the book as good as Watership Down the movie?
That movie was pretty good in my opinion
>>9228515
The movie is a diet version of Watership Down
The book contains a more fleshed-out story, including rabbit mythology stories interspersed throughout, adding to the worldbuilding aspect.
>>9228552
>adding to the worldbuilding aspect.
Oh good, now I'm positive I should never read it.
Why don't we have a thread comparing and discussing the prosodic features of our native language? I'm mostly thinking of prosodic features of the traditional poetry (including, not only meter, but also things like rhyme, alliteration, or pitch cadence as in Classical Chinese poetry), but information about the modernist innovations would be cool too. I'm not sure if this should go on /lit/ or /int/, but it seems like there are enough people with a language other than English as their mother tongue for this to work. Discussion of classical languages is also more than welcome.
For my part, as a student of Spanish, I know that the traditional prosody is more or less like that of French--i.e., neither stress nor syllable length (which is of course nonexistent anyways) are taken into account, and the only metrical restraints are syllable count and caesurae. I also know that by far the most common Spanish meter is el octavosílabo, just as the most "natural" meter in English is blank verse.
That said, I know that many modernists and proto-modernists imported classical meters (dactylic hexameter, iambic trimeter, etc.), using the stress accent of Spanish. Perhaps the most notable of these (correct me if you disagree) is Rubén Darío, whom I think I like, although I've only read a handful of poems of his since I have to look up a word every other line. That said, my question is, which of these "classical" meters has been the most successful in Spanish, and which is the most "natural"? Is there any particular stress pattern that you think is most natural in Spanish, as iambic is in English?
>>9228480
In Spanish, the most common stress pattern are emphatic (enfático), heroic (heróico) y melodic (melódico). These three's sixth and tenth syllabes are stressed (these are called static stresses, or ''acentos fijos''), the only difference is whether the first stress is placed in the first (emphatic), second (heroic) or third (melodic) syllabe.
Accentual versification in Spanish isn't very common though.
>>9228480
>the most "natural" meter in English is blank verse.
The most "natural" meter in English is rhymed iambic couplets.
>>9228632
>couplet
>meter
Is this worth reading /lit/?
It's philosophy, so no.
>should i read outdated philosopher?
When will you plebs get to contemporary stuff that is actually relevant?
Overrated piece of junk. Its role in the history of the philosophical tradition is vastly overstated. Its contributions were in fact nothing groundbreakingly new, much less relevant for its time.
Don't bother.
Hey, /lit/.
Did you know you can pick and choose pieces of philosophy to justify whatever it is you feel like doing?
:o
I can just sense that this will be a worthwhile thread.
Subscribed
>>9228443
yep and then dumb it down to a bunch of pseudos
reading school of life's comments gives me cancer
Did he really talk about animorphs or was that a fake quote?
Of course he did
not.
>>9228587
*(as in not a fake quote)
>The 30-day free Trial
The Non-Heteronormative Science
>>9228393
Moby Cuck
>the instagram picture of @DorianGray
I'm committed to reading everything that is of any persisting significance.
http://grtbooks.com/default.asp?idx=0&yr=-5000&aa=JO&at=AA
Is this a good list? What writers should be added? How many languages should I learn while doing this? How long?
Of course I'm overwhelmed, but I'm committed.
Start by learning french, then read their big names (not neccessarily their whole ouvre, one work per author should suffice), then you move to italian, it'll be easier once you have mastered french, read Petrarca, Dante, Ludovico Ariosto, etc. Italian will make learning spanish piss easy, though the number of works you gain access to is limited compared with the previous. There is no reason to read german philosophy if you're into the greeks
>>9228330
Going through a whole list is a very tedious enterprise, especially if you're already a beginner reader. If you're just reading things because "they have to be read" you're going to be miserable and probably give up. You can still read good literature while reading something you enjoy and that you're genuinely interested in reading.
Fine but they skip all the core eastern poetry and the four great novels of China. Considering that China had a culture in which you couldn't hold public office without learning how to read it write poetry, this is a glaring omission towards your goal.
>Science / positivism will never tell us how to live / what is morally good.
I agree. But why do you try to imply that anything else can?
>Universities teach you how to think / how to be rigorous / how to critically think.
Rigour is simply lack of errors. Critical thinking simply consists of questioning assumptions.
>Some other shit i cant be bothered talking about.
Universal education was a mistake. It's painful to see people sincerely consider Economists, Sociologists, Legal scholars, and journalists to be experts.
Religion. I agree on the rest.
let me plant a fag here
>>9228313
can i get a slow walkup on these two?
Hi, so I'm writing a fiction about monster vs humans. Can anyone think of a ranking system/name for the monsters? Calling the monster level 1 seems to be a bit bland so I'm trying to think of something else. Something similar to ranking of Bleach hollows would be cool. As in Vastroid Lord is the highest rank etc.
>>/tg/
Ask /a/ but be very humble and don't expose your newfaggotry
>>9228331
thanks anon
So did he take the road less traveled or what? What did I miss, why is this so misunderstood?
Taking the road less travelled isn't necessarily a good thing. Most people who read it believe that it's a positive.
>>9228283
Because it is you faggot.
FUCK NORMS
What's up with the second half of this /lit/? I wanted satan's escapades not balls and Jesus.
>>9228178
I still fail to understand the epilogue of this. That was too deep.
>>9228178
I think its more Sympathy for the Devil/"Rather laugh with the sinners than die with the saints" than traditional views of Satan.its pretty clear that the master and margarita become a part of satans inner circle and arrive at their own form of paradise
dunno. my translation is atrocious and i've never made it past about page 30. i really need to find a better version.
Anyone read this?In the unlikely case of yes, what do you think? Currently reading the German original
>the nazis were just sexually frustrated lmao :^)
Freudian psychoanalysis is a predictable joke. How can anyone take it seriously?
ugh, fucked up the spoiler
>>9228181
It's mostly not even about Nazis. Nor Freudian, if I understood that part right.